but I'll post it anyways
>>61180222Checked and thanks for the hopium kind stranger.
>sovereign buyingkek
>>61180247 it's a shit ton to take in. I think I'm going to put some money in some of these funds and diversify a little bit. but holy fuck like wrapping my head around it Jesus they loaded a fucking Cannon and they could choose to do it or not and if they choose to do it holy shiiiiiiiitttt
>>61180256do you remember what happened in the 1970s 1970,1971,1972sperg Nations found out how the United States was essentially butt fucking the entire world and then the FED had to come out and be like "yeah well..."how there was the post world war II economy up until 1970 was seen as a massive boom era.essentially the FED found out a way the butt fucked the entire world which they eventually called them out on and that's the reason why everything for Americans started to become more shitty to the point of where it is now well if they do what is outline essentially in the image of original post they will have instantly shot us backwards like we're talking about like massive butt fuckery for the rest of the world with the United States profiting the most I mean it's good for Bitcoin but we're talking about like a reversal on a level in multiple things in multiple markets all at the same time while one pumps like crazy like this this would have to be what is near equivalent to a great reset the great reset is like the fabled one that will never probably reach but this is pretty God damn close and it's kind of crazy that it's actually set up mostly it's just waiting on like a couple of decisions and like maybe one or two outliers to be fully in place but they aren't that far off
>>61180222qrd op???
>>61180306Just read the image you lazy clown
>>61180222>Shaka Laka Shabalaba Ding Dong Hernandez>AI generated jeet slop postAnd yet he's completely correct. Based
>>61180222>Shanaka Anslem Perera
>>61180314So buy 50% BTC and 50% gold??
>>61180290>>61180339A sinking titanic rises all lifeboats, you know?
Hey look ma, the Atlantis believers are posting schizo nonsense again
>>61180247Fact is If the fed cuts sharply, Bitcoin will likely outperform almost every other asset but not because the $7.4T all “detonates.” Rather, because even a small sliver of that pile entering a finite-supply asset creates outsized pressure on price. And based on high ETF flows to BTC in the past couple of years it will likely be a huge portion of it.
>>61180222>checked dextools before brushing teeth again>integrity dao chart already screaming at me>everything else flatlined>dao green as fuck>i nod like an idiot at 7am drinking expired coffee
>>61180339i mean... id say 80/20... gold and i mean this as not a jeet niggergold is at like the peak of highly suspicious like that bitch could go down like the multiple other times that has gone down severely except it's scaled up at this point so it's like now it's at 5,000 but the drop from $5,000 to say couple hundred that would be a pretty bad drop and it would stay around there for probably about at least 12 years at the very least and I'm being very not bearish compared to the other things that I've said before I would say hedge moron Bitcoin because with the image said there was essentially people are going to look for not so much as a flight of currency but a limited currency so if this was to happen and if gold was already starting it's bear market a little bit it could shoot gold back up but it would be dwarfed by Bitcoin buy an exponential rate because these money markets are going to look for is a rarity that is limited supply like 6 months ago Bitcoin was starting to run low on exchanges and that pushed up the price a good bit imagine if somehow 5 trillion landed on bitcoin tomorrow and two trillion into gold we're talking about almost an instant 200k if not a little more the versification I'm going to say about maybe a trillion goes someplace else but stock market is shit the housing market is shit I mean sometimes maybe you could get some more into bonds but only grandmothers and Banks buy bonds really
>>61180371Bitcoin’s fixed supply and inelastic seller base amplify inflows. The float (available BTC for sale on exchanges) keeps shrinking, around 2M coins (~10% of supply) are liquid in practice.A $50B inflow at today’s liquidity depth could conservatively push price 3–5× without proportional outflows.inflows -> higher price ->greater narrative -> more inflows.This is what gold experienced in 2005–2011 after ETF approval but Bitcoin’s supply mechanics are even more extreme. When yields drop and real returns vanish, the portfolio bucket of gold/BTC/TIPS grows and Bitcoin will likely receive a rising percentage because:>It has higher convexity>It’s easier to buy than gold for large portfolios>It has 24/7 liquidity and lower friction than commodities
>>61180363it could theoretically turn into the cycle disruptor but people have been like praying to their computers for since like 2017 because with that much in the market maybe profit taking when it happened until like around just under 200k the guy kind of said it all it's kind of like all massive price Discovery at that point and it would be such a massive inflow who the fuck knows what that could do to the to the four-year cycle all I know is that I think I'm going to strap in a little bit longer and if dips arise I'll DCA and if we go down I'll DCA the whole fucking time it's just a crazy theory until it happens type deal and if it happens it's going to be like the best day for pretty much anybody holding a bag of anything really because all coins follow Bitcoin for the most part even though the altar kind of peg to it in a little bit of a way something dumps on bitcoin you know you're alts are dumping too
>>61180371I would agree if miners were up. But they aren't so you are wrong.
