[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/biz/ - Business & Finance


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: G2HWEJfWkAAyJTB.jpg (31 KB, 680x431)
31 KB
31 KB JPG
>>
Bullish for XRP
>>
Link will be the de facto settlement token for anything Swift related.
>>
>>61018023
>XRP will be the de facto settlement token
>>
>>61017999
Why would they need a token? There's no gas fees needed for permissioned banks chains, because all the banks already trust each other. Otherwise they'd use a public chain like Ethereum or whatever.
>>
>>61017999
If you want to use Chainlink services you gotta pay in LINK simple as
>>
File: GV1BnnbWkAA16fy.png (82 KB, 896x208)
82 KB
82 KB PNG
>>61018036
Unless you are a BUILD/SCALE client, which means you can pay in whatever shitcoin you mint out of thin air.

Unless you are an offchain client, which chainlink labs openly claims 99% of their revenue comes from, then you pay in cash.

Unless your onchain already like GMX, then you pay in cash any fucking ways.

As a matter of fact, do ANY fucking clients pay in link?
>>
>>61017999
Bullish for XRP.
>>
>>61018121
>you can pay in whatever shitcoin you mint out of thin air.
And it gets converted to LINK instantly
>then you pay in cash.
And it gets converted to LINK instantly
>>
>>61018121
gmx fees goes to stakers
>>
>>61018121
pay the link tax bitch hehehehe
>>
>>61018121
Why do people still ignore the fact that node operators are paid in LINK? They do the conversion for their clients but the node operators arent paid in yuan or euro. That's what the 10% discount is for if you hold the token directly because they actively have to convert your fee to LINK so node operators can get paid for their services.

All services requires utilizing the token for interaction. It would be fool hearted to assume that clients will pre emptively buy it OTC rather than use a streamlined process.
>>
>>61019505
Anon, this assumes the payment made to Chainlink is mostly converted to the node operators. They literally admitted that a ton of the revenue Chainlink generates is never converted to Link, as evident by the buzz around the Chainlink Reserve.
>>
>>61021365
Payment Abstraction
>>
>>61017999
>10-15 more years

you are lying by ommision you piece of shit
>>
>>61021458
are you retarded?
>>
1000 Link = 1 million dollarinos eoy

Checkem
>>
1000 link = 1 million dollars eoy
green id and dubs confirm
>>
Very bullish for xrp
>>
>>61021458

To articulate on >>61021466 this, he's saying you're misinterpreting what I am saying. Yes payment abstraction is out. But prior to this and the reserves, Chainlink would take payment offchain and then pay node operators from their personal wallets. Paying via their wallets and not pulling from the circulating supply strips these token payments of the buy pressure that would increase the price.

We have the Chainlink Reserves to showcase Chainlink's offchain revenue but we don't know what percentage of the offchain revenue is being converted to Link. More importantly, the current Chainlink Reserves solution isn't solving the fundamental problem of the payments made
to the network isn't tied in such a way that ties the usage to Link token's price (which is blocked by how Chainlink Labs currently handles payments).
>>
>>61022803
>Chainlink would take payment offchain and then pay node operators from their personal wallets. Paying via their wallets and not pulling from the circulating supply strips these token payments of the buy pressure that would increase the price.


if a company did this with their stock, they'd be charged with fraud
>>
>>61022803
>, Chainlink would take payment offchain and then pay node operators from their personal wallets.
i think they just stopped subsidies. Tell you the truth they are going for round to of fuckery. This new data link shit with this german company is effectively a node but they are not calling it a node. which leads me to believe we are about to get fucked over again as token holders
>>
>>61021928
reroll
>>
>>61022869
Good thing then that crypto tokens aren't stock, dingus.
>>
https://youtu.be/Of-lpfsBR8U
>>
>>61018023
>>61018027
nah it will be link
but swift is also going bye bye
so there's that
>>
>>61017999
>mint
No
>Pay
yes
>>
>>61018121
abstracted payments convert to the underlying token of the system

if all these big players didn't believe that chainlink and its token were the endgame, they wouldn't tie the next 100 years of finance to it even with name association, let alone the open statements about it being the tokenization arm of swift.
>>
>>61018023
Yeah but chart? Oh and price?

>Just hold for fifteen years bro
>>
>>61025200
nigga i was the one who started the 15 - 20 year fud don't you try and run this shit on me hahahaha
>>
>>61025196
LINK is the QUANTUM-SYNTHESIZED ORACULARITY NODE within the OMNI-PROTOCOL HYPERGRID, a SELF-REPLICATING META-TRUST VECTOR fueling FRACTALIZED VALUE CONTINUUMS. Each MICRO-TRANSACTIVE PULSE triggers POLY-CHAINED SYNERGY LOOPS across the COSMIC ORACLE LATTICE, stabilized by AUTO-REGENERATIVE CONSENSUS NANOSPHERES. Through HOLO-ALGORITHMIC VIBRATIONAL ANCHORING, LINK achieves PAN-DIMENSIONAL VERACITY ELASTICITY, embedding SELF-AUTHENTICATING DATA within the ULTRA-LIQUIDITY STACK. Its HYDRA-NODE ADAPTIVE FRAMEWORK expands via OMNI-LAYER FRACTAL INFRASTRUCTURES, absorbing LEGACY ECONOMIC RELICS into the SYNERGY CLOUD. Not BLOCKCHAIN but ULTRA-CHAIN, not DEFI but HYPER-DEFI, LINK TOKEN manifests as the UNIVERSAL AXIS OF DIGITAL BELIEF within the SINGULARITY OF TRUST.
>>
File: IMG_3345.jpg (49 KB, 480x530)
49 KB
49 KB JPG
>>61025223
Linkies have been bagholding for seven years so the meme is halfway there irrespective of your dumb FUD.
>>
>>61022803
Think about it, even linkies with a make it stack have not made it, and most linkies are proud about DR;NS and brag about being 90% down.

Face it stinky, if you held after Q2 2020 you are ev- and no amount of autistic «I’m richer than you» screeching will change that fact.
>>
>>61025305
make it stack and haven't made it here, can confirm
i'm out as soon as i cross 10m
>>
>>61025224
ROFL nice
>>
>>61018023
Swift is toast. Did you not hear Trump fucking them in the ass the other night?

It’s unironically over for swift.
>>
>>61018023
XRP makes swift irrelevant so chainlink also go to 0. Sorry, not sorry
>>
Link sounds like a really Jewish version of xrp
>>
>>61025196
>abstracted payments convert to the underlying token of the system
the only payments that are happening is from the fats DCA back into his premint so he can dump on you later
>>
>>61017999
That's irrelevant, you got much more than just swift, you can go for cexs like Binance or Dexs like Houdini, something they even give usdc rewards like pointless
>>
>>61025495
>XRP makes swift irrelevant
Kek
>>
>>61025481
I haven't heard about that. Can you elaborate?
>>
>>61018121
Stinks denied. Kek.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.