https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdLjIVlA_DA>This is the year. This is it.
*crashes*
>>60991012This has literally nothing to do with Chainlink.
The comments lmfao
>>60991012>tom zschach LITERALLY saying with a cheeky smile that the time of POCs and trials is over and they're looking to scale nowsuper bullish interview, you can really tell they were working hard on the financial revolution
We need to talk about "the lollipop incident"wtf was he thinking.
>>60991098Whats odd? He always has a lollipop.
>>60991072Hopefully soon I tell ya
>>60991012they fucking rugged ETH just to cover this shit. Fuck you, not selling.
>>60991098Sergey looks pretty pleased with himself, I’m sure that took months of practice honestly. He pulled it off.
Serg did say next year the block chain space goes vertical though... maybe oldfags can retire by Thanksgiving tho
>>60991012>one of the most insightful people in capital marketswho is he? what has he done so far that merits Sergey's admiration?>Chief Innovation Officerwhat exactly is the purpose of this role? what other innovations has he brought to SWIFT or anywhere else so far?>time of POCs and trials is over then why is Sergey still discussing this in fireside chats with the Innovation Officer instead of the Product Officer??and when is the time of utilization happening??>this is the yearWHEN exactly doe?I have so many questions
>>60991012I actually took the time to watch it and it was bigly bullish, just wish it would reflect the price.
>>60991352>who is he? what has he done so far that merits Sergey's admiration?He's no one, literally, stop looking into it. Just stop.
>>60991012Sounds great but will the token actually profit, that's the question.Will whatever they're building actually be used. The collab they did with Mastercard back in summer sounded great too but who's actually using it?
ok but price
>>60991352>what other innovations has he brought to SWIFT or anywhere else so far?GPI, ISO 20022, CBDCs, ... and of course tokenization and interoperability (i.e. Chainlink).You know, massive watershed innovations. Borderline revolutionary, even.
>>60991016kek
bullish for cardano and tron and xrp and doge and bingus and vechain and icp and nano and bitcoin cash NOT for chainlink.
>>60991425I've just accepted that the only thing that will move the price is institutional adoption. The "market" is fucking retarded and has the brain of a boomer. It doesn't invest in anything unless the television tells it to.
>>60992080You can see that quite plainly reading through the xrp subreddit, people there are legitimately retarded old boomers Good for ripple, they did a great job hooking them
>>60991012How are you gonna cope when 2026 arrives and nothing has happened.
>>60992154I have a well paying job, so basically nothing would really change
*dumps*
>Both of them glazing each other over and over again how many years they've known/worked together>"i know weve said that before in our industry and people have become a little desensitized (/biz/)...but I think THIS is the year...*smugly chuckles*...So NOW...This September..THIS is the year..*sassilly wags finger* THIS IS ITNever seen Sergey this zesty/cocky before. Its a bit disturbing
>>60991012Millions of revenue and no money for tables to put their water on, gonna market sell this shit, fuck it
>>60992309timestamp?
>>609925506:20
>>60992309>Never seen Sergey this zesty/cocky beforehe was very cocky on his new years address in 2022 toothen he stopped doing new years addressesits the same playbook again almost 4 years laterhe sees the defi volume and knows its about to be another giant bear and he is talking people into holding into the dumpagain for the second time he is doing this
>>60992752chatgpt cope
>>60991012>sneakers with a suit>constant siren noises in the backgroundhahaha this shit was filmed in a basement wasnt it? This shit is going to crash so fucking hard lol
>>60992309He sounds like he's just saying "next year" in a joking way desu
>>60992550>zoomgroids can't even make it through the opening section of a 50 minute videofucking kek
>>60992853I have the attention span of a fish and I'm also working, anon. Cut me some slack, be a fren.>>60992644Thanks anon, checked, digits deserved
>>60991098timestamp? i'm not watching a 50 minute video.
>This will be our year>Took a long time to comeThank you Sergey. I always believed.
