Oh wow, the token price must be going absolutely parabolic in anticipation of this.
>>61007027Unfortunately picrel made me sell today.
>We'll be home by Thanksgiving marines
>>61007048Unironically bullish.
>>61007027I’m going to laugh at you OP when it’s December 2025 and it’s trading at 15
>>61007048Unironically the price to be able to work with the eurocucks running SWIFT. "When in rome" and all that.Better be worth it in the end
>>61007027>The year is 2025....
>>61007504This. Whatever. I’m a clown world vet. My only concern is to save my children and grandchildren from this shit hole clown world by being as rich as possible.
>>61007561>My only concern is to save my children and grandchildren from this shit hole clown world by being as rich as possible.Same but my niece and nephews
https://sarsonfunds.com/swift-chainlink-integration-set-for-november-2025-from-pilot-to-live-deployment/The board is dead though, and the market is retarded. So, price unaffected.
>More price feeds
>>61007537okay i help youit is september 29, 2025 nowwatch the interview at 6:40https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdLjIVlA_DAsee date from swift docs:Standards MT November 2025SR 2025 – Business Highlights
>>61007561My plan too. But is 1700 enough? Biggest investment then I have some eth/btc and gold and silver
>>61007027there is no staking so this is meaningless
>>61007027you retards take everything so seriously you can't even understand social queues where he's making a tongue in cheek jokehe says for him every year is the year til november for the last X yearsso then he makes a joke"so this is the year til november, then its next year! next year is the year the blockchain goes woop!"he's joking about how he sees the world and how he approaches every year with the mindset this is the yearyou fucking homebound antisocial losers can't even tell he's joking again, and that he's in no way indicated this is the year.LINK is the rails of global finance given another 5-10 years without a doubt running from $3k/ to tens of thousands, but you retards will shoot yourselves too early because you don't understand what you're holding."NOOO I WANT THE WORLD TO RUN ON CHAINLINK NOW ITS BEEN A WHOLE 7 YEARS WHY CAN'T ALL FINANCE RUN ON IT TODAY!"
>>61008121No but what OP is showing is that quite literally this is the year, SWIFT & Chainlink go live in November.
>>61008121>without a doubt running from $3k/ to tens of thousandsBROTHER, IM THE BIGGEST HOPIUM FILLED SHILLED HERE AND IT'S SO HARD TO IMAGINE THESE ASTRONOMICAL PRICES ANYMORE. IM COMPLETELY BUCKBROKEN. MAYBE IN 2020 I WOULDVE BELIEVED IT, BUT AFTER 5 YEARS OF NO GAINS, MY BRAIN HAS A HARD TIME OF EVEN PUMPING BACK UP TO 50MAYBE BY TOMORROW THIS TIME WE'LL BE BACK OVER 50 WITH A MASSIVE ANNOUNCEMENT, WHO THE FUCK KNOWS
>>61008176look i get a lot of you are excited and you should bethis play is the only time we'll get a shot at bitcoin level gains ever again, fair, and it's going to happen.you are completely retarded if you think just because the rails are live, that the people who use the rails are ready.you'll see a slight up tick this year, and that's itbut a lot of you will lose hope too soon.most major banks and finance firms haven't even started tokenizing outside of Canton, which in it's own right, is substantialbut there is a difference between tokenization and interoperating the tokenized assets. interoperability as a need comes as tokenization matures and grows to a substantial amount ACROSS different networks that need to trade.Canton is ONE network and although substantial, doesn't mean interoperability yet.you need at least 2-3 CANTON SIZED tokenized networks for a need to use SWIFT with LINK.THAT WILL COME.but don't be a fool. the rails needed to be set up in advance of this future to further incentivize banks and finance firms to tokenize, to show them that when they're eventually passed initial tokenization, they will be able to interoperate.think
>>61008199unlikely to pass 40 this yearbut summer 2026 fully anticipate 100-400 depending on the narrative setting 2026 Q1.
