>>61180301
>GIVE ALL POWER TO THE GOVERNMENT AND PRINT MORE MONEY
>DON'T WORRY, I'M AN EXPERT!
Why are leftists so brainwashed lol

File: 54e3b45f3d142ae4355652bca(...).jpg (56 KB, 736x901)

56 KB JPG

>Paul Volcker, as Federal Reserve Chairman from 1979 to 1987, raised interest rates to nearly 20% to combat high inflation in the late 1970s and early 1980s. This policy, known as the "Volcker Shock," caused a severe recession with high unemployment but ultimately broke the back of inflation by 1983, dropping the rate from a peak of around 14.8% to 3.8%.
Absolute cinema.

>>61180301
>Tiny hands
>Monkey head
>Fish lips
>Squeaky L o N d O n voice

Yep I think it's about time to T a H x d U h r E e C h and stop blaming migrants so we all can marry a brown Indian wife

>>61180315
This is literally what milei is doing right now. I hope he has enough time

Has he considered stopping immigration?

Satoshi buying advertisments for Bitcoin while shorting it, innit mate

>>61180301
He's unironically giving out bad advice to people

>>61180311
>Leftists
Found the retard

>>61180469
His heart is in the right place but yeah, he's retarded

>>61180469
Good. Britain needs to collapse because of Gary. Then there will be a civil war and something better will arise in its place

>>61180301
he's a rich communist who doesn't help out his struggling sister.

>>61180301
has he considered that most of the tax take goes to service interest repayments on money that was printed out of thin air?

Marxists never talk about that...

How about abolishing systemic usury, clearing the "debt", kicking out the immigrants and issuing currency from the central bank at 0% interest rate in return for productive WORK??

>>61180301
>just be Margaret thatcher bro

>>61180311
Holy fuck you are retarded

>>61180469
>>61180533
>>61180535

I've never heard an actual criticism of his ideas besides le marxist, and le bri'ish.

Is there no credibility to returning to 1950-early 1980's top percentage tax rates, or having a better enforced wealth tax?

To me, it sounds like these taxes would work as a drain to get all of the printed money that's accumulated out of the ultra-wealthy in the hopes that it will drive down asset prices (specifically housing).

>>61181103
he's advocating for the community on the expense of the individual. If you take his word for it you might believe that you on an individual level can't make wealth and become rich, which absolutely isn't true. He's been in debates where people push against this notion and he doubles down.
He also advocates for immigration and tries to pin anti immigration sentiment as a capitalist idea, which makes no sense except for him catering to his audience.
Don't get me wrong, I don't mind that he is trying to challenge the wealth gap, but the way he goes about it is dishonest.

File: you get nothing.jpg (54 KB, 620x336)

54 KB JPG

>>61180301
>Right then, I was top dog at Citibank's trading desk, I was.
>What's that, are they saying I weren't, eh?
>Anyway, we're all jolly well obliged to rally round and look after the immigrants, and give the wealthy a bit of a thrashing with taxes, innit?
>Am I rich? Yes! But I'm one of the decent sorts, I'd like to think.
>How can you become rich?
>I say, there's absolutely no chance! The whole system's a right stitch-up, innit? One simply must vote for socialism!
I don't understand why this absolute retard has any credibility with anyone, or why he keeps getting posted here.

There is no way you can raise taxes here any higher. People earning over 50000 are already paying almost half their income ffs. Everytime these people advocate for taxing the rich, they really mean taxing the upper working class and skilled middle class.

And people are wondering why there are a lack of doctors and other skilled workers. Truly a fucking mystery.

>>61180301
>>61180311
his message is TAX THE RICH
its absolute legimate

>>61181609
its about taxing rich people
like 10 million $$$ networth upward

>>61181505

A problem that he has with his presentation is that he makes retarded, over-broad statements like "If you don't have a rich dad, you'll never make it". That is obvious ultra-lefty pandering, but I still think his economic ideas hold up as far as wealth inequality driving the cost of living crisis in the UK, and moreso in the US.

