Is it safe to assume that XRP pumped more?
>>60928905>gish gallop
who is this man, anybody have a name?
>>60928905>>60928914This is in all honesty one of the most absurdly pathetic demonstrations ever witnessed on this board and it reflects in the clearest possible terms the absolute decrepitude of linkjeets that the only tactic remaining to you, after years of humiliation and price stagnation, is to defer in totality to an artificial intelligence program and attempt to generate a pale, hollow, and transparently insecure caricature of an XRP argument delivered with utter repugnance, as though the simple mimicry of my particular style without the corresponding substance could ever be persuasive, which it obviously cannot. You seriously imagine that people cannot immediately perceive this for what it is; a desperate and clownish act of projection by a broken cohort that has so thoroughly conceded defeat that it must invent a mechanical surrogate to articulate its own cope and yet you parade it as though it were clever, which makes it even more embarrassing.You have literally been reduced to NPC like parroting, incapable of origination, and so in the absence of anything resembling conviction you now outsource to software the appearance of rhetorical force, which is not actually force but only an aroma of performance stacked several layers of abstraction outside of reality. This is not debate, it is confession. It reeks of insecurity, of fraudulence, of errant desperation, and of the absurd delusion that pasting GPT generated walls about USB dongles or spreadsheets somehow redeems your project, as if it's so far removed from that in an exacted fashion.So yes, continue posting this bot-vomit and declaring it victory; every repetition only further substantiates what has already been demonstrated that LINK holders are not competitors in any meaningful sense but clowns, insecure and broken beyond repair, literally incapable of fighting their own battles without the aid of artificial mimicry, which is the most humiliating concession imaginable.
>>60928922>So yes, continue postingI will, thanks
>>60928915Some literal who Linkies are trying to co-opt into the face of XRP despite the fact that their cofounder LITERALLY dumps 2/3rd of the commingled float onto their head in order to fulfill their payroll requirements whereas XRP only sells to INSTITUTIONAL clients and would NEVER dump on retail unlike the disgusting LIARS at CLL who unceremoniously partake in utter errant corporate fraud on an ongoing basis with absolutely zero regard for their baggies.
>>60928934>>60928922
>>60928905>>60928914>>60928938Behold, the new face of xrp investing
>>60928905>a 4x and a 20x(You) pumped most
>>60928934ive been trying to find this video for like 2 weeks, can you share it with me? i dont have a name to search for, so it's hard to understand what all the drama is about
>>60929695https://x.com/VALELORDX/status/1957370019530375573
4x link is literally all i need
>>60929757finally, thank you
>>60928934And don't forget, Ripple doesn't know who they are selling to (otherwise XRP would be a security) so they exclusively sell on cexes where they don't know the counter party, but they also don't dump on holders because their institutional buyers buy at exactly the same time so it evens out, so even if they are sending billions to cexes they are definitely not dumping on holders (unlike CLL who definitely dump all coins directly on exchanges and it's not a smart scheme like Ripple's where holders are safe because brad would never betray and buy luxery items with the XRP that was definitely not dumped but smartly sold bypassing the evil SEC and their ludicrous targeted stipulations for the chosen crypto, XRP).
>>60929757This is obviously satire of course the linktardeds would fall for it
>>60930017ILL BAGGIE
>>60930121The classic Chainlink defense (a mishmash of misguided arrogance and laughable ignorance), you seem to completely ignore the simple fact that Ripple’s revenue is off-chain, built through real partnerships (something Chainlink clearly lacks) while LINK’s entire existence depends on selling more tokens into the market to keep the lights on, (pathetically inflating supply and devaluing the token over time) meanwhile XRP was designed as a liquidity/settlement layer without the need for exploitative middlemen (or useless native smart contracts that only serve to complicate things). Ripple’s business model is straightforward and sustainable, (selling XRP exclusively to institutional partners) while Chainlink has dumped 45-50% of its total supply through its ICO and subsequent sales (to retail), creating an unsustainable token economy based on pure speculation rather than real utility, and let’s not forget how Chainlink’s tokenomics were built on lies, promising a "ring-fenced" operator reward system, only for them to later sell those rewards (to fund their operations and bloated payroll), which is literally a form of fraud disguised as growth. Ripple, on the other hand, controls less than half of the total XRP supply, ensuring a more stable long-term outlook (unlike Chainlink which will continue to dilute its token value to fund payrolls and business expansion that serves no one but the insiders). Chainlink isn’t even close to being self-sustaining on native revenues (their entire business model relies on constant dumping), and you of course, completely miss the point, (probably because you’re too busy justifying your delusions) thinking arrogance equals accuracy while refusing to face the objective facts, your argument is nothing but low IQ rationalization, unable to grasp even the most basic principles of tokenomics or market structure, proving only that you’re too emotionally invested to see the glaring flaws in your precious LINK.
>>60928934kek linkies btfo
These threads never fail to make me laugh kek. keep it up
This is the saddest linkie xrp fud there is, blatant chatGPT posts and forcing some dude to be the face of XRP kek
>>60931276
