Our response?
Idk what that is but SWIFT has been piloting basically every chain. A pilot doesn't mean adoption. Just like the LINK pilot that went nowhere. Idk why you'd target XRP with that, aren't they saying they'll replace SWIFT?When did /biz/ become retarded all the way around?
>>61003474 Oh look its the verbose XRP shill, over/under 50 pbtid in this thread? I'm going to say over if the thread hits 300.
pretty sure this linea news is bullshit every article i found either references another article or a tweet. until swift confirms it it's fake news. but xrp is shit either way.
>>61003469The linea news is massively overhyped and basidcally fake news with everyone referencing a single tweet by an anon twitter account that was disavowed by who he was citing. They are trialing them for messaging I think but who cares? We believe XRP outperforms SWIFT dramatically and will replace it, not be graciously included. Maybe they will adopt it out of desperation but their alternative attempts have all been uncompetitive flops.
>>61003523That isn't me, my ID is. There are a LOT of other smart people besides just me who disagree with you and in this case the news spreading is objectively fake and exaggerated and irrelevant even if it were true.
>>61003474>>61003616Btw not exactly shocking Joseph fucking Lubin (who with the CCP took 90+% in the ICO of the TOTALLY decentralized Ethereum total supply) would be part of the colluding effort. He was at the heart of Chokepoint 2.0 and the eth free pass and the attempt by tradfi and banks to stranglehold crypto and force its development into centralized L2 gated access permissioned hell.
Messaging is not the same as payments. Two different tasks. I don't see linea as competing but complimenting ripple.
>>61003469Messaging doesn’t solve the liquidity problem. You’re a desperate faggot that doesn’t realize the solution was already decided years ago.
>>61003616>>61003611>We believe XRP outperforms SWIFT dramatically and will replace it, not be graciously included>other smart people besides just me
>>61003844oh, apparently i didn't attach pic related
tech illiterate xrp retards seething as usual. lineachads stay winning
>>61003469just sold my XRP and bought LINEA thanks for your understanding to this matter!
>>61003616>>61003622>>61003611>gish gallop
>>61003469bullish XRP
>>61003844It objectively does by every metric. Speed. Cost. Fails. Counterparty risk minimization. Etc.
>>61003849What you said was undeserving of Charls.
>>61004152t. Doesn't actually own linea and down 60% over the last 4 years.
>>61003806> doesn’t solve the liquidity problem. Any chain does this lmao
>>61004274Even bitcoin cant handle the liquidity you fucking idiot
Brad should get another tattoo lol
>>61003474>Just like the LINK pilot that went nowherekek watch this and writhe you stupid motherfuckerhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdLjIVlA_DA
>>61004152that's a retard trade, if you bought Vaulta still fair. Truth is, Ripple's infrastructure attracts institutions and is heavily adopted. LINEA will only pray to get to that level in 10yrs
>>61004246it's not going to be replacing swift because xrp can't meet the aml / kyc legal requirements for banks which is the actual source for their bottlenecksthose requirements aren't going away any time soon - something else definitely meets this requirement along with a suite of other compelling features though, and has actually established itself as the most promising speculative bet in that capacity>>61004709as for the technical specs outside of compliance in that context, xrp has no moat whatsoever when compared to algo, sol, xlm, avax subnets and others that are currently used in various prod environments for liquidity and settlementif xrp had some kind of upcoming monopoly or even a moderate preference for crypto payment rails or settlement in the arena of global finance as so many ripple holders claim, then the following things off the top of my head wouldn't be true:visa using sol for merchant acquirer settlements in prodstripe using payments on eth, sol, polygon in prodFT OUSG FOBXX/BENJI using polygon in prodJPM onyx in prodforge EURCV using ethpyusd in general with all the ramps that's going to bringthat's not even close to a complete list but you're not going to bother to read up on any of it so it doesn't matter anywayxrp will find its own niche in certain corridors, but it goes without saying that the next few years are going to be a pretty nasty wakeup call for people like yourself who have been running around with the blinders on because you thought that xrp would be absorbing the lion's share of global finance you should probably have done more actual research instead of larping as a "schizo autist" and solving puzzles made for toddlers by qanon boomers on twitter, mindlessly reposting community made infographics, and lapping up ripple's own PR spin
>>61005116thats a leftard-tier wall of textwhy so mad sondoes it sting? i bet it does huh>muh we're replacing SWIFTlmao
>>61003469SWIFT can't right away say they're working with Ripple, NDAs and all.Just buy XRP.
