Look at the cute pokeman at the site of a deadly human accident

>>61190636
It's such bullshit to blame billionaires for environmental damage, as though this wouldn't happen no matter how large industries were structured. The USSR wasn't exactly environmentally friendly.

Anyway to answer your question, if the world takes global warming and carbon seriously, uranium mining and nuclear power and solar panels would be safe long term holds. Nuclear fusion is possible. Maybe Elon Musk will come up with space based solar power, I can't see anyone else with the vision.

>>61191320
I think Elon is more worried about his dick working

>>61190636
Billionaires need their billions so they can buy super yachts that they'll sleep on for like a week maximum.

>>61190636
>Oxfam report, the world's 50 wealthiest billionaires generate more carbon through investments and luxury transport in just over 90 minutes than an average person does in a lifetime.
That seems like a lot until you realize that it's just 50 fucking people. So what, they end up having the carbon output of 1000 people.
Do you know how many people exist in the world.
Leftists are dumb.

>>61191442
Could you show me you calculation? I got to the number of 25920000 people, if the billionaires live until 90 years.

And who the fuck is a leftist here? I bet you are, that would be the only way your statement makes sense

I believe in Econophysics and bio-economics. The terms left and right, are also outdated and only make sense for cucks who align with things like they are soccer teams, fuck this, I align with correspondence to reality