nice
>>60982873I could easily get in but I don’t live in NYC anymore. Oh well.
LET ME CHECK THE PRICE REAL QUICK!YEP, TANKINGWHO FUCKING CARES ABOUT THIS "INVITE-ONLY EVENT"?
>>60982873at this point all the signs point to something big at sibosbut ptsd tells me it won't happeni will be very upset with chris barret if we get nothinghopefully we hear that these trials were successful and we're going into productionhttps://www.swift.com/news-events/news/live-trials-digital-asset-transactions-swift-start-2025
>>60982954I would have had this mindset but Zschach is speaking at the farting event. It has to be time.
LET'S PLASTER THIS "INVITE-ONLY EVENT" ON OUR SOCIAL MEDIA PAGES AND LET OUR FANBOYS DO CARTWHEELS IN CELEBRATION. BY THE WAY, DID YOU SEE ITS INVITE-ONLY AND THEY CANT COME?>RETAIL NOT NEEDEDHMMMMM
>>60982873> forumI lost my breath for a moment because I thought they were going to open a forum website and move the discussions off of Discord.
>>60982954if the trials happened already wouldnt we be able to see the activity on ccip?
>>60982873nice
>>60982873Hell yeah, hope they decide on another $140m token dump today, it's on me lads.
looks like they're setting us up for a nice short entry
Does anyone have any theories for the following:Let's say that Chainlink/smart contracts/blockchains are an almost existential issue for the US government. Treasury demand through stablecoins (at a time when major international UST holders are either getting cold feet or, in the case of competitors, actively hoping to use their treasury holdings to hurt the US economy) is a perfectly timed gift. An almost deus ex machina solution to US treasury demand.Blockchains as a complete revolution in market efficiency, in "compliance" and the ability to control asset flows, in locking in your status as the financial standards setter for the next 20+ years (and all of the geopolitical benefits that come with being able to set the rules) all of these things are coming to the US at an absolute critical point, during a real apogee in the threats to US dollar hegemony and US financial power projection.Now, if you take that all to be true (and many here do) what do you make of the fact that it seems like the previous government was not only not facilitating it as a major national security priority, but wasn't even really engaging with the absolute S tier representatives of this revolution, like Chainlink? War on Ethereum, war on DeFi yield, war on Uniswap, war on Binance. I get it. All "competition" with US banks offering their 0.0001% interest, and the big bank lobbies telling their government PR team to stamp them out.But war on Chainlink? Not reaching out to Chainlink? Chainlink holding their flagship event in Hong Kong because it was impracticable to hold it "at home"? Sergey has said many times "it's nice to have a government (now) that is friendly.What the hell were the last admin thinking? Were they really so in the thrall of central bank/BIS types that they just thought folding their arms and looking the other way for as long as possible was a solution?
Were they in the the thrall of China themselves, who were exchanging "stability" for a mutually agreed pact to stifle blockchain innovation so that the central bankers on both sides of the pacific could regain control?In the current world that is rocketing towards true multipolar competition, how could the Biden admin follow such an insane, anti-competitive policy track that held back literally trillions of dollars worth of economic flourishing, and the entrenching of American values into global assets for the next few decades at least?
>>60983306we can see public testnet transactions but have no way to see private testnet activity afaik
>>60983306no because what we see is only public chain to public chain
>>60984526>>60984527how convenient
>>60982916/thread. Same shit every year. Sold my entire stack. Feel free to screencap this, but it's a guarantee dump after this "event". It happens with all of this shitcoin's hypeboy new.
>>60984552>>60982989t. triggered xerpies
>>60982873That's cool and all, but... price?Oh, and... chart?
>>60984549yes, it is convenient because just like ripple has private transaction functions, you need that for institutions.
>>60984549Yes, banks having the ability to use their in-house private chains is very convenient for them.That's a big reason why they're all turning to Chainlink, while individual L1s grow more and more irrelevant.
That's cool and all... but..... price??.... oh... and chart??
>>60982916>>60982989>>60984552>>60984558>>60984582
>>60984515>What the hell were the last admin thinking? Were they really so in the thrall of central bank/BIS types that they just thought folding their arms and looking the other way for as long as possible was a solution?Anon, you had Elizabeth Warren on the democrats promoting herself for making an "anti-crypto" army. Liberals all think crypto is a scam and bad for the environment. Combine that with Biden half functioning and I dunno how you were expecting anything otherwise. Trump is an anomaly in how he's openly embracing crypto to the point of releasing NFTs and memecoins.
>>60982873God I wish I could afford to buy meat
>>60985005I've got some meat for you*unzips dick*
