If you were an actual time traveler and showed 2018 LINKies this screenshot, and said it was from 2025, they would be certain that LINK would be >$500 by now.
>>61102568All this means nothing, its a scam, they are paying to be at these events or even host them themselves to seem relevant
>>61102568No one could have imagined that they would go this far to suppress the priceBut never selling was invented for a reason
>>61102578>hurrr it's paid Funny how Ripple with 100x more money than Chainlink can't get anywhere close to that kind of connections.
>>61102578every VC funded crypto scam company would pay an absurd amount of money to be able to do the same, but you only see Chainlink same with everything White House related
I would tell them that LINK would be 86k in 2026.Wait what?
>>61102582>CLL shill detected
>>61102708Yes technically im getting paid by CLL1 LINK = 1.0432 LINK
>>61102568why is the securitize rat allowed back in the buildinghe needs to be feathered and tarred on stage
>>61102772Maybe the "fireside chat" is just Sergey manhandling him into an open fire.
>>61102772They bend the knee
2 more fireside chats and 3 more keynotes
>>61102713The Linkie is immunized against all dangers: One may call him a baggie, parasite, schizo, retard, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a ChainlinkLabs shill and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: "I’ve been found out
>>61102840>opens Link thread>finds people saying Link goodwhoa, how did THAT happen???
>>61102847>goes to the one place on the entire internet that people care about LINK>scroll through the catalog past 10 LINK fud threads>find one LINK thread with a few holders chatting>"OMG STFU ABOUT CHIANLINK YOU SHILS"
>>61102869kek and they do this exact shit every fucking day.Like what even is that.
>>61102869Dont forget another 5-10 demoralization threads targeted at linkies.All threads created by the same paid fudders
>>61102888>Company pushes "truth>trust" as a slogan for almost a decade>get asked why off-chain payments have no transparency>get asked why no fees are being collected in link token, nor are they being converted as they were supposed to >WoW YoU ArE a BaD AcToR FuDdiE hUh?Noooooo! You cannot just list facts! Duuuuuuuuude! You must be nigerian or bulgarian or something! Fuddies must be desperate today! 1k EOY. It’s happening. Tonight. Duuuuuuuuude! I bought 8 years ago when it was cents and it’s around $20 today. I am a fucking genius! What? Hundreds of shitcoins did the same? Duuuuuuuuuude! You will never be white! What? Check the Link/BTC chart? DIDNT READ NOT SELLING!!! Opportunity cost? What is that? Stay based chudie fudie kiddos pool is closed based chudie fudie kidddos! Meds? No I dont take them. Yeah I’ve been bagholding all these years. Yeah I live with my mom. How did you know??
>>61102906Thanks for caring about my financial well being but i think eth holders might need your help more or cripples
>le "I'm just asking reasonable questions about my investment" defense to justify hundreds of thousands of schizoid berserk fud posts
>>61102906>translation: i am a rapefugee faggot named Adem Kayser who "peeled back" the layers of his "porn identity" so much that when he's not crying about being a suicidal sissy gooner, his 2 brain-cells are solely fixated on other people's folios to the point where he posts on 4chan biz like its his job
>>61102568>how RippleNaming your free tenant is not an argument, baggie.
>>61102772they bent the knee last week
>>61102948OP didn't even mention Ripple.Seeing things again, xerpie?
>>61103003Somhow tagged OP and not baggie below>>61102674
>>61103091Ripple does have a lot more money than Link, and Ripple's whole thing is institutional users.Therefore: if you could just pay for institutional partnerships, Ripple would have 100x more than Chainlink, not 1000x less.It's the perfect comparison.
>>61103106>Ripple does have a lot more money than LinkCorrect>Ripple's whole thing is institutional users.So is chainlinks>It's the perfect comparisonRipple uses the money fot other things, like buy other companies 1/10th the mcap of chainlink. Dont know why you think this comparison is great. Comparing an oracle provider to the number 3 crypto. Completely diffent ballpark.
