Due to the recent Twitter drama, i will come state some facts and dispel rumors. Link fudding was autonomous and decentralized during the 2022 era. As price action worsened, anons started talking shit about link out of frustration on /biz/. After the x rebrand, twitter got popular for crypto, so a lot of anons made accounts to shitpost under chainlinks comments. As the price action got worse, more people joined in on shitting on sergey and chainlink labs to the point they had to block all "fudders" one day. Sometime last year, that fud group chat was created randomly by some guy who just started inviting people that he saw were "fudding". If any of you talks to chainlinkgod, he can confirm that since he was originally added to it too. I personally almost never chatted on there except the first day. There were only like 10ish core fudders that were always talking to eachother. This Redstone fag wasn't there until a few months ago. Schizos will probably say that this post is damage control by link competitors, but nah, you have my full blessings to go after and try to destroy those cockroach faggots. I can only speak for myself but I think real fud marines dont give a fuck about any competitors, at worst we would sometimes hype XRP and PYTH just to troll and get under shills skin. I dont think anyone would seriously invest in that garbage over link. Thats why every "fudder" seems to be so knowledgeable about your investment. And why the FUD seems to amplify during times of negative price action. As an OG /biz/ fudder, I disavow any competitor jews trying to scheme. I personally dont fud sergey and link out of malice, I hope to create diamonds out of pressure. I also fud to prevent black people, redditors and twitter normies from holding chainlink. I dont know about the other fudfags extent of working with competitors, but it does seem to me that most are just bored link marines shooting the shit waiting for link to finally pump.
yeah i ain't reading all that. if you fud link ironically you're a loser. if you fud link unironically you're a loser. go outside. get some sun. do something productive with your time.
Rory said its fine bro
>>61148073Brother, the fudding is the reason we aren’t at $200+ right now. You will have to live with that forever. Once the market comes back to reality these hyper speculative prices all will disappear. LINK will likely go sub $5 as it can be used at a very large scale at a low price. These times when liquidity is low and retail creates volatility are the only chances we will actually get to capture the gold rush retardation. If we miss this window it’s unironically over. If you guys put your energy into shilling we might be able to squeeze to $100 before the show is done, but time is limited. Yes, all the trash will die off completely. That does not mean LINK goes to a high price. When fundamentals finally are king you don’t get to enjoy the spoils of clown market anymore, which is all that is keeping these insane prices propped up for all alts. I’m lucky, I have 300,000 LINK and already sold enough to make it. But if we can’t surpass $50 by the end of this year I’m out and I’ll let you guys hold my bags forever. As someone in a major whale group I can tell you I’m not the only one thinking this way.
>>61148487There wouldnt be fud if sergey wasn't incompetently failing. Just look at the difference between BNB with CZ vs LINK with spergey. Lack of tokenomics, marketing etc is not the communities fault, its the leadership. We've tried to tell sergey to stop dumping and focus on token value accrual, were the ones that want chainlink to succeed. Cheering him on while he's fucking up our bags is counterproductive. Calling these things out is normal behavior. What exactly do you think they do at company shareholder meetings when companies are failing to provide revenue to investors...?If this was a publicly traded company, spergey would be long gone.
Quick reminder that this board is full of gullible but smug retards who believe they are smarter than they really are and actually and unironically believed a time traveller sent an encrypted message from the future to shill LINK on a mongolian basket weaving forum, instead of I don’t know, sending us the lotto winning numbers or something.The message said that Chainlink would be 81k by late 2026. It was accompanied by a graph that showed that on 12/21/2026 Chainlink would reach such heights.Which means it should be around $20,000 USD by now, as shown in such graph.>anon it is a pic of a screen! Look at the glare. How can THAT be photoshopped!?!?!?Many such cases.>yeah I’m copping hard anon, my link is only 100x from ICOWhat is opportunity cost?At least BIZ was fun back then, with that german boomer faggot 42 spamming it’s esoteric anti semitic adenochrome riddled saturn cult bullshit.Casual anti semitism is kinda fun nglOh well. I guess it stopped mattering during the 21 run, when we all made it with SHIB while the linktards seethed, dilated and copped.>muh retarded market. Muh normies know nuttinThe truth is that crypto is an IQ test. If you hold LINK after Q2 2020, guess what that says about you?Congrats anon. You paid for a bunch of HR roasties that inflate sergey’s ego.Well playedSeriously.
