>XRP is the future, sonny boy, I been around since AOL dial-up and this feels the same, but faster, and banks actually behind it. Don’t matter what news say, I seen real paperwork, my buddy at the pub told me. Bitcoin is old horse, XRP is new car with no gas needed, runs on magic. Hold it, forget it, retirement locked, grandkids will thank me later.
>>60921963>Cheers, XRPARMY!
>>60921963Wut 37500 tumor banks?
>>60921963>all those desktop shortcutsyikes
>>60921963How do we win these retarded boomers and convince them to buy Link instead?
>>60922260>Please buy my not needed ERC20 token
>>60922260Have you tried arguing on x and biz ?
>>60921963if its so good why does he have sanpuku eyes rather than relaxed and confident eyes?
>>60923020This is what 7 years of bagholding XRP does to a mf
Where the FUCK IS MY CARD I ORDERED ON DAY 1 REEEEEE
>>60922246Use your eyes dickhead
>>60926460
>>60926611Crypto = fakePhysical assets = real
You have literally constructed a taxonomically invalid cope narrative predicated entirely on Alinsky projection and NPC-tier misunderstandings of market structure (which I have objectively explained in every single thread for the past year). LINK is a valueless middleware token with no endogenous demand, whose only purpose is to subsidize Sirgay’s biweekly liquidation events, in which he dumps 2/3rds of the commingled float on retail bagholders — a fact they LIED about in official materials (yes, lied — not misrepresented, not misunderstood, lied). The protocol has no need for a token whatsoever, and if you had the cognitive bandwidth to interpret basic economic logic, you'd see it’s a mechanism of retail extraction, nothing more. This is definitively true and remains so regardless of your cartoonishly low IQ attempts to spin it otherwise via memes and reddit-tier "counterarguments" which you no doubt believe are clever but which transparently betray your status as a broken, demoralized, heteronomous pseud clinging to a narrative that has already been obliterated hundreds of times on this board alone. And you still pretend it’s a debate. Pathetic.I’m not going to “debate” someone who doesn’t even understand what a float is, who can’t define endogenous demand without googling it and who genuinely believes "Sirgay" isn’t orchestrating an exit strategy with full legal opacity. This is not a conversation, it's a correction — one you’ve been receiving for months — and your inability to internalize it is evidence of either paid engagement shilling or actual NPC conditioning, and frankly, I don’t know which is worse. Cope harder.
>>60926659Now THAT is a picrel word salad
The fuck is with all this xrp fud? It's making me so bullish. Every time XRP gets attacked this much it means we are on the verge of a major breakout.
>>60927433bullish at xrp
>>60927433You've posted this en verbatim at least 5 times over the past week. Getting nervous?
>>60926621I Stack with my crypto profits
