>>61060427>sold yesterdays scam pumpGET THIS DIRTY PEDOCOIN OUT OF MY SIGHT
>>61060436Upset linkie?
>>61060427the total ruin of investors
>>61060427>i've hurt myself today
>>610638352021 was a bulltrap>>61064192Not for these that bought in the past 5 months
>>61064632> for these that bought in the past 5 monthsGive it time and they will be hurting all the rest
nobody can tell you what this dinosaur does. What's the point of this coin?
>>61065022>I don't know what it does, so noone does!Polkadot is ethereum executed properly, solving the trilemma. Like ethereum it is a blockchain that scales through rollups, but at orders of magnitude greater efficiency, while also being the most decentralised and secure. Polkadot is capable of delivering 800k+ TPS, rollups that can dynamically respond to demand to increase or decrease their TPS/block time (down to 500ms per block), has the largest data availability layer in crypto, and soon the ability to run *any* code, *any* program, website, whatever, using the preexisting network, offering something akin to ICP but actually decentralised.
>>61065022As a pedocoin, it gets you a pardon and all charges dropped.
>>61065134Nobody gives a damn, look at the chart
>>61063379Mind broken cuck I held this shit for 5 years
>>61065022Think ETH, but far ahead in tech.>>61065190How is it a pedocoin linkie
Thank you saar!
>>61065190That seems like a great feature sar
>>61065134Nobody cares, sperg
>>61071960Easy Linkie
>>61066384Why what’s going on with the chart?
>>61073231Its dead
I have just market bought another 100k$ worth of DOT. What do you guys think? Am I going to make it? My stack is not 482k$ at an average price of 3.9$
>>61076487>My stack is not 482k$ at an average price of 3.9$now*
>>61076487I am bagholding 12000 DOT with average of 11$I hope it can go back to 10 so I can sell
>>61076725We’re MOONING!!! Look at the chart!!!
>>61076487I think the bull market will not hit DOT or alts in general until april/may next year, which means it'll coincide with the switch to the fixed supply halvening, and thus a big supply drop to CEXes. I reckon you're really well positioned for that with a good buy price. DOT could easily reach 15 to 20 dollars which is 1.5 to 2.5mil for you, upward to maybe 45 dollars. Of course it could go further but 15 dollars is where I would start selling in tranches. You can still earn about 2.5k additional DOT by staking until this point, and I would personally do this by shifting your holdings into gDOT on hydration which keeps it liquid. Selling into stables on hydration is simple and you'll also be able to earn 12 to 16% in stable pools after you sell. Assuming a good run and you exit with 3.5m that's close to half a mil annually in returns which is easily make it territory.
>>61060427i sold Dot at $12, I doubt it will ever go back.
>>61077450You are INSANE! This is the most BULLISH chart in all of Crypto
>>61077438You could earn 7.5k DOT from staking even, not 2.5.
>>61077465I sold and I have no regrets. Dot still stuck at $3-4, its retarded, I got in early, not going to hold something with so little value, so little promise.
>>61076725>I hope it can go back to 10 so I can sellGood, sell so I can buy more at a cheap price like that. I'll gladly buy your desperation.>>61077438I ain't sallening my DOT until 100$+.
so I looked at le leddit and they are sad that some paracords or whatever are leavingAny way to spin this as bullish news?
>>61065134The blockchain trilemma is not some bug waiting for a patch, it's a structural trade-off between decentralization, security, and scalability. Improving one edge mathematically and operationally eats into at least one of the others. That’s just the physics of distributed consensus, not an engineering mistake. Every project that claims to “solve” the trilemma has simply chosen a different point in the trade-off space. It’s like saying someone “solved” the speed-safety-cost trilemma of cars, you can build a Formula 1 car (speed), a tank (safety), or a Corolla (cost-balanced). You can’t get all three at their theoretical maximum simultaneously.
>>61077601>so I looked at le leddit and they are sad that some paracords or whatever are leaving>Any way to spin this as bullish news?Phala is leavingIf you go to the vote: https://phala.subsquare.io/democracy/referenda/77Literally everyone is the comments is like "This makes no sense", yet some whales still voted "Aye" for some unknown reason. Even if you read this: https://forum.phala.network/t/proposal-sunsetting-phala-parachain-and-migrating-to-ethereum-l2/3999, you can see that they didn't even state a clear reason.>>61077614>The blockchain trilemma is not some bug waiting for a patch, it's a structural trade-off between decentralization, security, and scalability. Improving one edge mathematically and operationally eats into at least one of the others. That’s just the physics of distributed consensus, not an engineering mistake. Every project that claims to “solve” the trilemma has simply chosen a different point in the trade-off space. It’s like saying someone “solved” the speed-safety-cost trilemma of cars, you can build a Formula 1 car (speed), a tank (safety), or a Corolla (cost-balanced). You can’t get all three at their theoretical maximum simultaneously.>Every project that claims to “solve” the trilemma has simply chosen a different point in the trade-off space.Well that's the thing bro... DOT did "solve" it and no trade-offs were made. It's a trilemma until it's not a trilemma. Just because no one has been able to tackle it doesn't mean that it's impossible. Literally by DOT existing it PROVES that it has been solved.
