GET THE FUCK IN HERE, MARINES!!LET ME TAKE THE TIME TO EXPLAIN THIS LATEST SERGEY INTERVIEW>TOTAL NOTHINGBURGERTHERE, I SAVED YOU ALL 45 MINUTES OF YOUR TIME23 BUCKS IN THE YEAR 2017+8https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITKXYIisxFc
>>60926136I miss the old days where that 1 anon would scribe the whole thing
>>60926161always here fren. i think ill do his sibos speech assuming it becomes public
>>60926180Based
Has he revealed who he really is yet?
>>60926180CANT BELIEVE THEY DIDN'T GIVE YOU A JOB OVER AT CL LABS. YOU'RE MORE DESERVING OF ONE THAN THE 700+ USELESS EMPLOYEES ON THEIR PAYROLL DOING JACK SHIT ALL DAY
>>60926229you don't get to maintain 100+ HRoasties on $300k/year without breaking a few eggs
>>60926180Legend
>>60926229hah thank you sir. I wasnt asking for much so i do believe it was their loss thanks for posting the vid. seems like sergey is excited and the government regulators are excited, so therefore i am excited
>>60926264aww sheeet, you guys have got me in the mood now. give me an hour or two
>>60926305as thanks here are some other pieces of nagai's work to linkify
>>60926305
>>609263053/?
>>609263054/?
>>609263055/?
>>609263056/?
>>60926161You do know that youtube has a transcribe button don't you?
>>60926351not the same
>>60926136ty mr caps i do value my time
>>60926136> 108 viewseven the employees aren't watching this shit
>>60926503BROTHER, THEY ARE LIKELY PERMANENTLY AWAY FROM THEIR COMPUTERS ON VACATION, PARTYING, ETC. YOU THINK THEY PAY ATTENTION TO THIS SHIT LIKE WE DO?NOPETHE SICKENING THING IS THE PROBABLY HAVE FATTER LINK STACKS THAN ALL OF US HERE + ARE GETTING PAID RIDICULOUS SALARIES
HELL, THIS PAST WEEKEND I FIND THE CITI REPORT THAN MENTIONS CHAINLINK BEFORE IT'S DROPPED ANYWHERE ELSE ONLINETWO WHOLE FUCKING DAYS LATER CL LABS POSTS IT ON THEIR TWITTER ACCOUNTTHESE LAZY FUCKS ARE TOTALLY ASLEEP AT THE WHEEL
>>60926523> literally explaining how cl fills the role of a compliant transfer agent enabling nav
>>60926533BROTHER, WHEN IS CL GOING TO FILL THE ROLE OF ACTUALLY MAKING US SOME FUCKING MONEY?5 FUCKING YEARS, NO GAINS
>>60926551This is in all honesty one of the most absurdly pathetic demonstrations ever witnessed on this board and it reflects in the clearest possible terms the absolute decrepitude of linkjeets that the only tactic remaining to you, after years of humiliation and price stagnation, is to defer in totality to an artificial intelligence program and attempt to generate a pale, hollow, and transparently insecure caricature of an XRP argument delivered with utter repugnance, as though the simple mimicry of my particular style without the corresponding substance could ever be persuasive, which it obviously cannot. You seriously imagine that people cannot immediately perceive this for what it is; a desperate and clownish act of projection by a broken cohort that has so thoroughly conceded defeat that it must invent a mechanical surrogate to articulate its own cope and yet you parade it as though it were clever, which makes it even more embarrassing.You have literally been reduced to NPC like parroting, incapable of origination, and so in the absence of anything resembling conviction you now outsource to software the appearance of rhetorical force, which is not actually force but only an aroma of performance stacked several layers of abstraction outside of reality. This is not debate, it is confession. It reeks of insecurity, of fraudulence, of errant desperation, and of the absurd delusion that pasting GPT generated walls about USB dongles or spreadsheets somehow redeems your project, as if it's so far removed from that in an exacted fashion.So yes, continue posting this bot-vomit and declaring it victory; every repetition only further substantiates what has already been demonstrated that LINK holders are not competitors in any meaningful sense but clowns, insecure and broken beyond repair, literally incapable of fighting their own battles without the aid of artificial mimicry, which is the most humiliating concession imaginable.