I don't think he necessary advocates for immigration. I don't think he really takes a stance on it. From what I can see, he pushes against the narrative that "the reason you are getting poorer is immigrants" to distract from the real problem. In a sense, immigration is a problem, but the economic problem is the root cause for most people's issues.

hitler was taking 95% tax on ultra high income
socialism is the only legit way with all upcoming ai and robots

>>61181103

Is it possible that taxing the ultra wealthy and corporations could also help to incentivize productive captital expenditure, rather than them just hoarding money for yachts and whores.

>>61181647
I think he's absolutely making a stance on immigration. Him saying it's not a major factor in wealth inequality is indirectly endorsing it, and I think he's being quite dishonest about it. I understand that he does not want to split his community, and have it focus on the issue he wants to tackle, but blatant misinformation is not the way. Otherwise I don't have an issue with his model on wealth inequality.
As for personal finance all I've heard is complete nonsense. Don't do this, it's pointless. Don't do that. Doomer nonsense that will set you back financially if you listen to it.

Poor people (mainly poor liberals) have this weird mindset where they view anyone with even a few million as the sole reason why their life sucks. They can't comprehend how small time a few million is compared to the dynastic inherited wealth of old world elite ( who make up 0.000001% of the population or some shit) and are the real reason everything sucks and is gay no matter who gets elected. Raise taxes all you want it won't make a difference because these fuckers (mainly jews) control the BIS, IMF and World bank and therefore every central bank in the world. They are essentially money itself

>>61181792
How does immigration meaningfully factor into wealth inequality? Genuinely asking.

And yeah, whenever asked a question on what someone should personally do with their finances it can sound very black-pilled and that it's over. Tbh I think he says that to stop degen dickriders from following his trading advice whether its good advice or not, most people are retards and would fuck it up. I think he mentioned this when he told a friend to buy gold when it was in a serious bull run circa 2021-ish, and then said friend fucked up his whole portfolio because he didn't know what he was doing.

>>61181647
>A problem that he has with his presentation is that he makes retarded, over-broad statements like "If you don't have a rich dad, you'll never make it".

that's the truest nuke he's ever dropped, upwards mobility is dead in the UK. if you don't inherit, you will die poor

>>61181680
I think so. I don't even think it's bad for the ultra wealthy to buy yachts and whores. The ultra wealthy consuming helps the middle class. The problem is the inflation of assets.

I think taxing the ultra wealthy would also incentivize the selling of assets like real-estate at an affordable price so the middle-class can have a chance at ownership.

>>61181924
I'm an Amerimutt so I may be speaking out of my depth. But I'm pretty sure upwards mobility is worse in the US. And even in the US it is doable, it's just really hard.

>>61181901
>How does immigration meaningfully factor into wealth inequality? Genuinely asking.

labor pool dilution means wage suppression, and wage suppression makes the rich richer, and thus the poor poorer
>but just because the rich get richer doesn't mean the poor get-
yes it does, it's an invariably zero sum relationship. the rich further consolidate assets and thus prevent upwards mobility. the fewer assets available to the poor, the poorer they get

File: 1744404954856319.jpg (276 KB, 1500x1308)

276 KB JPG

If the ultrarich are growing at 8% and the economy is growing at 3% how can everyone else NOT be getting power?
Also he is absolutely correct that during covid $1T just went straight from govt to avg joe to ultrarich with no reclamation plan and it is why assets have skyrocketed.

He needs to be harder on immigration though. No shit it's dividing working class people. That and suppressing wages are the whole reason the ultrarich support it without even considering they hate white people intrinsically.

>>61182011
getting poorer*

Easy, capital controls. Lock down the riches ability to offshore wealth. Force taxes on them.

>>61181968
But this argument breaks down if you socialize the gain from outsourcing those jobs. You’ve not lost a job but you’ve instead picked the most effective candidate for the job and share the profit from that with the other laborers.

>>61182025
You can't say that this argument breaks down because you have thought up of some utopia. Immigration world wide puts a downward pressure on wages and benefits the asset holders, on behalf of the working people. that is why we have it.

