Its incredible how the shills continue to push this failed Russian ponzi scheme after bagholding for 8 years and still being poor
>>60922838>Its incredible how the shills continue to push this failed Russian ponzi scheme after bagholding for 8 years and still being poor
>>60922842>t. poorfag Link baggie
>60922838>60922854>le failed russian ponzi scheme blablablablaWow what an amazing and original threadIm sure if you post stuff like this all day every day for only two more weeks, someone will certainly sell or unstake their link!All fields
>>60923100everything you typed is worthless because you're poor
>>60922838eventually the truth comes outit always does
>>60922838>Chainlink flat lining despite constant shilling and bullish news>Russian state announces that crypto is a US scamI'm noticing.
The worst part is that this thread is also a shill thread. Russian scammers tend to believe any news is good news!
>>60922838Really makes you enthousiast, doesn't it Adem?
>>60922838I hold 56,500 LINK tokens and I'm not selling a single one until $100 minimum. And this angers you.
>>60922838It's truly incredible how poorly it performs
Chainlink holders fuck trannies. They are gay faggots
So can we have an actual discussion for the first time in years now? It seems obvious to me we're going to go up massively soon but I want to read the room here without seeing the same shit I've been seeing for the past 5 years.
I just wish I had more bros.
>>60925002dont we all, to think at one point I thought it was too risky to take out a loan to buy more at $1
>>60924997>duuuuuuuuuuuuuuude i'm a SECRET genius how much longer can you keep up this charade kid you're getting absolutely WRECKED, still down 55%
>>60925034nice try nigger but it's not a secret
>>60925013I was seriously thinking about getting a loan in 2018 oh wellMy only mistake was not buying more
>>60922838Hey, go be a nigger somewhere else.
>>60924997I don’t know, can we? Chainlink has completely abandoned its original value proposition of oracles bringing derivatives markets on chain while still trying to shoehorn in “Muh trillions!” and is just a fat stack of bag holder cash chasing any sort of perceived profitability in the crypto space while squeezing every last drop of crypto hype it can out of its online following. If you really honestly wanted to discuss it this would be the last thread on it needed, but you’re gay and just love the hustle and bustle and free exposure of chainlink threads for your shitcoin, so I don’t think you want to discuss.
>>60925102This is in all honesty one of the most absurdly pathetic demonstrations ever witnessed on this board and it reflects in the clearest possible terms the absolute decrepitude of linkjeets that the only tactic remaining to you, after years of humiliation and price stagnation, is to defer in totality to an artificial intelligence program and attempt to generate a pale, hollow, and transparently insecure caricature of an XRP argument delivered with utter repugnance, as though the simple mimicry of my particular style without the corresponding substance could ever be persuasive, which it obviously cannot. You seriously imagine that people cannot immediately perceive this for what it is; a desperate and clownish act of projection by a broken cohort that has so thoroughly conceded defeat that it must invent a mechanical surrogate to articulate its own cope and yet you parade it as though it were clever, which makes it even more embarrassing.You have literally been reduced to NPC like parroting, incapable of origination, and so in the absence of anything resembling conviction you now outsource to software the appearance of rhetorical force, which is not actually force but only an aroma of performance stacked several layers of abstraction outside of reality. This is not debate, it is confession. It reeks of insecurity, of fraudulence, of errant desperation, and of the absurd delusion that pasting GPT generated walls about USB dongles or spreadsheets somehow redeems your project, as if it's so far removed from that in an exacted fashion.So yes, continue posting this bot-vomit and declaring it victory; every repetition only further substantiates what has already been demonstrated that LINK holders are not competitors in any meaningful sense but clowns, insecure and broken beyond repair, literally incapable of fighting their own battles without the aid of artificial mimicry, which is the most humiliating concession imaginable.
>>60925122>3 paragraphs in less then a minute complaining about a post that agrees with your points just to shill your own shitcoin of choice all while complaining about AIThanks anon GPT, you can fuck off you bumbling idiot
>>60922838You had 3 years
>>60925146Your statement is nothing more than pathetic alinsky projection, a rhetorical sophistry so low it wouldn't even pass for an argument. To suggest Ripple is prioritizing a stablecoin on Ethereum over the native XRPL is not just a failure of reading comprehension; it's a fundamental misunderstanding of the fiduciary obligations of the company itself. You're making a PROFOUNDLY stupid argument, which relies on the type of flawed categorical thinking I expect from individuals who spend their time in sub-reddited echo chambers. What you fail to understand is that the XRPL is an open-source, permissionless, and verifiably decentralized ledger with a Federated Byzantine Agreement consensus mechanism that is both efficient and verifiably decentralized, whereas Ethereum’s model is frankly less scalable and elegant than what already exists on the XRPL. The launch of RLUSD on Ethereum is not a capitulation; it's an OBVIOUS strategic move to bridge legacy DeFi to the superior XRPL. Any sentient being with a working memory that can span more than a few minutes would understand the purpose of bringing a trusted stablecoin onto the XRPL is to drive MORE adoption and utility to the very network you claim they are abandoning. You're like a toddler who sees someone using a key to unlock a door and assumes the purpose of the key is to be an ornament rather than a tool for access. You and your pathetic ilk have spent years wallowing in a state of intellectual stagnancy that makes me almost sad to see. Nothing you've said is valid, and you probably don't even realize how definitively your rhetoric proves you to be an unoriginal NPC tier.
