[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/biz/ - Business & Finance


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


A few days ago the UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Secretary Bessent met to coordinate crypto strategy. Joining them were banks: Bank if America, Barclay's and Citi. And crypto companies: Coinbase, Circle and Ripple.

https://www.theblock.co/post/370930/us-and-uk-to-deepen-crypto-collaboration-financial-times
>>
>>60966650
Based as fuck. XRP IS THE STANDARD!
>>
Bullish for XRP.
>>
>>60966650
Bullish for xyz niggercoin saar! Institouwnshouwns madarchod mumbai!
>>
>>60966685
As a successful business person that was VERY early into BTC and realized how bad it sucks balls and can't ever actually be used for anything (I realized this by 2015), it's very weird that people hate the fast, cheap, open business ready token.
It's like they don't understand anything at all and hate for no reason.
>>
bullish xrp
>>
>>60966690
It is literally just seething NPCs in a greed cult who don't care what is true or know anything about XRP or how its consensus or their own projects work. Crypto community went from being about tech and libertarian principle to being about vested interest normie specific coin greed cults who don't care about anything but number go up and will sell out all values for it but ironically would literally rather miss the crypto moment than admit concede to one specific project or admit their original thesis was wrong. It is really weird and irrational and there is not strong basis for it, it is just very similar leftist/zionist group identity.
>>
File: 1758158020985071.png (115 KB, 640x1348)
115 KB
115 KB PNG
>>60966698
Indian Chainlink Advocate hands wrote this post.
>>
>>60966698
This is true. I was there early because of libertarianism and the PEER TO PEER payment method.
However it was obviously a full traceable, non anonymous, expensive and slow, operation. The worst part being dependent on processing power, which is retard tier.

I would actually be much richer if I was a retarded normie as I'd have probably held way long from back then.
But I'm fine. I just wasn't aware, blissfully unaware I suppose, that the entire thing would go full globo glowie grift.
>>
>>60966704
100%. Satoshi's ENTIRE thing was always a usable p2p anon un-gate-able anon money and now it has basically become unusable without using TURBO-centralized L2s that have huge risk and are beholden and are still not 1/100th as competitive as XRP in cost or speed, selling out all principle for an inferior product that can't scale at L1 and is massively resource intensive and hating one which scales natively at L1 with zero counterparties and is more decentralized and not vulnerable to 51% attack which 100% across Pareto time would accrue in the hands of corporatists (Black Rock ALREADY messaged that the supply "isn't necessarily fixed"). Even Ethgate Vitalik said it was better sound money than Bitcoin. The entire anti-position is completely incoherent and it isn't even for principled reasons, it is just demoralized heteronomous people lost in confused social game mazes.
>>
>>60966702
You misunderstood my post. I don't hold any CL.
>>
>>60966694
Yay kreep toes blody!
>>
>>60966650
>rachel from accounts
fking hell no wonder ripple were there. comedy of errors. i bet you a month's wages she took payment for that meeting
>>
>>60966731
Pic related is the role she has and she was meeting with the Secretary of the Treasury of the largest economy in the world who is also (at least nominally) an ally. Why would the US gov pony up to the UK gov who is floundering and has no empire or physical collateral or etc? Your argument doesn't even make sense. She is the literally THE person who would be on the other side of this collaborative strategy meeting.
>>
>>60966731
>>60966751
(if you're wondering who first lord of the UK treasury is, it is the Prime Minister Cuck Starmer)-She is the equivalent of Bessent in the UK for this role. Why petulantly pretend otherwise, portraying exactly the type of person we described earlier in thread? Seriously, what are you even getting out of it?
>>
>>60966761
look, its a nice cool evening in hyderabad. go outside and eat some curry instead of wasting your time shilling this horseshit
>>
>>60966771
I am whiter than you are. Seriously, why be like this? Why do you get SO mad and insist on being disingenuous? Why choose to be so insufferable and retarded?
>>
File: IMG_1303.jpg (442 KB, 1170x868)
442 KB
442 KB JPG
>>60966778
you're brown. sell your stupid ripple scam coin and go buy BNB. what are you going to try to fud binance next? that will work out for xrp wont it. fudding the biggest exchange. CZ should de list your scam
>>
>>60966792
Literally mentally ill, definitely a thirdworlder of some sort.
>>
>>60966751
The US govt is desperate and panicked to do something because every they do gives them more probly and more failures.
When you're a spoiled manchild bully and all you know how to do is beat people up and steal their lunch money, it's hard to do anything else
>>
>>60966792
I think the point is that XRPL is actually cheap, fast, and peer to peer more than anything that exists and hating it is retarded.
LTC is up there, but has no business organization pushing it's use.
But you should want cheap, fast, easy, permissionless.
XRP, XLM, LTC, not many qualify as actual options for people to avoid being ripped off non stop.

