He will be leading the crusades against the kekfuddies and the xerpies
>>61226005fuddies having an absolute meltdown over this
holy shit ripple destroyed
intense peeling incoming
>>61226005>tommy is going to dump his freshly bought stack on our silly heads when smartcon news hit the marketPlease let me make it
Dump more of the stinky reserve
>>61226005>A rapid expansion of ecosystemIs this it, at last? No testing, no theory but actual use cases? Am I reading this right?
Tom my friend from myspace?
What happens when it fails because its a limited erc20 token?
you just know tom saw this retard and laughed
Get ready for an increase in circulating supply, rank 15 and the announcement that in the end of 2026 they will start their pilot of the proof of concept of the first phase.
Digital cash refers to stablecoins.
>>61226207Idk but i think they meant the spam of partnerships and integrations they're posting now. They're basically posting 8 integrations per day since then.But it says convergence of tradfi and defi so hopefully smth that happens during smartcon
sergey would probably speak at xrp con if asked
>>61226005So since they like proofs so much we'll get proofs of how Chainlink has been using the 350000 tokens allocated to the network improvement during ICO?Oh also well get a smart contract controlling the unlocks?Oh and finally we'll get receipts for all the fees they're getting for running the price feeds while USING THE PREMINT?
>>61226005>the next phase of digital finance>the future of our industryWell I guess we can rule out anything going live at Smartcon
More proofs of concept on the way. Amazing.
>>61226352>how Chainlink has been using the 350000 tokens allocated to the network improvement during ICOThey've been using them to pay the node network for six years now.
>>61226207>theory>>61226369>proofs of conceptWhat the fuck are you talking about.Chainlink has been in production since 2019, with explosive adoption. Pretty much all of Defi relies on Chainlink at this point.
>>61226040fucking kek
>>61226400Proof? Tom wants proofs
>>61226525
>>61226549These aren't the dumps going to Binance retard
>>61226593He asked for proof of them paying the node network for six years.I gave it to him.And those tokens in that pic were also "dumped" on Binance before they were paid to the nodes.
>>61226599>those tokens in that pic were also "dumped" on Binance before they were paid to the nodes.There is no way to know that. Why lie?
>>61226673All tokens from the non circulating wallets go to Binance.Therefore, the tokens paid by Chainlink to the nodes went through Binance.
>>61226678Tokens are non fungible, you are making assumptions. Also you would have to prove ALL the 350 million tokens went to node operators, and CLL did not make a profit getting the fees from clients in exchange. You can't. So just shut the fuck up everyone is tired of your retarded circular logic
>>61226701>Tokens are non fungible, you are making assumptions.Where else is CLL getting those tokens from?> you would have to prove ALL the 350 million tokens went to node operatorsFucking why?It was 300m for company funding, and 350m for network; or roughly 45% vs 55%.As long as this proportionality is maintained, Chainlink is doing exactly what they promised to do in 2017.
>>61226727notice how everyone is tired of your shit
>>61226727and stop swapping ids every fucking time you spastic
>>61226897>ummm ackshully sweetie, no one likes you, okay?
>>61226897>>61226901>has no arguments>gets triggeredMany such cases.
>>61226701>you would have to prove ALL the 350 million tokens went to node operatorsYou can only prove this after all the tokens have been released, which is 4-5 years from now.
>>61226005WAIT WAIT WAIT WAITyou're telling me.. that the turbo faggot who has cripple living rent free in his head and engages with literal who retards on social media over it... is a stinky?kek you literally can't make this crap up
>>61227059There's literally nothing about Ripple in OP.You ok bro?
>>61226005great tweet tom, keep us updated
>>61227070are we not allowed to bring things up that are not in OP? I guess I'll explain it again so your autism can understand...the only reason I know this guys name is because he is posted here all the time engaging with "the xrp army" telling them they are all retarded... like he has nothing better to do with his time than respond to these schizosthen it turns out from this post he is a stinkernow it makes sense why he can't stop thinking about cripplealso if you clearly understood that and I had to point out how dumb you are, sick own bro
>>61227110>the only reason I know this guys name is because he is posted here all the time engaging with "the xrp army" telling them they are all retarded...There's a very good reason for that. Xerpies spammed Swift socials for many years.
>>61227128yeah but even if the guy is 100% right he looks like a losera genius dunking on retards is pathetic, not epic
>>61227138Swift even had to manually remove all cripple replies at one point. Clearly they made it company policy to start pushing back against the mass xerpie spam.Swift's socials are for them to communicate through, not for xerpies to use as a shitty graffiti wall.
