1.1 Million added to the Reserve
>>61184963>exit liquidity when they are about to go bankrupt
>>61184971That doesn’t even make sense
>>61184963> $320m out> $1m inNice! CLL investing in the token big time!
>>61185385>$1.1 millionSo bullish they're increasing the weekly buys!!
>>61185385chainlink need to send that money to israel dont be anti semitic
>>61185395no he said 1.1 million without a denomination so we have to assume he is talking about the divisible asset known as "chainlink" (given the OP picture)that would be around $19,030,000 which is dogshit in comparison to all the money they've made from dumping tokens on us
>>61185733>more whining about token dumps that we all knew about since 2017did you expect the reserve to completely offset the token dumps? are you stupid?
>>61185741>he doesnt understand quadrilation steakingaris blood sweat tears and probably cum went into the design you know
ok so this MUST be good for the price - right?>goes to check price
imagine missing the most obvious 10x because it crabbed for a few years
>>61184963This guy looks like he chugs soimilk
>>61185741>we all knew about since 2017I knew about staking AND dumps in 2017but it turns out, only one was true
>>61185733He's not, it's literally in USD lmao. Why would the team ever buy back 1m of their funding token.
Okay hollup can anyone rollup on the 1.1 million claim? I is be thankin the weekly shit was a solid 1 mil?
>>61184963The day we all saw this guys face we knew it was over.
>>61187011doing his best sergey cosplay has to be the faggiest fucking thing I've ever seen in crypto
>>61187111Checked, what a faggot. Based his whole look around a project that does literally everything but make holders rich.
>>61185873>the most obvious x10Linkies have been saying this since 2020. It's never happening lil bro and you missed buying BTC at 10k
>>61187123>does literally everything but make holders richNot true, it made the biggest holder (CLL) incredily wealthy
>>61185385We've known since 2017 that they'd release 650M tokens.Meanwhile we've only known about the reserve since two months ago.>>61186087>I knew about staking AND dumps in 2017No you didn't you liar.Staking is never mentioned in the OG whitepaper. Only the use of Link as node payment.Meanwhile we knew about the dumps BEFORE the OG whitepaper was even released.
>>61187011>>61187111>>61187123>>61188452>>61188870Here comes the group chat lol
>>61188921Ummm excuse me linkie its not a "group chat"It's a support group for bullied brown faggots trying to make a few pennies per fud post
>>61188921kek this
>>61188948this shit is hilariousLook at him.
>>61188948
>>61188992What about the fat, bald, boomer college professor?That's even more hilarious.
>>61189042>heh, us fuddies have been getting schooled by a college professor for years to the point we conspired together to doxx him. That is way more hilarious than ANOTHER fuddie being outed as a complete loser!if you put it that way, it is pretty funny.
>>61189042What's hilarious about a white higher educated boomer being on twitter? That's probably one of the absolute biggest user profiles on there.The hilarious part is the faggy chatgroup where browns go to mald, coordinate fud, obsess, and doxx.
>>61189086A fat old boomer spending his golden years kvetching on Twitter all day about a crypto project in which he doesn't even own.If you don't think that's sad then you have a lot of growing up to do
>>61189305You are convinced that an obsessed Chainlink bull doesn't hold Chainlink? How did you arrive to that conclusion?
>>61188908nulinkers are TERRIBLE liarshttps://warosu.org/biz/?task=search2&ghost=false&search_text=chainlink+staking&search_subject=&search_username=&search_tripcode=&search_email=&search_filename=&search_datefrom=&search_dateto=&search_media_hash=&search_op=all&search_del=dontcare&search_int=dontcare&search_ord=old&search_capcode=all&search_res=post
>>61189395staking was a HUGE talking point among early marines EVEN BEFORE THE FUCKING ICOANYONE trying to convince you otherwise by downplaying the importance of staking to LINK's game theory is a slimy, jewish, kike faggot shill
>>61184963
>>61189305>A fat old boomer spending his golden years kvetching on Twitter all dayYou just described 80% of twitter you mong.Including Musk and Trump; the richest and the most powerful man on earth respectively.
>>61189317What are you talking about?He kvetches about XRP all dayAbsolutely patheticBut hilarious as a casual observer that he turns out to be a fat boomer
>>61189395>>61189431>staking was a HUGE talking point among early marines EVEN BEFORE THE FUCKING ICOkek it's literally 5 posts. With zero sources.Now show where Chainlink said anything about staking. The word isn't even in the white paper.Nobody cares about 5 random headcanon posts on 4chan.
>>61189938The reason he harps on cripple on X is because of cripples constantly inserting themselves into shit like Swift. For years.
>>61189938>>61189981Not to mention the direct attacks, of course.
>>61189981Who cares though?Why does this boomer care about others' investments?Obsessing over another project and spending your entire life kvetching about it is pathetic
whenever you see an investment community start lashing out anyone who even has mild criticism, you know there's something off on the inside it then becomes a self fulfilling prophecy, where the toxicity spews out, turning off further investors. and so on and so forth
>>61189955Are you really trying to fucking argue that staking was not a thing before second whitepaper in 2021? Are you fucking serious right now? Staking was all everyone was talking about in 2018 you lying scumbag
>>61190022Well if you keep lying that Swift is working with XRP instead of Chainlink, then expect Chainlink holders to call you out.Simple stuff, really.
