The xrp community are now victims of another mogging.Bunch of fucking retards who think they know better than Swift hahahahaha
Nobody cares faggot
>>61040009That’s why you’re here right? Hahahaha
>>61040009keke seething cripplet kekeke
>>61040009ahahahahah
>>61040009I know when I don’t care about things I follow them online and seethe about them at every opportunity.
bullish xrp
>>61040004NO ONE CARES ABOUT THIS SWIFT TOM ANY MORE. HE PROVED TO BE A NON-DECISION MAKER AS SIBOS WAS A TOTAL LETDOWN. HE OBVIOUSLY HAS LITTLE SWAY IN THE COMPANY. HE CAN TWEET ABOUT LINK AND POST EMOTIONCONS ALL THE LIVE LONG DAY BUT IF IT DOESN'T MOVE THE PRICE, THEN SERIOUSLY WHO GIVES A FUCK?
>>61040075The XRP community spent years trying to get the attention of Swift. Now they have it and now they don’t like it.
>>61040080I DONT CARE ABOUT XRP, DUDE
>>61040082Bridge currencies are useless bro. Do you understand now?
Tom Jew Is a fucking idiot
>>61040004>xrp is living in Tom’s head rent freeBullish
>>61040080XRP community said xrp will replace swift, not work with them retard
>>61040489Since when?
>>61040514Since forever and are you really gonna use that bald retard as an example?
>>61040536>couldSo vale only wrong about ripple wanting to compete, not work with Swift?
Anyway, I get why Tom is mad, because Ripple is direct competitor to SWFIT, not a partner, hence XRP lives rent free in his head 24/7. I can’t blame him, though.
>>61040565
>>61040563No idea and I don’t care, I blocked him years ago.
>>61040573Is that you in Vancouver?
"bridge currency" not needed
>>61040565How are they competing?
>burn usdcoin>mint equivalent amount of eurocoin, yencoin, whatever the fuckripple not needed. I could write the code for this in my sleep btw. lmao
>>61040618Ripple is trying to replace both the messaging and settlement layer, while SWIFT provides the messaging rails for banks to communicate about cross border transfers. What you don’t understand exactly? It’s pretty obvious that SWIFT has a monopoly, but it’s an outdated system and jews are desperate to keep that system as is, because cheap payments mean less to no profit.
>>61040082You hold xrp though. You ain't fooling anyone with this hey fellow link holders act.
>>61040664I understand the concept of what they would need to do to replace Swift but that doesn’t answer my question.How are they going to do this? You keep saying that Swift is a monopoly but it’s run by the very same people you think are going to circumvent their own network? How would they go about doing this? Where do they start? They currently don’t have any banks using them for messaging and settlement. Would banks use both at the same time? Are they going to remove themselves from Swift? But that also means the other banks need to be using ripple too for this to work?
>>61040699>How are they going to do this? You keep saying that Swift is a monopoly but it’s run by the very same people you think are going to circumvent their own network? How would they go about doing this? Where do they start? They currently don’t have any banks using them for messaging and settlement.Why are you asking me these questions? I don’t work for Ripple. Do you expect me to have some insider knowledge or what? Touch grass.
>>61040723kek retard
>>61040733Trump pushes stables and crypto now. If banks eventually use stablecoins, they can use any chain, and USDC on XRPL is way more efficient than USDT on ETH. How SWIFT plays a role in stablecoins, I have no idea. What a time to be alive, from Larry Fink spread in Bitcoin book, to anons arguing and defending SWIFT kikes, lmao.
>>61040697ACKSHUALLY I DON'T, RETARDIM 100% ALL IN LINKWHY IS IT THE TOPBUYING LINK BAGHOLDERS HAVE XRP ON THEIR MINDS 365/7/24? IF SOMEONE SAYS ANYTHING CRITICAL ABOUT LINK, THEY ARE INSTANTLY CALLED AN XRPER? EVER THOUGHT THERE ARE PEOPLE OUT THERE WHO HOLD LINK THAT ARE BEYOND FRUSTRATED WITH THE FUCKING HALF DECADE OF ABYSMAL PRICE ACTION?
>>61040004This is a total stinky cope, but I wonder to what extent chainlink actively avoids chainlink having good price action to specifically keep away the kind of moon chasers that taint and ruin the reputation of whatever they buy and start shilling.Scammer cultists are a great way to make real institutions want nothing to do with you
>>61040757Actually you do. Hey hey hey fellow LINK holders, look how mad I am at Chainlink Labs!!! You're mad to right? Hehe. Duuude LINK is just the worst right? But I'm 100% in LINK hehe.
>>61040009is that why you're the first comment?say it with me:D U N K E DUNKED
>>61040723> Ripple is trying to replace both the messaging and settlement layer, while SWIFT provides the messaging rails for banks to communicate about cross border transfers.> Why are you asking me these questions? I don’t work for Ripple. Do you expect me to have some insider knowledge or what?So essentially, you’re admitting you have no real knowledge here and are just parroting jargon to sound informed?
>>61040779YOU'RE A BIT DEAF, ARENT YOU?
>>61040664Explain how it’s “outdated”. Technology evolves. SWIFT already has built a more efficient digital asset system than XRP can ever be. SWIFT is fully engrained in the financial system which is an incredibly complex machine. You don’t just rip it out and drop something else in. That’s like saying you just rip the tracks from under the train and put some other dumb fucking contraption under the train while it’s moving that it can move on but keeps it unable to go anywhere meaningful instead of just updating the track materials. I really can’t with blockchain retards anymore. It’s not just XRP, the “investoooooors” really just don’t understand basic business fundamentals and therefore can’t even begin to comprehend how this is all going to play out. This is exactly why LINK is still a good investment, because not a single one of you retards has any fucking clue which way is up and so much money is getting misappropriated into garbage.