You can buy a coffee with .0001 cent fees with the above.
You can't use ETH or BTC or any derivative for anything under $100 for cheaper than just using a VISA card.

In fact, there were $8 ETH fees just yesterday. So to beat a cc you'd have to send like $500 before it was even better than just swiping your traditional card.
>>
>>60966751
If you had any idea what a laughing stock she is in thir country (UK) rn, you'd know what i was getting at. She is woefully underequipped for the role, lied on her CV, hasn't been fired for it, and sits in parliament, literally sobbing in the House of Commons because she doesn't have a clue and feels sorry for herself. But hey, that's stunning and brave, right? This is like a monkey going to a chess tournament. You can bet your money on the US getting the better deal out of this meeting. Which ripple shareholders sponsored.
>>
>>60966830
your tech-illiterate blabbering makes you look retarded. you're not convincing anyone. plus you're gay and brown
>>
>>60966832
>taking theatre as reality
>>
>>60966830
i just use nano, its the same fees for me
XRP is just nano with better marketing desu
>>
>>60966838
What's tech illiterate about comparing fees and speed between payment options?
I started an e-commerce business in 1999. I have a fair amount of technical knowledge, but of course hire out basically everything.

AS A BUSINESS PERSON though I'm quite adept. There are three or four workable solutions and I named three.
>>
>>60966861
>taking reality as theatre
>>
>>60966864
Yes, let me tell you something I've learned in 25 years of e-commerce.
It's literally ALL marketing. Everything is generic, the same, and available to everyone cheaply.

At a certain point the return on "faster and cheaper" loses to marketing overwhelmingly.
We are at the point for five years with BTC/ETH. They ARE so slow and shitty that they are losing even with marketing. But between XRPL and NANO, it's so close and insignificant that marketing is worth far more than the improvement.
I don't care about fractions of a cent for a tx.
>>
>>60966867
my ID has GOD in it, sit down you little faggot slave
>>
>>60966895
>gods bi
Yea, don't think so tranny faggot.
>>
>>60966895
>all grown up
>>
>>60966832
This doesn't matter literally at all and is huge cope. She and her office are in the official role that would exist in this arrangement regardless of individual competency. This was not a decision she specifically made, it is her enacting UK's monetary/economic policy. Starmer is a joke also and your entire country is fully and completely demoralized and cucked. You can't even fly your own flag without your own government taking it from you and arresting you. Rapists are let free while the young girls who complain about being raped are arrested as are those who comment on it online. Your government literally tried to censor the world's internet through its hate speech laws and threatened to try to arrest sovereign citizens in the US violating it with their posts. Hopefully you are finally standing up, but you emphasizing a specific incompetency in your totally and UTTERLY cucked and failed state and country and people is pretty amazing. You doing so to fud a crypto you specifically don't like is probably the most pathetic thing imaginable.
>>60966823
You objectively don't understand money or politics or how the eurodollar system works or the stablecoin strategy. You are probably wrong and cringe on literally everything you think which is basically just assimilated to corporatist metanarrative, and are probably obsessed with social politics that are really gay and retarded and demonstrably wrong.
>>60966830
And it all scales natively L1 with a built-in protocol layer dex anyone is free to use and no one can stop them using.
>>60966838
No argument.
>>60966864
Nano is literally a multi-event exit scam. The team were telling people everything was fine while they knew it fell apart and they were then gated from selling or accessing their money. The network crashed catastrophically and never recovered and operators mass-abandoned it. It is unreliable at scale. The lawsuit was dropped just because it was in another country from where it was retardedly launched.
>>
>>60966870
You are assuming the only feature that exists is tps. This is not true and this is a generalization that does not pass actual inspection. There are profound protocol level differences.
>>
>>60966955
He doesn't understand that no one will ever trust nano again. So no one that matters will use it.
>>
>>60966955
>your country is a joke
I fully agree and it's the reason i'm leaving. If you think xenophobia is the way to get under my skin, I'm afraid you're not getting anywhere. You're about 8yrs behind
>You doing so to fud a crypto you specifically don't like
You underestimate the scope of my fud. I specifically loathe the ripple company. It's way and above the xrp token, which is coming to the end of its time. If I were a ripple shareholder, i'd be getting out, before the xrp holders do.
I know a giant fucking con when I see one.
>>
>>60966967
I understand that fully. That's for other things.
Simple is what is needed. Complicating simple tx is for absolute faggots. That's where bitcoin went wrong.

