Nadine of Swift explains that they don't trust the ChainLink oracle service even after 7 years of working with them, what better fud is there?https://youtu.be/7eCrqQs6RiI?si=udPCh4ex6EFgXouS&t=987
Nice try fuddie but the talk is about the new corporate actions initiative and not everything else that chainlink is going live with SWIFT in november.
I just unstaked and sold all my LINK.
>>61014661if anything big were to happen between swift and chainlink in 1 month wouldn't they talk about it now at sibos
>Nadine Chakar>of Swiftuh...
>>61014736Of course, if chainlink was really as important and bullish as the paid shills advertise, dont you think it would have been front ran by insiders years ago already?
>>61014850why didn't bitcoin hit 100k in 2008
>>61014799Excuse me. Of DTCC point still stands, why are boomers so slow, they think they will live forever.
>>61014661>chainlink is going live with SWIFT in novemberIt's literally not. They're just using it for data in a limited capacity while testing some 'pilots'. Huge fucking nothingburger.
>>61014572They trust Chainlink just not the process. I wouldn't trust AI either to automate corporate actions without heavy handed actions from a human much less have it as a set and forget it where it's completely hands off on their end.
>>61014890We're not far from the point where I would trust a bunch of AIs doing commit/reveal over a single person.
>>61014572She's saying the exact opposite.They've been trying to automate data "for decades", and now blockchain oracles (i.e. Chainlink) have given them a "better shot than we've ever had".In other words she's saying Chainlink is the key to finally automating the global financial markets.She couldn't have uttered a more bullish general statement.
>>61014880Back to your containment thread faggot >>61005945
>>61014922I have 5k link you fucking sperg. Not every criticism = xrp you dumb bitch. Fuck i hate this "community".
>>61014924The little phrase "Link is just for data" gives you away instantly, xerpfren.
LINK is the only token that is NOT allowed to pump before it has been 100% adoptedEven though everything has been confirmed if you know where to look, LINK powering the next financial system, price is NOT allowed to increase before the system has in fact been implemented completely. Then, and only then, is the price allowed to god candle to 1k.Before then, price is going to be rangebound between 10$-30$ and will NOT go higher than this. This is just a fact, dare I say, a law of nature.t. fudcuck mindspace
>>61014892if you go back about 30 second of OP's timestamp they also describe it as an issue they've been looking into solving for decades. This also means that they are willing to wait another 10 years of continuing to do test pilots and breadcrumbs before they actually go full scale. CLL doesn't care about ICO investors that are on a basket weaving forum saying "when lambo" every single day. They care about solidifying themselves permanently. Of course this doesn't mean that the price won't inflate eventually, it just guarantees that it will happen eventually. From Nadine's mouth directly, this isn't their first rodeo and there have been hundreds of Oracle providers that have been manipulated then ditched.
>>61014926>Link is just for dataFor the pilots you fucking moron.
>>61014947>>>61014922
>>61014947These comments never made sense to me. Yea LINK is for data. What do you think "muh value" on your ghostchain is? It's data. >>61014850This is interesting. Chainlink isn't important. But it is clearly the most important, otherwise they wouldn't be on stage. this entire thread... >Cope
>>61015038if it's so important, why are you still poor?
>>61015061This market doesn't value importance.See XRP, it has the third highest value in all of crypto but nobody uses it.
>>61015069then why did you buy and continue to hold after realizing that your definition of importance isn't that important to the rest of the market?you might be retarded
>>61015061So it is important? Or it isn't important? Which one is it? Why would you think I'm poor? Would you like to see my staking rewards? Bit uncouth, but you are an arsehole.
>>61015092well, phoneposting is usually a sign that you're poor as fuck>is it important?not to me
>>61015091The entire philosophy of investing is buying undervalued things
>>61015101undervalued according to (You)
>>61015097Poor grammer is usually a sign you are stupid. If you are stupid, you are poor. So, as you are stupid and poor. Why would anyone care what you think? I care about SWIFT, DTCC, Euroclear and 100's of other FMI's think.