>>61008121>>61008222>you are completely retarded if you think just because the rails are live, that the people who use the rails are ready.imagining thinking we don't get a sustained speculative pump if we an announcement that the rails are going live with chainlinkmost of ct is so desensitized to bank adoption due to years of XRP shilling that they don't believe it's going to happenif SWIFT say that chainlink is live then everything changesobviously it will be a process of years to decades for adoption of smart contracts but it's just ptsd to say that an in-production announcement doesn't shift the dialin saying all that, i would still be surprised to see an annoucement
>>61008222Only responding because of your digits. There will be a 1 year grace period to transfer over to the new messaging system. >Financial institutions must update their IT systems and improve data quality to be able to provide structured postal addresses, purpose codes, and Legal Entity Identifiers (LEIs)https://pages.chain.link/hubfs/e/GLEIF_Chainlink_Identity_Report.pdf
>>61007048For me its hu hu
>>61007679Actual live deploy and the ptsd here means all we get is a meh There really are only 13 anons left here arent thereBut to state it out loud, this is the enterprise abstraction layer liveSomething even the strongest believer thought was vaporware a year ago and is exceeding the wildest expectations from the 2018 eraEth could only wish for this type of integration, etherilize is only now going to start looking where big serg was at for 2016 at the latest
>>61008121Thats a lot of words for this is the year
anyone wanna unstake so i can get my toes wet? just wanna see what it feels like being in the exclusive pool
>>61008222True adoption takes time, but everything gets frontrun, markets are forward lookingThis year was the last time to get in cheap, a speculative pump can happen any moment and then you are sidelined foreverAlso stable coins interop will happen real fastAnd as has been said xrp will make us richThats 100+ bil market cap thats going to be flipped once it becomes clear that xrps valuation narrative has been realized by another project and its value is actually zero now
>>61007956Are you kidding me? This is literally lifetime opportunity aka 4th industrial revolution investment and you still hold boomer shit?
>>61008657Chainlinkgod is really riled up over on Twitter because Sergey says this every year and the other Twitter shill accounts are upset because of his lack of faith in the cult. Check Twitter anon I am not even joking
>>61007027I swear I visit /biz/ less than I otherwise would because of the linkies.
>>61007203Can't wait to see my sweetheart. The brass said it'll be over by Christmas.
>>61007566Why can't you have a family of your own?
>>61008879>Check Twitter
>>61008199Checked and it looks like your capslock has been fixed at last.
>>61007048That pic is covid era old, anon
>>61008886How about this thread? What are you doing here?
>>61008879Thanks for the reminder anon I would never have checked Twitter let alone Chainlinkgods profile without your based and timely reminder. This is why I come here take note shills. Solid old days vibes thanks again anon stay based and redpilled
>>61007027
>>61009066Bitching and complaining
>>61009082Fudsisters, our response?
>>61009082nooooo my $100k bonus is literally on its way to my bank account right now wait for me i want to buy morewhy are bank transactions so fucking slow fuck
>>61009123Dont worry nothing will pump LINKs price
wow I bet Chainlink is mooning on this news HAHAHAHAHAHAH
>>61009161why would you look at a 7 year chart to see if it's mooning on news? lmaoamateur hour over here
>>61009120Easy, price?... oh.. and chart?...
this must be chainlinkquestion is... is an announcement coming at sibos... or smartcon... or not yet
>>61009082Chainlink wasn't even mentioned in that article btw.They probably never will. "uh, it just works, ok? Stop asking questions!"
>>61009289Developing their own ledger for cross border paymentsThere is a verbose cult that isnt going to like that
>>61007956It fucking better me enough. I only have 1100. But I am steaked, which has been really good. I’ve almost earned 100 extra stinkys.
>>61009457>>61009289>building on earlier pilots, Swift also will add capability to support interoperabilityWho were those "earlier pilots" done with?
>>61008975I shan't breed
>>61009289what happened to babka or whatever
>>61009484>Who were those "earlier pilots" done with?Multiple different "chains". They're never specific. Even with all the shit talking their linkedIn queen does they still wind up ironically working with ripple too. So it could be a multitude of different "pilots". It's all so tiresome.
>>61009651>Multiple different "chains".The pilots refer to interoperability pilots between chains.
>>61009659It really pisses me off we get such bullish news and the price tanks. I'm genuinely losing hope. Every.Single. Year.
>>61009666We’re up like 3% today.
>>61009682We're down, when did you check last? Also 3% is nothing. We should be mooning. We literally never pump on bullish news and I'm tried of pretending im not running on copium. It's bullshit anon.
>>61009682holy fuck i literally just retired
>>61009715We’re up 3.7% in 24hrs. I mean it’s not great but zoom out and remember when we were at $6.66 for fucking YEARS.