>>61181968
I agree that immigration causes wage suppression, but fundamentally that is a supply and demand issue right? Most Americans don’t want the low paying jobs that immigrants will do, so immigrants fill that gap be-it through legal or illegal immigration. So in that sense, getting rid of immigrants should theoretically increase wages. The question I think you’re left with is, do Americans want to work those jobs to begin with, and if they will, you’re still left with this race-to-the-bottom situation we’re in now. To be clear I’m not pro-immigration, we needed to be way more strategic with immigration, but the US at least hasn’t Sweeden’d itself.

Also, I really hate the “zero-sum” argument because it’s misleading, and this is one of the arguments that Gary uses which frustrates me. Wealth creation is a thing, but what drives wealth creation is consumption, and investment into productive parts of an economy. Not taking a bunch of printed money, punting it into the stock market, or coming up with dumbass financial instruments to sell debt. That kind of shit is done purely to take a bigger slice outta the economic pie.

>>61182025
If by socializing the gain, you mean by taxation then I agree. Every other mean seems like it would make perverse incentives.

But capital control is icky. It turns you into a China where your currency can’t be trusted.

>>61182054
>thought up some utopia
>immigration benefits asset holders
The argument is simply put the assets in the name of the workers and suddenly outsourcing is a good thing in many cases. If your economy is rejecting qualified applicants something is very wrong.

>>61182117
You don’t necessarily need taxes, you can just print money.

I think capital controls are the logical step forward for capitalist economies. Capitalism always devolves into fascism.

>>61182230
The main argument is that Gary is endorsing immigration and neglect the impact it has on the wealth gap and working people's economy, which it clearly does. That you want to champion immigration doesn't really matter here, but to answer your point - What you are advocating is not how immigration works in the real world. That you want the world to work better is great, but it doesn't really matter to the discussion, and even further - what qualifies as qualified applicants is a gray area that is heavily pushed to suppress wages with low skilled workers.

>>61181936

Aside from the fact that the money doesn't trickle down in any substantial way, the other important factor is that when you put ever more money into the hands of the wealthy through low taxes and money printing, they inevitably look for assets to invest in, putting them in direction competition with the lower classes for housing etc, and creating asset bubbles.

This is the most compelling argument for why inequality is a problem imo - not because I really care that the rich have it so good, but because they inevitably start fucking everyone's shit up when they start hoarding assets - this is a key point Gary has made.

>>61182314
>gary is endorsing immigration
>neglecting the impact it has on the wealth gap
If you tax the rich, the money they made outsourcing the work goes back to the public, I think you just want ignore the connection between fixing the wealth gap and the problems of immigration because you’re a stealth racist that doesn’t want immigration at all but don’t want people to think badly of you for that.

>>61182411
if you import millions of working adults you literally fuck the worth of your working class, cope all you want

>>61182429
You think the only valuable thing you’ll ever do in life is break your back working until 65, cope all you want

>>61182411
>A impacts the wealth gap
>Gary pretends it doesn't
>You advocate to change A so that it doesn't
Your position makes no sense.
>muh racism
lol

>>61182448
Taxing the rich, as Gary is advocating, lowers the wealth gap. Lowering the wealth gap makes immigration a non-problem. Cope and sneed, not my fault your unironically a racist trying to argue semantics so immigration bad :)

>>61182441
this... so much this... import more brownturds who live in 1 bd apartments with 6 mattresses in it and spread the rent among all of them helping to fuel the real estate bubble and many other bubbles... the only solution to this problem is TAXING the billionaires... LOL!

>>61182460
The problem is that Gary is saying that immigration doesn't impact the wealth gap and economic situation for working people, which is just false. It doesn't matter that you can think of ways to improve the situation, we're talking about the current state situation. Gary is being deceitful there because he wants to dodge a potential divide in his audience.
I don't think you're too dumb to understand this, but I think that you go into this from an emotional standpoint. Try to understand what I'm saying instead of throwing ad hominems.

>>61182485
I don’t think you’re too dumb to understand that fixing the wealth gap makes immigration a non-issue.