>>61190044>Are you really trying to fucking argue that staking was not a thing before second whitepaper in 2021?I'm arguing against the post that said "staking was a HUGE talking point among early marines EVEN BEFORE THE FUCKING ICO".Did you just get a lobotomy?
for anyone who's been around the last year, the link vs xrp stuff really ramped up when xrp went 7x from oct '24 thru summer '25, while link could barely muster a 2x this drove the boyscouts insanein their minds, they are in on some secret genius investment that's just so complicated that no one else can see itthe irony of course being they are apparently partnered with the largest players in the world, none of whom seem to agree re the investment and therefore don't buy the token it's a tough place to be... where you've tied your entire identity to your genius altcoin, and are having to confront the realization it may not be what you thought it wasthis can be a major hit to the ego, which is the kryptonite for arrogant people
>>61190090It's because cripples keep spamming their shit in anything even remotely related to Chainlink.>>61189981>>61190009>>61190045
>>61190107>it's becauseoh i think you misunderstood...i wasn't asking you for your opinion on what the reason was, boyi was telling you what it was
Not even 3 million LINK per year. Max supply = 1 BILLION. Means they’ll reach 3%... in TEN. FUCKING. YEARS. Ten years of “accumulation”. 3% is nothing, they are just trying to scam you
>>61190117I'm telling you what the reason was.The spam got so bad that Swift had to start deleting all cripple replies to their tweets.And I can post receipts all day long.
>>61190132>CLL starts buying Link on the open market out of the blue>"th-this is too little!"kek they didn't have to do it at all.
>>61189938>He kvetches about XRP all dayChainlink holders have a vested interest in shitting on XRP, I thought that much was obvious. XRP is at 10x the marketcap of LINK with 10% of the connections and working products. Lots of liquidity that could flow into Chainlink. Now LINK fuddies on the other hand, what is their motive for kvetching about something all day that they don't hold?
>>61190141>Now LINK fuddies on the other hand, what is their motive for kvetching about something all day that they don't holdAll LINK fuddies hold Chainlink
Test
>>61190181>All LINK fuddies hold ChainlinkEmpirical evidence says otherwise.The last fud spammer to get unmasked literally worked at Redstone kekZeus Capital was Nexo with a massive Link short, Chris Blec was a Tellorfag, etc.
>>61190202>The last fud spammer to get unmasked literally worked at Redstone kek>>61190202That was a guy who was in a group literally full of Chainlink holders
>>61190202so you're basically saying that a bunch of fudders on X and 4chan are singlehandedly responsible for crashing Link by -70% from 2021?Damn....that doesn't sound like a great investment
>>61190221no the price suppressors are behind thatChainlink is programmed to be out of top 10 since then
>>61190214>That was a guy who was in a group literally full of Chainlink holdersHe was quite literally the CMO of Redstone, a Chainlink competitor.Literally nobody in that group holds Link.>>61190221What? Who said that?
>>61190249Literally everyone in that fud group holds ChainlinkYou're dense if you think they don't
>>61190231>price suppressionsource? every single altcoin baggie repeats the same mantra
>>61190133>And I can post receipts all day long.same here here's the one i was talking about (the chart), which is all that mattersnow queue your response:>duuuuuuuuuuude i crushed it back in 2019"damn homie, in high school you was the man homie"
>>61190276its those>3rd world fudders>bulgarians>btc whalesholding us back!! time to face reality, shills. the reason link is not triple digits right is now is simply because Chainlink Labs doesn't want link to be triple digits. there's a reason why the team absolutely refuses to discuss the token and its price
>>61190193>Testit worked
>>61190267We've had a few major fudder leaks, and every single time it's a competitor or a shorter.NOBODY spams like Link fuddies do without a financial interest.
>>61190292>here's the one i was talking about (the chart)kek no you were talking about Linkies hating on Cripples.That's like saying the Spanish Reconquista was because of islamophobia.
>>61190309why does his use that pfp but he is brown?
>>61190292zoom out
>>61189395>>61189431>>61190044Ehh we might have been talking about staking a lot (presumably because it was mentioned in a blogpost or presentation), but it was not in the whitepaper itself: https://research.chain.link/whitepaper-v1.pdf
>>611903692.1 - Oracle Selection > Oracle Selection An oracle services purchaser specifies requirements that make upa service level agreement (SLA) proposal. The SLA proposal includes details such asquery parameters and the number of oracles needed by the purchaser. Additionally,the purchaser specifies the reputation and aggregating contracts to be used for therest of the agreement.Within 5.2 > Amount of penalty payments: If penalty payments were locked in to assurea node operator’s performance, the result would be a financial metric of anoracle provider’s commitment not to engage in an “exit scam” attack, where theprovider takes users’ money and doesn’t provide services. This metric wouldinvolve both a temporal and a financial dimension.This is how we derived the concept of "staking"; where to qualify for a some job as a node operator, you'd have to qualify with some amount of Linkies. If you mess up, you get penalized.
