As an incel who holds chainlink, how do I repond to this without sounding mad?https://ripple.com/ripple-press/ripple-expands-footprint-into-spain-through-new-agreement-with-bbva/
>>60926034Ripple custody services have nothing to do with XRP?
>>60926034>incelTheres no such thing. Stop forcing this retarded meme
>>60926041/thread
>>60926034You have to be one of the most transparently dishonest and low-effort posters on this entire board if you think some contrived parody of a press conference “hello yes everyone, XRP is a scam,” constitutes anything resembling an argument rather than the kind of cope I’ve called out literally dozens of times across multiple threads. You invent these skits because you cannot engage substantively with liquidity depth, ODL corridors, regulatory clarity, or even the most basic mechanics of settlement, so instead you hide behind a hollow caricature that nobody reading in good faith could take seriously. It’s projection in the most literal sense: you know your position is the scam, so you mirror that accusation onto XRP in the form of this absurd theater, which doesn’t even make sense, and then you pat yourself on the back as if stringing together a fake dialogue is the same thing as engaging with facts. It’s hilarious in the most pathetic way possible. You will notice, as always, that the second you are challenged on details why correspondent banking is inefficient, how settlement risk is mitigated, where billions in throughput have already been documented; you collapse into these tired routines, repeating yourself in ever more errant and abstract ways, clinging to childish performance because you literally have nothing else. If your best shot is to pretend to be an XRP executive making self-sabotaging statements, you’ve proven my point: you are not arguing in good faith, you are coping, you are looping, you are insecure, and the only person convinced by this tactic is you. Everyone else can see exactly what you’re doing, and once again you’ve owned yourself with every keystroke you made.
>>60926034>ctrl+f xrp>0 results
>>60926041>>60926057>the custodied assets won't be used as the liquidity pool
>>60926041No one mentioned XRP.
>>60926073So why would a LINK holder be mad then?
>>60926059More
>>60926041All the dumb chainlink did is actually true for xrp kek