You should use the least energy, power, resources as possible if you want to do anything worth doing.
Commies think work creates value. What actually creates value is savings or benefit vs alternatives.
Smart contracts, things like the IC protocol, etc. Many will be big winners. But NOT AT ALL in the simple tx arena which is what the world POS payment system needs.
>>
>>60966870
e-commerce is a scam and is fundamentally different than something like blockchain infrastructure for finance. I've also worked in e-commerce for a long time, not quite 25 years but coming up on 15. I agree with you in e-commerce it's basically
>first mover advantage
>marketing
That said, while first mover advantage is a thing across industries, marketing does not fucking matter for many. This is why every day a company you have NEVER heard of and will NEVER hear of gets bought for millions or sometimes billions of dollars by tech giants.

That said, XRP is legitimately a scam and any anon trying to act like it's anything other than a vehicle for them to attempt to get rich quick on the backs of a bunch of monkeys who have already got rich by dumping on them is being disingenuous. There is nothing to be excited about in the tech. Speed is not a paramount value prop of blockchain, security is, and XRP currently has some of the worst security of any L1. Speed is valuable, don't get me wrong - but when you're talking about settlement used to take 24-48 hrs and now it takes either 30 seconds or 3 minutes, nobody is sacrificing security to get the extra 2.5 minutes back. ETH is very fucking fast, and very fucking secure.
>>
Rachel Reeves and the rest of her government are a clueless, hypocritical bunch of cunts. Everything they touch turns to complete shit - just look at the UK. If anything will bring down crypto, Labour's meddling would be it. The sooner they are voted out and various charges of treason brought against the whole lot, the better.
>>
>>60967032
'we' still churn out some of the best music, though
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SLdfzDnftY
>>
>>60966989
And native credentials, soon to be domains/dex, AMM/dex combo, autobridging, hooks, rippling, escrow, etc. XRP is not just a transaction network for payments (though it is also this) it has many other purposes without being encumbered like you said in smart contracts etc. (especially its ability to have credentials/domains etc. without needing fragmented or bottlenecked services referenced, natively).
>>60967030
You are literally just gushing talking shit but saying nothing (muh monkeys, worst security, etc.). No one here is making the argument XRP's chief and only benefit is speed. Solana/SUI are faster but don't have the reliability in fee predictable fee structures or (sol) are too centralized etc. But you are still retarded if you think payments taking 100x longer and being 100x more expensive don't matter to players moving quadrillions of transactions, or those who wish to compete with them and can outperform their correspondent services with a software anyone can use, let alone individuals doing so themselves. Lol If XRP has such terrible security why did the largest bank in Asia's Switzerland (Singapore) and Franklin Templeton (1.5T AUM, also speaking at Ripple's Swell, CEO/President said that "bitcoin is the largest distraction from the largest disruption to financial services" (crypto)) just choose to use it to tokenize and buildout a repo market structure? Why no full crashes and only a few blips of downtime in its 14 years? One specific report chose to narrativize it and you clung to it like a desperate liferaft in a storm you refuse to admit exists.
>>
>>60967032
Them joining doesn't mean them controlling. Whatever you can say about her you can say about the entire UK government and people, but you cannot say about Bessent, who chose specific US companies to come along, one of three being Ripple.
>>
>>60967126
>chooses (pretends) to ignore what Swift's CIO, Tom Zschach, has openly stated, and what CL have proven to work and is about to go live
You hold $Link but are ever so convincing. What's your day rate and do I get a discount if i pay in rupees?
>>
>>60966979
>Xenophobia to get under skin
