Stacking 1.0 can only open when there's enough revenues to provide enough money for stacking to be actually profitable. Until it happen, we're trapped depending on speculation and on cheap tricks to get the price going (payment abstraction and the reserve being recent exemples). When stacking 1.0 is ready we're gonna be rich beyond our wildest dreams. But it could take decades, and most likely a solid 5 years minimum. And the worst thing is that we can't sell because we might still be priced out by the time we get there. Or we could bleed and bleed more against BTC. There's no way to tell.
you're supposed to flip your profits into low cap alts
>>61028577SWIFT is literally going live this yearNever selling
>>61028577that doesn't make sense, i dont think staking 1.0 will be dependent on price alone it makes no sense in practice. that would push back staking's release every cent unless it can make more than 4%. i bet they turn on extra revenue streams on top of the 4.32% they are subsidizing, or just topping up any apy by subsidizing. CLL are greedy fucking jews so probably just topping us off instead of base + gains. theres also a small chance they can flip the switch and stakers will suddenly be making crazy apy but nobody else can get in, as Sergey did say "Early stakers will be heavily rewarded"
>>61028684It is possible that early stakers can stay in Chainlink labs premier steaking pool thats basically risk free, while plebs have to use 3rd party steakers
staking can only open when they develop a mechanism where staking actually secures something. lmao. right now it literally does nothing and there are no obvious developments in sight
>>61028684>Sergey did say "Early stakers will be heavily rewarded"That doesn't sound like the kind of language he would use. When did he say this?
>>61028644It wont do anything for token holders and stakers
>>61028644It will go live but will it generate enough fees to actually pump the token? CCIP went live, so did payment abstraction, and it did nothing for the price. We held during the obvious top of the clown market because payement abstraction was just around the corner, and it did nothing for the price
>>61028577Roundhouse kick the bagholder clutching his 15 LINK at $50 entry.Slam the wannabe oracle wizard straight into his mom’s basement floor.Pull out my katana and slice through his dusty Ledger that hasn’t been opened since 2021.German suplex him onto a chart showing four years of sideways action.Choke slam his “sergey is god” T-shirt into oblivion.Drop-kick his staking rewards until they’re worth less than a McChicken.Finish him off with a fatality: whisper “it’s still an ERC-20, bro” as his hopium fades.
>>61029059because CLL is pocketing all the fucking money from every revenue stream that was supposed to be directed @ stakers. If CLL distributed that 1,000,000$ every equally amongst all 45,000,000 staked link, 10k link would net you like $220 a week. So idk what the FUCK CLL is keeping stakers rightful earning from them for other than being greedy fucking kikes.
>>61029128They gotta give something to nonsteaked linkies too kek
>>61029093it does put things into perspective when you realize that Chainlink is the most valuable non-stablecoin, non-derivative erc20 token
>>61029128Stackers already in the pool don't matter, they're in the pool so evidently what they're getting is already good enough for them. What we want for the network is the ability for everyone stack and be rewarded with a fraction of fees from network usage. I have little doubt it will happen at some point, but I fear it won't be soon.