I really don't understand what exactly is bullish? Chainlink wasn't even mentioned.
>>61008296>imagining thinking we don't get a sustained speculative pump if we an announcement that the rails are going live with chainlinkWe already had this announcement, the market didn't react because smart money already got in on the sly and retail doesn't buy anything if it hasn't been shilled by their clickbaiter of choice
>>61008121>reddit spacing>ignoring the context in favor of how he views the video and ignores the last few lines he says where he "I actually think this is the year...." "November 15th" - Tom "No thanksgiving" l-Serg "I actually think this is it this time"dont really care either way because even if the partners go live it doesnt mean smartcontracts are being actively used yet but there will be inbound cash whenever we see JP Morgna/Swift/Citi are listed as green on the partnership page
>>61008121you're starting to realize how the grift works, but still think there's some end game where you "win" so you're about halfway there buddyto the losers here, sergey could point at the sky in the middle of a thunderstorm and they'd swear it's not raining because he said sosergey can afford to say that every year because he's a billionaire, directly from selling said liesit's actually in his best interest to delay things year after year because it's another year he can sell tokens he printed out of thin air for additional billionsthis is not a new conceptmadoff went to prison for this but in today's world i'm not even sure what's illegal anymorei think the link team has probably made enough payoffs to be on a exemption list, at least with the current regime
>>61008222hey man can you not jack my writing style it's confusing for my readers herethanks
>>61009082>landmark momentlmfaothis.just.doesn't.work in 2025, people have realized words like this no longer have meaningit's the same as the liberals calling everyone fascist and racistread the boy who cried wolfyour hubris was your downfall
>>61010169I've become convinced that since lefties found the word "grift", it's become completely meaningless. You have no clue what a true grift is. Take Madoff, his ponzi scheme operation only employed 15 people. He managed to pull off a 65B "grift" with just 15 people. You should ask yourself: why would a grifter share his grift with additional people, risking exposure and having to share the profits with more people? Why would CLL hire all these people if they never intend to actually build something? I swear Thomas, you're a fucking retard and always have been. My personal favorite is when you likened the building costs of Chainlink to the building costs of the WTC. A kid in a grown men's body (without a wife and children, I must add).
>>61010174>my readers shut the fuck up you retarded porn addict
>>61010232>muh hirees gee I dunno anon, why did Theranos employ 800 people at their peak? Did Holmes wanted to share her grift with additional people? Was it perhaps an attempt to legitimize their bullshit organization in the eyes of morons, such as yourself? I think you should be the one asking yourself these questions, anon
>>61010487Ah yes, thank god you arrived. We desperately needed to hear from the angry jeet with the broken English.
>>61010499amazing retort brokeep harping on about muh hundreds of employees, as if this means anything
>>61010506>keep harping on about muh hundreds of employeesFuddies have been doing exactly that for years.
>>61010516...yes, because it's not bullish, you actual brainlet
>>61010506>hundreds of employees doesn't mean anything>>61010530>hundreds of employees is bearishkys
>>61010537>hundreds of employees do not legitimize a fraudulent organization, see Enron (20,600 people lmao), Theranos etcftfy, you pedantic sperg
>>61010232>You should ask yourself: why would a grifter share his grift with additional peoplenot every grift is the exact same bro maybe serg thought to himself that's where ol bern went wrong...i'll go out and hire as many people as possible so it looks like we're some huge successful companyhow many people at cl actually know the inner workings/financials of the company anyways? i bet it's less than 20>Why would CLL hire all these people if they never intend to actually build something?see this is where your credibility is shot... theranos had 800 employees at its peakenron had 20,000 worldcom had 80,000ftx had 300>I swear Thomas, you're a fucking retard and always have beensays the guy who hasn't made a dime for 5 years straight in one of the largest bull markets in history> My personal favorite is when you likened the building costs of Chainlink to the building costs of the WTCit was actually a pretty funny comparison, because at least with a building, something was actually built you on the other hand have to beg a 26 year old "god" for software updates lmfao
>>61010547>hundreds of employees do not legitimize an organization>... but they do DElegitimize itFuddie logic.kys
>>61010273>>my readers>shut the fuck up you retarded porn addictvarys has entered in the chat>duuuuuuuuuuuude if i can't beat off, neither can you!!!!bro you need to talk to someone
>>61010556800 people for a fucking startup with no functioning products is a red flag, yesyou do realize you're getting 'oxed once this shit inevitably implodes, right?