Lol What? How is that what you took from me? I don't give a fuck what you think about it. The objective truth is that your country is being LITERALLY raped by shitskin islamic 60 IQ savages and your government is enforcing it happening and punishing the victims of it. Your entire government is INSANELY cucked and evil and your people are passive posture obsessed disarmed cuckolds who it took THIS much to stand for. I am not antagonizing you, I am describing how absurd it is you would act like she is a specific "laughing stock" or what an ACTUAL laughing stock it is to consider to give the posture of your people's objection as being a potent or meaningful show of anything. If anything, you are making my argument for me-the current UK admin will suck whatever is put out for them to at US direction, just like Starmer metaphorically did when to iron out trade, he flew to Trump's island in fucking Ireland using his private security and helicopter rather than him going to limey old Britain. I don't care if you agree that thirdworld hell spawn are raping your women and bilking your social spending, they are whether you agree or not and your Finance Minister is the least embarrassing thing about your government and country.
>Ripple community
Not sure how this adds to or undermines what I said (it doesn't). Lol You are a literal NPC for hating a crypto project and shilling another. It is exactly what we discussed earlier in the thread.
>>
>>60967160
>drunk diatribe
ok boss, you're the best. keep making a fool of yourself
>ripple community
i never mentioned any ripple community. see above
>>
>>60967151
Literally who gives a fuck. You guys always spam this. SWIFT is literally no exaggeration the financial equivalent of the fax machine. Or Google up until recently with their "moat" around their search business. Then AI comes and it is all over. Lol XRP and crypto in general is that. GPI is WAY too little WAY too late and CCIP is literally hundreds of times more expensive and slower than XRP using ILP. It isn't even remotely close. If banks choose to stay they choose to underperform available technologies by 100x and pay the premium to do so in a more centralized way for no benefit and more risk. Meanwhile community banks which choose otherwise will literally be able to outperform JP Morgan in international remittances. Institutions which don't join will be left in the dust. If you introduce speciation and give one series 1% advantage over the other in 100 years it will have driven it into near extinction. It's just math, and Tom ENDLESSLY seethes on Twitter and Linkein but never really says or refutes anything. He is currently seething that SWIFT were not invited to Ripple's Swell and talking about how Sibos is so great because anyone can attend (but Ripple chose not to, I wonder why!). It's almost like its a dying legacy system that will increasingly be eat into even outside Ripple by Target and newly emergent payment systems that no longer require its 70 year old messaging software and have no benefit from its massively uncompetitive attempt to cope with disruptive tech. I am whiter than you and for that reason I will never hold link.
>>
>>60967184
>Nonargument cope
Being unable to respond and just playing gay rhetoric games doesn't have the winning aspect you pretend you think it does to feel like you really came back on me. Name a SINGLE way what I said is even arguable. Your government covered up the Paki rape scandal and then when caught tried to cover up the cover up. There are cases where girls 11 years old are found drunk in the home of/with a group of adult muslim men and the girls get arrested. Lol And people who share the story get arrested and posts mentioning it are filtered and block in country. Your country LITERALLY arrests more people for posts than any other country in the world. You are an absolute joke to the world and you wanna talk about a specific member of your elite class being a special laughing stock. Get a fucking clue
>Ripple
I am not saying XRP community, I am saying Ripple's ecosystem and network of business, which you explicitly mentioned, you literal retard.
>>
>>60967184
Your statement is nothing more than pathetic alinsky projection, a rhetorical sophistry so low it wouldn't even pass for an argument. To suggest Ripple is prioritizing a stablecoin on Ethereum over the native XRPL is not just a failure of reading comprehension; it's a fundamental misunderstanding of the fiduciary obligations of the company itself. You're making a PROFOUNDLY stupid argument, which relies on the type of flawed categorical thinking I expect from individuals who spend their time in sub-reddited echo chambers. What you fail to understand is that the XRPL is an open-source, permissionless, and verifiably decentralized ledger with a Federated Byzantine Agreement consensus mechanism that is both efficient and verifiably decentralized, whereas Ethereum’s model is frankly less scalable and elegant than what already exists on the XRPL. The launch of RLUSD on Ethereum is not a capitulation; it's an OBVIOUS strategic move to bridge legacy DeFi to the superior XRPL. Any sentient being with a working memory that can span more than a few minutes would understand the purpose of bringing a trusted stablecoin onto the XRPL is to drive MORE adoption and utility to the very network you claim they are abandoning. You're like a toddler who sees someone using a key to unlock a door and assumes the purpose of the key is to be an ornament rather than a tool for access. You and your pathetic ilk have spent years wallowing in a state of intellectual stagnancy that makes me almost sad to see. Nothing you've said is valid, and you probably don't even realize how definitively your rhetoric proves you to be an unoriginal NPC tier.