>>61103204>>Ripple's whole thing is institutional users.>So is chainlinksNope, Chainlink owns Defi too.>Ripple uses the money fot other thingslmao, they'd buy institutional partnerships in a heartbeat if they could.
>>61103204>for other thingslike lining their pockets
>>61103226Ok baggie,Sure thats reflected in the price right?Hows that flippening coming along?
>>61103249Link's massive adoption and institutional partnerships are not reflected in the Link price.Just like Ripple's complete lack of adoption and institutional partnerships is not reflected in the XRP price.
>>61102568Does anyone remember all the shit coin threads from 2017 with >LE MICROSOFT PARTNERSHIP
>>61103258>not reflected in the Link priceWhy is that?>complete lack of adoption and institutional partnershipsMy bag is up, unlike link.Hello biepum,Denying reality again?Are you going to deny your kiked overlords just dumped millions of link before the crash?
>>61103226Yeah but price? Oh and chart?
>>61103274>Why is that?Why is BNB at ATH right now?Why is Solana in the top 10 after all those failures?Why is ADA in the top 10 without any users?etc.
>>61102568At this point all you can do is laugh about it lol...feels like we are almost there though.
>>61102955>>61102789source
oh great another LINK thread on its way to devolving into a 200 post LINK v XRP seethefest with the same two spergs going 1 for 1 with each other like they do 4 times a week
>>61102568Bullish for XRP.
>>61102568record of the past is a prediction of the future
>>61103305https://x.com/ARiHBARi/status/1975907539507380383
>>61102568id have said it was impossible to be so in with so many institutions and yet the token only be $20-$25, id have said that fud is so ludicrous itll never trick anyone. yet here we are, amazing, simply amazing. sir gay is the greatest scammer of all time, how the FUCK could he create something so integrated with finance yet keep the token Price so low? in another life he would have made a master torturer, or an example from fiction, like O'brien from 1984
>>61103402it's fairly simple, LINK is literally not involved in any of this shit
>>61103377So Chainlink 100xing from $0.20 to $20 means it will go to $2000?
>>61103408how does -99.99% sound to you?
>>61103402https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYLiBEgLOYE^this is what its like to be a link marine
>>61103395thats not a source
>>61103428You want blackrock to tweet that they upgraded to Chainlink and to market buy Chainlink (ticker: LINK) token ?
>>61103431yes
>>61103463source you really want that
>>61103284>Why is BNB at ATH right now?Because the chink runs the biggest exchange and looks like bnb is used. Also memecasino on bsc drives price up. >Why is Solana in the top 10 after all those failures?Meme casino, pushed by hook noses, sol is used for gamblingADACharlatan Hoskinson knows how to talk to normies. Similar to Sirgays talks. So memes and they are good at marketing? The real point here is why dont you mention these tokens every time? Why does XRP and ripple live rent free and not bnb and sol?
>>61103508>looks like bnb is used>sol is usedNope on both.Fees on both Solana and BSC are almost non existent. There's virtually no functional demand for either.>Charlatan Hoskinson knows how to talk to normiesHoskinson literally told normies that he needs Link in order to gain access to US government adoption.
>>61103528>Fees on bothAre you the verbose midwit who cant into annything else but ''fees power le network and make profit else no chain?''The same guy who cant into ripple validators work for ''free''?>>61103528>The shitstain literally told normies that he needs shit in order to gain access to US government adoption.
>>61103568Fees is literally all BNB and SOL can be used for, what the fuck are you talking about.
>>61103578>BNBparticipation in token sales, governance, and staking >SOLsmart contract executionsstakingmemecoin casino >what the fuck are you talking aboutDont shit yourself biepum
>>61103676>participation in token sales>smart contract executions>memecoin casino aka fees>governanceAbsolutely meaningless when Binance controls the validators.>stakingThat's not "using", that's parking.Literally nothing happens with those tokens.