>>60992916It's AIWhole talk was just about them patting each other on the back while shilling SIBOS, waste of time as usual. Gonna let AI summarize these long ass talks again just in case anything of value is mentioned
>>60991012props to the tailor for sergit can't be easy working with those proportions id guess a 48 size jacket but the sleeves have to be chopped in half from normal, and then extra pockets on the inside to carry napkins to wipe up all the sweatthen on the pants, 46 size waist and extra wide at the bottom to fit over sneakers
>>60992080>It doesn't invest in anything unless the television tells it to.what channel was hyperliquid and aster on? the reality is you're just not a good investorof course you need to tell yourself a lie about it being the market's fault, which to anyone seasoned is comical but understandable coming from an immature investor
>>60993059The shitcoin casino is 99% jeet scammers and Saudi retards frittering their billions away.
>>60993150>The shitcoin casino is 99%while that's true, there's still money to be made by noticing trends/following liquidity marrying a random utility coin isn't a good strat
I've been holding 4k LINK since shit maybe 2017 or 2018?? ........................ zzzZZZZZZZZZzzzZZzzzzzzzz
>>60991012> 13:00> "all of those things really matter in systemic important market infrastructure, and we're nowhere near that, in terms of scale and kind of doing things like settlement on chain..."straight from the horses mouthit's over, just sold 25k LINK
>>60993293he is clearly talking about current L1s and the validator issue is saying sol is indeed garbage
>>60993197>invest $1k>7-8 years later it's $100k>zzzZZZzzzZZZzzz....Crypto has broken you
>>60993378It should be millions.
Tom: its impossible to do agentic ai (in finance presumable) without a verified trusted data source>sergeys face whenanons here have always said that chainlink would defacto become a critical piece of ai infrastructure too
>>60993448I wish I could find that one post on warosu that discusses distinguishing between information and verifiably true information, a problem that not even Google could solve and whoever solves it solves a trillion dollar problem.
>>60993448I'm waging in finance AI as a tech lead so this made me pause.It's kinda too vague to really comment on but the general statement is correct. Verification of data is a huge thing in all of finance or insurance or trade or any such industry with high volume transactional data.What is not necessarily true though is that this verified source of truth must come from a blockchain, or any system that guarantees it's correctness. In fact, what most companies are starting to bet on now, and what my company is building, is that this source of truth is just... more AI.Of course corporations require tons of audit trails and human-in-the-loop and so on, but the critical part is that verification tends to be a local issue. This isn't always true, there are definitely cases where verification includes multiple companies/banks/entities across the globe, but mostly one company has all the scattered data to verify if something is true or not; it just doesn't have the human capital available to reconcile this data. As in, if you need 3000 people to keep up with verifying your contracts against all of your transactional data 365 days a year, you're just not going to find that workforce that has sufficient training and expertise.1/2
>>60993577So these companies turn to AI to solve the scale-issue of verification, and then paste some human oversight on top to solve liability (since AI can't be liable right now, you need a human scapegoat after it that can be litigated).Then, once the data has been verified internally in your system, you consider it true and can offload responsibility of further handling that data to automated systems (including AI if you want to, but usually this is just something downstream that pipes the data to whereever it needs to go).And because this verification is such a local problem, this is a capability that pretty much every large organization needs and will have to pay for.Is there a utopian reality where this isn't necessary and all the data is reconciled in a beautiful Chainlink system with a single source of truth? Yes. But it will come AFTER the fragmented AI verification has already flooded all industries.2/2
>>60993586>you need a human scapegoatso i can summarize your proposed tech as dude trust me bro and if you dont i have a scapegoatsee this is why dons are being build so you dont need to do the song and dance you just described
>>60993564>I wish I could find that one post on warosu that discusses distinguishing between information and verifiably true information, a problem that not even Google could solve and whoever solves it solves a trillion dollar problem.https://warosu.org/biz/thread/16353767#p16354498I think this might be the post I've been looking for; trustlessly filtering and selecting for verifiably true information out of a sea of virtual data.