>>
>>60967184
The only logical conclusion is that you are either a complete sociopath with a total inability to self-reflect or a paid poster whose instructions have been reduced to mere sophistry, because nobody with a functioning brain could possibly believe that Ripple's entire business is a single product or that XRP, a highly volatile speculative asset, is "by far the most established crypto for payment rails" when it's just one piece of a much larger, and frankly more nuanced, ecosystem. The entire thing is truly hilarious, a masterclass in deluding oneself. You're trying to argue against a position I never even took, claiming I said ILP is centralized, when the actual argument is that Ripple’s implementation of ILP and the business model built around XRP are inherently centralized, a distinction you are willfully unable to grasp, because to admit that would be to admit your entire premise is built on a house of cards. The "SWIFT is a taxi service" analogy is the pinnacle of this intellectual malpractice, a stunning display of a fundamental misunderstanding of global finance and regulatory frameworks. You own yourself with every single keystroke.
>>
>>60967184
It feels like you know what you are doing is trying to project your own rhetorical failures onto my clearly superior and contextually driven messaging strategy. In what way is trying to reframe my tactical deployment of your own words back at you as a "weak messaging strategy" a strong messaging strategy on your part? Lol. Given how much you try to mirror my language in this very thread, adopting my analytical and taxonomical methods, and given how consistently low IQ and ESL you have demonstrated yourself to be, I genuinely can't tell if you are trying to sincerely pass this off as something you actually wrote in an effort to maintain some semblance of a valid argument or if this is simply the final, frantic convulsion of an argumentational corpse. Clearly the strategic and intentional use of my own words against you was a fully formed and effective tactic, but this seems like it might be an attempt to pivot to a meta-discussion as a desperate gambit to escape the irrefutable facts of your prior posts. You are literally just trying to gaslight me with a non-argument that I am somehow behaving in a manner that is completely alien and illogical, when in fact I am simply re-contextualizing your own failures and presenting them as an irrefutable body of evidence. The only logical conclusion is that you are either a complete sociopath with a total inability to self-reflect or a paid poster whose instructions have been reduced to mere sophistry. It's truly hilarious.
>>
>>60967185
Lol. Tom is a classic example of an intellectually dishonest person attempting to invalidate a point they lack the working memory to comprehend, let alone the rigor to investigate. What you perceive as a lack of evidence is actually a profound ignorance of the public-facing and private-facing ledger solutions that Ripple has been building out for over a decade. The fact that you even ask such a question betrays a mind that is still shackled by the antiquated, bifurcated world of old-money finance. I could write for days, but for your simple brain, let's break it down: XRPL's fundamental tokenization and decentralized exchange capabilities are being leveraged by a consortium of Tier-1 financial institutions. Ripple's partnership with Euronext isn't just about cross-border payments; it's about tokenized equities. Their work with HSBC and Santander on liquidity solutions is public knowledge, and their Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) platform is being piloted by central banks you're not even aware of. They are a founding member of the World Economic Forum's Digital Currency Governance Consortium, their blockchain is utilized by major players in the Derivatives Clearing Systems, and they have an ongoing pilot with Bank of England for a cross-border settlement protocol. That's not even mentioning the ongoing partnerships with institutions like Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Royal Bank of Canada, and their strategic S-1 filings for a potential IPO, which would make them a publicly-traded utility. You want evidence? The evidence is that you, an irrelevant voice on an internet forum, are asking for proof of a monumental shift that has already been underway for years, precisely because you were too busy memeing on Twitter to read a whitepaper.