hate linkjust need to hate linkas much as one loves godi must hate link
Hate stinks, simple as (fuck em all)
>>61148487>Brother, the fudding is the reason we aren’t at $200+ right now. You will have to live with that forever. Once the market comes back to reality these hyper speculative prices all will disappear. LINK will likely go sub $5 as it can be used at a very large scale at a low price.Best fud angle ever.
Stinkies get the rope
>>61149409This isn’t a regulated company on the stock market, fuddies pretending it is doesn’t change the fact. You are in the Wild West, there are no rules. The ones that get ahead are the ones relentlessly shilling and capturing the attention of a very small pool of people. If you think you’re going to pressure the team into doing something for your own pockets you are probably retarded. They sell hundreds of millions of dollars worth every 3 months. They don’t need to bend the knee to some fucking 50,000 LINK poorfag who is behaving like a child. The only way to push the prices in this market are to capture retail attention and fuddies are actively working against that. When the music finally stops they’ll have to face this reality. One shot and blew it by being mentally retarded and applying all their energy against their own interests when they could have done the opposite and achieved their goal.
>>61151110Also I’ll add the Chainlink team is well aware of this which is why they are desperately going ham on marketing and trying to push all of this good news. The problem is people tend to trust other people like them more than companies, so when there’s a dissonance like they see a company having the largest integration in crypto over and over and then they see a bunch of autistic “investooors” saying “yea but the tokenomics are bad!” They just parrot the entity that is more like them. They go “oh, the tokenomics are bad. I won’t buy that and I’ll tell everyone the tokenomics are bad.” When ADA is $0 and DOGE is $0 and XRP is 20 cents and LINK is 50 cents I guess fuddies will feel victorious. We are about 20-30 years out from LINK’s fundamental value needing to be $10+. A lot of these fudfags will die before then. If they truly hold LINK they’re simply fucking up right now and we are sincerely close to the last waltz for clown market.
>>61148073>Link fudding was autonomous and decentralized during the 2022 era.We already had Zeus Capital and Adem before that.Link fud was always forced and inorganic.It has nothing to do with the price action either, pic is "legitimate concern" fud spam from early 2020, after nearly 2 years of Link outperforming the market.
>>61149409>Just look at the difference between BNB with CZ vs LINK with spergey.CZ, the guy who admitted to fraud and went to federal prison?The guy everyone's shitting on after the 10 October crash Binance caused?That CZ?The price of BNB is the most inorganic manipulated in crypto history. BSC memecoins across the board flashed to 0 on 10 October, and a few days later BNB hits a new ATH. Enough said.
>>61148073chainlink demands a price from all its holdersthese pro-fudders paid in their sanity. During the period of the Great Tribulation their inherent greed and arrogance twisted them into something unrecognizably repulsive.For those who used the fires of the Great Tribulation to reforge themselves better, their debt will be repaid by hunting down and eliminating the first group of bitter and dangerous linklords.(normies that just used the riches to have fun pay by ending up in a dark and freezing type place)
Unironically why do they keep double dipping on income? Like they make so much money from selling their services to get dollars that they don’t need to keep selling their token stash for dollars but they do anyways.
>>61151294They have to get rid of their stack or network will never be secured
>>61148073>I personally dont fud sergey and link out of malice, I hope to create diamonds out of pressureSergey bought smartcontract dot com the same week bitcoin was released, he was retwitting Sam Altman in 2013, was mentioned by Klaus Schwab in 2015, and is collaborating with Swift since 2017. If you think that some mentally ill idiots on xitter are going to influence his work in any way, shape or form you're severely retarded >I also fud to prevent black people, redditors and twitter normies from holding chainlinkGreat idea, we wouldn't want retail to make us rich before 2035 when we're old and tired. Dumping our bags on retail wouldn't be based at all, better let them make money on dogecoin.Fucking retard.