>>61015106No, according to defi and tradfi.
>>61015109why don't you invest in them instead of an asset which belongs to a market that doesn't value what you deem as "important"?
>>61015111then why isn't defi or tradfi buying it?
>>61015116Who says they aren't?
>>61015118who says they are?
>>61015120You asked why they aren't.
>>61015122correct me then, who says they are?
>>61015126I don't know if they are, I never claimed to.
>>61015129>defi and tradfi believe it's much important sirs>idk if they're buying do lol, I simply trust the experts holy fuck
>>61015136They most likely are buying though.
>>61015113Clearly poor and stupid. You buy undervalued assets. You sell overvalued assets. Chainlink will be overvalued at some point. I will sell then. And continue my existence of shit posting and casual investing while raising my young family.
>>61015144Okay Fishy.Is your wife still fucking your kids swimming coach while you sit at home getting into arguments on Twitter?
>>61014572Chainlink seems to have shackled itself to aging institutions like SWIFT and DTCC, which are locked into the Western sphere. The geopolitical landscape shifts and the eastern bloc is building alternatives. The stage looks set for a digital-native economy, and other projects may be better positioned to capture it. A new disruptor, something like Hyperliquid, could easily vampire attack these legacy systems with far greater efficiency.I’m starting to think the whole “we’re working with institutions” playbook is misguided. It makes more sense to focus on on-chain natives, who move faster and generate far higher multiples.Fuck Sergey and his carrot dangling.8 FUCKING YEARS.
It's over.
>>610147364shit once again thinks I'm spamming. See picrel
>>61015233>Chainlink seems to have shackled itself to aging institutions like SWIFT and DTCCExcept Chainlink is the king of Defi too lolYou're a retarded faggot.
>>61015247They're losing their lead.They were the only game in town, now they're getting fucked.For years people asked for push based Oracles and they had to be kicked in the balls by VC funded shitcoins to finally understand.
>>61015268Pyth being even considered by the US gov should light a bulb.Sacks isn't a retard.
>>61015268>moves the goalposts from "institutions is all they have" to "but they're losing their Defi lead">is still wrongChainlink defi dominance is at ATH right now.And that's without even considering that Chronicle (aka Maker) is now mostly Chainlink too.
>>61015275also wasn't there a thread a few years ago when chainlink released push based oracles, then someone (clearly from the pyth team) commented on biz about how 'we' released it first. then someone posted chainlink's announcement which was clearly before pyth's, called out the 'who is we', and then they deleted their post and abandoned the thread. i wish i had that screencap still
>>61015209It is funny that you think anyone coherent talking about LINK is some guy on twitter.How much of your life have you spent arguing with him? Do you regret the time wasted? What could you have done that is productive? Does he make you feel stupid as well? Suppose it's not hard.
>>61015275Fair. I made my money on LINK anyway, bought in 2017.Looking at Pyth today:>DAO with ~8% APY rewards>DAO votes on fees>sharp price moves on news>large community>visible adoptionMeanwhile, I spent the past decade holding LINK, collecting crumbs. I can keep clinging to that, or stop acting like a boomer and shift capital to something more productive.As for TVS, sure, they dominate. But I’ve seen them change their headline KPI three times. Apple has a small global market share yet captures most of the profit. I’d rather hold Apple than Samsung.Why even invest in oracles anyway? I'm new money today, I look at the state of the market, do a little research, not sure I'd put my money in LINK. People are already convinced Oracles are important.
>>61015292>i wish i had that screencap stillBrother, you are in luck
>>61015391Thanks but the one I’m talking about is a biz post
>>61015304You'd have to be three times the man you are to have enough balls to debate me. How's it feel to be so fragile Fishy? To be forced to hide behind the block button because you're getting humiliated in front of your Chainlink gay boys.