>>61227172and tom is... the social media intern?if so it's still cringe but much less soif he's anyone important swift is really overalso>>61226005>xerpies>>61227070>There's literally nothing about Ripple in OP.what are "xerpies" exactly?
>>61227188>and tom is... the social media intern?He's the chief innovation officer. Basically their absolute top guy when it comes to blockchain.
>>61226277Anyone know where Sergey lives?
>>61227197literally makes no sense to talk to xerpies because they will just ignore reality and lie, thats all they can do
just like>Tom Gonser>Allen Day>Ian Keane>John Wolpert>Fat Fernando>Yorke RhodesThis guy is just the flavor of the month exec that the cult is latching themselves onto. A nobody that will not help your investment price increase. A year from now he'll just be another name to be included in the list above
ADEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEM KAYSERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
>>61227287Tom is from a very different world than crypto, one where reality actually matters.The crypto market is about to get a real taste of that.>>61227296Chainlink has been working with Swift for eight years, long before Tom.
>>61227310That does't change a single thing I said
>>61227333Of course it does.
I think someone needs to audit Tom's personal holdings
>duuuuuude i owned le fudders by missing the bullrun and keeping a jackoff diaryhas it sank in yet? i'm referring to that little voice that's been in the back of your head this last year>you: what if the realists "fudders" are right, and i am being griftednext time don't get so attached to an investment you were warned for years
>>61227395why?
>>61227428because you'll realize he wants to pump his stink bags all while being afraid of... wait for it.. cripple kek
>>61226005
>>61226404>duuuuuuuuuude we're in production bahahhahahasee this pic for accurate description of the link product life cycle
>>61227483>low usage
>>61226040I PEEL
>>61227499>mylastdollarportfolio.png
>>61227499not sure what this is but here's what i do know: you aren't getting paid from itand you're going on 6 years of horrific price actionthat's actually almost impossible to do by the way... like you could give a 10 year old a trading account and tell him to blindly pick some plays... the probability of going 0/6 is very low
>>61227524oh you mean like this?>https://ripple.com/ripple-press/ripple-adopts-the-chainlink-standard-to-further-rippleusd-utility-and-access-in-defi/
>>61227593>not sure what this isI'm sure you don't.>you aren't getting paid from itWhat does that even mean.
>>61227600idk what this meansI was just making a joke because the pie chart was unlabeled
>>61227593>if you measure from my fixed time frame then uhhhh it's pretty bad what if you bought at $5-$8 as it ranged there for almost 2 years? $11 a few months ago? what if i bought at $9 during the flash crash a couple weeks back? congrats on your wormhole investment btw
>>61227651>what if you bought at $5-$8 as it ranged there for almost 2 yearsthat's a fair question but let me answer you with another question: what if you bought btc/eth/sol/xrp at the same time?btc went 6x since theneth 3.5xsol 10xxrp 5xall of these exceed the 3x you got with link, and you took on substantially more risk with link
>>61226005>next week I'm going to prove a nothing burgerok
>>61227602>>you aren't getting paid from it>What does that even mean.it means you personally are not making money off whatever that graph is so to you, it appears chainlink is essentially a futbol club you root foryou're celebrating them winning something, but you aren't involved, as whatever that graph shows doesn't help pump the funding token you hodl
>>61227724>substantially more risk wrong>if you didn't pick the best investment you lost even when you objectively are winning do you measure your stock gains against nvidia too?
>>61227749>do you measure your stock gains against nvidia too?.... doesn't everybody?
>>61227757no
>>61227741You said Chainlink products were low usage. I refuted it.
>>61227724also how's that wormhole doing there bud? doing okay champ? hanging in there?
Hahahhahaha I can prove OP is a GAY NIGGERTruth > trust
>>61227741Are you peeling?
>>61227059>CIO of SWIFT is a major LINK supporter?>Wow, can't make this shit up!Yes I know, crazy timeline we're in!
>>61227724LINK actually went to $30 from the $5 low so it’s the same 6x XRP saw, it just happened sooner and then lost half the pump, same as XRP is in the process of doing. All the cherry picking in the world won’t change the fact that LINK actually is one of the best performing cryptos all time. 99.9% of them just go to zero. Long term LINK really has only gone up. Draw a line from where it started to where it is today and compare that line to MOST cryptos and it’s insanely good. Extract the noise of insane pumps. People like to call out $50 ATH but neglect to mention the fact that was a market anomaly where LINK absolutely mogged the entire market, Bitcoin included. If you don’t look at that kind of noise it has been a fairly health investment and most buyers would be in profit right now.