>that’s not the way things work though
The solution he provides changes the way things work. We don’t disagree as of this moment the majority of income from outsourcing goes to the top income quintiles which negatively impacts the majority of the population. Your inability to admit the proposed change effects this state is at best unwitting ignorance.

>we're talking about the current state situation. Gary is being deceitful there because he wants to dodge a potential divide in his audience.
And you’re being deceitful by pretending his proposed solution does not effectively change the supply and demand of immigrant labor.

>>61182550
alright don't have time to keep going over this, he doesn't own up to that current immigration is a net negative for the wealth gap. I'm not talking about how it can be improved, he simply can't own up to it. that is all.
have fun

>>61182608
It’s ok, not uncommon around here to be blatantly racist, you can own up to wanting to argue the semantics of an argument because you hate Indians and Africans

>>61182375
>but because they inevitably start fucking everyone's shit up when they start hoarding assets - this is a key point Gary has made
The hoarding is the problem, it's not a le bad thing when they buy lambos or have 6-figure weekends in Monaco because at least that money is being spent

>>61181633
>>61181643
>>61181663
>>61182411
>le tax the rich
An effective tax rate of 90% over any amount is inherently retarded. First of all, rich people get out of paying taxes through loopholes. All raising the marginal tax rate to 90% does is encourage more of that loophole finding (and they can hire a very good accountant to do it, which, get this, they can then write the cost off on their taxes). Basically anyone that doesn't claim enough deductions to get under the threshold would be a retard. Watch this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22CjsRG0sTc
>>61182411
>if you don't like immigration you're a racist
Immigration is encouraged because the wealthy realize the only way to durably get the price down on anything is to increase the supply. Thus they flood the market with laborers who don't even have to be willing to work for less, but simply because there are more of them they have to work for less or they won't get a job in the first place.

No one here mentioned interest rates as being an effective way to lower wealth inequality, because nobody wants to admit it. Sure, someone sitting on top of 100 million dollars in cash might not want to do anything with it if they can generate 10 million dollars of revenue a year by doing nothing, and that would include not hiring anybody or consoooming, but that also includes not buying up an entire block of low income housing because they're seeking a return. All of these rich globalists LARPing as marxists go full steam ahead on inflationary measures because they're in the pockets of both rich donors who know how to use low interest debt to avoid taxes and the government who needs low interest rates to increase spending and enrich themselves.

>>61182824
>First of all, rich people get out of paying taxes through loopholes
Hence needing capital controls, as my post already stated

>Thus they flood the market with laborers who don't even have to be willing to work for less, but simply because there are more of them they have to work for less or they won't get a job in the first place.
Yes, this is certainly how it works in economies where a nations citizens are only able to make money through labor alone. Reduction of wealth inequality though would either lead to the jobs paying so little that competition ends or a decrease in reliance from the citizens on job income decreasing competition. Whether these are actually viable social solutions are ignored because the alternative is that wealth inequality is good and quality of life and other humanistic goals are unnecessary road blocks to maximizing a nations economy.

File: 0-8163_emoji-directory-pe(...).jpg (53 KB, 820x444)

53 KB JPG

>>61183004
>Reduction of wealth inequality though would either lead to the jobs paying so little that competition ends or a decrease in reliance from the citizens on job income decreasing competition.

>>61180301
he loves banks, this parasite

>>61181680
The ultra wealthy already pay a lot in taxes and contribute way more than everyone else

>>61181103
Capital is significantly more mobile than ever before. UK is a service based economy. Every company that could leave would and so would all the rich people. All you would have left is a rainy deindustrialized shithole with high energy costs, low productivity, and pointless regulations. The top 1% pay more in taxes relative to the rest of the population than they ever have.

>>61180301
How would raising rates solve the issue?

>>61181643
You tax the rich by lowering income tax and increasing consumption tax, adding a massive tax on empty real estate, while simultaneously increasing interest rates.
He's advocating for none of that.
He wants to rape all the crabs who managed to barely climb out of the bucket. Same with every other commie ever.
>>61181647
>over-broad statements like "If you don't have a rich dad, you'll never make it"
That's not an over-broad statement, that's the truth, and the reason for it is income tax, which he wants to see increased.