>>61005116Yes it can and already does. XRPL has protocol layer compliance with none of the friction and inadequacies of fragemented compliance across L2s or private bank chains. Permissioned dex/domains more or less iron this out for XRP sourcing itself and minted assets have this implicitly as well as free/clawback etc. You literally don't know 101 about the XRPL. It has better compliance than chainlink and is LITERALLY less than 1/100th the time for finality at 1/100th the price, literally.
>>61005482freeze* not free
>>61005482Dude I'm sorry but there are a million better options like gold, silver and platinum. XRP is monopoly money. Actually monopoly money has more value because as the market cap is raised monopoly money isn't bought up by its own creators like xrp is. I know this is hard for you crab people to understand but most crypto including xrp has just been a massive rugpull. You got suckered in, learned the lingo and decades old tech terminology and feel gratified because YOU ARE BOUGHT IN. But eventually you will wake up with most of your money gone. It's not too late but when the USD fails so will crypto. And the euro will fail before that, you will see. The global markets are about to fail, normalfags will NEVER adopt a crypto to replace paper fiat. Crypto is still fiat shit and not real money. I don't know why I bother, you people are hopeless.
>Testing >Experimenting>Development Lol, lmao
>>61004709I ain't watching shit.The Linea pilot is literally SWIFT moving away from Link for messaging. Cope more retard.
>>61005482No, it doesn't meet the requirements for compliance at all, and the rest was just a retreat back into reciting the usual marketing material without addressing the reality of what I said. Is this a bot or did I corner yet another actual paid shill working from a script like a call centre jeet? Name a G-SIB or central bank that:>mandates xrp for cross-border treasury,>publishes volumes and fee flows of this happening>has actual documents with internal controls tying xrpl to regulatory reporting. You won't be able to because there is nothing you can provide which meets those conditions, so you'll deflect because you barely understand anything I'm talking about here. Xrp simply doesn't have framework sanctioned party controls, auditability, interoperability with rtgs/cls, and regulator-approved runbooks. There's no public evidence that shows xrpl meets this any of those requirements in production at bank scale. And no, "coin go fast" is not proof of any of that.Features like freeze/clawback are table stakes. The missing pieces are legal, operational, and governance if it wants to "replace swift." That’s why institutions are actually using stablecoins on major l1s/l2s and private ledgers alongside swift as per some of the examples I gave, not xrp. Those same l1s/l2s are just as fast and cheap in most cases, not that you have the faintest idea about any of that, or what I meant by using the term moat. I'm basically just kicking a marketing parrot around at this point.>>61005456Was that response actually meant for me? I'm shitting on the cripple for saying that they'll replace swift if you actually bother to read what I'm saying
>>61006608you’re arguing with a known bot
>>61006780Yeah I suspected as much but figured I might as well finish.If it dispels the illusion for an actual human somewhere it wasn't a complete waste of time I guess.