>>61190009>that picHoly shit its pure, unadulterated, military grade crystallized seethe. Fucking xrptards are going to kill themselves after their scam collapses arent they?
>>61190009What can we do about this? Basically Ripple is stealing our exit liquidity
>>61191843Take them to Kleros court.
>>61191820>they're going to kill themselves aren't theyI'll be bullying a few of them into suicide for fun after, so yes.
chainlink means that swift messages can use blockchain transactions
>>61193131
>>61191820there's going to be the equivalent of a reverse bank run on xrp, when people begin realising what's happening and the realisation gains traction exponentially. most are likely still in the dark. trying to guess when the turning point will be is fun
>>61190309Holy shit its that full time door dasher paet time link fudder. whatever happened to based Chris Blec?
>>61193179This post made me seethe. Sometimes I wish I was a midwit, life is so easy when you have the autonomy of a cattle.
>>61190009THIS !!!
Rent free baggies
>>61190249>Literally nobody in that group holds Link.No he's right, even the fudders working for competition are likely to hold LINK themselves. Imagine if your employer told you a crypto project was so great that they need to spend time and ressources fudding it on twitter, wouldn't you immediately buy a bag?
>>61188908>i knew i would get kicked in the balls. and here i am, getting kicked in the balls. i am happy
almost 10,000,000 usd added to the reserve, from protocol revenue. If that went to stakers like it was supposed to instead of CLL's convoluted way of paying themselves just to dump even more later, ever staker would have made 22 cents for every link staked. As an og with 10,000 staked thanks for not giving me that 2k usd serg while completely ignoring staking or any protocol value accrual. very cool.
>>61191195/threadFUCK retarded nulinker shills
>>61194846That only proves that staking was a very vague concept in the original whitepaper, and not even tied to Link at all. That came way after.The actual section on token usage makes zero reference to penalty payments or staking, even in the vaguest sense.Literally the only use for the actual token in the whitepaper is node payment.
>>61194838It’ll go to stakers when staking expands to those feeds.It’s just that PAL was ready first.
>>61190009srsly what the absolute fuck is wrong with xerples?
>>61195125staking was the primary function of LINK from day one you lying sack of shit>node payments = node rewards
>>61195568You're retarded.Node payments/rewards have nothing to do with staking.
>>61195593nobody falls for your bullshit, kike
>>61184963As time goes on, swindlers usually become more emboldened as a result of their initial crimes a la Sergey Nazarov. Years of dumping on linkcucks made him see that not only did they not fight back, they actually enjoyed the humiliation. Case in point, the chainlink reserve. Now he has constructed the world's largest public cuck degradation ritual for everyone to see. Laughing behind the scenes with his buddies all you can hear him say is "just look how much I can dump on them this time." kek baggies
>>61184963he looks israeli
>>61195125>That only proves that staking was a very vague concept in the original whitepaper, and not even tied to Link at all. That came way after.Anon, Linkpool was founded in 2017 specifically as a crowdfunding service provider between nodes and stakers. You think he would kick off a company on a "vague concept"?Stop trying to Ctrl-F "staking" and READ THE FUCKING WHITE PAPER.Anons spent weeks analyzing every segment to consider the implications, after digging into the authors (namely Ari) before getting super excited and obsessed. You're not going to understand this shit in the route you're going; "oh crap lemme go skim this doc to show them out!". At the very least you can go back to the sections I mentioend and put some imagination in how these would work >>61191195
>>61185395Just 300 more weeks until they break even assuming no further dumps in the next 6 years
>>61197810Chainlink is an AI token
>>61196931>Stop trying to Ctrl-F "staking" and READ THE FUCKING WHITE PAPER.The whitepaper mentioned the idea of penalty payments, without much detail and without tying them to the Link token.Meanwhile the 650m token dumps were firmly laid out before the whitepaper even came out.
>>61199171>introduced the idea of penalty payments without tying them to the LINK tokencertainly, it OBVIOUSLY referred to OTHER forms of payment and NOT the token that is being utilized by the network to pay Chainlink node operators, you're a fucking genius dude!this is next level gaslighting oh btw, STOP SWITCHING YOUR FUCKING ID every time you pathetic jeet
>>61189431>staking was a HUGE talking point among early marines EVEN BEFORE THE FUCKING ICO>>61189395>grand total of five postsYou're such a faggot holy shit
>>61199250there's hundreds of others under "LINK staking" you pretentious gaslighting faggot, the issue is that you have to comb through them because LINK could mean "link"
>>61199273>there's hundreds of others under "LINK staking"I just checked, it's the exact same five posts before the ICO as "chainlink staking" and zero more.Why are you such a lying faggot.
Why is Zohran Mamdani connected with CLL?
the whitepaper came out AFTER the presale
>>61200072what silly argument is it this time? anons rushing to defend chainlink because they didn't deliver shit again? that happens all the time, just let them give their money away to a start up that wastes it on bullshit for a decade, they are happy like this
>>61184963cuckholds of the crypto. I will buy when it's dump to 2$. Chainlink is to mainstream. No one gonna buy this crap.