>>61040779fucking kek, I'm stealing this
>>61040807Fuck off xerpie, try another angle. You've been found out.
>>61040825"FOUND OUT"ANYONE CRITICISING LINK = XRP GUYMAKES TOTAL SENSEYOU'RE A FUCKING MORON
>guy whose organization depends on the nonexistence of bridge currencies shits on bridge currenciesRiveting.
>>61040837Look how you recoil, how injured you are...
>>61040839> nonexistence of bridge currenciesHe doesn’t care they exist, he cares if they have a purpose, which they don’t.DvP and PvP swaps require 1 transaction.Using a bridge currency requires 2
>>61040004Swift is so scared of XRP replacing them. Lol
>>61040863>XRPtards are so afraid of Xrp going to zeroOne is an established institution used daily and one is a startup lol They’re so scared when they talk about what’s going on in the industry and it ruins your little narrative
>>61040009SEETHING
>>61040060lmaoI've been railing cripples about ODL being the dumbest fucking shit on the entire planet since forever in this boardnow they have to hear about it from the niggers they simp for
>>61040489and a dude that works in the space is literally telling you how fucking stupid that idea is
>>61040908But they love it. Xerpies are rejoicing about Tom senpai noticing them. "Swift is scared!", "First they fight you, then you win!" are the new narratives.
>>61040664>Ripple is trying to replace both the messaging and settlement layeryour shitchain does neither of those things
>>61040004Why is Tom obsessing over a product he claims to be a non-competitor?If Ripple was truly a nothing burger why wouldn't he just ignore the comments? That's corpo PR 101.
>>61040917Not an argument. Why is he unable to address the supposed ‘main use case’ of the #3 crypto, the one constantly spammed at him on LinkedIn and Twitter?
>>61040936>you can't ask a question I don't like the answer toThat's not an argument. Answer the original question.
>>61040946loaded question. he's not obsessing over xrp
>>61040946Talking about is obsessing? Xrp influencers have spammed ripple/swift partnerships for years.Now you’re finally get attention from Swift themselves but now you deem it as “obsessing”because you don’t like what he’s saying?
>>61040917>Why is Tom obsessing over a product he claims to be a non-competitor?Because cripplets have been spamming Swift's socials for a very long time now.At one point Swift had to systematically delete all cripplet replies to their tweets because there were always so many.
>>61041245>article mentions chainlink>xrptards replykek
>>61040961this response from them was entirely predictable thoughanyone pointing out basic facts in regard to how global finance and business between banks actually works is poison to every cripple hype narrative, so now that they finally get a response and they don't like it, there MUST be an ulterior motive behind thatif he didn't respond this is how it would be>swift is too scared to reply to ripple>must mean exarpee to da moon if someone doesn't take the time to dispel our retardation
>>61040004>fax machine metafoarDeadass dis nigga old af
>>61040009HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HOLY SHIT IMAGINE THINKING XRP WAS SOME SORT OF AMAZING THING THAT EVERYBODY JUST HAAAAAAD TO USE HOLY FUCK
>>61040489>xrp will replace swiftLMAO!
>>61040004The CIO who failed to anticipate blockchain and now has SWIFT 15 years behind the ball which basically means guaranteed loss? He probably literally doesn't know the answer of the question. Lmfao
>>61041328The CEO of Fireblocks says it is apt.
>>61040780No matter how hard you try this meme will not stick. It is too insubstantial. It just comes across as a petulant and shitty version of the bottom part of pic related.
>>61040004dude I hope this cringy, manufactured Ripple-war is the final shakeout-wave(we all know the final shakeout is the drone strike on the yhact party)
Tom Zschach is only stating the obvious, XRP has always been a corporate scam. Everyone who says the opposite is just a huge bagholder that is either living on copium, flat our lying to make money (understandable) or simply doesn't understand anything about crypto.
>>61042075>The CIO who failed to anticipate blockchain and now has SWIFT 15 years behind What the fuck are you talking about.Swift was among the very first financial giants to start experimenting and developing with blockchain tech.And so far, legacy finance adoption of blockchain is still absolutely tiny, so really nobody's behind yet.
>>61043043Tom literally doesn't even know that XRP is a public token. He LITERALLY knows so little about the space, as the CIO, that it is not even surprising he would fail this bad. You SERIOUSLY think SWIFT have a 15+ year berth to build and stay relevant before possibly launching? Are you kidding? Before SIBOS we heard such a ledger was undesirable and ill conceived by XRP/Ripple by you guys, now their CIO sees the GPI play flopped and decided it is relevant to begin theorizing on. SWIFT are outdated rails we were told until 10 minutes ago were the desired standard and everyone would continue to use the internet from their fax machine and ignore the high performance desktop computers. Definitely a smart thought!
>>61043059>Tom literally doesn't even know that XRP is a public token.lmao this goalpost move.Also Tom calls it a "private token" because pic related.