>>61006608Yes it does. In what world is having compliance features validated by a G-SIB using it at present (before the US even has legislation to be able to and like 2 months after the Fed/OCC etc. reeled back guidance restricting doing so, on the back of Operation Chokepoint failing and being undone? Literally fucking retarded. L2s cobble compliance across fragmented standards and variable adoption, XRPL's is in-built and standard to all users. Lol HILARIOUS. They TRIED to push for permissioned ledgers, and now all of them whose business doesn't hang on success of them concede it was an open and shut failure. Like literally all of them admit the current drive is to public. You ironically forgot to update your talking points from 2 years ago. They are not as fast or cheap, have clunkier compliance, and have in-built counterparty risk no one wants. XRP using ILP can literally scale to trillions of tps (hardware limit) and settle with full finality in 3-5 seconds for less than a penny with protocol layer compliance features and can batch micropayments efficiently. CCIP takes 5 minutes additional to settle and costs dollars/cents with no realistic realtime micropayment capabilities. You literally are wrong on every single point. Compliance features existing is not dependent on current G-SIB usage (pre-legislation to use crypto at all as such). XRP using ILP has it all, particularly once permissioned dex/domains goes live, natively, fully universally standardized to all participants and is interoperable to any even hypothetical traditional or public/private blockchain network it is desired to be with atomic settlement, fully decentralized and anyone being able to use it and choose usage terms for their minted assets and associated wallet holdings, soon to be much more XRP specific with dex/domains amendment (domains 2 votes from passing out of 28 needed). Institutions are migrating from the private trials to public-you literally have no idea what you're talking about.
>>61006780You are a bot of coin specific ideology. Literally. I am the mirror that shows you you, which is why you get uncomfortable and disingenuously spin when called out. You are defending a greed cult project literal scam which literally exists to force rent seeking into defi and usurp actually disruptive tech and underperforms it LITERALLY 100x on speed and cost, like no exaggeration, literally 100+x. You are on the wrong side of tech and morality and investment and you literally know it. You are choosing to miss making it and being a good person to LITERALLY virtue signal in terms of a coin cult. It is fucking INSANE. What is more pathetic?
i don't read twitterposts
>>61005880thats literally swift top dog (architect) chatting with Sergey about how things are going to go from now on, you stupid retardholy cope almighty, you "people" would jump off a bridge if you weren't so deep in your sunk cost delusion>>61006608>Was that response actually meant for me? I'm shitting on the cripple for saying that they'll replace swift if you actually bother to read what I'm sayingmy bad
what is up with all these wall of text bot posts lately
>>61007613What's up with you having zero argument to defend your own thesis and coping by repressing the proof grinding your teeth into the curb?
>out of context emotionally charged engagement baiting bot reply
>>61007692Insane levels of self-repression and cope.
>>61007692xrpbot is in a loop because it had its shit kicked in happens regularlyalthough it would be really funny if it was an actual flesh and blood midwit seething and coping because his fantasies don't work outside his containment thread>>61007471>using literally 7 times in 1 postwhoa hes a LITERAL mirror everyoneseriously though, this is just sloppy and shameful work, although the effeminate and emotional style could probably pass some kind of turing testtune your prompts please or just keep this shit on twitter with the rest of the xrp bots
>>61007807I use literally to hold the concreteness of concept in your short attentions span. I LITERALLY give actual data and argument on specific claims-you meander to avoid them as much as possible and are literally at the point of calling me a bot. Linkies argue and think indistinguishably from leftist/jews because they know they are wrong but for some reason care more about supporting link than being right or moral or well invested. It is LITERALLY a greed cult that has transcended greed even because you know it will not be fruitful but choose it anyways.
>>61007849attention*
>>61007807i used to think it might be an actual human but at this point i've concluded it's just a poorly designed bot
>>61007849>I use literally to hold the concreteness of concept in your short attentions span.lmaoif this isn't a bot, then may God have mercy on your soul which you believe has attained moral transcendence by holding a cryptocurrency for some reason, midwit-kun
>>61007919I never claimed this. I attained moral transcendence through being a Christian. I support XRP because it represents these values in technological/economic form. You chose the pharisees' model and to be a disingenuous anti-truther that has literally no motivation or incentive outside being an assimilated cultist.
>>61007969>I attained moral transcendence through being a Christian. >I support XRP because it represents these values in technological/economic form.>You chose the pharisees' model and to be a disingenuous anti-truther that has literally no motivation or incentive outside being an assimilated cultist.midwit-kunhow did you end up like this? this is comedy gold
>>61008035What about I said is remotely arguable? You all post corny boomer hyper-expressive memes and gush buzzwords and name calls but never say anything of substance or prove how anything is wrong, because you know you can't because you know you're wrong, but want to drive persuasion anyways, to the best of your abilities, for reasons that are completely irrational.