>>61148487>Brother, the fudding is the reason we aren’t at $200+ right nowLmao no. The fud is unironically the only thing keeping this shitcoin advertised at all.>>61151110>The only way to push the prices in this market are to capture retail attention and fuddies are actively working against that.Kek. >cucks finally admitting they need retail after 8 years. The thing is retail has never cared about link. Just check picrel for this year, or even at chainlink ATH. The interest has never spiked outside of retards shilling here. It's just a big circle jerk. >>61151125>Chainlink team is well aware of this which is why they are desperately going ham on marketingThe "marketing" is word salad. Retail doesn't care. >>61151337>we wouldn't want retail to make us rich before 2035 when we're old and tired.This was unironically the linkfag stance since 2017. Funny how things have changed. Kek.
>>61151446>MAPRed VS Blue>TOTAL WARWho wins? >TRIPS DECIDE
>>61148073>I also fud to prevent black people, redditors and twitter normies from holding chainlinkunfathomably basedit isnt enough for me to win, others must losewhat the poorfags screeching here dont understand is that /biz/ witnessed an entire market cycle before chainlink became knownthat means anons already made it on eth and those anons see, correctly so i need to stress, that the greatest long term value lies in fudding normies out of link during these timesbutbutbut, look at gold today the cattle will queue up to buy even at 4000 a pop for link in the enddoesnt matter a bit to people who have all the time in the world already sitting comfy forever out the cagenu/biz/ fails to comprehend this nuance and i doubt it has the intelligence to better itself
>>61151446LINK is the 9th biggest altcoin by marketcap retard, obviously some people are buying
fuck stinks>>61151590yeah, retards
>>61151110>This isn’t a regulated company on the stock market, fuddies pretending it is doesn’t change the fact.fag its about destroying sergeys social capital untill he changes course
>>61151294congrats in the eyes of link twitter you are a fudder now
>>61148073not reading all that. not selling, but going to kms if we don't hit atleast $100 by eoy. fuck all of you.
>>61151590It's not even top 10 retard
>>61151294They way they behave with the token indicates that theyre not bullish on their token at all. Shills kept saying they supposedly had a massive warchest of usd, yet they were happy to dump huge amounts even at $5
>>61151110Fudders got us a lot of concessions such as the unstake function. Your staked link was originally supposed to be locked for years until they update to the next version. the reserve is also a likely reaction to the mass negative sentiment. If the majority of linkies kept complaining all over X, the team would have no choice but to make changes as this drastically impacts their public image. Companies always have to make changes when their image reaches a critical mass of negativity. Think budlight. Praising and defending CL while everything is on fire burning is evil and does way more harm to holders than fud.
>>61151294>>61151771>>61152384They told us they were gonna unlock all tokens, and the rate of emission is extremely average for a crypto.unironically end your miserable existence if you can't stop fucking crying about it AFTER EIGHT FUCKING YEARS
>>61152412>I did a raindance very day for a year>that made it rain todayliteral subsaharan nigger logic
>>61152415cope more stinkiefuddies winit is US who are in YOUR head
>I also fud to prevent black people, redditors and twitter normies from holding chainlink. BASED
>>61148163/thread
link doesn't need the help of negative community posts to perform poorly, sergey manages that just fine
>>61152462>sergey manages that just fineSergey?You mean the guy who's in that conference at the Federal Reserve in two days?
