Fellow Stink Marines, your counter?
>you now remember
>>61019948>>61019950I’ll answer your question with a question What do you think banks want to use:>1) 15 minute finality with 100% up time and guaranteed security, still shaving roughly 24-48 hrs off of finality time and making it so they can securely execute numerous smart contracts saving them billions and trillions annually and opening up brand new secure markets across multiple blockchains OR>2) 2 second finality with no security guarantees where actually the blockchain might just stop working and take hours to boot back up and no connection to anything useful or any liquidity
>>61020010Hello SWIFT employee. Here's a 8 minute video of Trump shit talking swift on live tv. From about 2 days ago. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlLdD-2Ltco
>>61020010The 15 minute finality is actually bs as well, but xrpaypigs are desperate for anything at this point so they're using llms for copium as per usual.In reality it's based on source / destination chain and the amount added on top of that by interop itself is very little. It's like grok pulled from the VERY early beta eth crosschain docs where that was the longest example runtime with several security checks. Actual times are a couple secs to a few minutes between chains while cripples thinks its an achievement to reach those speeds in their own centralized UNL environment, which pretty much any popular l1 or l2 reaches (the difference is those chains are decentralized, actually see usage, and dont randomly go down or get fucked up by a patch for several hours)
>>61020031>US exits futureSucks to be an American then I guess?
>>61020226no it's definitely because of finality time. outbound from avax is near instantaneous for this reason, for example. all bridges do this for safety, it's not just ccip. we're all used to "fast" bridges because there is relayer infrastructure forwarding the money before finality completes.
>>61020010Based. /thread. Looks like it’s gonna be a few more years to really cash in my stinky stack, but that’s ok.
Eric Trump just mentioned how XRP would take over Swift on Fox BusinessDavid Schwartz aka Satoshi joined the board of directorsRipple XRP is literally ready now
the greatest trick that ripple ever pulled was convincing a ton of mediocre nobodies with average to below average intelligence that they know better than the people who run the most important financial system in the world
It doesn't matter, swift will have their own block chain and xrp will not be replacing it....how long will it take for the news to set in before xrp whales start dumping it?
>>61020010>>2) 2 second finality with no security guarantees where actually the blockchain might just stop working and take hours to boot back up and no connection to anything useful or any liquidityProtocol built with liquidity at its coreHas not stopped working since inception (And the few hours of transactions stalling is not a shut down)Its hilarious how butthurt you are biepum. 15 minutes to settle on ccip? Holy shit to think you tards even had a chance.The seething and the lies. You got some heavy bags you yeet. Send arsch goyal my regards.
>>61020568>The seething and the lies.yes, there's a lot of that coming from you
>>61019948Intercontintental Exchange (Parent company of Nasdaq)DTCC (Depository and Trust Clearing Corporation)EuroClearSWIFTUBSJP MorganFranklin TempletonSBIDeutsche Börse GroupANZ Bank
>>61021059Goldman SachsSantanderGLEIF (Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation)VisaMastercard
>>61021063BNY MellonClearstreamCiti GroupBNP ParibasWellington ManagementFidelity
>>61020568>nooooo transactions not processing and the blockchain needing manual intervention to process blocks again isn’t a shutdown!!!Do you even fucking hear yourself? You are watching — every single day at this point mind you — all the biggest institutions onboard with Chainlink and zero institutions onboard with XRP, you are watching this happen in real time, and still here coping and pretending like XRP is the superior product everyone will want to use. It’s peak delusion. Wake the fuck up.The craziest part is you still have time to dump your bags into LINK and get an easy 10x and instead you’re holding out for literally $1 trillion mcap on a do-nothing token. I know there’s no saving you but you will look back one day and wonder what the fuck you were thinking.
>>61021278I always held both. 1 did a 6x the other one is bleeding from its anus. When I mention the bleeding you faggot mascots just keep denying. Reserve did 0Payment abstraction did 0News does 0The gay cowboy marketing 0The blue chain mascot -5Buildldldld 0Airdrop 0, cant even properly claim it without risking the stackPartnerships 0The xrp fud shitflinging 0The gay Swift officer meddling 0Given all of the above im almost tempted to convert it to xrp. Link can not pump.
XRP is clearly only useful in a rigged society
>>61019948By purchasing xrp, you are donating to ripple labs to keep them afloat. Its not even a share in which a company has a duty to shareholders. Ripple doesnt owe you shit and their token has no utility, its not being used by anyone. Banks will use something for stable ie stablecoins. Xrp is over their use case died when swift announced their blockchain endeavor, thats why the xrpjew resigned.
>>61022624Do it, and post your sell order :)
>>61020242>Based. /thread. Looks like it’s gonna be a few more years to really cash in my stinky stack, but that’s ok.how are you dealing with the realization that you missed this bullrun? >>61021278>onboardLOLthe advocates get a real rush using all this jargon>going live>in production>shipped a few years from now, when none of this has produced a single onchain transaction: >duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude its still a PILOT
I couldn’t read half the post because the party hat is in the way :DJust not gonna sell, is all
