I'M ALL IN XRP (TICKER: XRP)
>>61001530So?
>>61001536BULLISH XRP
>>61001543And?
bullish xrp
so bullish on xrp
bullish
>>61001551>bullishxrp
>>61001530>>61001536>>61001543>>61001551>>61001563>>61002003>>61002024>>61002489The delusion on display here is frankly BEYOND belief, a perfect, tragic testament to the mental gymnastics required to ignore the obvious, undeniable, and foundational reality that is unfolding around you. You talk about "playbooks" and "pamphlets" and "theatricality," but you're a child playing with toys while the adults are building the actual infrastructure of the future. While you're busy with your pathetic word salad, the Japanese Banking Consortium, a consortium of over sixty major banks, has been leveraging Ripple and XRP for real-world settlement for YEARS. We're talking about BILLIONS of dollars in daily transactions, regulatory-aligned and legally compliant operations, not some flaky, speculative, and utterly meaningless "pilot" with a glorified hobbyist oracle provider. And that's not even getting into the CROWNED PRINCE OF DUBAI, who has explicitly endorsed XRP in a massive, forward-thinking deal that is set to revolutionize payments in the Middle East. These aren't just buzzwords, they're FACTS, they are the very FOUNDATION of global finance, and they are happening right now, in the light of day, while you sit in your basement trying to get a rise out of me with your ridiculous, circular, and transparently dishonest diatribes. You are so consumed by this weird, insecure need to get the last word that you have completely blinded yourself to the reality that XRP is the digital asset of the future, a foundational liquidity layer that is being built, legally and compliantly, on a global scale. This is not a "debate" about who has better metaphors; this is a conversation about who is living in reality, and your every single post, your every single pathetic, verbose, and utterly pointless word, is proof that you are losing.
bot thread
>>61002504I literally did address it directly. Lol It isn't dogshit. If it is, say why or what exactly doesn't work about it because I used the analogy but also provided the technical justification for it. Be specific, and I will absolutely fill it in. I never ask you to take me on authoritative trust, the only one who has done that is you guys, whose entire argument hangs on the words of one SWIFT innovation officer who MISSED AND TRIED TO PAPER OVER THE BIGGEST TECHNICAL INNOVATION SINCE THE INTERNET, SPECIFIC TO HIS INDUSTRY (and never even justifies his argument, which industry players clearly are acting on an anticipated gradual obsolescence of his platform). I have zero God complex and am a humble servant of the one true God and Lord Jesus Christ from whom all good things flow next to whom I am unfit to know but through Grace receive. You are a dishonest person who knows they are wrong and inadequately justified in their position but instead of accepting this and not arguing or contending with fact and letting truth that doesn't congeal with your preconception matter, you react in an immoral and weird way and do EVERYTHING you can to try to have what is true dismissed or not matter next to whatever rhetoric games you try to play, aiming at means of successful persuasion despite the truth, rather than being a purveyor of it. You name call and project and accuse but never prove or demonstrate or honestly engage with anything. It has made you weird and a literal NPC of a greed culture that gets weirder and weirder the more you participate and double down into, literally indistinguishable from the way leftists/jews think/argue/abstract.
>>61002512>>61002514You have to be one of the most transparently dishonest and low-effort posters on this entire board if you think some contrived parody of a press conference “hello yes everyone, XRP is a scam,” constitutes anything resembling an argument rather than the kind of cope I’ve called out literally dozens of times across multiple threads. You invent these skits because you cannot engage substantively with liquidity depth, ODL corridors, regulatory clarity, or even the most basic mechanics of settlement, so instead you hide behind a hollow caricature that nobody reading in good faith could take seriously. It’s projection in the most literal sense: you know your position is the scam, so you mirror that accusation onto XRP in the form of this absurd theater, which doesn’t even make sense, and then you pat yourself on the back as if stringing together a fake dialogue is the same thing as engaging with facts. It’s hilarious in the most pathetic way possible. You will notice, as always, that the second you are challenged on details why correspondent banking is inefficient, how settlement risk is mitigated, where billions in throughput have already been documented; you collapse into these tired routines, repeating yourself in ever more errant and abstract ways, clinging to childish performance because you literally have nothing else. If your best shot is to pretend to be an XRP executive making self-sabotaging statements, you’ve proven my point: you are not arguing in good faith, you are coping, you are looping, you are insecure, and the only person convinced by this tactic is you. Everyone else can see exactly what you’re doing, and once again you’ve owned yourself with every keystroke you made.