>>61015461>Be schizo >1 personality devoted to fud'ing a cryptocurrency>Focus obsessively on an anon twitter user>Everyone is this twitter user if they talk about this cryptocurrency>Realisation everyone has blocked him and now his entire personality is rudderless and unacknowledged. You are here. >Kill self over wasting your own life. Meds. Now. It doesn't have to end like this.
>>61014661To be fair, she was saying, on a wider level, "we dont think tradfi trusts the truth of decentralized oracles" ...yet - not just with corporate actions. It was strange - Nadines been there from the start, as has Jonathan and he sort of left him out there hanging, dying on stage. I got the impression watching this, Sergey had been led to believe it was a coronation, and was ambushed by the negativity here. I dont know if there was a message from upstairs "we're still hiding" - or its punishment for Chainlink openly saying the switch was flipped, but they put a fucking circuit breaker in on it yesterday if so.
>>61015520>gets called out>"t-that's not me, y-you're schizo"Okay Fishy, you carry on hiding online like you hide in real life. You ever leave the house these days? I guess being terminally online means you don't get out much. Maybe if you were more like Mike at Nitro then your wife would love you again.
>>61014572SAY IT WITH ME MARINES15 MORE YEARS
>>61015268Chainlink has had pushed based oracles since before any of these “competitors” existed. 2019. Find me a “competitor” still around today who did it first. Redstone launched in 2023, Pyth in 2021. Chainlink was and still is literally years ahead of these clowns and the gap only widens every day.
>>61015520look at this pussy trying to use passive aggressive liberal shaming in 2025you have no ballsit's ok to admit you're pissed that your hero fishy is getting called out
>>61015520ooooh shit the adem and eve poster is back!got any more amazing predictions for ((us))?
>>61015577>>61016148>>61016158These are the same person.He's the Link fuddie who obsesses over Link and all Link-adjacent people like CLG, fishy, biepum, namefags, ...
>>61016172NO! TIS I, ARTEMIS!
>>61016172wew lad
>>61016194Yeah you definitely arent switching IDs
>>61016220yes, I definitely am not, are you though?I mean, aren't you this guy?>>61016172
>>61016226You have a massive obsession with personalities who are associated with a coin you hate.Even those who actually like Link do not care about these people.That makes you stand out.
>>61016262sorry mate, I truly am not the guy you think I am lolwhy do you keep switching ids tho?
>LINK FAGS EATING THIER OWN AFTER CHAINLINK ANNOUNCED 15 - 20 YEARS ADOPTION TIMELINE kek. Baggies.
>>61016270I don't think you understand.There isn't one single legit Link holder who gives half a shit about figures like CLG or Fishy. But here you are trying to convince us that there are so many Link HATERS who can't stop talking about them that there are three of them concurrently posting itt right now.It's clearly you and only you.
>>6101457215-20 years you heard it from Nadine link marines WAGMI
>>61014572Months ago Swift and DTCC were both listed as platinum sponsors of SmartCon, but some time since then DTCC was dropped from the page. That struck me as odd for a while now, and now Nadine has a much more muted tone than in the past. Doesn't exactly inspire confidence
>>61015414i know the one you're talking about. anon says "who's we?", and the original post is immediately deleted.
>>61016400It’s especially weird that Sergey keeps pressuring timelines, gets shut down openly by his copanelists that these are still in experimentation and need longevity and scale time over another 15-20 years to truly back the financial system, but he just autistically continues on his own imagining they didn’t say what they just said.It’s like he’s trying to use this event to put hype behind CLL when all they wanted was to finally formalize the conversations and long term planning
>>61016415>Things a fuddie imagined happening but never didIncredible, the fuddie mind.
>>61016400>Months ago Swift and DTCC were both listed as platinum sponsors of SmartConDTCC was never a smartcon sponsor.>Nadine has a much more muted toneNo she doesn't.She's saying the work with Chainlink has put them closer than ever to global production release, but they (i.e. DTCC) are not quite there yet. Which is pretty much what she always said.