>>
>>60967195
>Ripple's ecosystem and network of business
yes
>>
>>60967199
>>60967204
>>60967208
Still the weirdest step in all of the abstract oddness of cope has been to write stilted non-reply attempts at satire that aim to imitate what I say but never really doing so. I didn't even use the taxi analogy here. BUT..In the corpus of your work doing so across many threads, in this specific time of doing so, there were multiple parts that made me laugh genuinely. Lol You did a good job of streching and winding out things that feel like they are never going to close and then closing them in a sound enough way to make the stretching out feel rhetorically justified. The redditor fedora accents of "...reduced to mere sophistry" etc. are a bit heavy handed but speaking to the whole product, genuinely really funny. Your writing has improved dramatically in this one too in the parts you were taking seriously and not just inserting barbs you meant to be deliberately/ cheaply punchy.
>>
>>60967248
it's all ai based on your own writing. fucking clown
>>
>>60967230
I know. That's why I said it. I was literally quoting you whether you understood what you yourself said or not. And you accuse me of "drunken diatribe." Lol You are fleshing out the skeleton we outlined earlier of the petulant leftist/jew style anti-XRP type.
>>
>>60966650
More presidential grift lol
>>
>>60967253
The AI is getting better language-still pretty stiff and stilted but conceptually cool in a few ways. Exactly how is this supposed to own me or make me feel bad or help you cope? How does being like/doing this make me look like a clown and not you look like a retard (it doesn't)?
>>
>>60967253
Are you hoping my writing gets conflated with it because you know its writing is actually unconvincing and a stylistic but mostly insubstantive aim at my writing? Are you hoping to have me be dismissed because you make arguments posing as me because you lost the arguments consistently, without exception on a single point, while being DRAGGED kicking and screaming for fucking months thread after thread every time, and you are STILL THIS obstinate to accepting reality? Do you realize how objectively, INSANELY narcissistic and wilfully delusional/repressed this makes you? I literally cannot even imagine letting myself become this. You are what we described in full evolution. What do you even get out of it if you aren't a paid thirdworld poster (serious question)? Seriously. Like if you realize you are wrong or can't argue the point, what is the win condition? What sphere of benefit are you even aiming at? Do you ever even consider this?
>>
>>60966685
Kek
>>
>>60967030
>scam
I mean. I'm a distributor and wholesaler. So it's just an online catalog. Not really a scam except the corporate sellers and retail is for sure a general overall scam.

XRP isn't a scam because it's a package deal with business people that are doing all the leg work. It's not about XRPL being "the best", it's about it being very fucking good relative to other options and a group of highly competent business men are shilling it and doing everything the can possibly do to build a network.
I'm betting on their business people really. Because for business I need to do business with a REGISTERED AND REGULATED COMPANY.
That's just the fact of the matter.
>>
>>60966650
>"..become a leading digital asset and innovation hub"

we've been hearing that since 2019. Meanwhile in the real world they keep closing access to exchanges, de-banking people, allowing banks to block user access to exchanges without reason, forcing ridiculous crypto knowledge tests on open accounts at random times etc.
>>
>>60967664
I'm not even allowed to use the world's largest crypto exchange in the UK. Joke country.
>>
meanwhile retail still can't buy crypto ETFs in the UK
>>
File: Gz2IIrcXAAIQn8P.jpg (98 KB, 557x807)
98 KB
98 KB JPG
>>
>>60967664
The UK isn't going to be a leader in anything because of it's authoritarian nanny state nature. How can you be leader in something that nobody can use easily? The retards in this country drive me insane.
>>
>>60967134
I wasn't commenting on anything other than the bunch of fucking self-serving clowns that are the Labour gov.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.