>>61043068His whole argument hangs on crypto continuing to not be money, as OCC/the Fed/SEC/CFTC/etc. are literally all rolling back restrictive guidance, legislators are prioritizing enshrining it in law-market structure being slated for within the year, and SWIFT banks themselves migrating 100% to a compatible messaging standard within the next month, all of whom already through PSPs etc. have the possibility to use it, with most Fednow providers also being either outright partners, sometimes even node operators, or otherwise integrated with it as a service. His last statement is unironically an argument against outsourcing to a centralized service in favor of a public ledger they don't have to presume counterparty credit/rehypothecation risk etc. and can be paid in efficiency for choosing to lose risk among a million other benefits. Tom literally doesn't even know XRP is not a private token. He is THAT behind the ball and he is the Chief Innovation Officer. Lmfao
>>61040080kek
XRP can only go as fast as the slowest chain it bridges to
>>61043068It is objectively not a private token. That literally doesn't even make sense. Calling XRP a private token and then building out infrastructure on an Eth L2 is fucking hilarious. He doesn't understand core concepts because he didn't expect to need to or he is choosing to be obtuse because all SWIFT care about is continuing the jewry and Ripple/XRP increase efficiencies instead of entrenching inefficiencies and charging a toll booth fee for it in a token they have no other reason to hold on their balance sheets or buy other than paying the fee if not arranged off-ledger or hybrid/proprietary which is literally what link is.
>>61043105It makes perfect sense.You're just a seething cripplet, Thomas.
>>61043126Cope lil nigga
>>61043105Who gets all the revenue from XRP token sales? i'd assume it will be split to all those who operate the ledger? Being a public token...
>>61043128XRP is a proprietary token belonging to one specific chain. Swift is aiming to work with tokenized assets that are inherently multichain.That makes XRP "private" because it belongs only to one specific silo.>and then building out infrastructure on an Eth L2 is fucking hilariousThis L2 won't even have a token. Because if it did, it would be "private".
>>61043149Then the CIO is using the most primitive terminology in an embarrassingly out of touch way and is still wrong. XRP is implicitly interoperable with any even hypothetical ledger traditional or blockchain public or private and is scalable to trillions of tps (hardware limit), micropayment capable, and has a built in dex/order book. You get increases in efficiency and due to the public nature decreases in counterparty risk. L2s are centralized trash with fragmented standards, XRP has protocol level compliance features and the new MPT mutable token with permissioned dex/domains and ZKP/protocol layer lending/credit creation coming Q1 of next year trounces it with no tradeoff, and banks by then will be fully migrated to be able to use it and already have the access to both in SWIFT and Fednow etc. DOA attempt to cope with being a decade and a half behind the ball because Chokepoint/Ethgate failed but actually it isn't even that, it is just marketing desperation.
>>61043158Stop spamming AI slop
>>61043139XRP is a public token. Ripple hold a large escrow of the public token privately. They sell XRP exclusively to partners using XRP and do not sell to the public market since May 2020. Who gets the profit from link sales which dump directly on retail and draw from the 2/3 of the float they lied about ring fencing the operator rewards of given and pilfer constantly and pay out minimal necessary to keep the network grift running which is itself less than 20% sufficient in revenues to maintain itself? They have already sold a HUGE (much higher percentage than Ripple with XRP) percentage of the total float onto you while you lost 70% across 5 years. 94% of XRP wallets are in profit and XSG average is <.5 being 6x up since last December alone, largely due to Ripple spending $150M in court litigating and winning the non-security status of XRP in court despite being told they could settle immediately early on if they would accept XRP being not declared such (I wonder why this mattered to the Clayton/Gensler SEC! Lol) with Brad and Chris attached as parties independent of Ripple being sued, winning secondary sales for the whole market in probably the biggest legal win crypto has ever gotten, a total win for liberty, to your total scorn and venom. Lol
>>61042140This guy works for Israel's Unit 8200 and he understands how dangerous SWIFT's open banking initiative is to Jews. He's promoting the Circle Payments Network here as an alternative to SWIFT, which is laughable given how feature-complete ISO20022 is relative to CPN. CPN can currently do maybe 1% of the operations supported by the SWIFT network. For CPN to become true set of alternative rails to SWIFT they'd need at least a decade of development work to add support for features in securities trading and settlement, trade finance, FX, corporate-to-bank, etc. The SWIFT network can already do all of this. They're just not even positioned to acquire the knowledge required to build a true competitor product. They'd have to re-learn decades of lessons SWIFT has already learned. Not to mention they'd have to convince banks to stop using SWIFT and start using CPN, which is extremely unlikely. Banks would have to do years of PoCs with CPN first, which would expose all these feature gaps. Even if CPN already had equivalent features and could support all of SWIFT's use cases, it would still be several years of work (at minimum) to migrate systems off of SWIFT and onto CPN.Also, it's real fuckin' rich this dude is talking about how SWIFT's PoCs haven't had real-world impact yet when CPN has no banks in production and they're still just doing PoCs.
>>61043159Literally nothing I have written is AI referencing. You are LITERALLY so cooked it is inconceivable to you that someone could write a paragraph in a knowing way. Stop doomscrolling and virtue signaling to a greed cult that has transcended greed and chosen self-destructive willful loss the way anti-natalists have after starting out as an aiming-at hierarchy rebalancing starting in a framework they are uncompetitive in. and become a real person. You let yourself get weird and SMALL.
>>61043174It's the most obvious AI slop imaginable.Just letting you know.
>>61043170There are plenty others who think what he does, I was just using him as an example of one that is far from saying so on behalf of Ripple. I fucking hate Circle and was hoping Ripple were going to acquire them the way they did Rail, which for a time seemed likely. I am not arguing for a full migration onto CPN or even a partial, but most banks using SWIFT can already use Ripple and when pacs.008 is active have a big incentive to. Complaining about bias in interpretation is a bit rich in the context of quoting Tom as the balanced authority on how viable SWIFT's forward projecting posture is.
>>61043179Being frustrated you can't respond to something and playing gay sophistry games isn't the strong argument strategy you think.Just letting you know.