>>61152412>u-us fuddies MATTERED and we're IMPORTANTi guess you have to find a way to rationalize thousands of hours wasted fudding on a dead 4chan board (even on holidays) but pretending that chainlink themselves have ever actually given a shit about what a mentally ill fudcuck on 12 sockpuppet accounts has to say is peak retardationfudcucks never really made an impact on retail either - you utterly failed to stop either staking pool from being filled up in a few hours, and that's probably the only provable metric you could have gone by to claim that you made a difference at allthe only thing you actually achieved was spending thousands of collective hours spamming this place with garbage, 99 percent of which probably wasn't even viewed or interacted with by anyone outside of your faggy subhuman twitter groupchat members... oh and adem also got himself doxxed, so there's thatthat's all there is to ityou're not getting your time back and it made no difference whatsoever lolthe only consolation you can realistically have is the understanding that your time wasn't worth much to begin with - you're just dumb animals and you probably would have had just as much impact applying that same amount of time to something else
>>61152415Stop gaslighting. Why would they have two separate labeled stacks of 350m and 300m when they are just going to be used for the same purpose of dumping?No one in 2017 believed 650m would be dumped. Your emissions cope was only added later on after the whitepaper 2.0. 350m was intended for development, and 300m was for "incentivizing the network". So tell me, how do they expect to pay nodes and stakers once they finish dumping the other 300m stack? Dont tell me its from the strategic reserve, which will take 125 years at current rates to reach 300m. Even ethereum has a long term stack which they are holding long term. I was here in 2017, all the shills were saying 300m will be used for incentivizing banks to get into the staking system. Its pretty alarming how sergey has no plans after 5 years, you would think if this was the hyper bullish 4IR future of finance there would be some plans to hold a substantial sum long term 50+ years. Instead we have 350m being sold to the public, and 650m being sold to the public, so sergey collects all this cash and then fucks off into the sunset.
>>61152771>when they are just going to be used for the same purpose of dumping?CLL have been paying the node operators from the dumps, anon.They've been doing this since May 2019.What are you not understanding here?
>>61152492How's all those countless hours wasted "studying the fundamentals" listening to sergey talks and shilling to cattle treated you? How's the price?
>>61148073I have a sizable LINK stack for which people would call me a liar and FUD like a motherfucker.I do it because it's /fun/, and because it keeps me honest, it makes me dig deep to create absolute fuming COAL.That's how I filtered all niggershit back in the days, you'd be surprised how easy it is to spot shit projects by just reading the documentation and whitepapers.
>>61152783But wait.. I thought they have to pay nodes in link.. the dumps are for getting them usd which they spend on roasties and luxury circlejerk events
>>61152794>well uh sitting on 4chan spamming fud is the same as paying attention to news about your investment>you "only" have 7 figures as a result of this, aren't you a DUMMYlmao next time just write "i'm a retarded brown faggot and you're right, ABrMI6qR"anyway, >>61152492 still stands eternally and it will always cut you losers deepTHOUSANDS of hours wasted for NOTHINGcongrats on this, seriously
>>61152800>I thought they have to pay nodes in link..That's literally what they've been doing.See pic, this is from the early days of the feeds when each node got paid individually per answer.You thought every Linkie going to Binance was sold?
>>61148073you are as much of a joke as the redstone retard.
>>61152795Based knower. If you know your game theory, you know that fudding is the optimal move. Fudding works with the link thesis because if its le secret banker project that will pump from banks usage, retail cattle is irrelevant. From a game theory perspective you dont want a bunch of retail buying when its cheap and undervalued, you dont want them to buy until the parabolic pump so they buy your bags and contribute to your exit liquidity. Link at $17 is 2020 prices.. are you really trying to make the og anons past 5 years of holding worthless? Why should some twitter moonboy cattle be spoonfed the golden ticket while OGs have been suffering for 8 years waiting.
>>61152818This recent 16M dump came out of the 300m "network incentivization" stack and it went to binance. What did CL do with the $10B+ of total dumps, did they spend it all already?
>>61152834I bought at $0.20, what about you anon?
>>61152858>This recent 16M dump came out of the 350m "network incentivization"And all the previous dumps came from the 300m company funding wallet?That means they've been incentivizing the network from the company funding wallet these past six years.You are literally below 100 iq.