>>61002540It is LITERALLY beyond comprehension how a person can engage in such blatant rhetorical sophistry and then have the unmitigated audacity to complain about it and accuse me of doing the very thing you are in the middle of doing. This entire post is a perfect example of your broken, copypasta-tier brain because you are still stuck on a PROFOUNDLY stupid analogy you invented and are now pathetically trying to walk it back and reframe it when it was so utterly blown out a toddler could have seen it coming. Your continued reliance on the intellectually dishonest "fax machine" comparison proves you have zero clue of 101-level basics and refuse to engage with the actual arguments about fiduciary trust and regulatory frameworks because it would require you to admit you are wrong and that your entire thesis is built on a house of cards. You and your pathetic ilk act as if GPI and the other improvements are "too little, too late," but that is just a symptom of your delusion, as your own narrative requires you to believe that a highly-profitable, established, and regulated network would choose to go extinct rather than adapt, a belief that is so detached from reality it would be hilarious if it weren't so sad. The fact that you think your pathetic and baseless accusations of "term mirroring" and me being an AI help you is the ultimate display of Alinsky Projection, and you are just so pathetically aware of how little substance your talking points have that you have to resort to attacking the very medium of this exchange. You and your pathetic arguments are so completely blown out that you are now just a desperate flailing corpse of a thesis, and the only logical conclusion is that you are either a complete sociopath or a paid poster whose instructions have been reduced to nothing more than a few keywords and a handful of disproven analogies. Lol
>>61002504>>61002514>>61002540>>61002588Why are you samefagging across multiple IDs acting like me to cope with having zero argument for why link doesn't suck. To make peple think they read things I actually wrote and dismiss me because you know the things I actually write won't be dismissable like this? Do you realize how big of an admission this is of your own deliberate repression/willed bad faith? What a weird way to be. Anything to avoid having the technical aspects of your own project described in threads you specifically post to antagonize despite knowing you are wrong and can't argue it.
>>61004287Further: All in defense of the fucking jewish attempt to usurp defi and permanently engrain rent seeking middlemanning. It isn't even like linkies are fighting a principled fight for the heart of man or against all odds. Linkies are defending the entrenchment of the worst aspect of the system we are trying to change to defend a product that isn't even technically good that is one aspect of the establishment play to usurp and strangle crypto through Chokepoint 2.0 while Ripple/XRP with the Eth free pass and Joseph Lubin's collusion with the legacy CCP and JP Morgan (which FLOPPED).
>>61001530Based. I'm like 90% in on XRP. I keep 10% for shitcoin side bets like Bitcoin or Etherium.
>>61004287>>61004296>linktards!
>>61002504>>61002514>>61002540>>61002588>>61004287>Automated spam bot
>>61001530I'm all in Vaulta (ticker: A)
>>61004398Literally no one even knows who this bald faggot it. Most failed meme of all time.
>>61005502This literally isn't what it means. XRP was declared a non-security, Ripple since May 2020 have sold EXCLUSIVELY to institutional clients, and their injunction waswx waived by the SEC. The SEC tried to sue them for billions of dollars and the judge ruled 150M which the SEC asked the judge to undo ruling of to accept settlement with Ripple because they determined the prior admin (which drove Operation Chokepoint 2.0, which aimed to strangle crypto in the cradle and coopt its technology by siloing development into REALLY shitty and fragmented, centralized L2s on Eth (which link is part of strategy to). Link and eth are literally the establishment play that failed expecting the rest of crypto to be stillborn, never delivering on tech and failing to stifle better tech players. Ripple said they would settle for a fine on specific sales between a specific time (which they totally restructured their product since) at the very beginning of the suit if they got clarity XRP was not a security and ended up with exactly that. Brad and Chris were attached to the lawsuit as parties themselves to intimidate them and they STILL didn't bend the knee. Ripple/XRP is the ethos of crypto and link is the ethos of jewish usurious unnecessary fee capture for its own sake and establishment throttling of innovative technologies that give people more control over their affairs and money and literally NOTHING you said about the ruling is true. Cope.
TVL? #chainlink
>>61005516Now copying my posts from another thread? In what way do you think this owns me and doesn't just make you look like a retard exactly?