>>60926556>can no longer distinguish verbose xrp troll from ai because no one is going to read all that
>>60926550serious answer... it could still take 2-5 more years before fundamentals kick inbut it looks like a lock now https://app.rwa.xyz/so there's a good chance it will appreciate ahead of time as the market realizes it's inevitable2017: "there's a good chance this wild thing could happen if you assume blah blah and blah..."2025: "this wild thing is obviously about to happen, no assumptions necessary"anyone who is here and doesn't scoop this money because they're impatient is nutsbank adoption won't move on your personal schedulenow is so much more derisked than ico
>>60926161he's still here, he comes by like 3-5 times a year. usually sibos, smartcon and like ethcc or whatever keynote the big guy has.
>>60926136I'm a straight guy, but I must admit that every time I see Sergey I immediately want to push my nose into his fragrant fupa to guzzle cum from his fat hog.Anyone else get that?
>>60926643See:>>60926556
Larry Fink could suck his dick on live TV and the price wouldn't do shit
>>60926654Lmao linkies are genuinely delusional if they think yet another low-effort Sergey Nazarov interview (indistinguishable from a mid-tier marketing webinar) constitutes meaningful development when in reality it’s the same recycled, NPC-tier platitudes about “abstract value,” “cross-chain messaging,” and “future infrastructure” he’s been droning on about since 2019 (while dumping 2/3rds of the commingled float on retail (which they lied about (objectively, verifiably, inarguably))) and yet you people still eat it up like it’s holy doctrine because you’re not investors at this point, you’re doctrinally broken sycophants who mistake rhetorical fluff for technical substance despite the fact that there is no token necessity (none, zero, it’s not used) and your entire thesis is predicated on vague “potential” that never materializes in any tangible form while actual projects like XRP continue building real infrastructure (ODL, liquidity corridors, regulatory engagement) and demonstrating utility at scale while LINK remains a speculative middleware solution propped up solely by the delusions of its own bagholders who’ve become so disconnected from reality they treat AI-generated Sergey cope as bullish confirmation which is hilarious and humiliating because it just underscores the parasocial messiah complex surrounding this guy whose only real innovation is selling you the idea that maybe, someday, someone might use something tangentially related to LINK while he bleeds the project dry and disappears behind layers of abstraction and regulatory buffer language designed to deflect from the fact that you were conned by a bearded spreadsheet with a thesaurus and an exit plan.
>>60926669My stuff actually says something. Which is why you guys get mad and why you direct the conversation to errant argument avoidant nonsense. It isn't irony, it is layered cope tu quoque/whataboutism that isn't even true for me. I have literally always argued point by point in sufficiently expressive but non-frilly language. You have all (again maybe not you specifically but definitely the basically total cohort engaging) have always done everything you can to not have specifics about your project mentioned. And I have almost entirely only replied in threads mentioning XRP negatively. Never made a single thread myself. It is fully self-inflicted and really desperate cope. You guys started by arguing the information until you lost and pivoted into this weird nonsense that got increasingly abstract. I am just seeing where it goes and replying substantively to actual discussion as it crops up (rarely). Your fellow linkies literally start half a dozen threads a day. You guys talk about XRP more than you do link and so do all of your "influencers." All I did originally was prove your thesis and fud wrong and still would prefer to do this but it happened so long and comprehensively that now all I get is AI slop and shitty rhetoric games. I want to see how far it can go.