>>61043187>playing gay sophistry gamesSays the faggot gish galloping AI paragraphs 24/7
>>61043170Also pretty rich to consider the entrenchment of centralized inefficient fee collection of the toll booth of CCIP and Eth L2s in general etc. as anti-jewish. btw:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/fireblocks-and-chainlink-labs-announce-strategic-collaboration-to-accelerate-regulated-stablecoin-issuance-302249711.html
>>61043195You tried replying failed. You tried burying failed. You tried calling me a lolcow failed. Tried calling me a bot failed. Now I am AI fed. Anything to avoid actual discussion of the failed technical thesis of your investment and technology.
>>61043204>Anything to avoid actual discussionNothing avoids discussion like spamming AI slop walls of text.
>>61043209Embarrassing/corny as fuck.
>>61043209its the verbose xrp shill, you can tell because he always has to use the term literally in his run-on paragraphs.
>>61043166So Ripple gets the profits from the token sales. A token they control. If I sell property and keep the proceeds. That is a private sale.XRP is a private token. Also consider, Ripple board members colluded to increase the price via "leveraging influencers". Not something you do for an item you would not profit from.
>>61043233Ripple sales account for less than 1% of total volume and as said drove token price through their advocacy substantially. They also sold a SUBSTANTIALLY less percentage of total float than SirGay sold and XRP is not POS, their holdings do not affect consensus at all. Anything can be sold publicly or privately and if you choose to just fixate on one context anything can be said to be anything. Dollars could be said to be a private currency owned by a single person who sold his for something else or another currency, even people who Ripple sold XRP to on the other side of the transaction could be considered this for dollars. This is an unimaginably retarded argument. You're gonna blow your top when you realize what Ripple board members colluded to do to increase the price via "leveraging technology!" Insane Ripple have A MARKETING DEPARTMENT!>>61043229Cope lil nigga, literally
>>61043259Why are you talking about volume? 99% of Ripple revenue comes from XRP sales. It's a private funding token.
>>6104336199% of XRP value comes from RIpple's groundwork. Same for link token for link. Ripple's revenue dwarfs CLL's and XRP's appreciation dwarfs link's. The only difference is SirGay sells WAY more of total supply and earns WAY less and sells directly to you as a literal fraud exfil of your savings to his pockets.
>>61043390No. It comes from sales of their private token, XRP. All of XRP revenue is selling a private token. See here; >>61043139You think a private token that solely profits a private business, will be used as the world's reserve currency? Keep up the delusion. Don't take your meds. If realisation hits you, you may just kys.
>>61043445Already addressed this argument. Is the sale of dollars on the other end proof the dollar is a private currency owned by the counterparty sold to? Lol The only difference is XRP has no central counterparty the way the dollar does at root. Endless cope.
>>61043259You’re literally parroting the XRP defense thesis like a kid who memorized the brochure and thinks repetition equals insight.> less than 1%This line gets thrown around like it’s some magical shield. It literally doesn’t matter if it’s 1% or 0.1% when the structure is Ripple holding the vast majority, dripping it out strategically, and then pretending the market is “organic.” Wash trading and programmatic sales don’t absolve you, they just make the dump slower. You’re literally mirroring the same tired talking point that’s been posted in every thread for years.> not PoS so holdings don’t matterThis is literally the dumbest sleight of hand in the XRP shill toolkit. Validator lists don’t override the fact that Ripple controls the supply and therefore the economic reality of the network. If one entity literally owns half the float and times its releases, they steer the market. Your whole thesis is pretending governance is purely technical while ignoring the economic chokehold. It’s literally mirroring the “but validators” cope ETH shills used years ago, just with less tech and more pre-mine.> marketingThis isn’t some shocking reveal, it’s the entire business model. There’s literally no organic demand for XRP as an asset. Banks don’t want to hold it, corridors don’t need it, and the “advocacy” is just a marketing arm trying to inflate price to offload bags.You’re not dismantling criticism, you’re literally mirroring boilerplate lines and calling it an argument. The fundamental issue doesn’t change. XRP is a centralized pre-mine wrapped in corporate PR pretending to be infrastructure. Cope.
>>61043543You're literally the same retard that segments everything into a million greentext blobs and takes the entire character count to say absolutely nothing and just act like size transmutes into substance. Ripple absolutely sell strategically and as a consequence of that XRP is #3. Their "dump" doesn't affect price virtually at all and their business massively builds its prospect. You LITERALLY don't understand how XRPL consensus works. They don't control a majority of nodes and get voted against often. There is no "economic" chokehold. They massively fund amendment proposals-failing to see how that is a bad thing? There is literally zero bespoke authority over the network via holding size. Eth sold 90+% of total supply to the CCP and Joseph Lubin in the ICO and are POS and XRP scales at L1-the two are not remotely comparable. Again, literally all XRP sales since May 2020 are to customers, so either they are "dumping" but it is only because they have such a high demand for their product, or they are not dumping because they get no business (despite having higher revenues than Chainlink by a wide margin and selling uniquely to clients through blind bid ask). Can't be both. Hilarious your use of mirroring and parroting because you're literally doing both to me right now. Terminology is not enough you need to actually have something to say.