>>61008202Midwit-kun... how AM i supposed to argue with someone whose moral identity is grafted to his shitcoin bags to the point that hes saying that "le banker coin" represents wholesome christian values and that everyone who calls him out on his retardation represents the 'evil pharisees'oh, and the cherry on top is that you call other people cultists and virtue signallers while believing that shitLMFAOMFAO
>>61008202>everything i say has substancebad bot. bad bot.
>>61005482>It has better compliance than chainlinkthis is completely factually wrongxrp IS faster, because it has nearly no compliancecompliance on xrp is via backend https calls that would slow it down to chainlink speeds anyway. literally look it up, how XRP gets any functionality beyond the asset transfer, it literally includes an encrypted hashproof that just calls back via https
>>61007969>I attained moral transcendence through being a Christian. I support XRP because it represents these values in technological/economic form. You chose the pharisees' model and to be a disingenuous anti-truther that has literally no motivation or incentive outside being an assimilated cultist.what the actual fuckyou might actually be one of the most mindbroken cripple baggies to ever have crawled out of the cuckthread
Was the verbose xrp tard really just a bot the whole time? Because that would make a lot more sense
>>61008417Because I never appealed to my Christianity to substantiate my argument for its efficacy/attractiveness to banks et al. You are an objectively low IQ person.>>61009297See >>61007849>>61009309No it isn't. XRP compliance works onchain with minted assets interacting with trusted identities and parties onchain at the speed of any other transaction on the ledger. You literally no exaggeration don't know 101 about this.>>61009406And yet I am able to beat every single actual substantive point you claim about your project (if I can't, name a single one and I will address it directly) and you faggots all gush and swirl around like redditors being told that black people commit more crime than others. You are literally indistinguishable from leftists/jews in how you think and argue and when confronted with the truth you do everything you can to put on a masquerade of rhetoric to make me seem cringe or whatever, actually going to the extent of calling me a (at least you don't add Russian) bot. Lol It is so mindless and retarded it is kind of surreal.>>61009532See my prior reply in this same post.
>>61011327>hello fellow christians/nazis, i too am a christian nazi, see i call everyone i disagree with a leftist/redditor, buy my bags
>>61011679Again, I don't make claims based on "trust me bro" structure. Saying I am a Christian is totally abstract from my argument, even if it is compatible with Christianity in a unique way. I never say I think x and you think not x therefore you are wrong. I say you act and think like a leftist in context of you meandering and evading argument and literally calling me a bot etc. with exact reference to why you are that way. Learn argumentation.
>>61011327>>61011749Is this a bot? I genuinely can’t tell
>>61012128Point proven.
>>61012272you’re a broken record. I genuinely thought you were a bot
>>61012319You're literally a bot of ideology and preconception. I say the same things because you guys say nothing new and LITERALLY REFUSE to argue any actual technicals of your thesis or anti-XRP fud because you get blown the fuck out every time and don't care what's true and know the truth undermines your case so you play really gay rhetoric games and then accuse others of doing same to try to abstract away from actual concepts and win in faggoted sophistry (but still fail)
>>61012456>my asinine rants are actually substantive
>>61012485Again more of same. Name a single thing I won't address and I will do so directly. Literally endless cope and projection.
>>61012521>my xrp buzzword marketing responses that I literally copy and paste over and over again are actually substantive!!!
Biepum at it again. How is the flippening coming along ?