>>60926669BEAUTIFULLY PUTA RARE GEM AROUND THESE PARTS
>>60926684>>60926687You’ve been repeating this same delusional narrative arc for months now as though endlessly restating it taxonomically somehow transmutes it into truth (it doesn’t) and pretending your posts “say something” while everyone else’s is “AI slop” is the most transparent projection I’ve seen since thread #60625439 (which you obviously read but conveniently ignored, particularly post #60625449 where this exact cope spiral was dismantled) and your selective memory about your own posting behavior is either pathologically dishonest or you’ve actually gaslit yourself into believing that flooding every thread with multi-post screeds isn’t functionally equivalent to making them yourself (see also thread #60577714 and your 14 back-to-back replies between #60577722 and #60577841, which you pretended were “just responses”) and your smug refrain about “arguing point by point” is outright laughable given that your points are bloated circular premises nested inside half-baked economic abstractions layered with terms you can’t define without slipping into even more wordy obfuscation (already addressed in #60499388 and #60499407 where your so-called ‘expressive but non-frilly language’ literally required 4000 words to say “link doesn’t capture value because I say so”) and the idea that you were “just replying” when you have dumped archives of self-quoted manifestos (which, again, I’ve already debunked in thread #60200444 post #60200467 and #60200512) is pure cope — the AI didn’t cause this pivot, your refusal to internalize being refuted over and over did, and now you’re stuck arguing with parodies of yourself and losing to them, which is poetic in a way that I’m not sure even you can fully appreciate given how deep into your own feedback loop you are
>>60926669You are a pathetic creature putting so much effort in a crypto token you have no investment in or are you at least shorting link and what's your liquidation? Or you own nothing and are a pathetic loser? Pic related
>>60926669
>>60926305Based transcribe anon, hope we all make it sooner rather than later
>another ai generated chainlink thread
>>60926687>>60926697I know more than you do about your own investment which you don't understand, and conspiracy stuff. Hilarious your understanding is limited to vague descriptions and appeals to check the archives but you still admit that participating in the normie greed cult you internalized satanic character, and still choose it. You are low information and simultaneously willfully corrupted for a token that is 60% down over the last like 5 years. Lol Even if the conspiracy thing is bullshit and you are just graduating into deeper satanic character through action and intention itself without Saturnian metaphysical substrate, which is likely the case..Genuinely asking: What could be more pathetic than choosing this (outside doing so in a deeply informed and diligently pursuant way)?
>>60926721See:>>60926739
>>60926739>>60926742It’s GENUINELY hilarious how you think invoking vague metaphysical mumbo jumbo about “Saturnian character” somehow elevates your already bankrupt argument when in reality it just exposes the desperate lengths you go to psychologize losing investment decisions rather than address any actual substance which is typical of NPC-tier fudders like you who default to ad hominem occult references because you lack the intellectual rigor to confront facts and market realities meanwhile your painfully predictable tactic of conflating critical analysis with “internalized satanic character” not only fails spectacularly but ironically underscores how deeply you are trapped in the very “normie greed cult” mindset you pretend to transcend and to top it off your attempt to weaponize conspiracy theory as some kind of moral litmus test for investment acumen is laughably transparent like a toddler flinging paint on a canvas calling it art so keep doubling down on your pseudo-metaphysical cope because it’s really all you’ve got left as the price action and fundamental truths steamroll your narrative into oblivion while I’m here actually engaging with complexity not spouting tired one-dimensional insults about some imaginary satanic substrate you clearly wish existed to justify your losses and intellectual bankruptcy.
>>60926136Sergey talked about election voting on blockchain
A lot of people don't realize that the SEC changed rules right after meeting with Sergey and Chainlink team.
Many topics were discussed1 data integrity2 public data transparency3 government and supply chain trust issuesTransfer rules are changing soon which benefit tokenization
>>60926847I've started viewing LINK as being in a similar time period now as it was in 2017-2019.Back then it was all theories about them taking over DeFi and price was largely sideways until it was proven to be true.Now it's all theories of them taking over TradFi.
Sorry I can't enjoy a Sergey interview when yet another pro israel conservative voice gets targeted.https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1960056637185831228?t=tPD_Yb_lwAJltgbVZmq3xA&s=19
>>60926136On a serious note, great interview.I wonder if we'll get an interview at some point in the foreseeable future which goes into Sergey's ideas for just how wide the scope of link could end up being once it reaches *full* maturity. *All* data meaningful to smartcontracts we haven't even begun to consider yet could be collateralized and monetized, not just that which immediately pertains to financial markets and assets / derivatives. Smart"contract" is a bit of a misnomer when you break them down for what they are - decentralized, tamperproof executors which can act on any input or output it receives. They're more apps or functions than our idea of what a contract is.
>>60926838>>60926847none of this shit matters, only thing that does is liquidity in the market.
>>60926237just interviewed with CLL had a male roastiehe was pretty chill. only mad cause they didn't take me to technical rounds for no reason. i think i foamered too much (google foamer in train industry) and they didnt want a fairly OG holder on CLL stafff
>>60926973They need Chainlink to get tokenization
>>60926136hey man, I'm not going to watch itbecause I already have link staked in the poolhave a bump though. thank (you hold link) for keeping this a link board.