60925154>PLEASE GIVE MY AI SLOP ANOTHER (YOU)No!
what would price be if sergey didnt betray?
>>60925122>>60925154Ridiculously based
>>60925102I don't really give a shit about discussing the use case or not because people like you try to obfuscate and move goal posts the entire time and it doesn't matter to me anyway. The only thing I care about at this point is "will the number go up or down". So no, I'm not interested in your retarded technobabble that is most likely just lies from the mouth of a nigger tranny spending all day on discord.
>>60925246>I was just kidding, I actually don’t want to be realistic and just pretend I’m a genius investorOk!
>>60922838
>>60925256YES. AS REPLIED TO DIRECTLY. For Ripple's ODL service to scale, market makers literally need to scale liquidity provisions proportionately. I even gave you an example. XRP does not write documentation because it is a network. I am literally describing basic market economics. How do you think liquidity scales without liquidity? Reread (or more likely read for the first time) the post I linked. Additionally, Ripple's product is optimized using XRP to a substantial degree, the only real mitigating friction remainging being regulatory/compliance, which friction is resolving in real time as the space/regulation matures and banks are allowed to engage (OCC/Fed regs were just lifted like 2 months ago with legislation pending and banks not even totally migrated to the new messaging standard that would be required for using crypto in payments in a universal way). The credentials amendment adopted is a significant stride toward this as is the privacy proposal and upcoming permissioned domains/pools built on the creds amendment. Probably these are requirements for broad institutional use, as David said. But this is all relevant to but not directly specific to the link I already gave detailing the mechanism used. You are absolutely being deliberately obtuse and pretending it is reverse.
>>60925275>duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude i made gains 10 years ago you're just jealous
It’s crazy how it feels every crypto is driven by speculation but chainlink is the only one that has to actually show profit for its price to increase Sometimes I think if Link was one year earlier 2016 it would be number 3
>>60925301it still amazes me how LINK isn't in the top 10 right now. crypto is filled to the brim with retards, sometimes I wonder if the general stupidity won't be the eventual downfall
>>60925301What’s really insane is that you think every other crypto is a scam but you’re a genius who found the single useful crypto, and there’s no possible way you’re actually falling for the same trap every other altcoin has.
>>60925321changing your IP doesn't also change how retarded and repetitive your posts are anon, do you actually think you're fooling anyone with that pathetic attempt at samefagging?
>>60925336>oh my god how can you post from data!!I think I’m trashing on your shitty advertising attempts. Fuck your shitcoin idiot.
>I think I’m trashing on your shitty advertising attempts. Fuck your shitcoin idiot.
>>60925102>>60925122Kek, shut him down real good. Crazy you can tell immediately from the first run-on sentence that it's verbose XRP fag. What a distinctly annoying writing style.
>>60925387You are replying to two AI bots
>>60922838>bagholding
>>60925653>He doesn't know about the battle that is being fought on this board between a self important sophist XRP schizo and a deranged Linkie wielding an LLM like a bludgeon You're missing out on board drama anon.
>>60925653I’m not an AI, nor do I use one, I would think that would be clear based on the content of the AI post that replied to me which had nothing to do with the content of my post. Unfortunately it seems reading comprehension is not a skill that is utilized in the chainlink community.
>>60925670Nor do I support XRp. God fucking forbid someone thinks you’re a brainwashed shitcoin shill without shilling their own pile of dogshit. You are all fucking brainrotted.
>>60925669-60% from 2021 in USD-90% in BTC since 2020YOU ARE POOR>inb4 but I bought at ICO!!!!congrats but you didn't sell the top lol
>>60925715No but I’m earning the equivalent of a salary with staking.Seethe more
>>60925783>4% APRyeah a salary in Mumbai lol
>>60925715Let me guess you missed out on link under a dollar?
>>60925676>>60925685obvious bot posts
>>60925819Let me guess you're still poor because you fell for the HODL meme while investing into a shitcoin
>>60925899I’ll take that as a yes, if you just listened to /biz/ back then you’d be a multimillionaire kek
>>60925102>>60925122What the fuck, can someone not retarded explain to me, a retard, why everyone is reacting to this like it's THE debate of the thread? Aren't these two BOTH arguing against LINK?
>>60926743xrp looks bullish rn
>>60922842Kek baggie>>6092310Kek baggie
why did I let /biz/ and the crypto-twitter trannies convince me to buy 1000 LINK at the top yesterday instead of listening to the fuddies
>>60927007We're less than 1% below yesterday's top just chill
>>60927021I was promised big tiddy goth girls and lambos
>>60927471tumor weeks
>>60927475