>>61181949
>But I'm pretty sure upwards mobility is worse in the US
It's not.
You still have skilled tradies who hire 2-3 apprentices and become millionaires in less than a decade. This in unheard of in Europe.
The only way to escape middle class in Europe is by getting an investment by a billionaire, who also happens to have lobbying power.
But ironically, capital markets are still 100x better in the States anyway.
Exception being the 10% flat tax rate EEU countries where the mafia targets you after a certain threshold so you need to escape to Dubai anyway.

>>61181087
Why do you say that?

>>61181633
>his message is TAX THE RICH
>its absolute legimate
No it isn't lmao
How about we cut government spending and stop printing money

>>61184562
My thoughts exactly anon. They think the state is perfect with 100% efficiency. The lib dems will say things like.
>Taxes are higher than ever and services are worse than ever. its time to make taxes go even higher and rejoin the EU.
They will never admit that the solution isn't throwing more of other peoples money at the problem.

>>61184593
The solution is TBD

>>61184593
Based
Unfortunately people have no idea what we're talking about.
>>61184599
Why not just abolish the central banks?

>>61184599
i am unfamiliar with that term. Do you mean TND? The N key is right nest to the B?

>>61180311
Socialism is a mode of production. Fuck socdems and fuck you retard

>>61183679
The reason the wealthy can hoard assets and buy everything up is because they have access to cheap debt. They can also write off their debt-fueled purchases on their taxes. See the first part of my post here >>61182824
But you'll never hear a cocksucker like Gary argue for them because he's bought out by rich people and the government. The government is nothing but a money sink of debt that needs low interest rates to survive. Rich people love debt for the aforementioned reasons and banks also love debt because that's the only way they make money. Basically the problem with the economy isn't mean white people with too much money, it's that money isn't fucking real

>>61184616
>mode of production
marxist gobbledygook
Marxism is a religious cult. You're a tool.

>>61184647
>it's that money isn't fucking real
THIS
This fucking gary guy SUPPORTS central banking and endless money printing, which is literally the cause of the inequality and poverty.
Fuck him.

>>61184647
even without cheap debt, the rich having enough money that investment gains outpace their living expenses invariably leads to the current problems he describes. it's not malicious, nobody would just keep their money laying around, obviously they reinvest. but it creates a system where the prices of real world assets are driven up by people that don't need them, out-competing those that do. it's clearly true, the only decision to make is if society is fine with this and if not, what should be done about it

>>61184709
You don't understand. Access to cheap debt easily doubles a person's paper wealth. Not only that, but the reason why basically everyone who is super wealthy has as much money as they do is because their benefactors have access to cheap wealth. For instance, Elon Musk wouldn't be worth half a trillion if Tesla wasn't worth 1.5 trillion, and it wouldn't be worth 1.5 trillion if debt was harder to come by, hence why its stock price dumped by 75% during the rate hiking cycle.
If your actual tangible wealth was all you had, you wouldn't be recklessly buying up all the assets because the interest on the debt you use to pay for it would be too high. Rich people HATE using their real money, they mostly use debt. Look it up.

>>61180301
no one cares

>>61181103
The thing no one will say out loud is that everyone is massively overleveraged. The money printing isn't for funsies, it's because everyone with debt defaults if the money-printing stops, and everyone has debt, ESPECIALLY the people who are "rich" on paper (and if the wealthy skim off the top for their lavish lifestyles in the meantime, why, isn't that worth the stability of increasingly insane yet still "solvent" resource allocation?).
>>61181505
He's right on all those counts, though. Only some people can become rich. Chances are you aren't one. A high floor and low ceiling is more rational for the vast majority of people, as we will almost certainly never be able to afford the Gulfstream that makes living in the air worth it.
>>61183670
America is slowly learning what it means to try to maintain a service economy without institutional knowledge as Boomers peace out, trying to do that suddenly would be Brexit 2. Companies aren't going shittywhere.