>>61228324that's not the crazy partthe crazy part is he's obsessed with xrp even though xrp is like anti-crypto retard kool-aid
>>61227782he says he bought at 0.09 in mid-march(see here) >>60304487that means that at current prices, he's down -30% since.ouch!should have bought LINK insteadAdem, you're 36 and no wife and kids.... your hubris was.... your downfall
>>61228462And how can we forget... this dood>>60394920this one is for the hall of fame. right up there with the ETH 2016 regrets
>>61228457How is he obsessed with XRP when all he does is deboonk retards that comment under his LinkedIn posts or SWIFT's twitter posts? Bit unfair to blame him for all those retards being XRP holders, no? If I recall correctly he never explicitly mentions XRP, he just debates retards on bridge currencies and stuff (who again, all happen to be xerpies).
>>61228538are you mentally ill? is his time really worth this little?take any top athlete, how many of them are bashing literal retards on their social media for spewing "incorrect" nonsense? well no matter the number, the ones who do are little bitchesmaybe he should do some actual work instead of deboooonk moronsterrible look
>>61228574kek you sound like one of the guys who got absolutely broken by him and then got blocked and now all you can do is REEEEEE on this board
>>61228574hahahaha you got swindled by the XRP jews, dont take it out on Tom. if anything he is the first person on the internet who hasn't lied to youxrp suicides and rampages are going to be glorious
>>61228590this is the only social media I use but I think the retards who actually got such vigorous responses from him are "le epic troll winrars" because they got engagement with literal retardationisn't that what they want?>don't feed the trolls>high profile businessman feeds bottom of the barrel trolls en massebrilliant
>>61228574>is his time really worth this little?>take any top athlete, how many of them are bashing literal retards on their social media for spewing "incorrect" nonsense? well no matter the number, the ones who do are little bitchesI guess if something is your passion, and people are purposely spreading misinformation on said passion, under posts YOU posted on linked discussing the passion in question, you'd want to respond regardless? Doesn't sound too weird to me. >maybe he should do some actual work instead of deboooonk morons>terrible lookYou're starting to sound more and more like a very distraught xerpie, while earlier in this thread you acted like you're definitely a concerned LINK holder who thinks xerpies are retards. Odd. Maybe let his boss worry about where he spends his time, no?
>>61228609now why do I care about cripple? because I think it's pathetic for people supposedly delivering something substantial to have xrp living rent free in their head all the time?I literally don't get it
Fuck. We’re never going to make it. WW3 will break and the institutions will puss out and we’ll all be conveniently too late
>>61228623Oh you're rent free anon lol. Supposedly holding both XRP and LINK, but only vocal about people that shit on XRP, never the other way around. Interesting character. You've been posting "rent free" for months now. How is that working out for you?
>>61228622for the record faggots I hold both but I care about neither until they actually do somethingup a bunch on both but I don't have enough invested in either to really "make" itcripple and stink can still go up but seemingly both are scamsand isn't that why everyone is here? to make money? the tech could be amazing but if it makes no money... who cares right?
>>61228641kek no I literally hold bothI'm just here visiting the special olympics because apparently I am mad like the hatter on this wild ride with you losers
>>61228646>but I don't have enough invested in either to really "make" itthis is obvious, just like all xrpeepeepoopoos
>>61228641also this is probably the first time I have ever written the term "rent free"I love this board, people are so smug when they are so incorrect
>>61228665but not stinkers?man pot calling the kettle blackhope you all make it whatever you are invested inthese clown companies though are just circle jerking each other while you pay for it
>>61228646>and isn't that why everyone is here? to make money? the tech could be amazing but if it makes no money... who cares right?Sure, so why would you get upset about the CIO of SWIFT openly supporting LINK while shouting off of the rooftops that competing tech is DOA?
>>61228675because it's cringe how can you not see that?it comes off as pure cope which is why it's mind bendingthis is connor mcgreggor not going after the next in line for the titleit's him flipping out on some literal retards incapable of fightinglike he's fudding on purpose
>>61228699see >>61228622i like how you deflected with some retarded bullshit about holding both while exposing yourself as poor
>>61228574I’m gonna need you to peel a step back pal.
