Big paradigm shift coming. They don’t want people like you owning any link. It’s meant for the elites that run this country. You will never have a chance to stack this cheap ever again.
>>61165870Ugh.....thanks but I'm just not going to buy your bags....ugh....I know, I know.....but I'm just not going to buy them hahahahgahagha
>>61165870Nice, see you at $10
>>61165870I'm sick and tired of this BULLSHIT.
>>61165870
>>61165870yea that's why they can fork another token and fully integrate it with the system, Thank you and token not needed. sirgay betrayed.
>>61165870this is your chance to redeem(saaaar) yourself with some actual leaks after multiple duds
>>61165870>You will never have a chance to stack this cheap ever again.I've stacked been fully stacked since sub 20 cents, how long until we blast past $100? counting inflation since we hit $50 not even $200 will get me to part with my link baka
>>61165982Duds? I told you Trump had a plan to effectively neuter Powell, either by straight out removing him or maneuvering to pressure into immediate rate cuts. This played out. I told you that the chainlink/fed integration was happening, to which many doubted. I’m telling you now that the US government is actively accumulating, along with several other major names and corporations. Their ambition is to isolate chainlink from the rest of crypto scams and cheap branding. It will remain under the radar in perpetuity
>>61166082and the price of the token?
>>61166082You mean it will take 3+ years for any significant price movement?
>>61165870Ok.. price?? Oh........ and.... chart???
>>61166082first point is a big stretch, fed integration was leaked from github ages ago.the last one you just dropped is news to me and i sincerely appreciate that you just said it straight up. thank you, i hope to see it come to fruition.
>>61166082The volume indicates youre just making shit up, thanks for the larp though its been pretty boring around here.
>>61166082drop more info pls, you have anything on trump kids insider trading?
>>61166082theres a lot you can gleam from the public github, but I actually think the next 6 months will be life changing for a lot of people here
>>61166082if you won't tell us about token price, at least give us a time line pls
>>61166340two more weeks marines
>>61166353I said this before back in June, I can’t comment on price because that’s not a controllable vector for the people I have heard from. They know price will reflect a mammoth asset class for collatoralization - likely thousands per token if you do the math projections. But many are just low time preference monkeys screaming about price at this very moment. Like I said they will regret not accumulating more no doubt of it
>>61166386the fact that the likes of xrp cardano and doge are multiples of links marketcap is criminal, what the fuck is being done about the blatant market manipulation you larping double nigger?!
>>61166386i assume these institutions have been accumulating tokens through OTC deals and not grabbing them off the market? considering the grayscale report concluding that supply unlocks affect link tokens differently or whatever. could you give us some info on this, even if you cant make it specific?
>>61166386Got any other relevant info or developments beyond what was discussed in prior threads?
>>61166489I don’t know because, like I’ve said before, those other chains like xrp and ada are not mentioned at all in the discussions I’ve witnessed. Your question is like asking “why has doge ripped higher than chainlink on a short time basis”. The answer is surely market hype. But also like I told you, there is a concerted effort to not let chainlink become a market meme hype situation.
>>61166528>there is a concerted effort to not let chainlink become a market meme hype situationno fucking shit, I can see the timely bitcoin dumps killing any and all momentum link hascriminal faggots justifying the harm they do to people, link should be #3 by marketcap minimum>manipulated clown market
>>61166516>>61166520Yes OTC accumulation. There’s not much more info other than watching the system unfurl and see how this new paradigm pans out. I’m not sure if I mentioned this before, but CLL has taken feedback from government institutions and reworked their own internal roadmap/timeline. Particularly the staking mechanism, which is why a new version has been delayed.
>>61166386I bought another 400 on the 10th at $13... I would just enjoy the luxury of being able to pre-plan my life as far as job/housing goes.
>>61166588>Particularly the staking mechanism, which is why a new version has been delayed.UH OH STINKBROS... smartcon doesnt smell so good anymorethanks for the update anyway. at least i'll have more time to build on my little stack
>>61166082>you will never have a chance to stack this cheap ever again.>under the radar in perpetuityPick one, these are at odds with one another. As soon as price goes parabolic everyone will take notice. What's your timeline?
