Pretty much all of CT and /biz/ now think the top is behind us and we're going to shit the bed again as per all cycles. It does feel eerily like the beginning of last cycle's decline. Is it actually over, bros? I didn't make it. Should I just sell now and salvage what I can?
>>61133795No
>>61133795always do the opposite of what /biz/ sayspersonally i think the cycle of it's so over/we're so back once every couple of weeks is bad for your mental health
>>61133795yes cause CT is notorious about getting things right
everything will be fine you nigger
>>61133795>Pretty much all of CTWho gives a fuck what Connecticut thinks? Dogshit state.
>>61133820it means "crypto trannies"
Most of /biz/ are still bagholding. They will only accept reality when BTC dumps below 80k
>>61133827then he should say crypto trannies like a normal person
"The cycle" is bait for low IQ incels. We had a top early 2024 and late 2024. You could say we also had a top late 2025 but the energy was nowhere near the energy of either the early or late 2024 tops and it was mostly bitcoin and ethereum barely putting in new all time highs after Ethereum dumped 65%. Look at the chart for total3ES, Total2es, or even BTC. There's no blowoff top, just distribution in an upwards motion
>>61133795We went from 126k to 107k. A 15% drop. Everyone thinks it's over because bitcoin fell 15%.
>>61133795My nigger. We are in a new paradigm, you stupid faggot. This shit isn't gonna dump 70% with institutional investors pumping it.
Sold my btc and fomo'd into gold.
>>61134162hey, I'm not any of those things.
>>61135693are too
>>61133795BULLISH to LINK,,,, CHAINLINKdevaLABS will be the one to know youyou must know first, and take great fortune from the investments we expect soonthanks upon you for doing the reading