>>61010560>no functioning products
>>61010570did I stutter?tick tock, shiller, your time's almost up
>>61010560funny how their argument about employee count immediately backfired>>61010556bro scroll up and stop trying to win debatesyour boy above tried to bring up employee headcount as a disqualifier of fraud and immediately got btfo take that l kid
>>61010578>no functioning products
>functioning productsLOL >duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude QUADRILLIONS>duuuuuuuuuuuude OFFCHAIN revenue that's HISTORICAL
>>61007048fae/faer here.
>Pic rel fresho otta SibosKekfuddies lmao
>>61010551All of these businesses except for Theranos had real, working products and/or services, where most employees worked on actual projects without knowing there was fraud going in the background. Even Bernie's pyramid scheme was concocted within a company of 200, where only 15 people knew of the ponzi stuff going on and the rest of the company was a legit brokerage. Same for FTX where SBF and his squirrel were colluding to trade against users with their owns funds. I fail to see how any of these companies are similar to CLL. The smoking gun here is that Chainlink has 700 employees, and in the past some companies supposedly used company growth as a cover for lack of actual substance? Or are you saying CLL is mostly legit but there are some crooks at the top committing fraud? Or is it a Theranos style bluff where everyone but the most junior employees know it's all bullshit but they're keeping the charade going to hopefully cash out at a higher valuation? All of these different fraud styles bring different motives and behavior with them, but I feel to see how Chainlink fits the pattern. According to you, what is the Chainlink scam endgame? >>61010587>shows an example that proves the product doesn't just work, it also transferred $20 million cross chain for a mere $669Lmao.
>>61010628
>>61010952WOW A PICTURE!!!WHO FUCKING CARES, DUDE. THE PRICE IS STILL 20 FUCKING BUCKS. GET A FUCKING CLUE ALREADY AND LEARN HOW TO READ THE ROOM
>>61010965
>>61010984SO THAT'S WHAT FISHY LOOKS LIKE. ALWAYS KNEW HE WAS A FUCKING NERD
>>61010952linkchuds...its over...
>>61010945>is it a Theranos style bluff where everyone but the most junior employees know it's all bullshit but they're keeping the charade going to hopefully cash out at a higher valuation?bingo>I fail to see how Chainlink fits the patternyou'll come around eventually
>>61010558bro you were doxxed as a suicidal porn addict. is this how you cope? Lmfao
>>61011233>Lmfao>downvotesit's not authentic typing this as tears stream from your eyes son>>61010945>All of these businesses except for Theranos had real, working products and/or services, where most employees worked on actual projectsthe majority of cl employees most likely do not touch "products", ie marketing/pr, sales force, investor relations, accounting, legal, hr, it, etc and no one outside of top management sees financials>According to you, what is the Chainlink scam endgame?same as it is for every grift to stay out of legal troublethey've already given themselves generational wealth, fully funded a startup company using a funding token with no connection to the business without having to give up a single % of equity or taking on debtso now they just need a clean walk away
>>61010945>>shows an example that proves the product doesn't just work, it also transferred $20 million cross chain for a mere $669>Lmao.and?isn't chainlink subsidizing those fees? aka it's coming out of your pocket this cost them billions of dollar to build and it's giving a vending machine return
>>61010952it's so over
LINK is a pilot coin... nothing will ever go into production
>>61007945all i’m hiring is that sergey is a permabull and that this is the year that he feels bullish enough to even give a public opinion that this is the yeari don’t doubt that they do or release something but even sergey can’t predict price action or even if banks actually end up using blockchain (or their costumers so to speak if there is a big enough need)that cements for me that they aren’t plotting illuminati style controlling every single pump or dump behind closed curtain they believe in blockchain and they want to see it usedbut they don’t know if anything will actually bare fruitspersonally i think it will but we can’t see into the future and neither can sergey
>>61010586cripples are liars, they just can't help themselves
>>61012046xrp is a jew coin founded by jews and shilled by jews and browns
>>61007679>This November 2025, the world’s largest financial messaging network, SWIFT, will officially launch its integration with Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP), connecting blockchain technology to more than 11,000 banks and institutions worldwide.
>>61012266It's bs. Nothing will happen. If Swift was going live with LINK they would say so in Sibos.
