[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/biz/ - Business & Finance


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: nonolinkersallowed.png (155 KB, 562x458)
155 KB
155 KB PNG
Fees the past 5 days:
Oct 18: $1,045.62
Oct 19: $515.59
Oct 20: $622.23
Oct 21: $646.58
Oct 22: $596.69
This is a total and complete failure at this point. Live for over 2 years now. What a total disaster this has become.
>>
File: 400.png (15 KB, 882x758)
15 KB
15 KB PNG
fuck link
loathe link
despise link
abhor link
what more can i say? i fucking HATE THIS TOKEN AND ALL IT REPRESENTS
>>
File: BYND.jpg (98 KB, 576x672)
98 KB
98 KB JPG
I'M ALL IN AT BYND (TICKER: BYND)
>>
I’m black and own Link
>>
I'm black and invest in crack futures.
>>
>>6117138
The figures are accurate. Why would they lie about them? If you were going to lie about the figures you'd likely make them higher. Unsure what your point is.
>>
>>
>>61171389
Trust the plan marine
Sergey wouldn't lie to you

Q
>>
>>61171389
the dark CCIP transaction fees must be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars PER DAY
>>
Two years ago CCIP was pulling in around $2k each day in fees
This is what we call a failed product, which is concerning considering CCIP is the supposedly the straw that stirs the Chainlink milkshake.
>>
>>61172984
I stirred your moms milkshake last night if you catch my drift
>>
>>61171389
its so over i immediately sold my stack
>>
>>61171389
Not selling this shit at $50 is the biggest mistake of my life.
>>
Must be a slow day in the TG kek
>>
>>61173195
It's a slow day every day on CCIP, that's the issue.
>>
File: 30abc.png (90 KB, 823x244)
90 KB
90 KB PNG
for years people here warned that link would not return to ath and would miss this bullrun

did you listen?
>>
>>61173624
>b-b-but Chainlink is ESSENTIAL to Defi!! Without Chainlink, Defi would simply not exist
How does that help the average investor?
>>
everyone ITT holds LINK
>>
>>61173659
And everyone here is getting out earned by grandma investing in her municipal bonds.
>b-b-b-but Chainlink has the best fundamentals in crypto! Just wait until the repricing event!
>>
>>61173681
you hold LINK
>>
>>61173695
you mustve been in the top of your fucking class!
>>
File: 1738480306569.jpg (151 KB, 568x1200)
151 KB
151 KB JPG
You were warned.
>>
>>61175871
this is the ultimate redpill baggies will never swallow, they'd rather believe (((Sergey))) with his infinite carrot dangles
>>
File: 3heh.jpg (202 KB, 600x595)
202 KB
202 KB JPG
here's the final red+black (dark shade of red) pill, stinkies:

YOU
>YOU
LOST
>LOST
THE
>THE
GAME
>GAME
OF
>OF
LIFE
>LIFE
>>
>>61171397
Why though? Isn’t it odd that you post this about Link and not Eth? What is it about Link that makes you so hate filled?
>>
>>61176468
tbf I barely see 1 single Ethereum thread per day, meanwhile Chainlink has atleast 7-8 per day. Just sayin'
>>
>>61175871
Sergeys been real commited to this exit scam then by shaping crypto policy lmao
>>
>>61176478
Do you know how filters work?

By the way, does any other crypto project have anything close to what Chainlink is doing? For example, did another crypto project speak at the federal reserve?
>>
the bridge space is strange in that the underlying bridges don't make much (or any) money, it's the instant relayers that make money
>>
>>61171389
when ccip was first released they had fees to match the other bridging protocols
then their banks friends got in their ear and told them that they needed to slash fees to make it appear reasonable
and now you have the current situation
>>
>>61177486
>To this end, the pricing models for CCIP’s “burn and mint” and “lock and mint” token transfer mechanisms have transitioned to a flat fee premium model. The total fees for transferring tokens via CCIP are inclusive of both the destination chain gas costs incurred by CCIP, which can be a variable amount based on gas prices, and the additional premium paid to CCIP service providers.

>By optimizing for higher transaction volumes, with lower per-user costs, CCIP is now one of the most cost-efficient solutions for transferring many of the most popularly bridged tokens. As CCIP gets integrated into more applications, such as bridge aggregators, this competitive advantage is anticipated to result in increased market share and the acceleration of CCIP’s adoption. Furthermore, an increase in high-value transfers helps prove the security model of CCIP, providing additional in-production proof of the protocol’s ability to serve capital markets use cases.

https://blog.chain.link/ccip-native-eth-and-optimized-pricing/#introducing_an_optimized_pricing_model_for_ccip_to_propel_the_cross-chain_economy
>>
>>61177517
Link thus needs like 1t volume daily to be a 250b mcap coin. Lowkey fud, but i only need link at 100b and thats only considering ccip so lowkey hopium again
>>
CCIP isn't making money because crypto casino scams do not need to be crosschain to scam retards. Crosschain is required for tradfi, tradfi isn't officially using crypto yet, so its a waiting game. And yes there was a bullcase narrative that CCIP would be used for and enable new crypto casino scams, but it turns out the scammers prefer to have control over all the guardrails, which isn't very surprising.

Anyways watch BNB pull an FTT/FTX in the next 6 months, that's the other shoe that's been waiting to drop since 2022.
>>
>>61177825
>Anyways watch BNB pull an FTT/FTX in the next 6 months, that's the other shoe that's been waiting to drop since 2022.
protip: it won't
>>
>>61171389
There really isn't much to say, there is no adoption. Defi is mostly using other protocols like Bungee, tradfi has no need for a bridge since the market cap of tokenized assets is still super low and most of it are on Ethereum anyway. No need to bridge anything around. Kinda sad at this point but potential is still there imo.
>>
>>61177844
checked and kek'd
Same shit was said in 2021, people thought FTX and SBF was untouchable, well CZ already got touched once and its going to only get worse from here, the scammers don't win forever. Of course I'm probably talking to a binance shill, the biggest open secret on this board is /biz/ has been covered in binance shills astroturfing here since 2019, its why you'll never see threads shitting on binance without pushback.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.