Why is India so poor?
>>61029166somebody has to be
>>61029166Because it’s a nation full of Indians
low iq shitskins
>>61029166That crown could feed an indian village of 200 for 10 years.
>>61029166The UK stole all their wealth
>>61029166Under british raj india's share of the world GDP fell from 25% to a mere 3%
Their average IQ is 76. For reference, Hispanics are 86. We got fooled into thinking India was better than Africa by sheer weight of numbers and their 99th percentile doing well enough in the 90's/00's.
Too many CEOs, not enough Indians
>>61029166you bloody bitch basterd
>>61029187What was the dollar value of the goods that the Mughal Empire export before the British East India Company showed up in Bangladesh?
Indians are poor, India as a country actually seems particularly rich, if a family in the UK were to breed to the same population density they would not have any money left. It's a problem if the relative value of their currency is shit, but what would you expect from pajeetistan? And they are still retaining more resources which seems like a more pertinent metric.
>>61029291A country is its people. If Indians are poor, India is poor. You can find a relatively "rich" person anywhere. But compare Indian rich to American rich, no comparison. Far more American billionaires.
Currency is actual shit, which you can print yourself.
>>61029166They got too much infrastructure to build and have to choose between investing in future technologies or uplifting their enormous poor population
>>61029172this makes a lot of sense
>>61029184>>61029187so why is uk so poor?
>>61029411No a country is literally a landmass, it's wouldn't be impressive for a country of like 10 people if all of these 10 people were rich lmao
>>61029166They got to many CEO
>>61029178Low IQ plus socialist tendencies plus stupidly high levels of regulation
>>61029166I fucking hate phats, I had almost 100k in gp and didnt sell and watched it literally go to 0 and that moment was the starting point of the downward spiral that I can't climb out of today
>>61029291England has 438 people per sq km, India has 488 so basically the same.
>>61029166Because it is full of Indians
>>61031111Because its full of Indians
>>61029166Low IQ.
>>61029166loads of things>poor is the natural state of farmer civilisations. Hunter civilisations dont produce enough worth buying. We are the aberration.> clannish collectivism with families controlling so much of the individuals life is anathama to what produces wealth, but standard as india goes.> manual rice farming requires and geneticly incentivises incredible collectivism in order to work.>Their ruling class did not believe the lower class should be materially wealthy, they rationalised it by believing it'll help with their reincarnations. The idea of meaningfully improving your life physically is absent.>The view of the world as dead mechanistic material is not the standard. without it, there is little invention.
>>61029215underrated