>>60993615yeah that's what he's saying. chainlink will provide the system with a source of truth, but for now organizations are doing their slapdash best to create a verification system with the tools they have: humans and the current state of AI. Chainlink is great and the solution to lots of these problems, but it's not fully deployed into enterprise production yet. even Swift who has been working with Sergey for a decade are only just now going live
>>60993615You're correct, but it's a much steeper hill to climb.I own LINK because i think we will climb that hill eventually. But in the short term it's not like there is a gaping void just waiting for chainlink. There's a stopgap solution.
>>60993680>But in the short termyes of course, never meant to imply to was a short term thingjust one more future usecase that will be worth fortunes to look forward too and isnt even remotely priced in yet today more importantly
>>60992154They have until 2032 in my book
>>60992154LINK has always been a 15-year hold. We have until 2032. Tokens should be fully circulating by then, and I'm guessing staking 1.0 will be functioning.
STAKING 1.0 IS THIS YEAR, BUCKLE UP MARINESSIBOOOOOOOOS, SMAAAARTCOOOOOOON!~
>>60993577checkedbut your post is fundamentally flawed >What is not necessarily true though is that this verified source of truth must come from a blockchain,This right here tells me you misunderstand the value of blockchains. The bread and butter that Chainlink and initial Ethereum OGs were scrambling to figure adoption for banks and businesses is for smart contracts. It's extremely hard to explain how revolutionary they are; how the core concepts of programs that run in an embedded payment network can automate stuff to an extreme degree of reliability and efficiency. And then Web3 (I don't believe 80% of the industry truly understands this) is insane and is brought to life from how protocols are basically live githubs that you can connect to and build on top of without any need for permission.I'd say dig up an old Smartcon Keynote speech from 2022 or something, but you have to play around with smartcontracts and build something you find value in to really grasp all the concepts I spoke of. And once you click with the insane capabilities, then the appreciation for being able to filter to select for verified data gets stronger.
>>60991012also 44:55 to about 46:00tom absolutely dunking on ripple that moving your own token on your own chain in 3 seconds does not mean finality in the way swift interprets it and cre for that matterconsidering the amount of fud we swallow here all the time about processing times
>>60993728>we have until 2032if this is true, there's literally no reason to hold the token in the meantime, it's just wasted opportunityin all honesty fuck this token and fuck this board for psyoping so many of us
Did anyone actually watch it?He says every year he thinks this is the year until November and then he thinks next year. Hardly bullish lmao.
>>60993880He also said he's bad at predictions. That's why I believe 2032 will be our year.
>>609938806:15 to 7:10he does address the 'i think it every year', but then he is exceedingly smug about it somehow for this november
>>60993857Post your sell order.It’s a simple and logical progression of your statement.
>>60993943I've been holding for years, why the fuck would I sell before sibos and smartcon you fucking retardI said *if* anon's statement (which I'm interpreting to mean we can't expect real price appreciation until 2032) is true
>>60993918No he says he thinks it every year until November and sarcastically says "but THIS november". You'd genuinely have to be the most punjabi jeet going to miss the comic tone.
>>60993439And it will be
>>60993699yep, agree>>60993794Mate, no need to lecture me about smart contracts. I was building entire multi-wallet videogames in Solidity back in 2018. I have developed smart contracts that plug into CLL products like chainlink automation.The only thing fundamentally flawed is your understanding of my point.
>>60991012This is the year
>>60991012This whole talk was basically an advertisement for Chainlink Runtime Environment. Sergey and Tom spend the first 45 minutes shilling the benefits of blockchains together. Then Tom makes it seem just out of reach by bringing up all the hurdles around real world implementation to do with legality and compliance, then he segues to Sergey to say 'But wait, all of that is actually solved by CRE!'. This is basically a preview of what the SIBOS talk will be, anyone hoping for big link news will be disappointed. SIBOS is about recruiting more interested SWIFT member banks, not for big announcements. Smartcon will be where the big news is dropped, that stuff Tom said about people having 'PoC fatigue' and the rush of people now in production, name dropping the Digital Euro,... I expect a few major projects will be announced to be live in production in Q1 & Q2 2026. Also, I didn't realise Sergey and Tom had directly contributed to the section of ISO 20022 relating to blockchains, interesting.
oh sweet let me check the price
>>60993994I read it over. From what I understand, those companies are doing is different from the approach Chainlink is doing. Chainlink is working with companies so that they can pull data from their infrastructure to a shared database (blockchain) via oracles. Your experience is that, if I am understanding correctly, companies are building AI agents to scour individual databases within their infrastructure to compile the necessary data to meet whatever regulation/verification requirements. Now then my question is, will said AI agents be ready to onboard regulatory compliant data onchain to be ingested by smart contracts? Cause that's the context of the statement here >>60993448, using agentic ai for DeFi and the fledgling tokenized RWA market.