>>61228699I normally dislike appealing to authority, but the guy is literally the Chief Innovation Officer of SWIFT. We can safely assume he is in a position of authority and has at least some expertise, and is knowledgeable on the subject. They are the cusp of rolling out one of their newest innovations, which took more than 10 years to iron out with a lot of different parties involved (including Sergey/Chainlink). Under every post announcing or discussing this fact, XRP tards come out of the woodworks to claim Tom is actually referencing XRP and how SWIFT will work with XRP. Do you seriously fault him for correcting these comments, especially when these are comments placed on things he posted on his personal LinkedIn profile and when these comments put words in his mouth or try to explain his own thoughts? Lmao. Also, you have to take into consideration that it has been TEN YEARS of this. Only lately has he been this reactive to it, maybe because they are actually launching soon and rumors like the xerpies are spreading can no longer be tolerated.
>>61228699You are having a mental breakdown lol
>>61226404Where are GMX fees trannie
>>61228775>I normally dislike appealing to authority, but the guy is literally the Chief Innovation Officer of SWIFT.this doesn't fucking matter. liquidity does and sergey is dumping on our heads and their are no new buyers.
>>61228673>but not stinkers?not on this board no, I used to swing tens of thousands of links, lost tens of thousands using leverage on scamnance, you can not even imagine the amount I've played with.
>>61227782>also how's that wormhole doing there bud?it was up and now it's down. my avg cost is 7.5 cents and i'm debating buying more>doing okay champ? hanging in there?of course i'm disappointed it's not back at 12 cents where it was recently but given i haven't tied my entire identity to it, i'll be ok. i'm expecting it to run back up soon >>61228272>Are you peeling?you keep track of other dudes' jackin off tho
>>61229316If you share your stack size, I can calculate your loss for you if you want. My pleasure! (apologies if pleasure is a trigger word, not intending for you to relapse)
>>61228363>LINK actually went to $30 from the $5 low so it’s the same 6x XRP sawyou're getting desperatebut ok if you want to do that:xrp went from 30 cents in the bear to 3.40 recently for a 11xsol went from 10 to 250 for a 25xbtc 16k to 130k for 8xi'm sure you can see where this is going...> the cherry picking in the world won’t change the fact that LINK actually is one of the best performing cryptos all time. 99.9% of them just go to zeronot "is", but "was" unc there's like been like 40million coins invented at this point, most of them scams made in a few minutes on pump. so saying something is better than most in this space is an empty statementas i've shown you, link is not in the "best" categoryi would put their all time performance in mid range category with other dead alts (vechain, iota, etc)
>>61229316You keep jorkin it and fudding my investments brother. You can’t be doing that man, cmon. Get help
>>61229316>i haven't tied my entire identity to ityour porn identity? or your fud identity which is tied to chainlink for some reason? >keep track ofdo you know what that phrase means mr esl? reminding you of your embarrassing blogposts isn't "keeping track of"
>>61229369xrp is 7 years negative
>>61228462>he says he bought at 0.09 in mid-march(see here) bro i've given several updates since... see here avg was 8 cents in sept https://warosu.org/biz/thread/60957571#p60957688 and i avg'd down once more since to get under 8 cents
>>61229396>xrp is 7 years negativeyeah we were discussing recent price action unc please read through the posts and digest first before you waste my time
>>61229404so is this you on or off your meds? you use the same words but you're not triple/quadruple posting or ranting like a maniac nearly as much as you usually do
>>61226404>Pretty much all of Defi relies on Chainlink at this point.Then why is it not top 2 or top 1 then? Fucking nigger clown world
>>61229351>If you share your stack size, I can calculate your loss for you if you want.it's not a huge position so only a few grandnow link holders like >>61229396 this guy for instance...he's down hundreds of thousands. ouch!!!!>>61229371>You keep jorkin itwtf>>61229390>your porn identity? or your fud identity which is tied to chainlink for some reason?isn't it crazy you originally came here for investment discussion, and you ended up tracking other dude's beating off kinda gay bro
>>61229463>doesn't know what tracking actually means>conflicted between his fud and porn identity you're kind of a retard bro
>>61229569This is the most bizarre interaction I’ve ever been in with that fudcuck.
>>61229435p e e l i n g
>>61229601now imagine what goes on inside his deranged brain
wait a minute>chainlink is a USA company albeit based in the Caymans, Grand Cayman specifically>Based Trump wants to make America first in blockchain probably all tech So 100% those "dumped" token have not been "dumped". Thats completely ludicrous. Its outrageous to claim that sending tokens to Binance means those tokens have been dumped. As an American company those LINK tokens have been send from Binance straight to Israel.
