What’s the reason behind the recent increase? Being added to the Binance wallet?
>>60935486they started having steady trading competitions you cant buy back and burn your token supply at a rate of 15-25% annually and not expect the price to go up sellers will be exhausted
>>60935970Yeah do miss the free GNS we were getting from staking but happy to keep the burn going inshallah
>>60936153honestly id rather have the 20% paid directly to me at this rate and just accumulate more GNS. i became less interested in being involved in the community when i was heavily ignored when i advocated for 50% staking reward 50% burn but i still hold because their product is unmatched
Bump
>>60936569 That's an interesting idea. The revenue is high enough to run a 50/50 mix and still burn a fair chunk each month. I assume as more coins get burned, the revenue would go up for each holder too, right?
>>60939241agreedi just like the idea of some yield. my proposal was deeper, i said yield should be paid out in a coin of the staker's choice (which they could easily do with their infra) so USDC, DAI, ETH, or GNSthe irony is i would have picked GNS and continued compounding so it goes, gTrade is top tier i hope seb and team keep pushing foward sad to see so many hyped VC scams come and go while the true king goes unrealized for so long.
