[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/biz/ - Business & Finance


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_0974.png (137 KB, 1280x1280)
137 KB
137 KB PNG
Do you think Chainshit will:

A) break through $23 like a normal non-piece of SHIT coin?

or

B) dump after a limpdick sissy“pump” as usual?
>>
>>61050797
i unironically think itll pump soon
>>
File: IMG_0309.png (5 KB, 447x447)
5 KB
5 KB PNG
I think I'm selling this shit as soon as I break even
>>
we're at multi year resistance right now
>>
if we pump and it somehow manages to break it's resistance, this will be the god candle of the cycle for LINK.
>>
>>61050850
>>61050874
spoonfeed me what is the resistance? $23? It looked like $26 just a little while ago in september
>>
>>61050874
eh not really, even if we break resistance late breakout longs have to be liquidated. the actual breakout comes after the retest
>>
File: 1729966602414651.png (141 KB, 615x960)
141 KB
141 KB PNG
>>61050887
>It looked like $26 just a little while ago in september
That shit was fucking depressing
>>
>>61050797
dump after a limpdick sissy “pump” as usual?
>>
>>61050908
can you do that but with ETH this time? I think we've all been fooled, BTC might be suppressing ETH instead of stink
>>
>>61050897
>have to be
there is no "have to be" in this market. Otherwise retarded bears would have been right back in 2018 when they claimed BTC HAD TO retest 3k at the bottom. It went to 5k instantly instead. Or all of these retards that say "muh CME gap" and redraw the lines whenever they can. So many people say "well we HAVE TO do this one thing before bull" and it almost never happens

>>61050887
The short version is look at the LINK/BTC chart combined with the current chart setup on timeframes longer than 4 hours. Personally I think most of the reason LINK can't pump is these fucking annoying trading algo bots trading against the sat value. link is pretty suppressed at the moment, all we need to be sent massively upwards is to get above 0.0002300 sats, or to go above ~23 - 23.5 which will consequently then send us above the sat value for the multi year resistance. There are a lot of various chart patterns people are also gazing just waiting for a breakout (bull flag, cup and handle, etc)
>>
>>61050947
I'm afraid that next stop is 8k sats, buckle up
>>
>>61050908
oi dont even own link. ,but why do you think they dump bitcoin when link pumps? who could be dong it /? and why??it has been doing that for years.

this is one reason i hsvent invested in it, obviously manipulated with hundreds of millions of coins able to be dumped...

yall are crzy for investing in that coin
>>
>>61050947
>there is no "have to be" in this market
I agree, most of this is just pure memeline astrology bullshit
>>
just broke 23
>>61050947
thanks for the brief



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.