>>61148163/Thread.
>>61151446/thread
>>61148163pick up a dictionary on the word irony you illterate twat
>>61148487>Brother, the fudding is the reason we aren’t at $200+ right now.Anon, Chainlink is well known and sponsoring events AT THE CAPITOL. Chainlink is presenting and having talks AT SWIFT'S SIBOS. A bunch of bored NEETs kvetching on twitter at this point has no bearing on the price. I can even take this a step back to 2022 when we had Crypto CTOs talk about figuring out problems Chainlink already solves. Most people don't understand what Chainlink offers to the industry. Even the Bankless boys got schooled on Chainlink. If the Ethereum industry doesn't hold much weight to Chainlink, the greater crypto industry knows fuck all about smart contracts aside from "hey you can make meme coins or some shit", Chainlink themselves takes payment in currencies OTHER THAN chainlink meaning no buy pressure, on top of price suppression to keep Link out of the top 10, it's not going up.
>>61151337>If you think that some mentally ill idiots on xitter are going to influence his work in any way, shape or form you're severely retardedStaking v0.2 was a result of vocal critics criticizing the 24 month lockup.
>>61152771>So tell me, how do they expect to pay nodes and stakers once they finish dumping the other 300m stack?They are betting the network will be profitable and self-sustaining by the time they exhaust the 300 million meant for node operation. As of now, it's not, hence the need to dump LINK to pay the node operators.
>>61154890thats completely different from fud you mongoloid. if youre fudding at this point youre mentally ill or just braindead
>>61154877God I go between selling everything and not selling to triple digits. I’m unwell bros. Is this the final countdown or not?
>>61152818>>61152883OP btfo so hard he got kicked out of his own thread
>>61154877>Chainlink themselves takes payment in currencies OTHER THAN chainlink meaning no buy pressureAny payment in currencies other than Link are automatically converted into Link, because the nodes simply have to be paid in Link. No exceptions, ever.You know this and still you're here lying about it.
Reminder that fudniggers are brown and organized in a very homosexual groupchat
>>61150136Nice try but DR;NS
>>61152883Lmaooooo
>>61155814holy fuck these guys are ugly and retarded HA
I bought LINK at 0.40 and I only come here for 5 to 10 minutes every day or so then I read about all these people that basically became LINK cultists and its so fucking crazy how much fucking time all of you wasted lmao
>>61152818>That's literally what they've been doing.no nigga, they have been paying nodes free gibs and then keeping the cash while also selling more tokens and keeping the cash from that. then gas lighting the community with truth over trust while totally circumventing the whole point of the token with offchain deals, which they then keep the cash from that. Then when there is any profitablity from CCIP or SVR they get paid out first from the profits of that and whats left over goes to baggies.
>>61152883you are a misleading faggot. And the 300 mill for node incentives? Was that supposed to be market sold while they keep the cash? There has literally been no reason to buy the token for these past nine years because all of defi has been using chainlink services for free while sergey has been taking the cash and removing all buy pressure. there is a reason linkies are called the cuckolds of crypto
>>61155791>Any payment in currencies other than Link are automatically converted into Link, because the nodes simply have to be paid in Link. No exceptions, ever.this doesnt matter when sergey gets cash and gives chainlink services for free while market selling. Thats what has been happening this whole time
>>61156153People are paying tens of millions for free services? Why?
>>61156192nigger its not free, link baggies are paying for it. sergey effectively offloaded all of the sell pressure onto token holders whille getting paid via offchain deals. Which btw they are still doing manuel buys for
>>61156153>sergey gets cash and gives chainlink services for freeNow read that to yourself a few more times.