>>61166783Fair point. To clarify, token price will rapidly ascent with online systems in use at a mass scale. But there will be limited media attention. There are many stocks and commodities that have blown up but done it quietly. It’s only decades later that a normie will look at the chart and realize what they missed. Hope this clarifies
>>61166845>To clarify, token price will rapidly ascent with online systems in use at a mass scale.Why would it? Just fork the token and use the fork for your operations. 0 need to use the public one
>>61166845ty for the hope artemis God bless, im 38 year old retard, no family, living in the house from fight club and skip meals to survive. i have 1000link and its my only hope for the future
Reasons to use the public token in your operations:>0Reasons to not use it and just fork a new one:>plenty
>>61166588>Yes OTC accumulation.Is there anything out there that supports this? >>61166516>considering the grayscale report concluding that supply unlocks affect link tokens differently or whatever.That report basically concluded nothing other than "price doesn't immediately tank after an unlock", suggesting the selling is done in a coordinated way to prevent said tanking.
>>61167031yea i thought it could be due to some controlled OTC offloading but then again the supply wallets are still seen transacting through binance.>>61166845>But there will be limited media attentionyou previously mentioned>There will be a lot more buzz as press details have been sent to major media outlets that will start saying the word chainlink for the very first time. are you saying that this had already happened?
>>61165870>You will never have a chance to stack this cheap ever again.but then you say >>61166082> it will remain under the radar pick one, reading on it seems that you believe LINK will not go under the radar. I'm looking forward to selling my LINK insurance derivatives that institutions are buying incase of a volatility spike LINK will have its own VIX >>61166845this isnt possible in crypto too much moonfag attention too many marines have made too much potent propaganda i have no doubt they will continue to attempt to keep the masses out, but once the price starts to hit 100, they will only be able to keep those heavily influenced by mokingbird media out > token price will rapidly ascent with online systemshow rapidly? im thinking it pulls a rhodium, the inverse of the 10/10 scam wick down. BTC wicks up 15-25%, LINK does 80-200% all eyes will still be on BTC
>>61166884>>61166917This would go against the entire premise of the chainlink ecosystem and incentive structure. Seems like you don’t understand the core proposition of an oracle network. >>61167163>>61167167There’s a distinction, of course this isn’t some secret operation that is only whispered about in the shadows. There will clearly be some level of awareness in all markets across the globe, and there is an effort to provide those media outlets with the proper info and terms for discussion. But at the same time, there’s also a concerted effort to refrain from traditional hype marketing that is employed by many other companies for short term gain but long term damage to reputation. Hope this makes sense.
>>61167504is $200 per link within 3 months a reasonable hope to have?
>>61167504> there is an effort to provide those media outlets with the proper info and terms for discussioni can't even imagine the coordination going on with grey powers outside of CLL even i have friends who have worked at arbitrum, polygon, aave, etc. I worked in quant finance IN CRYPTO for fuck sakes. All of them hated chainlink as an investment. Its been insane. I want to know how "they" have achieved this effect on the masses. no one sees the value. > But at the same time, there’s also a concerted effort to refrain from traditional hype marketing that is employed by many other companies for short term gain but long term damage to reputationsergey was selected for this role, there was going to be a LINK, smartcontract was simply selected as winner. im sure you've seen the video of the WEF award dinner like ~3 years before LINK's ICO
>>61167583hurry up and wait
>>61167583nigger you are being fucked with.
>>61167583noI fucking hate you people so much
>>61166588>Particularly the staking mechanism, which is why a new version has been delayed.checked. expand on this more
>>61168947This
>>61168947Compliance controls, auditability features, reporting standard for institutional/dollar-assets. There will be whitelisted institutional staking pools with extra compliance oversight. Also have heard chatter about differing “membranes” to the staking protocol based on jurisdiction, that don’t affect the core mechanics.
>>61166528>there is a concerted effort to not let chainlink become a market meme hype situationWhat would be bad about it? They had 8 years to accumulate
>its another marketing trip chud threadgrim.
>>61169240best stock up on meme coins because we're not making it this cycle bros
>>61169398They don't want it associated or known as a get rich quick scheme. These are serious players rewiring global finance the last thing they need is pocahontas or some other sjw libs screaming because some internet nazi chud frog army anons bought lambos. Chainlink holders are unfortunately, collateral damage here at least in the short to medium term.
