>>61216474You said the same thing at 70k too
>>61216474let's play the "draw random lines and pretend to know the future" gameif BTC gets down to 40K again I'll cum
>>61216474Always has been
>>61216474Thick line anon, is that you?
>>61216483And we were right... It dumped from 108k down to 75k. No one's saying it's going to zero.
>>61216483Yeah that was before yuor fugazi notes (dollars) declined 16% in valuebitcoin has done absolutely nothing in real terms, for about a year now. it's quite impressive
>>61216474The line you drew implies BTC will run to 135k before crashing though, retard
>>61216716Holy shit. you're telling me I may get +8% while risking -60%?
brb, buying bitcoin
one day TA fags will learn about random walk
>>61216474can you point to the obvious part?
>>61216675>nothing in real terms for 1 year It’s up ~55-60% at current levels compared to 1 year ago thoughbeit, at recent ATH was closer to 70%. Why lie?
BTC is too big to fail now. It's gonna rip the world economy apart if it crashes 50+% like it used to in the past. A bunch of companies and hedge funds have BTC in their balance sheets already.
>>61216474What I find fascinating is the early volume vs the later volume.
>>61218946it's exchange specific, bitstamp was more common in 2017
>>61216474The better question is who is gonna cash you out if you start selling significant stock in case of a crash.
>>61216474I don't know what will happend, but I'm not buying butcoin above 40k.
>>61218946it's not fascinating... the volume is expressed in bitcoins
>>61218958plus this, of course>>61217709to real men, "1 year ago" means january 2025
alts are going to 0 at the end of this bullrun