>>60993974You mean Link won't be 81k by Thanksgiving?
very antisemitic
>no bad news>nothing changing in society>crypto takes the absolute biggest shit on itself for no reason other than it's the ninth month of the year because humans are retarded by nature and thus their algos are also inherently retarded by default causing an endless cycle of "if this support holds we're fine", causing algos to obey the herd and dump according to the law of many.The markets are not all knowing. The markets are as genuinely retarded as CT and Cramer
none of this matters until they actually release staking
>>60994725oh and since they've been radio silent, I expect absolutely nothing
>>60993378100k can by you a nice truck and pay for 3 months rent and groceries in a place where there are no frequent power outages
>>60993880he literally is giving his same gimmick he clearly said every year is the year until November because then he’s like ok next year is the yearThat’s what he’s fucking sayingLast November 2024 he’s like ok next yearSame jokeNothing is promisedThe whole thing is saying the rails will go live but Tom admits more than likely there’s going to be a LARGE gap between tokenization and traditional value for YEARSI listened to the whole 50m after work while laying downWithout a doubt in my heart this will eventually be the future of all transactions at most by 2040, but the great news is, I have no intention of retiring for 15 years desu. I can wait till then for a $10k link.
its no coincidence that the largest chainlink outflow from exchanges happened the same day this interview dropped. We already won. Thanksgiving is the date, nov 27 200 dollarinos
I remember him saying in 2021 that *that* was the year.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3kRd9HtV1s
>>60991012he's so bloated and his mannerisms are so autistic he doesn't even look like a real person
>>60995204Why did the price not go up
>>60995374withdrawing doesnt increase price (especially when eth is dumped to suppress news), not having tokens to sell when buying happens, makes price go up. -15million available tokens ;)
>>60994320>Smartcon will be where the big news is droppedi'm still not quite sure if sergey was joking but considering he said by thanksgiving, timewise it would make a lot of sense. Smartcon start of november with an anouncement that "A" will start EOM
>>60995204This guy is stuck in 2017.>>60995374Because most trading happens on-chain. Tokens leaving exchanges no longer means it's for holding.
>>60995210/thread
>>60992080>He thinks institutional adoption will move the price
>>60995210>>60995925Sergey was making a point about how foolish he feels thinking "this is the year" every year.Yet you're trying to twist his words to mean the opposite; that he's promising this is the year.You faggots are worse than CNN.
>>60992916Kek I’ve never watched 1 second of any speeches or videos by Sergey since 2018.
>>60993857Kek. Yeah I mean that’s true in a sense but at the same time everything is totally fucked. Shit don’t matter anymore post covid. Old world is gone. So I don’t really care.
>>60993912Sweet I’ll be 50 and my life can finally begin
>>60993857>YOU PSYOPPED US INTO HOLDING LINK>>60993956>haha no I'm not selling my Link, don't you know about [insert bullish Link events here]?You absolute fucking retard lmao
He is going to be the worlds first trillionaire.
https://smartcon.chain.link/speakersscroll to last 2 rows, more people added :) Dan the man with a plan.
>>60993197So you didn't cash out when you had a 200k worth of stinkies? Kek. KWAB even
>>60995968yeah and Link marines will still be poorkek baggies
>>60995204lol for all that panic selling during the tariff bottom and it all got gobbled up by the whales and immediately taken off exchangethis current outflow at a local low is indeed interestingthe manipulation is unreal but once it goes it'll surprise everyone
Interesting remark at the end. Z-Shock asks Serg if he'll setup a meeting with Elon. Sergey says "I'll tell you after."
