>let's put an LLM in the pipeline that gives different outputs for the same inputs based on opaque probability weightings to handle an important business process
if a business process is so unimportant that you can replace it with a LLM it was never that important to begin with. Most jobs are fakes as shit and unnecessary. A LLM can do a better job on average than someone youd have to hire for it very expensively even if theres an error rate. It all gets offset. Jobs are cooked. accept it.
>>61200012I think more likely stuff will start breaking and the AI bubble will pop causing a scramble to find skilled humans to rebuild systems
>>61200008Every time we have a hard problem to solve I ask the AI if it has any ideas and it always just regurgitates google results. There’s really no ability for it to be truly creative which is the issue