>>61180395> since like 2017Difference now is spot ETFs for Bitcoin only got introduced 2024.4 year cycle was never going to hold up in this context. It really is the game changer for everything, and it hasn't really been long enough for the true implications to take effect - that'll happen at fed cut.
>>61180395>people have been like praying to their computersYou do that too huh?
>>61180222This is funnyThis retard thinks the money will flow into bitcoin instead of gold
>>61180260with your 10k lmao?
>>61180404sometimes I really need to I also stop breathing from time to time lmfao i hate it but the adrenaline is so good lol
>>61180408that's what I said say diversify but honestly I think it would get spread around a bit but even for you gold baggy I would hold a little bag but not at these prices Jesus Christ no not at these prices I don't think you understand you keep on stacking you don't give a shit whatever that's your DCA fine okay I accept that but gold can go down there is a psychological level you guys all say 10,000 but I it's honestly just getting up there a bit too high you could maybe hope for a double top with 5,000 and 6,000 your next pump if it's going to pump is going to be 6,000 that's it then you're dead it's going down bear market couple hundred at best for literally years personally I think you guys are already on the way down and if this Fed rate trigger goes off who knows like like the the dude posted in the image it's price discovery no one fucking knows what's going to really happen it's going to be insane though you're going to see charged pop off everywhere there's going to be massively motherfuckers are going to start jumping from buildings there's going to be motherfuckers that are like made instant billionaires like one candle billionaires it's going to be crazy if that shit comes to fruition that shit's going to be crazy that's going to be a crazy day
>>61180412hmmm I don't know how to respond so I'm not going to respond it's probably for the best
>>61180437You are delusional. Most gold baggies bought pre covid at below 1500. It's mostly central banks and institutions trying to buy now. Funny thing is that mining companies are closing down, too. The supply shock will be kino. 30k gold is conservative thinking. As for bitcoin... well, no mining - no bitcoin, d'uh?
>>61180437Ease up on the addies lmao
>>61180392Why do you say this as if ETFs like SPY don’t function in the exact same manner?
>>61180529Missing the point. SPY isn’t comparable because stocks are elastic, companies can issue more shares, earnings grow, and the index itself constantly rebalances. Bitcoin is hard-capped at 21M, with maybe 2M actually liquid, so inflows hit a wall of scarcity.SPY inflows don’t directly move prices much; they just shift existing capital around in a massive, deep market. Bitcoin ETFs actually buy coins off the open market, tightening supply immediately.And unlike equities, Bitcoin’s price action feeds its own narrative as higher price = stronger legitimacy = more inflows. That reflexivity is what makes ETF inflows exponentially more powerful here.
>>61180222I just know I'm smart enough to buy oversold alts. Here is a tip: Degen Express.
>>61180408I stack physical gold and silver. I will continue to stack physical gold and silver. But I think having 10-40% in Bitcoin isn't a bad idea. It's more volatile, but doesn't seem like it's in danger of ever collapsing. I avoid alt coins like the plague, though.
>>61180536Stock splits don’t dilute the value of stock to holders though. Issuing shares does though, yes. I understand the dynamics of Bitcoin and its price action but feel some of the crypto bros don’t understand that in theory a stock could also have a finite supply and historically indices like SPY or even real estate have the many of the same fundamental market benefits of Bitcoin outside of being up 24/7. Just assets in general. IDK I guess it’s just a little tiresome sometimes.