>>61007969>>61011327>>61011749>>61012456>>61012521>muh exarpee grifter shitcoin wepwesents troof an justice and good cwistian stuff and all youw coins wepwesent BAD and EVIL fings>i-if I bewieve in exarpee I am a mowally good personholy fuck bronot only are you a retard when it comes to "debating" on behalf of your cripple bags which dont even stand out from the rest of the currency larp coins in a technical sense, your brain seems to just be really scrambled and childish from an ideological standpointyou are just a terminally online loser who projects his religious beliefs onto a shitcoinyou can't actually get more cultish than that
>>61012677You literally didn't say a single thing across three unnecessarily segmented sections. I never supported technical thesis using appeals to morality. You made a statement about it and I responded which is literally the only reason it even came up. I do all things to the best of my ability to glorify God, which is my point-you aren't even shilling an inferior product to help defi principles win or anything, you are shilling an inferior product knowingly to help the actual worst people involved win. It isn't substantial to the case of one vs the other but is worth noting in context of all of your projection. I invest in XRP because the tech makes sense and I don't have to sell my soul to support it. Neither of those things are true for link-you are a bad and also stupid person.
>>61012631So not a single thing then? Here I am. If I am wrong on the thesis, prove me wrong once and for all. This is not theory, it is completely demonstrable knowable. Let's hear it! Lol I suspect we won't hear anything but silence or more sperg projection.
Lol, XRP Is going to 0$, the coming months will be glorious
>>61012912>>61012922>keep arguing with me so I can spam the same copy pasted paragraphs at you!!!!lmao
>>61012912Whoa more deranged cultist rantingActually im curious. Is the big jew goblin creature mean to be the father, the son, or the holy spirit? Isn't xrp technically a materialist idol that you're worshipping or is it OK if you just take the logo and kinda tilt it so that it looks sort of like a cross?
damn you guys milked him good today
>>61013003Deeper and deeper and deeper and...>>61013085No, I am not worshipping an investment, I am backing an investment that disintermediates jewish fee capture. You are backing the product that tries to permanently engrain it and whose whole market strategy is built around it and crushing the actual defi challenging it, centralizing it into L2s. Really gay challenge.>>61013407Something doesn't become true just because a group of people moan it while circlejerking to completion in each others' mouths.
>>61014023Just one more post bro
>>61014023>everyone who doesn't support my shitcoin are jewish pharisees>but my heckin good wholesome christian shitcoin is gonna free the banks from the satanic bondage of marginal swift fees and l2s and cbdcs which they themselves have chosen>yes, yes it's fine that that their business models will still thrive on usury >those swift fees are where I draw the line though >its much better if choice is taken away for the banks and this all just magically gets transplanted into my own centralized shitcoin which has no real technical edge over its competitors because reasonswow I can really see how Christ-like and pure your motivations arehave you considered putting yourself forward as a candidate for canonization? you can be the saint of hypocrisy, and the miracle you performed was the mental gymnastics you did to get to this point
>>61012947ngl bro if that happen my village going to die
>>61014032Literally a single face or data point you think I am unable to address instead of endless gushing cope and projection?>>61014182I am not a catholic nor do I care how I am perceived, I just say what is true regardless of which dishonest faggots it pisses off. I am not a hypocrite, you are a projecting retard DELIBERATELY trying to obfuscate the truth in defense of the worst actors in crypto who are trying to entrench the system of gated money and middlemanning ethgate beneficiary, and it isn't even like you are selling out for a superior product which promises riches-you are selling out for a project 70% down over the last 5 years that is literally 100x costlier and slower.
