My question is why are people pushing for this now? Weren't the last three presidential elections fully consistent? Why would you need them on a blockchain if they have never been rigged?
>>60926103Chainlink is partisan and that's why it will fail
>>60926103Glowies will force the US population to get digital identities one way or another
>>60926103/biz/ predicted this
>>60926192>Jamie, play that mgs2 ai clip again
>>60926103I'm all for blockchain based election results.I just wanna know how far the BS cheating goes.I'd like to think it's minor, maybe 5% fake votes.But imagine if it's 30%+The entire demographic would change
>>60926103>on-chain voting in electionsDamn, that takes me back to 2017
>>60926168Who is strong enough to overpower Saturn?
>>60926103WOW! US GOVERNMENT USING CHAINLINK FOR ELECTIONS? THE PRICE MUST BE PUMPING!>Checks price>Dies
>>60926103>Weren't the last three presidential elections fully consistent?If only you knew how bad things really are
>>60926103Is this even legal?
>>60926429they're literally rewriting laws to embed chainlink, it will be legal
>>60926192This was the plan from the beginning, investing in Chainlink was a hedge against the hellscape future that is waiting for us, atleast I'll be rich innawoods
Dominion is not going to like this guy
>>60926103>I mean, we've had conversations with different groups inside of Washington about voting and blockchain systems being used for voting. I'm not going to probably name exactly who we've talked to as it's still early days there. I would say that the nuance with voting and blockchains in the U.S. political system is actually much more around identity than it is around using blockchains. I think the interesting nuance in the U.S. is that identity and a federally issued identity is a very sensitive topic. It's a very politically charged topic for both parties. And so before you even process voting voter rolls, or before you confirm that a voter hasn't switched states and isn't voting twice, so they're not double spending their vote, and before you have ways to guarantee proper node distribution to make sure that voting rolls aren't manipulated and that external state actors can't get in and manipulate them, before you get into all those interesting questions, you have to make sure that you question is, how are we going to create an identity layer for someone to prove their identity as a registered real voter? >And this is a political topic that is very sensitive that I think it's not a technology issue. It's a political issue about whether Democrats and Republicans, who both have their own fears about creating identity, even if it was a narrowly focused form of identity on voting, that issue will have to be resolved before you have this back end technology, blockchains and Oracle networks working together to create a voting system.
>>60927816>With something like that, how far away are we? Is the technology already there and it's a matter of the willpower? Or is it something that would take some time to develop to make it ready for use in such a sensitive, significant application? >It's 100% willpower. 100%. Technology's ready to go. >Oracle network's ready to go. Some cases, even identity systems, everything's ready to go. It's just a question of how the US government wants to approach the topic of identity. >They want to approach the topic of identity for financial transactions in very specific ways. How they want to approach the topic of identity for voting is a very unresolved issue. And that's not an issue that a technology platform or standard or open source way of doing something like identity can resolve. >So we can absolutely provide the technology that would enable highly secure systems using blockchains and Oracle networks to do things like log verification and other key cybersecurity activities. You can absolutely enable the proper use of data and compliance on chain. And voting is really just another type of on-chain data that would have to be synchronized across chains. >So that's something that can definitely be done. It just isn't something that I think politically DC is yet anywhere close to a practical level of agreement on.
All this for a single issue voter who votes for pro-Sergey pro-Chainlink candidateskek