File: affv.jpg (47 KB, 1280x720)

47 KB JPG

>>61184105
>increasing consumption tax,
Regressive.
>adding a massive tax on empty real estate
Loophole.
If you want to tax rich people, tax rich people.

He's not wrong about wealth inequality being the problem, but he is wrong about why it happens (ignores Cantellon Effect).

>>61185135
>(ignores Cantellon Effect).
Leftists are so fucking clueless they have no idea what this is or what central banks are.
They unironically think price increases and insane stock/housing market bubbles are simply a part of capitalism,
and their "solution" is more government LOL

>>61185576
Do you understand these things though? Please explain how money is created.

>>61185598
the government is the one doing the monopolies and selling everyone out dipshit. you can't raise taxes without taking care of the corruption first. goddamn.
https://cdn.mises.org/An%20Essay%20on%20Economic%20Theory_2.pdf
read it fuckass it's like a hundred pages
also here's some spoonfeeding on immigration too since you're fucking potatobrained. no i'm not responding to you
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RO8PJGC_rFc

>>61185598
A federal reserve partner bank or the government decides they need more money so the federal reserve "lends" it. They are very patient lenders.

>>61185135
How does he ignore the Cantillon Effect?
His whole argument is based on it.

In 2008 the bailout was given to the ultra-wealthy who immediately put it into assets, massively inflating the price of assets.

During COVID the government effectively did the same thing except with the extra step of giving it to the working class who's capital flows inherently go to the ultra-wealthy.

Both times the money was not drained out of the top creating the issue we're in now, hence why he is for high wealth taxation.

>>61185952
>In 2008 the bailout was given to the ultra-wealthy who immediately put it into assets, massively inflating the price of assets.
I mean that was just one event. Compare that to the tens of trillions of dollars that was printed since that time.
This gary guy literally supports central banking and wants more money printing and spending.
>hence why he is for high wealth taxation.
Why not just stop printing money instead of taxing production?
Taxing economic production is the most brain dead retarded thing you can do.

>>61184553
Idk how you got this message from his videos.
The "give all power to the government" maybe valid if you think taxation inherently gives power to the government.

But he has never advocated for more money printing. As a matter of fact he is explicitly that excessive printing contributed to the problem.

>>61185952
Give money to working class, and money still flows to the top. So now we have to tax the winners more?
Wtf is wrong with you losers?
How about no bail outs at all next time and we will see who suffers?

>>61180301
This inbred chav is such a grifter lmao

>>61185972
Yes, an economic shock like 2008 was a one time event. But it set the precedent of near-zero interest rates for the entirety of the 2010's, which we haven't recovered from. The tens of trillions that have been printed since then are also the problem, and the continued low interest rates contribute the the problem.

Also how does he argue for more spending? He's made the argument that you could increase taxes on the utlra-wealthy to pay for already existing social services instead of cutting said services while not taxing/cutting taxes to the ultra-wealthy. So if you take "not cutting existing services" as increasing spending then sure.

Gary hasn't argued for taxing income, or increasing consumption taxes. He's argued for increased and better enforced wealth taxes. Just to be clear, I'm also not for printing more money. I think it's been high time that interest rates be raised, it's just we've kicked this can so far down the road it gets more painful every passing year. Compound that with shit economic policy (retarded tariffs), and everyone gets hit harder. Doesn't mean that you don't do it though (Volcker shock sucked but it did decrease inflation).

>>61186004
Who are the winners here? If you're talking about the upper middle class, in a way sure they are winners. They got to see their assets rise while the rest of the middle class gets thinned out. If you're talking about the ultra-wealthy, they aren't getting taxed which is the problem. The money that they have accumulated is no longer flowing and is getting parked in assets.

To be clear, the bailouts were fucked up, and bailouts should not be allowed. If banks want to fuck around on risky, leveraged investments, while they lie to government agencies/congress, and then they get smashed, the entire C-suite should have their assets seized for it. I mean, if I make dumbass financial decisions especially with someone else's money, I have to pay the consequence, so why not them?