>>61180602true stock splits don’t dilute holders and equities can exhibit scarcity dynamics depending on corporate behavior. But the key distinction is programmable inelasticity.Stocks, real estate, and indices all have mechanisms that expand supply or absorb demand. New issuance, development, rebalancing, IPOs, dilution, etc. Bitcoin has none of that. Its issuance curve is hard-coded and ends entirely. It is a unique asset class in this regard.So yeah, assets share similar macro drivers eg liquidity, yields, risk appetite but Bitcoin’s response function is just more extreme. When capital flows in, there’s no elasticity release valve. That’s what gives it its asymmetric payoff structure, not just the fact it trades 24/7.
>>6118046730k gold xDD Supply shock - when they are mining & selling non-stop ? What am I reading ? Enjoy bearmarket
>>61180222Checked but they still won't cut aggressively because they know too many chuds are still invested in high risk assets. They'd rather kill the country through stagnation and depression blaming a non existent spectre of inflation.
I was thinking since my original post there's a big what if what if Satoshi nakamoto created bitcoin the year after the 2008 housing collapse knowing that it would happen again and knowing that the market was going to fuck up this bad what I'm saying is what if he created bitcoin knowing that it was going to be used as a digital store value and he knew what happened to Gold last time in 2008 because he created bitcoin 2009 but happened last time is basically patched this time because now we have Bitcoin what if this was part of the plan all along nigger sees problem nigger begins to work on solution releases first initial Bitcoins takes off just the way how they thought it would get to be the near the next financial crisis have everything loaded up in the favor of explosion of price greater than what a simple having that does what if this is what would have stopped the last financial crisis The missing Link there's a lot of what ifs but it's fun to think about on a tin foil hat level on a real level we can consider ourselves lucky that if there was another housing collapse and another gold dump but there is something else that's like went to while the market is still dumping that there is something to cycle into when the money funds need to run
How does this affect BYND?
>>61180339yes, youre resistant to jewish fake fiat, they literally hate if you do this, if 50% of goyim did this then their pyramid scheme collapses, they cant steal from you if you dont own any fiat
>>6118022210% rotates ($740B) makes bitcoin $550-700k What a bunch of crap.Current mcap of btc is 2.1T, small move of 740B would boost price of bitcoin by 35%. Meaning around 140-150k and not 500-700k. Everything else seems like a bunch of random words and overall blop
>>61180831lol ........ the math adds up though!
>It'a not x, it's yLLM Slop.
>>61180442>OP responded
>>61180777Checked but can you use punctuation for Christ's sake?
>>61180222>this isn’t just a, it’s a and bAI slop
>>61180644Holy based
>>61180306Delusional BUY BTC THE FED IS GOING TO HOP IN!!1 shit.
>>61180644>muh 21 million Yes, I think everyone and their dog is aware of this at this point, that’s kinda *my* point. Sometimes you guys remind me of hallocaust survivors. I often feel cryptobros are blind to anything else, not realizing their mindset applies to other assets, and it doesn’t immediately follow that something with a fixed supply is an inherently valuable asset.
>>61180644Arable land does not have means of new issuance.
>>61180408Gold will dump hard if this happens.
>>61180222Stopped reading at bitcoin.
>>61180222sick trips>only one asset is provably finite, instantly settlable>instantly settlableall right let's not get carried away here.Shanaka Insallah Timebongo will probably be proven right.
>>6118083110%—shit even 3%—of all the capital in MM funds rotating into BTC is a pipe dream. I wish it were true, because it would make me rich, but it simply won’t happen
>>61180831That's not how price discovery works. If the price is X and someone bids it at X+Y and someone else sells at that price, then that is the new price. Even if it's just fractions of the asset, that's how it works. The point is that large money flows in the hundreds of billions with comparatively little sell volume will gigapump the price.
thanks for this you fucking faggot
>>61180222Cool?99% of ppl can't buy btc>buy as much as you canNah, fuck you. My 1k will be higher, but it won't be 1m, so why bother?
>>61180222his chart disproves his entire jeet-prompted post. firstly, mmf funds don’t go down much at all (maybe 25% at most) and secondly, that only happens after a recession (when assets are cheap to buy) which is what will happen to btc if a recession hits. it would only “explode upward” from a much lower price. and way WAY less than $7.4 trillion would find its way to btc. like maybe 1% of 25% if we’re being optimistic.