>>61151125holy retardthe CLL team at the highest level does what they are told in exchange for being in the position they are in the WEF picked sergey before LINK was even a token. They picked it before "chainlink" was a name and it was just smartcontract.com you come here either as a retard or in horrifically bad faith. one is pathetic the other will bring you aweful >>61151294this one is probably just a retard>>61152771NOTHING CLL does at a high level was up to them the long term stack is the reserve >>61152858sergey gave it to is favorite findom jewess in israel
>>61155791no, no one knows this till they start putting out better accountingim not even complaining but there is no transparency>>61156133true i have wasted much time here
>>61156271>no one knows this till they start putting out better accountingYou want a private company to publish their internal accounting. That's hilarious.You're a fuddie pretending Link is a stock.
>>61156308you're getting 'oxed, that will be even more hilarious
>>61156135>>61156150>>61156153kek look at this roach spam his essays
>>61154890I would have preferred the lockup while maintaining the higher 4.75% rate
>>61156150>And the 300 mill for node incentives?They've been using that to pay the node operators since May 2019.Are you illiterate?
Pretty funny this pasta might actually come true this year. A little ahead of schedule.>>61152771>and 300m was for "incentivizing the network".In simple terms, can someone explain what this term means with CL? Does it mean they are essentially doing work for free in the hopes they'll keep customers? If so, is it working well or is there no way to confirm?
>>61155791>Any payment in currencies other than Link are automatically converted into Link, because the nodes simply have to be paid in Link. No exceptions, ever.Anon, this link conversion is only happening since the release of Chainlink Reserves. Sergey has claimed over and over that Chainlink generates hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue off chain. This reserve is meant to show proof by pushing in $1M in Link each week. Don't believe me? Show me the transactions that "hundreds of millions of dollars of revenue" were converted to Link.>>61155103and fudders were part of the crowd blasting Chainlink for for the initial lockup period.
>>61158076>In simple terms, can someone explain what this term means with CL? Does it mean they are essentially doing work for free in the hopes they'll keep customers? If so, is it working well or is there no way to confirm?They didn't know how long it would take before oracle networks could become profitable, so Chainlink has allotted Link to subsidize oracle node operators to keep them afloat until a number of oracle networks within the broader Chainlink ecosystem could stay afloat on their own.
>>61158202>this link conversion is only happening since the release of Chainlink ReservesYou said it wasn't happening >fudders were part of the crowd blasting Chainlink for for the initial lockup period.They changed the lockup period because a bunch of CL nodes were also ETH miners and they didn't want to go through the same thing as they did with the ETH staking lockup disaster.When you screech about literally every single thing CLL does, a fluke like this was bound to happen.
>>61158302you're getting 'oxed!
So what happens if the network is still unprofitable when the Company runs out of tokens to dump to subsidize the nodes?
>>61158395That’s when the reserve dumps begin. Get with the program
>>61158395that's the fun partthat's when they drain every last penny from the remaining delulu stink holders like a black hole xD
>>61158407It would take 6+ years of Reserve deposits just to match the dump from 2 weeks ago. It's not enough to cover the expenses.So, what happens? Does the project collapse or spin off into something else?
>>61158395>>61158407>>61158411>>61158420The network is so profitable that the second they automated user payments, they had to create a reserve to catch the overrun.
>>61158439pfffftHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAI can't wait for the 'ox
>>61158228>They didn't know how long it would take before oracle networks could become profitable, so Chainlink has allotted Link to subsidize oracle node operators to keep them afloat until a number of oracle networks within the broader Chainlink ecosystem could stay afloat on their own.Yeah this the usual vague answer. I wanted to know how much progress has been made towards this profitability scenario where subsidies are no longer needed. In other words, is there anything out there showing us that this strategy is working other than them telling us? Maybe we just don't have the information available. Also what exactly is the ballpark $$ figure that node operators incur?