>>61077667Parachains inherit security from the relay chain validators, so smaller projects don’t need their own validator sets. That improves security but concentrates power in a limited validator pool. It’s more efficient, yet less decentralized.Parallelized parachains allow higher throughput, which boosts scalability. However, it requires strong coordination between parachains and the relay chain, creating bottlenecks and governance overhead.To maintain security and throughput, the number of active validators is capped (around a few hundred). That’s far less decentralized than thousands of independent nodes, like Bitcoin or Ethereum.DOT chose medium decentralization, high security, medium scalability. It is impossible to have all three variables maximized simultaneously.
>>61077844>Parachains inherit security from the relay chain validators, so smaller projects don’t need their own validator sets. That improves security but concentrates power in a limited validator pool. It’s more efficient, yet less decentralized.>It’s more efficient, yet less decentralized.>less decentralizedhttps://nakaflow.io/ - Polkadot nakamoto coefficient = 184 which is 5.57575757576x higher than the 2nd project, Avail, with a nakamoto coeff of 33. All the corechains, as you've stated, inherit exactly this security. The security of a 184 nakamoto coeff.>Parallelized parachains allow higher throughput, which boosts scalability. However, it requires strong coordination between parachains and the relay chain, creating bottlenecks and governance overhead.Strong coordination? What needs to be coordinated? Creating a bottleneck, how? How come it creates a gov overhead, what needs to be voted on?>To maintain security and throughput, the number of active validators is capped (around a few hundred). That’s far less decentralized than thousands of independent nodes, like Bitcoin or Ethereum.>around a few hundred600. Going to 1000 sooner or later and more. Bitcoins nakamoto coeff is literally 3 (https://chainspect.app/dashboard/decentralization), while ETHs nakamoto coeff is a miserable 2. What you're saying is categorically false because all the validators are centralized inside pools like Lido (https://lido.fi/). What you're saying WOULD BE true if everyone staked with their own independent validator. But they don't. It would also be true in the case if the pools were genuinely decentralized, which they aren't.
>>61078015>DecentralizationWhile Polkadot's Nakamoto coefficient suggests a decentralized validator set, the actual distribution of stake among these validators indicates a more centralized control. This underscores the importance of considering both the number of validators and the distribution of stake when assessing a network's decentralization. For instance, in some networks, the top 20 validators manage over 60% of the total staked value>What needs to be coordinated? Creating a bottleneck, how? How come it creates a gov overhead, what needs to be voted on?Block production scheduling, which parachain gets to produce a block in each relay chain slot.Cross-chain messages, messages or transactions that move between parachains have to be routed and verified by the relay chain.Dispute resolution, if a validator signs an invalid block, the network needs a mechanism to identify and slash the offender.Even if parachains can process transactions in parallel, all finality proofs and cross-chain message validation go through the relay chain. This creates a centralized point that can slow things down if overloaded.Decisions such as adding/removing parachains, adjusting staking parameters, slashing misbehaving validators, or protocol upgrades require votes from a finite governance set (Council + referenda). With multiple parachains, each with their own needs and economic considerations, the governance layer becomes heavier and slower.
>>61078015Also I just want to give you credit, the validator centralization problem with Lido is a real concern too.
>>61060427the pedochain and the total ruin of investors. Don't be fooled, this thing can go much lower like 0.
>>61078733Why do I feel like I'm talking to ChatGPT?>the actual distribution of stake among these validators indicates a more centralized controlOh yea? Tell me about the distribution.>Block production scheduling, which parachain gets to produce a block in each relay chain slot.Ok, and how does that "bottleneck" anything?>Cross-chain messages, messages or transactions that move between parachains have to be routed and verified by the relay chain.Ok, and how does that "bottleneck" anything?>Dispute resolution, if a validator signs an invalid block, the network needs a mechanism to identify and slash the offender.Yes? And ... ???>This creates a centralized point that can slow things down if overloaded.>if overloadedHow many TPS would it take to overload the relay chain?>Decisions such as adding/removing parachainsWrong, ChatGPT isn't always right. You don't need a gov vote to remove/add a corechain.>adjusting staking parametersThey were adjusted twice in what? 2 years?>slashing misbehaving validatorsThe dispute resolution system does that automatically. Again, ChatGPT isn't always right.>upgrades require votes from a finite governance set (Council + referenda)Damn, ChatGPT didn't do you any favors. "Finite" governance set? Like what the fuck is a "FINITE" governance set?>the governance layer becomes heavier and slower.What does that even mean? How does a light and fast governance layer look like?>>61078765>Also I just want to give you credit, the validator centralization problem with Lido is a real concern too.TnxAgain dude, you can't just copy paste some words that ChatGPT formatted for you... It's really easy to detect because half of that isn't even true
>>61079647Chatbot brainrot is real, fucking sad to see.