>>61169516ETH didnt need any of this even when they had problems early on. it still mooned and made many anons rich. chainlink is a trap
>>61165870cool story BUT what about el precio xD
>>61169516You're talking nonsense, first of all it's already associated with the while crypto bro culture by virtue of being a crypto, and second of all it doesn't matter at all. That's like saying early Amazon's investors didn't want their bags to pump because Amazon is a serious company and that would make them similar to dotcom losers and penny stock scammers. That's just nonsense you imagined to explain the price suppression, but Occam's razor say it's BS
>>61169696Eth had a much wider investor base than link. Link was pretty much ONLY shilled on the chans for several years, and we are exactly the type of people (((they))) don't want having power (money).
>>61169946esl
>>61165870>redstone cmo gets busted and the fudcuck cult group chat members are leaked>fud threads drop off massively during the normal window, just a few stragglers making limp dicked fud posts in a few threads nowReally activates my legumes
>>61165870Sergey and Tom said November, and then next year.You say "big paradigm shift coming".Thoughts? Does it start next month?
Sergey spoke at the Federal Reserve today. The other panelist from banks basically kept to their "wish blockchain would be compliant to the current system" agenda though.
>>61170317>>61170332we will live in hell so long as women are allowed to hold any authority whatsoever over men. know that if youve had a female teacher, youve been conditioned to be a weak man. its not your fault. no female "authority" is legitimate
>>61170169You paid advocate piece of shit. How is that a good thing? The supposed "fud campaign" is now exposed and dissolved. And yet the price is even lower than before. The fudders are not the problem. Its the shills who are literally paid money to sell a fake dream.
>>61170390>I-I'm gonna project about you being a paid actor!>us fuddies that sat here all day every day like it was a fulltime job trying to derail speculative discussion at the behest of dumpster fire competitors like redstone was a GOOD thing>we were important and we MATTERED Its amazing that you think you're fooling anyone with this btwJust skip to killing yourself. I'm serious. Crawl into a dumpster and drink some drano. If you livestream it I'll sell a single link which is far more than what your life is worth.
>>61166082>It will remain under the radar in perpetuityso it will never pump
>>61170943>generic ChatGPT shillpostNobody has ever given a fuck about redshit. Its the Linkshit that needs to improve.
>>61171024>ill just cope by pretending that you're using chatgpt Yeah you got nothing except more projection, you actual npc.Kys like I said.
>>61170169Bullish for Redstone ticker: RED
>>61170943fuddies matter, shitbag
>they don't want you in the club oh, that explains all the subway and baseball ads they've been plastering everywhere if you still fall for those LARPs you deserve to be poor
>>61171565manhattan and congress isn't 4chan
>>61165870so prove somethingwhat’s their timeline to let this in a controlled setting ripthere must be a steady rise in price to eventually collateralize the assets it will need to collateralize
>>61170169Happy to know I wasn’t the only one who screen capped that brutal burn lol
>>61171763maybe next bull run
>>61172516emphasis on "maybe" because Link could very well be trading at $20 even in 2032I remember anons saying Chainlink would have reached atleast $80 this bullrun lmao
>>61169488this is for sure the case. if what this person is saying is true. its going to be ten years from now and the fat ass will use regulatory reasons to not work on tokenomics while he pays ari juels for another town crier theorized napkin project
>>61171603sure thing, everyone knows wall street thugs use the hobbo subway
>>61165877>>61165877>Ugh.....thanks but I'm just not going to buy your bags....ugh....I know, I know.....but I'm just not going to buy them hahahahgahaghaevery cycle has a newfag laughing while liquidity locks up and price shifts. you’ll call it manipulation when it’s just Houdini math.
Good thread.
>>61165870did the recent government shutdown and the failure of the market structure bill slow the timeline down hereseems like a lot of liquidity is waiting to enter the stables space when the regs are fully in place
Does anyone know who this guy is recording Sergey at the 39:46 mark?
>>61165870LARP threadTwo more weeks marines, maybe we'll make it to $32 next bull run!