>>61148073t. Stinkie who lost every argument and saw every argument be lost and knew the entirety of his positions are indefensible so now making up a shadow fud campaign despite this not addressing the fact that the positions are indefensible to deflect
Sergey talked about identity compliance todayHaha!
hating link: it's what i doand i'm not about to stopwould you tell the sun to stop burning?no
>>61158302>You said it wasn't happeningAnon, this is not a proper rebuttal to me pointing out that Chainlink Labs is now converting off chain revenue to Link, but once a week and $1M worth, when they've generating hundreds of millions of dollars of revenue but none of that ever translated to direct Chainlink token buy pressure. WTF are you trying to argue here? >>61158942>Yeah this the usual vague answer. I wanted to know how much progress has been made towards this profitability scenario where subsidies are no longer needed. In other words, is there anything out there showing us that this strategy is working other than them telling us? Maybe we just don't have the information available.They've announced that some DONs were profitable as of 2022 I believe (you gotta check one of the Dec 31st/Jan 1st videos by Sergey at the start of 2023 or so). But hard metrics, dunno.
>>61158420Well we got how many more years of unlocks? 4/5? Then factor in an increase in reserve buys, and I think it’d be fine. But if weekly buys aren’t at least 2 million per week in 30 days or less I think I’m selling
>>61162110you better sell, retardso sick of linkies hanging on to delusions and dreams of shit
>>61156308youre retardedthey are going to turn it into some foundation eventuallyonce they have completed the hiding strategy and Chainlink is ubiquitous it will becomre more like linux than some private compmany. no one will want to pay the CLL integration fee and people will do that work in house. i dont want info on integrations, i want the accounting on payments via LINK which will eventually become public >>61156916yes >>61158202> Sergey has claimed over and over that Chainlink generates hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue off chainand a HUGE portion of this is for the CLL integration work i mention abovea much smaller portion is for actual node services. there is very little actual adoption right now, the regulators haven't opened it up yet. the federal reserve talk toaysmartcon, the genius act, dominos are almost ready >>61158420yes, but the more that shit gets dumped be betterthe elite want the supply out there before the price pumpshit like SOL doubled their supply while going up 500% stop pretending like the 40% of withheld supply actually matters to ANYTHING
>>61164969>shit like SOL doubled their supply while going up 500% stop pretending like the 40% of withheld supply actually matters to ANYTHINGit is hilarious how the simple concept of supply and demand always eludes youstop listening to fishy and clg, use your fucking headOF COURSE it matters when the team has objectively failed to create any kind of demand for their token
>>61154877>Chainlink is not converting alternative payments to Link>>61158202>ok so Chainlink has been converting alternative payments to Link since the reserveHow is that not a rebuttal?
>>61164969>they are going to turn it into some foundation eventually>once they have completed the hiding strategy and Chainlink is ubiquitous it will becomre more like linux than some private compmany.Contract operators will almost always be private players.To use your Linux analogy; the code (Linux or Chainlink node code) is open source, but the companies using the code to connect to systems and data (Linux server systems or data feeds) are almost always private.
Dont get so cocky is going back down to $8
>>61164995> supply and demand eludes you no i addressed the concerns, they are mute points >>61165059agreed, i comprehend all off thisi guess its good to point it out for the sub 130's lurking
>>61164969>i dont want info on integrations, i want the accounting on payments via LINK which will eventually become publicI can echo this. Thinking about the ethos of what crypto originally was (or supposed to be), transparency was always one of the core principles. It's always confusing hearing communities argue that their respective team should not disclose anything.Obviously I'm aware of the lack of requirements for non public companies, but I think eventually if this industry is going to be taken seriously, there has to be some kind of accountability. Hopefully the new regulations will include that. Otherwise we have the public giving billions of dollars for a "trust me".And I'll also add, there are tons of private companies that send out financials and updates/letters to their investors. It's doubtful many here are accredited and have participated in a private offering. But if you did so, and then never heard back from the company you'd probably pull your money.
>>61164995If a crypto can dumps dozens of times more supply than Link, yet go up in price dozens of times harder at the same purely based on hype; then supply inflation is the most useless talking point ever.What you need is hype, because apparently it easily overcomes even the most insane supply inflation, like Solana's.