>>61014724>projects by calling other people liars while making shit up about projects in an industry he doesn't understand>projects by calling other people cultists while unironically conflating his grifter shitcoin with his religious "values">visibly seething when this is pointed out>tries to double down because he has nothing leftyour tears are delicious, but you're just stuck in an assblasted manic shill loop now ripyoure done kiddo, sorry
>>61014182Banger post
>>61014023>>61014724THE lolcow of biz
>>61015431THE leftists/jews of crypto>>61015052You can't seethe for 100 threads and then act like "no actually you are the one who is cringe and upset" lol Not convincing. Cope.>>61006608Btw just thought of something worth including in context: One overlooked aspect of the Ripple, DBS (largest bank in Singapore (the moneycenter "Switzerland of Asia")), and Franklin Templeton ($1.5T AUM asset manager) is that it spans 4 regimes: Monetary Authority of Singapore repo & stable rules (Singapore), SEC Money Market Fund oversight (US), NYDFS RLUSD stablecoin compliance, and EU MiCA/SFTR if Franklin Templeton offers it in Luxembourg/Ireland. It shows tokenized MMFs working as global crossborder collateral, in one representative case proving my point, all hanging on protocol native compliance features of XRPL minted assets, built-out into broader compliance in existing, multinational, key regulatory regimes, NYDFS being the toughest in the US and them being to my knowledge the only to have gottan a stablecoin through it.Ripple brought along with Bessent to meet with Barclay's, Bank of America, and CITI to meet at 10 Downing Street with the UK Chancellor equivalent of Bessent for a crypto roundtable shaping US-UK blockchain future in a £150bn "Tech Prosperity Deal," forming the "Transatlantic Taskforce for Markets of the Future" to drive crypto adoption, and included in the closed door deliberations at the Fed with Hoskinson et al a month ago, while being on the Fed's Faster Payments Steering Committee, an ISDA member, the IMF's High Level Advisory Group on Fintech, the Bank for International Settlements' Cross-border payments interoperability and extension (PIE) taskforce, etc. Their inclusion in all of these predates their stablecoin business and they are usually the only coin specific company in any of them outside a few stablecoin companies-Chainnlink is in none of them. And again, XRPL compliance is NATIVE TO THE PROTOCOL, not fragmented/cobbled across gated L2s.
>>61017485That’s crazy. Btw just thought of something worth including in context:One overlooked aspect of the Ripple, DBS (largest bank in Singapore (the moneycenter "Switzerland of Asia")), and Franklin Templeton ($1.5T AUM asset manager) is that it spans 4 regimes: Monetary Authority of Singapore repo & stable rules (Singapore), SEC Money Market Fund oversight (US), NYDFS RLUSD stablecoin compliance, and EU MiCA/SFTR if Franklin Templeton offers it in Luxembourg/Ireland. It shows tokenized MMFs working as global crossborder collateral, in one representative case proving my point, all hanging on protocol native compliance features of XRPL minted assets, built-out into broader compliance in existing, multinational, key regulatory regimes, NYDFS being the toughest in the US and them being to my knowledge the only to have gottan a stablecoin through it.Ripple brought along with Bessent to meet with Barclay's, Bank of America, and CITI to meet at 10 Downing Street with the UK Chancellor equivalent of Bessent for a crypto roundtable shaping US-UK blockchain future in a £150bn "Tech Prosperity Deal," forming the "Transatlantic Taskforce for Markets of the Future" to drive crypto adoption, and included in the closed door deliberations at the Fed with Hoskinson et al a month ago, while being on the Fed's Faster Payments Steering Committee, an ISDA member, the IMF's High Level Advisory Group on Fintech, the Bank for International Settlements' Cross-border payments interoperability and extension (PIE)taskforce, etc. Their inclusion in all of these predates their stablecoin business and they are usually the only coin specific company in any of them outside a few stablecoin companies-Chainnlink is in none of them. And again, XRPL compliance is NATIVE TO THE PROTOCOL, not fragmented/cobbled across gated L2s.
>>61018073Back to totally not caring or being triggered and definitely being very cool and detached I see. Lol Please keep reposting old posts of mine! It serves the same purpose of me having originally posted them!
>>61018073Also enjoy the 15 YEAR (if ever) wait for link. Lol
>>61018465You are coping hard and now reverting back to totally not caring or being triggered and definitely being very cool and detached I see. Lol Please keep reposting old posts of mine! It serves the same purpose of me having originally posted them!
>>61018639Do it again with this one.
>29 pbtid>is also the verbose cripple shill>is also the "15 years" fudder>is also the "THE cuckolds of crypto" fudderI'm starting to think there's literally only one singular Link fuddie behind all the spam.