>>61103808>That's not "using", that's parking.Parking is also a use other than ''fees'' you semantic retard.>Literally nothing happens with those tokens.They went up in value, thats why you sperg so hard.
>>61102939what he came for:>early altcoin gainswhat he got:>the gains never came, so he started tracking anonymous men's jerkoff habitsgrim
>>61103879So you got rich off BNB and SOL, what are you doing fudding LINK 16h a day on /biz/ then?
>>61102706This meme post is already invalidated.
>>61102568token not needed
>>61104689Adem is the opposite of anonymous
>>61105226so is this guy
>>61102674XRP has more important matters to attend to then hosting fireside chats with literal whos.
>>61105249who is this? I would trust him to roll me a joint.
>>61105282he's one of the stuttering potheads who run the chainlink shitshow
>>61102674Explain this away fudtards
>>61102939Man this just makes me feel bad for him. Porn ruins a lot of dudes, very hard to quit. Gotta give him some props for at least recognizing the problem and trying to fix it.
>>61105301I have never seen him. Who is it?
>>61105312Thats easy...... Price... oh.... and... chart
>>61105226>duuuuuuuuuude if i know the guys' name it means tracking his beatoff habits is okyou know how i know you're gay...
>>61105282>duuuuuuuuuuuuude weed, h h hehhh smoking is cool!!!!!>>61105389why would "feel" any type of a way about a random twitter dudemaybe there's someone you can talk to in person about these feelings you're having
>>61102568Buying trx would have been better, even Houdini recongnized it now
Bullish LINK
>>61106065Sharing your masturbation habits online opens them up for discussion
>>61103808ackchually, link is the self-evolving hyper-oracle of the omni-liquidity meta-continuum. it helps unbloat the legacy financial stack through decentralized deco nodes and ccip trust membranes. every micro-ping of data harmonizes with mixicle entropy grids to generate pure, uncut truth liquidity. sergey said thanksgiving would be the turning point (he didn’t say which year tho), and the marines still whisper “soon” into their staking dashboards. the oracular singularity is always one partnership away, one more integration that fixes everything forever. bags grow heavier, faith grows lighter, and belief becomes the only collater
>>61103808ACK
>>61103274>My bag is up, unlike link.same with my bag, holding snx and lock
>>61102568use your brainput yourself in the following shoesyou’re about to shift the financial system into an ultra-efficient god like protocol not seen or ever possible in human historyyou know that you’re essentially king making yourself and there will be outcry with this approachyou purposely let the public in, but need them to only be a tiny sliver of the actual protocol holders when the time comes to go full outyou need even the most emboldened in the public to let go of their holdingsyou still get to keep your free market narrativenow add it up: when would you let this rip? you obviously wouldn’t after great news. you want the holders to get used to “great news” and believe there will be no price reactions. you want to drain them.use your brain, how many more news cycles without price action would it take for you to break?that’s your answerthat’s the moment it’ll rip#1 MCAPbtw. just to prove to you I’m in the know I’ll drop you something no one else knows:there is an internal project pending name LINKHub. It’s a chain, but all it does is custody LINK. There are no smart contracts.This is being prepared to decouple risk from ETH being the native ledger for LINK. The same nodes for the oracle network will secure LINKHub. This is a project that will secure LINK for the future envisioned where it will become a #1 MCAP on the crypto charts. Can’t do that while bound to ETH as the base.There will be easy adapters to move LINK from any chain to LINKHub (name pending).
>>61102568yeah agreedi was always skeptical back in the day among all the shilling and delusion and thought there was a very good chance it would failbut for it to around in 2025 and with the ties they have is insanewhat makes it even worse is stuff like ada and xrp to be so much higher than us while doing absolutely nothingif LINK had HALF the cap of xrp today it would be at $110 which would mean i'd be retired with house paid off.. it's bullshit
>>61103428since when is the official github not a source?
>>61107096use your brain
>>61106084>maybe there's someone you can talk to in person about these feelings you're havingLmao nah man, nah.
>>61106848nigger pot pie and hot clam juice