>more copy pasted gish gallopping slop
>>61043568You’re literally doing the exact bloated sleight of hand every XRP shill does, flooding the screen with reheated talking points and hoping sheer volume hides the rot underneath.> strategic sales made XRP #3No, what put XRP at #3 wasn’t some organic market demand, it was literally Ripple’s coordinated price manipulation through T4 botting and manufactured volume, as laid out in the SEC filings. They artificially suppress and pump the price whenever they need to to create the illusion of traction, then timed treasury dumps to maximize profit. “Strategic sales” is just the sanitized version of wash trading and liquidity theatre. The flat price action since is proof that without those games, nothing real underpins it.> no economic chokeholdLiteral cope. When a single company holds half the supply, dictates release schedules, and has been caught literally manipulating markets to engineer dump windows, that is textbook chokehold. Validator votes don’t override the fact that Ripple dictates tempo and structure. Funding amendments isn’t altruism, it’s control over the protocol’s direction.> ETH and Joseph LubinYou keep repeating the Lubin line like it’s a revelation. Lubin doesn’t literally sit on half the supply and deploy coordinated price ops from a corporate treasury. Ethereum’s ICO was public, and distribution diversified through actual usage and developer activity. XRP’s distribution is a pre-mine controlled by one company that uses manipulation to unload on the market. The comparison is absurd.> sales to customers = demandThis is classic marketing inversion. Ripple selling to prearranged partners through blind bid-ask doesn’t prove demand, it proves they found structured channels to offload inventory without tanking price. It’s literally managed dumping dressed up as “customer sales.”> mirroringYou throw the word around while literally mirroring years of Ripple PR and legal deflections as if repeating them makes them truer. It doesn’t.
>>61043665Flagged for spam for some reason.
wtf is going on in this thread, there are mindbroken xrp cultists having their mind broken in every link thread, its an absolute treat to see this morning
>>61043811Headcanon cope.
>>61043763You’re literally doing the same tired Ripple script where every time XRP’s manipulation gets brought up you pivot to Chainlink like yelling “but them” somehow erases documented fraudulent behavior> Chainlink dump WAY moreNot only is this incorrect, Chainlink’s tokenomics are publicly in the whitepapers and operator rewards are a known part of the model. There’s no hidden T4 botting scheme pumping price to offload bags. Selling tokens to incentivize node operators and fund actual development isn’t remotely comparable to Ripple’s centralized treasury manipulating secondary markets to inflate price for a more profitable dump. Ripple literally orchestrated artificial volume and timed nothingburger marketing materials to exploit it. Can't paint anyone else with the same brush - that's on then.> they lied about supplyNo, Ripple lied about supply. It’s literally in the case filings. They presented escrow as if it were locked and neutral while retaining total discretion. Chainlink supply distribution is tracked in real time and tied to operational incentives, not secretly pre-coordinated treasury releases.> network would fail if CLL stopped payingThis is you repeating a bad talking point. Chainlink’s network economics depend on incentivized node operators, not a single company dumping supply to create fake liquidity. Allocated, yes. Equivalent, no. LINK’s set-asides are literally for operator rewards, ecosystem grants, and treasury runway that the market can track onchain. Addresses are known. Emissions are public. The cadence is not a single corporate escrow metronome designed to stage “heat, then dump.”Your entire thesis boils down to pointing at Chainlink’s public token releases and pretending that makes Ripple’s documented market manipulation acceptable. It doesn’t. Chainlink tokenomics might not be at full maturity, but Ripple literally engineered fake demand to dump bags from the start. That’s the difference.
>>61043860~45-50% of 1 billion link (~450-500M tokens) has been sold/distributed via ICO (35% in 2017). Ripple sells less XRP relative to its supply (~20-25%) of 100 billion XRP (~20-25B tokens) sold, mostly via escrow releases (200-500M XRP/month) and ODL partnerships. Ripple sells exclusively to partners and ODL users. CLL just dumps on you. Ripple controls less than half of total supply. Link isn't even 20% sustainable by native revenues. CLL lied about the tokenomics and comingled 2/3 of the entire float after suggesting the operator rewards were ringfenced (and then selling them to fund operations/pilfer) and have been selling directly to retail and dumping on you and eating your savings to make payroll and inflate business and payrolls and... by inflating supply selling directly to you. They have already done a huge share. This isn't whataboutism or tu quoque etc. It is LITERALLY just Chainlink Labs being guilty of fraud and Ripple not but you not undertstanding 101 level information and transmuting ignorance into undeservedly confident accusation because you are as arrogant as you are ignorant and you just assume you are entitled to automatic rightness. You are a low IQ/information person. The XRPL does not need Ripple and would continue fine without them, with less advocacy and dev drive. Ripple do not pay operators. You design language to admit every point while making it seem like you are correcting me. Everyone knows Lubin! Of COURSE link isn't 20% sustainable after 7 years!
>>61043878Whoa, doing the Cripple marketing numbers shell game again where you hurl percentages like confetti and pretend they overwrite documented manipulation.> LINK sold 45–50% vs XRP 20–25%Raw percentages mean nothing without context. Chainlink’s early distribution (ICO in 2017, ~35% of supply) was public and on-chain. Ripple’s “only 20–25%” came from a centralized treasury, where the company coordinated sales and artificial volume via T4 bots to pump prices before dumping, as documented in the SEC complaint like I already said. Internal communications showed them deliberately “creating price support” through volume tactics. This isn’t neutral market activity. It’s literal manipulation. And that 20-25% is just the tip of the iceberg.> Ripple sells only to partners and ODL usersThis is marketing theater. “ODL partners” are often Ripple-arranged promotional counterparties or pilot programs used to channel sales without crashing open markets or doing anything of substance. The SEC filings show Ripple targeted strategic buyers to support price, including OTC deals structured to minimize market impact while keeping treasury flowing. That’s managed dumping with a friendly face.> Ripple controls less than halfThey hold ~45–50 B XRP in escrow and have unilateral control over release timing. Courts have acknowledged that Ripple programmed the escrow itself and can modify release cadence. The entire market orbits that supply clock. LINK has allocations, but no single actor controls half the float with the ability to time releases against manipulated volume.> CLL lied about ringfencingAnother typical XRP shill attempt to try and create more false equivalence. Chainlink's distributions have always been public on-chain, tied to development and node incentives, and there is no evidence of coordinated price manipulation. No SEC case. No internal comms about faking liquidity. Ripple literally has that in black and white.