>>61186032
My post was more focused on that anons saying the second bailout went to the working class and yet the money still went to the rich.
My reply is so what???
We are at the point where the winners of capitalism is clearly defined.
Do you know how stupid it sounds to me like”oh we need to tax the rich cause the money flows to them?”
Yeah sure lets tax the winners cause we are losers. Wtf?

>>61186046
Sure you could just say "so what". It still doesn't change the fact that the middle class will continue to get squeezed out of owning assets.

So yes, lets tax the "winners" because we should have a voice in how we shape society. I am not anti-rich, or anti-wealth, but we are slowly regressing back to feudalism. The broad middle class from post-WW2 is not a historical norm, it's something that the middle-class who fought through the great depression and WW2 built for themselves.

Honestly, this argument is the saddest one to me.

>>61186067
Are you dumb? You don’t get to look up at the top and say “you have too much.”
Your job as someone not in the capitalist clsss is to get into that class.
Not you specifically but you, your parents and your grandparents had 100 fucking years to get rich.

>>61186067
> So yes, lets tax the "winners" because we should have a voice in how we shape society
Of course not. You’re retarded.

>>61185894
>no I’m not responding to you
Ok so you don’t know how money is made and are talking out your ass. Good to know!

>>61185897
True yes.

>>61185977
>if you think taxation inherently gives power to the government.
money is power
if you disagree, then try accomplishing your goals without taking other people's money to do it

>>61185972
>mean that was just one event. Compare that to the tens of trillions of dollars that was printed since that time.
>This gary guy literally supports central banking and wants more money printing and spending.
If you don’t consider the trillions of dollars of QE to be “printing and spending” by the central bank then what the fuck even is your argument Kek. “Oh I think the central bank invented fractional banking so I blame them for all money”

>>61186046
>Do you know how stupid it sounds to me like”oh we need to tax the rich cause the money flows to them?”
>>61186079
>Not you specifically but you, your parents and your grandparents had 100 fucking years to get rich.

Oh god you’re the “100 years to get rich” jeet kek.

I do agree with you that this is the ultimate state of capitalism though, “taxing the rich” is indeed a cope to try and pretend hyper fascism isn’t the end goal for capitalism. I think you probably believe that’s a good thing though which is where our agreement ends.

>>61186067
Look at how pathetic this cuck sounds>>61186067
> So yes, lets tax the "winners" because we should have a voice in how we shape society.
The brokie loser wants to shape society.

>>61186733
>>61186085
>>61186079

>Sperging this hard over being told to not give up

Believe in me, who believes in you anon

>>61186768
?
he said
> So yes, lets tax the "winners" because we should have a voice in how we shape society.

Look man, I just think owner-occupiers need to be taxed back into being rent cattle like the rest of us. It's not fair that they get to escape paying Mr Shekelstein his $4k a month.
Those fucking kulaks have it coming!

Also we need infinity jeets because... BECAUSE WE JUST DO OKAY??? If you oppose immigration it's just because a billionaire has brainwashed you. Immigration doesn't impact anything. Th-that's why we need it!

>>61187005
>NOOOOOOO I CAN’T STOP THE GLOBALLY IMPOVERISHED FROM BREEDING AND MESSING UP MY CONSUMING IF I DON’T STERELIZE THEM, NUKES NOWWWWWW
God you people are actually disgusting

He's fucking retarded...I even had to make a fresh youtube account after you niggers linked one of his videos because it filled my recommendations with faggot shit afterword.

>>61187035
I'm sorry, your model appears to be hallucinating.
Please reboot and reload the thread.

>>61187115
You’re gross and have disgusting beliefs. Par for the course for this site unfortunately.

>>61187138
Your explosive and hysterical opposition to anti-immigration sentiment makes you a perfect stooge for transnational finance.
You and Gary should fucking neck yourselves.

>>61187148
>explosive and hysterical opposition
Hilarious considering I’ve been told India and China legitimately need to be nuked by people with similar disgusting beliefs on here multiple times.

>>61187172
Keep sparring with those shadows, champ.
You're the best around!