Ummm… stink sisters? Our response?
>>61171983can't post response since 4chun thinks its spam so I'll just say TNN
>>61171983>not a technical necessityExcept it literally is.Nodes literally cannot work without Link's atomic swap function.
>>61172055not needed
NeededT. Blackrock director
>>61172055And other than the pure technical requirement, there's also the economic incentive requirement.
>>61172055>>61172098fishy is an effeminate twink bottom
“The best incentive is no incentive” - someone a whole lot smarter than Sergey
KEK is this the new coordinated angle by the brownoid gang?
>>61172098spam filtered and can't be bothered finding out why.
>>61172104Man you've really been going ham with the Fishy obsession ever since the chat group leak, huh?So which one are you in pic?>>61172139You make up way too much headcanon about this stuff.He believed that Layer 2 was anything that was not Layer 1, but connected to Layer 1. Which is very accurate, and oracles are part of that.
>>61172197fishy enjoys getting fistfucked
>>61172139If you think left and right is a thing at all at this kind of deep state level you're delusional
>>61172331There are power blocs. It's not inaccurate to put Google and Meta with the left authoritarians, and crypto with the right.
Link is a scam like most crypto coins made to scam dumb investors. It works because dumb brown people are somehow convinced this is the best get rich quick scheme.
>>61171983we've known this since atleast 2018. The only people who believe (((CLL))) are the baggies who hope to sell their stack on some greater fool.EVERY single altcoin is a scam
>>61171983ETH is not a technical necessity either. They could easily program the Ethereum blockchain to function with any other currency. Instead, they necessitated it requires ETH. Same with Chainlink & LINK. Same with every single blockchain with smart contracts.
yesterday at the Fed, Sergey was asked a quesiton by Congressman Foster. Go watch the video.'Sergey, your internal oracle syncing network does not use permissionless blockchain. Does this make you a trusted third party and single point of failure? ' For the linkies who don't get it, in the form of a question but actually a statement, that's basically, ''you claim to be decentralised but actually are not''And the answer was ‘’ so our system uses multiple independent nodes just like blockchains do and it does work with public chains as well as private chains. Generally speaking, those nodes can be configured into groups for a specific network that meets the requirements of a private user or public user. So for example if the Fed needed an oracle network to do something specific the Fed could choose the nodes and the conditions under which the nodes operate for the Feds specific oracle network. And that would be the risk that they choose in configuring that oracle network . The public oracle networks are configured similarly to how public chains are configured with many many node operators. Many of the node operators of chainlink oracle networks are also the node operators of public chain nodes. There’s over a thousand oracle networks running in the chainlink standard so you can configure an oracle network to meet your requirements for compliance, location of the node, and you know these different requirements.’’ 'different requirements' sounds like token not actually needed without saying token not actually needed.I suggest you go watch the video yourself