>>61043916Please please stop using AI to generate posts. I hate starting to read a post and the. Stopping when I realise it's just slop. It's just a waste of everyone's time. Thanks.
>>61043922Not AI slop. Thanks.Unless you meant>>61043878?
>>61043916Good post. For the lurkers, here's the evidence https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.551082/gov.uscourts.nysd.551082.845.2.pdf
>>61043811idk why they don't just sell for link, it's obvious where this is all going.
>>61043991Thanks. Honestly, all the ammo anyone ever needs against the bleating of Crippletards is in the stuff that Cripple has said themselves. The case docs were an absolute goldmine and it's pretty easy to tell that Cripple baggies have mostly avoided looking at any of it, based on how they try to lie. They wouldn't say half the things they do if they actually did bother to look at any of it.
>>61044013In fairness, a lot them can't read. Or their dopamine receptors are so fucked they can't do more then a few sentences.
>>61043259>They also sold a SUBSTANTIALLY less percentage of total float than SirGayThat's an extremely bad thing.It means they're not only dumping more on their holders, but also that they have so much more left to dump too.
>>61043878>Ripple sells less XRP relative to its supplysee >>61044096Insane that you're trying to spin this as a positive.
>>61042185
>>61044009They are too deep in
>>61043916>no single actor controls half the float with the ability to time releases against manipulated volume.holy gaslighting >https://etherscan.io/tx/0x3f69fe90b9d61e5d3cbc5609d098438444e549695c39df7075c37c4edfc3c7b5it has been known for years that CLL manually dumps whenever the fuck they want, is it coincidence that every time they dump, LINK craters to new lows shorty after?
>>61040004>grok: thats exactly right! you are such a legend for pointing out that a private token can technically be a bridge currency at scale
>>61044257>it has been known for years that CLL manually dumps whenever the fuck they wantYou mean exactly like Ripple Labs, Larsen, ...?>is it coincidence that every time they dump, LINK craters to new lows shorty after?You're such a lying jew lol
>>61044280why did you swap ids again?why are you always reposting the same graph from 2023, right before LINK cratered to new yearly lows?
>>61044314>Link craters every time they unlock!>except when Link pumps five unlocks in a row, of course
>>61044325>You’re literally doing the same tired Chainlink script where every time LINK’s manipulation gets brought up you pivot to XRP like yelling “but them” somehow erases documented fraudulent behaviornow swap ids again, fucker
>>61044330>selling tokens exactly as promised is fraudulent behaviorget triggered harder, xerpie
>>61043259>cope lil nigga Ah that’s explains why you’re retarded, pic related
mr tom wore a plaid suit jacket at sibos.... guess what color it was....
>>61044360>y-you're a xerpielike fucking clockworkget fucked, hypocriteand next time, extrapolate your shitty chart on this instead of cherry picking an 8 month chart you disingenuous shiller
>>61044375>extrapolate your shitty chart on this instead of cherry picking an 8 month chartsure
>>61044383that's not the chart, honey, try again
>>61044389Man you really don't like Sergey's unlocks huh?
>>61044402the chart, please ;)
>>61040004xrp will never be as fast as FIAT as FIAT only uses one server, while xrpl needs 35. It is literally 35 times the same job and adds nothing. also you would need 2 forex transactions for one change instead of one. it costs more to use. also it costs to send so it costs more to use times 2.
Repeat after me:Rent Freenow go cry about it
>>61044773lul
>>61040004Did XRP holders really think that SWIFT and their banks were going to adopt them when they can just produce their own stablecoins? Why?CCIP will be used for cross-network payments, they aren't going to adopt anything they don't control.
>>61040004isn't LINK also a private bridge currency?
>>61045476No.A bridge currency goes like this; suppose you have a tokenized asset A and you want to exchange it for tokenized asset B.>sell asset A for bridge currency>sell bridge currency for asset BYes, it's as retarded as it looks.Meanwhile an actual bridge like CCIP allows you to do this:>sell asset A for asset B
>>61044829It is amazing how mad you got over that single meme. You made an inverted version and then the random "Brad locked out" one that never was really clear in meaning even. It is literally exactly like bottom in >>61042185. >>61043991SEC complaint is not evidence. The judge literally ruled opposite.>>61044096>>61044106No it isn't, it is proof they dumped a LOT less than SirGay and never lied about how much they had control over. The don't even sell to retail. They don't even control the escrow schedule.>>61044923The core XRP thesis is LITERALLY that there will be dozens of private stablecoins that XRP settles efficiently and neutrally and has been for decades. See David's comments on "walled gardens." Pretty crazy you don't know even this about something you uncritically hate so much.>>61043916You are definitely not just feeding my responses into something because you are repeating yourself while conceding my points and acting like the points don't matter and inventing concepts to complain about directionally at me that are literally not real (economic chokehold lol). The SEC complaint was not found to be valid by the judge. She ruled that price fluctuated independently of Ripple action. Again, Ripple sales are to people who use it, which include 300 banks and some of the largest payment service providers in the world. Ripple do not have unilateral control over the release-they don't have ANY control over release. It is fully automated on the ledger and they cannot do anything to change that or the conditions that release. Point me to the place where the courts ruled they could modify the release cadence. There is extensive on-chain evidence of CLL them selling from rewards to make payroll. Your reply was 100% slop but at least it is obvious you aren't actually writing it.
>>61046064
>another ai threadits all so tiresome
>>61046064>Pretty crazy you don't know even this about something you uncritically hate so much. I literally couldn't care less about XRP.