>>61016300kek this is hilarious
>>61016446yeah, i just watched the full keynote rather than just the couple clips posted in the threads that are up right now about it. muted definitely isn't the right term, but she's absolutely hedging the timelines. and it makes sense, her rationale rings true -- it's gonna take a while before everything is DLT-based. there's going to be a several-year period where trad-fi coexists with de-fi. she also said they've been working on the corporate actions problem for decades and never actually had a shot at solving it until now, so that's bullish af (assuming staking 1.0 is actually released and the tokenomics are allowed to kick in). i was hoping this was the year, but that old familiar feeling is creeping back in.in truth, it doesn't matter in the slightest to me (aside from me just being impatient). LINK is the golden ticket, the only question is when.
>>61016443Are we getting trolled by Indians right now I can’t tell > no sar, when she say 20 year she mean only 20 Brahma seconds sar means she is confuse
>>61015461> You'd have to be three times the man you are to have enough balls to debate me.lmao what am I reading
>>61016262My theory is that this guy is either banned from X for unhinged behaviour or blocked by the people who live rent-free in his head so he comes on here and rants about them at every available opportunity as if he's directly speaking to them.Big time Norman Bates vibes and he's completely unaware of how much of a lunatic it makes him sound.
>>61016539time stamp where she says 15-20 years.you won’t, because she never said it.
>>61016415>that these are still in experimentation and need longevity and scale time over another 15-20 years to truly back the financial system,can you post timestamp of this specific bit? go ahead. protip: you won't because is not there you lying kike
>>61016172>These are the same person.the resident junior gman has checked in have you ever thought about doing some pi work on the side? or are you "retired"
>>61016415>It’s especially weird that Sergey keeps pressuring timelines, gets shut down openly by his copanelists that these are still in experimentation and need longevity and scale time over another 15-20 years to truly back the financial system, but he just autistically continues on his own imagining they didn’t say what they just said.he really is a sick piece of shit he needs this stuff to hurry up and happen (it won't) to keep himself out of prison when we get the next president, otherwise he'll be trying to explain why he raised $10b for powerpoint slidesthe banks on the other hand aren't in a rushtheir business records record profits every year and the world banking system works fine as is, every single day
>>61014932Actually based, gives plenty of time to accumulate
>>61017672>It's Sergey's fault banks are slow to changelolNobody has moved the banks towards crypto adoption more than Sergey, he's the absolute last crypto person you should be angry at. I bet people have called you stupid to your face many times in your life, aye?
>>61016446>>61016636>>61017755these are all the same person btw
>>61017826We know.
>>61017826Meds.
>>61017711CHECKEDYOU'VE HAD 8 FUCKING YEARS, ASSHOLEMOTHERFUCKERS LIKE YOU SHOULD HAVE BEEN PRICED OUT IN 2019.
>>61014572Ok so you're a nigger. She's fro. The dtcc not swift. Opinion discarded
>>61016172>Every fuddie is the same person.It is I who dubbed you biepum.
something feels wrong about assuming AIs and decentralized oracles can determine what is true or false at scale 100% of the time. if 20 different AIs all hallucinate on an event and immutably record something that never happened, what happens then?this single point of confusion for me is the only thing that is a thorn in my mind about chainlink and its vision
>>61016415sergey pivoted to tradfi cuck and is now suffering the consequences. he had years to harness the memetic energy of 4chan and wasted it. now he gets what he deserves.
I’ve been resisting twitter for years now (been on this site since the days of habbo hotel and /b/ actually celebrating cp) but it’s unironically the better platform now. I watched the interview, there was no “15-20 years” statement, the most bearish part was Nadine saying it’s still a ways from production but shortly after that she clarified “it’s no longer an issue of ‘if’, but ‘when’”. This board has always been full of garbage but it used to be interesting and funny fud with nuggets of extremely useful truth you’d find nowhere else on the internet. Now basically all those nuggets show up on twitter first, often only there, and this place went from 90% trash to 99.8% trash.
