Why Nano is at 90 mil marketcap? It allows for fast fee-less transactions, and unlike IOTA does so in decentralized manner. So it should be dream come true.
>>61195226I'm more of a Groestlecoin kind of guy
>>61195226Hello niggers. I hold nano
>>61195226>fee-lessso people mine this for free?
>>61195226Nano is literally a tech scam that doesn't work, that's why. But actually it's surprising it hasn't taken off like Terra Luna did, tech illiterates just love garbage projects that make ridiculous promises.
>>61195500No inflation.>>61195505You’re a liar
>>61195226Because it's a stupid shitcoin that no one cares about and never will.
>>61196142It has the technology built from ground up, and it's innovative and solves problems.
because of the bitgrail scam
>>61196717It seems so. it just needs adoption
>>61195226> $100K volume on 1 exchange> nobody cares> nobody in the developed world used crypto for anything except trading shitcoins> nobody in the developing world wants to use crypto for transactions, they use stablecoinsare you clueless anon?
>>61195226Was this the most Reddit coin?
>>61195226>Why Nano is at 90 mil marketcap?good questionit should be worth 0
>>61196800it's one of the tech illiteracy coins for retards that do not understand the byzantine generals problemthey get distracted by "no fees" and "le fast" and then lose all their money
>>61196926Was there any successful double spend attacks?
>>61195226its not some stupid blockchain copy or token so people cant put it in their standard walletsame goes for burst coin
>>61195226>fast fee-less transactionsbecause this is not what makes a good blockchain
>>61196926projection>>61196968nope, that's why he didn't answer you>>61197303it's what makes a good currencyThe archives will tell who was right ITT
>>61199310>it's what makes a good currencybut not what makes a good blockchain, and if your currency is secured by blockchain...
>>61195226Nano is a well-known scam, and Nano Foundation is bankrupt. https://warosu.org/biz/thread/16596049
>>61199626Nano has never been hacked...
>>61196968>>61199310>nope, that's why he didn't answer you>>61199666>Nano has never been hacked...this called "low-value protection paradox"because your BFT is so weak, nobody will ever put enough money on it, which in turn dissuades any attacker from investing into the infra necessary to perform an attack in the first placethe utter failure of your project ironically is the only thing that protects it from malicious actors the ultimate litmus test for a currency is its capitalizationhow much value are people willing to put inside you failed
>>61200054>calls others tech illiterate>uses chatGPT to confirm his schizo copingYiiiikes
>>61199666if this >>61199631 doesn't convince you nano is a scam, i don't know what will
>>61200603You realise anyone can just use this network and realise it mogs the entire field of competition right?