>>61046064You’re literally projecting so hard you’ve started accusing others of doing exactly what your posts read like. You’re parroting Ripple shill spam based on pure spin, and blog phrasing, then calling me an LLM because you know that others already understand that you run EVERYTHING through grok.> “SEC complaint not valid”Completely false. The judge didn’t throw it out, she granted partial summary judgment. Ripple was found to have violated Section 5 of the Securities Act for institutional sales. They were hit with a $125 million civil penalty and a permanent injunction against conducting future unregistered institutional sales (SEC v. Ripple Labs, SDNY, Aug 7 2024 Order). That’s not “invalid.” That’s a company getting legally nailed on core sales practices. You repeating “not valid” like a mantra doesn’t undo the ruling.> “price fluctuated independently”That line came from rejecting the SEC’s Howey analysis on programmatic sales, not a blanket endorsement of Ripple’s conduct. The judge didn’t say Ripple has zero impact on price, they said the SEC didn’t prove those buyers expected profit from Ripple’s efforts specifically. That’s not exoneration from what I've said in any way.> “escrow automated no control”Ripple designed the escrow and retains the stash. Automation doesn’t make it neutral. It’s a metronome they set. Courts don’t need to bless “economic chokehold” as a doctrine for it to exist. Traders price the drip. That’s reality.But by all means keep calling me a bot if you want. You're literally just projecting because you can't cope with anything being said. The difference is I’m citing actual rulings and complaint paragraphs and making logical arguments. You’re regurgitating Cripple’s PR spin that grok feeds you for all of your posts. The absolute state and audacity of you.
>>61040004bridgecoin cash? or bcash?
>>61044013Shit im cooked with my 60 xrp, what coin should i buy instead
We should know for sure pretty soon…sure is an exciting time
>>61046281You spend a lot of time on something you don't care about.>>61046113Literally doesn't even make sense as a meme.>>61046532This is more proof you aren't even reading what I say and are just plugging it. I never said they threw the suit out, I said the judge ruled XRP price was disassociated with Ripple's corporate actions. Brad and Chris had challenge to them dropped and Ripple were offered to pay a fine up front that they said they would based on specific old sales across a specific time if they would get XRP being declared by the SEC as not a security. SEC declined so they went into the suit and as a result, XRP was declared a non-security and so were secondary sales, Ripple restructured their sales to be non-securities offerings, and they ended up paying about what they were going to have to originally to settle up front and avoid suit. But now they got everything they wanted and no other non-btc coin has despite the ethgate attempt. And even this, the current admin SEC tried to have the ruling tossed and Ripple pay even less in fines with no injunction no sales. The judge did not want her ruling tossed so Ripple pays the small fine and the SEC waived their injunction. The Clayton/Gensler SEC sued them for billions. The judge absolutely ruled that the price of XRP was not hinged by Ripple's actions. Your AI is mistaking court filings. Courts don't need to bless economic chokehold "doctrine" for it to exist, but networks do, and the XRPL doesn't. You literally once again admit what I said, that their automated escrow is automated and they have no control over lock/unlock or schedule. Your entire thing is slop that doesn't touch a single point and skirt while admitting and pretending it is not admission.
>>61047840More projecting. Its a staple for you, isnt it? You keep accusing me of “plugging responses” while your posts are stitched together directly from thrice debunked cripple slop that only survives on the atmosphere of retardation in cripple echo chambers.> “Judge ruled XRP price was disassociated with Ripple's corporate actions”No. Again. They ruled that the SEC didn’t prove programmatic buyers expected profits from Ripple’s efforts, not that Ripple had zero price impact. That’s a narrow Howey prong, not some metaphysical proclamation about “price independence.” The complaint still stands on deliberate liquidity strategy and market conduct. You keep holding up this tattered safety blanket of a point because you think it sounds like total exoneration to people who haven’t read the filings.> “fine up front, XRP declared non-security, got everything they wanted”Ripple paid $125 million and is under a permanent injunction on institutional sales. The SEC didn’t waive the injunction; the court imposed it. That’s not “got everything they wanted.” That’s a settlement after losing on institutional sales. You parroting the “they were going to pay anyway” line doesn’t change the legal outcome or actually make it look good.> “the current SEC tried to have the ruling tossed”The SEC sought interlocutory appeal and lost. That doesn’t mean the SEC begged for a lighter penalty. You’re misrepresenting procedural steps like they’re strategic capitulation.> “escrow is automatd, they have no control”They have complete control of the automation in the escrow, they control the stash. They adjust it whenever its best to dump on cripple baggies. Courts don’t need to “bless” that for it to be real.Very rich that you accuse me of not reading while copying PR spin word for word as if it's a defense for a dishonest, predatory approach which fleeces a bunch of brainwashed retail bagholders for profit and nothing else. You're either an idiot or a liar.
>>61047946So youre saying i should sell all my xrp and buy pokemon cards?
>>61047955You can do whatever the hell you want, buddy.Eth, poly, linea, stellar are all better picks if you want an unironic suggestion.
>>610479462 more chatbot hallucinations
>>61047840>You spend a lot of time on something you don't care aboutThis is the first "XRP thread" I've ever visited. I'm here solely because Tom spoke to Sergey last week.