>>61077667>Phala is leavingJust speculation but it might be because JAM will explicitly offer the exact same product (decentralised compute) that phala does, likely at a better cost:benefit ratio.
>>61076487Staking alone will have you made it
>>61080242Oh well. The current level of AI does have a lot of usability... IF YOU KNOW HOW TO USE IT. You can use AI for anything, it's just, you have to know what is true and what isn't. I actually and I kid you not, used AI to write up my whole fucking CS diploma. I literally told the AI what kind of diploma I was writing and told me to come up with a motivation for the diploma, since one of the introduction chapters is literally "Motivation for diploma" and I was like "My motivation is literally to complete college. I have no clue what the fuck else I would write" and then I was like "Fuck this, I'll ask ChatGPT to come up with some bullshit motivation". I literally did that. Also my mentor kept telling me my spelling is crap and that my writting is crap and then I literally told ChatGPT to proofread that shit and it did and the mentor was ok with it. And I literally had ChatGPT more or less all of the useless chapters that aren't describing the code. Like I had a chapter talking about like monitoring tools... I can't be arsed to write that shit. I really don't care about anything but the code and that's why writting anything besides what the code does is a real fucking chore for me that I'm not prepared to do and that's where ChatGPT stepped in. He probably wrote well over 100 pages of my diploma out of the 173 pages I wrote. I can't make that shit up>>61080322But even if that true. The purpose of Phala is TEEs... So PRIVACY compute. JAM isn't private... It's just compute. I don't know man, I really don't see the reason why they would leave for ETH. The whole Phala community is upset about the decision... They haven't stated anything in particular why. Must be something behind the scenes, something they don't want to mention in order to not muddy their image. They mentioned that they want to be EVM aligned... I just don't see the real benefit of that. They could probably achieve that on DOT as well... I dunno man. Oh well, what will you do...
>>61080359I mean, the APY is getting more than halved on the 14th of March 2026 due to the BTC-style halvings getting implemented and supply getting capped. I'm actually betting on the alt coin season starting at about the same time as DOT implementing that + JAM will also come out at the same time
>>61080322And it's like... Why the fuck ETHEREUM. BNB would've been better if they wanted a FAST chain with EVM compatibility. ETH is just too slow... It's dying... ETH will sooner or later crap itself because no one is developing anything anymore on it. Like no new development is being driven since there's a maximum capacity on the DA and TPS. I have no clue what PHA is thinking. Everyone is running away from ETH and they're migrating onto ETH in order to become and independent L2 on it.
>>61080449I believe the majority of their clients are eth projects already, and since most people in crypto are echo chambered within their respective ecosystems they might be thinking they'll get better visibility being financially aligned, getting boosted by eth publicists etc. There is by by far and away the most money on ethereum. Just chasing the money, like nodle and kilt. Maybe others too.
>>61080398Supply getting capped is very bullish for DOT
Oh no, looks like we're going to 0. Damn
>>61081572Check the chart
https://x.com/BRICSinfo/status/1976753112053665908"US to impose 100% tariffs on China."Trump cucked everyone it seems. This is probably a good opportunity to buy more
It's a fire sale, flash crash. Buy anything you can... This is an opportunity of a life time. It'll just reset within hours or days
For some innapropriate reason people hyperfocus on the tarrifs. GUYS, listen up. THERE ARE NO TARRIFS ON CRYPTO
ARE YOU FUCKERS SCOOPING UP THIS DIP? ARE YOU SLURPING? IT'S A FUCKING FIRE SALE !!! BLACK FRIDAY ON DRUGS !!!
https://cointelegraph.com/news/trump100-tariffs-china-bitcoin-plummets-110k -> "https://cointelegraph.com/news/trump100-tariffs-china-bitcoin-plummets-110k" ... Le pic relatedIT'S OVER. WE PLUMMETED BELOW 110K$
>>61082253>https://cointelegraph.com/news/trump100-tariffs-china-bitcoin-plummets-110k -> "https://cointelegraph.com/news/trump100-tariffs-china-bitcoin-plummets-110k"Meant to say https://cointelegraph.com/news/trump100-tariffs-china-bitcoin-plummets-110k -> "Trump announces 100% tariffs on China, Bitcoin plummets below $110K"
Fucking orange faggot does this on purpose so he can buy cheapies.
Congrats on this, really.
>>61082337No. Hes giving you linkie losers an opportunity to buy
>>61082825Yeah it's ICP tier. Tragic shit.
>>61082825hit 0.6 USD at the peak. Did you bought?
>>61082926Where are you seeing that? It's saying 1.41 on Binance. I don't doubt it went lower on other exchanges, though. And no, I didn't buy. I missed the whole dump, and I'm not sure I want to buy this anyway since it's been performing like dogshit all year. Even after recovering, it's sitting lower than its October 2023 bottom.
>>61083243It was actually 0.628$ on Binance. Look at the DOT/USDT pair
Wow, COSMOS actually went to a literal 0$. That's kind of funny
>>61083621The old rivalry seems bittersweet when it feels like it's close to DOTs turn.