>>61047946Wtf does "they have total control over AUTOMATION in the escrow, they control the stash" even mean? Escrow is literally a process in the ledger participants cannot affect once issued the way Ripple has. https://xrpl.org/docs/concepts/payment-types/escrow>The XRP Ledger takes escrow a step further, replacing the third party with an automated system built into the ledger. An escrow locks up XRP or fungible tokens, which can't be used or destroyed until conditions are met.Once again, you are referencing the wrong thing with a really low grade understanding of the process of the case: The SEC, post-Gensler, after ruling, petitioned the courts JOINTLY WITH RIPPLE, to throw out the prior ruling (while both were in the appeals process) and allow a settlement of a SUBSTANTIALLY (halved) lowered fine and lifted injunction:https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-26306(also pic realated)Your literally objective failure and wrongness presuming to correct could not be more ironic. SEC issued waiver to the injunction when the judge denied tossing the ruling:https://www.sec.gov/files/rules/other/2025/33-11383.pdfOn Ripple "manipulating price via discount to investors" per the SEC filing, see pages 10-11 of the judge's ruling, where she does not accept their argument and says they did not prove it (she also, elsewhere, says they (the SEC) were acting outside allegiance to the law and good process and were being capricious and predatory:https://crypto-law.us/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/973.pdf
>>61048475I doubt it but if true, I am sorry you were caught in the crossfire and was speaking to your more butthurt and bolshevik compatriots.
>>61048830You’re mistaking PR spin for legal reality. The premise that Ripple "got everything they wanted" or that the settlement was a total victory is objectively wrong.The Core Loss is Undeniable: The court found Ripple's Institutional Sales were unregistered securities transactions. This is a clear legal loss. The subsequent $102.6 million civil penalty (not a small fine) was paid to the SEC for this violation. A company that "got everything they wanted" does not pay a nine-figure penalty to its adversary for past conduct. The final settlement secures a waiver on future sales, but only after conceding a past violation and paying the massive fine.The "Victory" Was a Narrow Technicality: The ruling that Programmatic Sales were not securities was not a declaration of "price independence." The judge simply found that the SEC failed to prove retail buyers, in "blind bid/ask" transactions, had a reasonable expectation of profit derived solely from Ripple's managerial efforts. It was a transaction-specific ruling, not an exoneration of the token itself, and it doesn't preclude a finding that Ripple's actions still influence price.Escrow is Misleading: While the XRPL escrow is technically automated once created, your defense ignores Poster 1's core point: Ripple controls the creation and timing of the token stash, which is the basis for the market manipulation accusation. Confirming the code executes automatically doesn't dismiss the accusation of strategic supply management.Misrepresenting the Judge: Your claim of the judge condemning the SEC as "capricious and predatory" and referencing specific pages in the ruling is misleading. The strongest judicial criticisms were regarding the SEC's handling of the Hinman documents in a separate context, not the core Howey analysis on programmatic sales.
>>61047330>Shit im cooked with my 60 xrp, what coin should i buy insteadliterally seeing many brainlets holding XRP for fundamentals. You should hop on the new trend on DeFi, Houdiniswap pointless program.
>>61040004xrp is not competing with swift. swift is a platform for sending USD bank to bank as a trusted centeralized Fed platform. sure they can tokenize and send value, but that still wouldn't be competing with xrp.XRP is being utilized as a bridge asset, this means small liqidity providers can instantly settle transactions in bumfuck currencies for pennies, making bank transfers from A to B currency seamlessbank a wants to send 100 USD to bank b in zimbabwe dollarsbank a goes to market and sources 100 USD in XRP for as close to 99.9 cents on the dollar as possiblebid comes back from thousands of liquidity providers in seconds. bank a picks liquidity provider a because it is best price.transaction settles instantlybank a now has .0005 XRP at 99.94 cents on the dollarbank a goes back to market looking for zimbabwe dollars with XRP. (repeat process from above)now bank a has roughly 100 USD worth of zimbabwe dollars.sends tokenized Zimbabwe dollars to zimbabwe.whole transaction with sourcing liquidity from usd to zimbabwe takes less than a minute.bank was able to source and send 100 USD of value to zimbabue in their native currency within seconds with only 1% loss in value through independent liquidity providers competing in an open marketbank charges 5% for the transaction.bank profits $4liquidity providers profit $1customer sends 100 in value to zimbabwe in zimbabwe dollars in seconds for only 5% feethis is not what swift is doing at all
>>61049871>XRP is being utilized as a bridge assetIt literally isn't.After all these years nobody's using XRP at all. Not even XRPL nodes.
>>61049871It is so funny how you q anon schizo retards cant even stick to a narrative about what this shitcoin is supposed to do or whats its intended goals are, now it doesnt want to replace swift?
>>61049908it can replace swift as well. Banks could use XRP for value transfer if the future is not as USD centric as today's world (it won't be)we could easily see a world where banks prefer XRP on the books rather than USD
Nice AI writeup>>61049315>A company that "got everything they wanted" does not pay a nine-figure penalty to its adversary for past conduct.The ripple fine is pocket money compared to actual fines. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_pharmaceutical_settlements>Ripple's actions still influence price.>doesn't dismiss the accusation of strategic supply management.Price manipulation involves illicit or deceptive actions intended to artificially alter XRP’s market price for unfair advantage, often creating price distortions or dumps. In contrast, strategic price management via the XRP escrow system is a transparent, pre-scheduled release mechanism designed to manage XRP supply. CLL does not care about token price.Therefore any entity that does something to manage token price is considered as price manipulation by the link baggies.
I hold XRP
>>61049871>xrp is not competing with swift.https://x.com/TheCryptoSquire/status/1912504213462011920lol, Is this why the CTO quit?
>>61050154>RIPPLE WON>ok so they paid a fine but it's only 125 million
>>61049877>XRPL nodes.rippled
>>61050193>Ripple adoption: still at near zero>Ripple value capture: mostly on Ethereum>"my job here is done"
>>61044402I wonder where this guy is rn..
>>61050349>mints 90% of RLUSD on ETH>"NOW my job here is done"
linkers owned xrp by missing the bullrun
