We're not in the same league.XRP
>>61226278>on the left: shit made up by desperate fags in an echo chamber>on the right: one small example of the real world usage they covet
>>61226347>shit made upyou gotta DYOR on what Ripple is doing
>>61226354>blogposts by literal whos making outrageous claimsmeanwhile, zero real world usage
>>61226278>target marketaka "hopes and dreams".Meanwhile in reality XRPL has some of the absolute lowest adoption out of any L1, both from crypto and tradfi.
>>61226354>its what they're totally doing bro just trust in the ndas the phoenix is rising in two more weeksFuck off back to your twitter shill containment thread, faggot.
>>61226360Ripple is working with banks and governments in over 120 countries DYOR
>>61226672None of which are using it.Ripple has a long history of literally paying for connections.
>>61226680Are you retarded or just trolling?Anyway spoonfeeding season is over. It's not hard to go to Ripples twitter to see what they are doing.
>>61226683I'm telling you the facts.Ripple might have some users for some of their products, but none of them even require the XRP token.You might argue that Ripple buying companies like Hidden Road means that Hidden Road users are now Ripple users, but that shit has literally nothing to do with blockchain, let alone XRP.
>>61226683Show me on the xrp blockchain where all this bank transaction volume is. There isn't any. No one is using xrp.
61226683>what they are doingFuckall. They're doing fuckall, but they are waving their hands furiously, hoping to impress retards like (you) with all the "activity".
if this was true all this is telling me is that 3rd worlders have switched from WU for scamming to XRP.....but i also dont believe OP at all
>>61226347WU is shit, it's pricey and slow.Various tech like Ripple's , including XRP and RLUSD, are cheap and fast, it takes seconds to move money.Not even in the same ballpark.
>>61226698>>61226680Banks really don't want to use Ripple / RLUSD / XRP tech. They are currently using their own tech , swift and wire transfers, that are SLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWWWWW and very expensive,HIGHLY PROFITABLE for banks . So, unless they are really FORCED to use something else, why would they want to stop using something slow and that makes them a lot of money? Now , however, if deposits are being mass taken out of banks and moved to crypto markets.And when Trump and US gov tells them they should stop fudging around and start connecting customers to crypto markets. Then they finally wake up and accept that their day of making $30-70 per wire transer of moving money from one computer /spread sheet to another are over, and now they have to finally accept it and charge CENTS for it (as it should be priced).
>>61227080you say this about everything that rejects using your coins servicesC O P EOPE
>>61227109Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat???Spell what you are trying to say, kiddo.>>61227102
>>61226698you can also literally see it on their own ledger stats, they have 500m onchain volume per day, but billions on the exchanges. Its just a washtraded coin, no one actually uses it.As a comparison, ETHs onchain volume is 5-8b per day, 10x to 20x higher. Does that warrant 1/3rd of ethereums marketcap?Infact, if you assume their fairvalue of lets say, 15x less volume, that would translate to 30b marketcap, which, what a surprise, is exactly what XRPs mcap was before the pump, and is gonna be where XRP will return after the whales start dumping
>>61227116ETH is retail volume. XRP will be banks / institutional volume.
>>61227122>will bei thought they're already working with 120 countries and institutions?Its being used TODAY by SBI japan right? And don't send me pilots or testphases or POCs because they don't count :)
>>61227131Read what I posted above: >>61227102 The banks have to be forced from an old, slow and very expensive system into a new one, where they'd have to stop charging $30-70 per bank / wire transfer and start charging what money transfers (or other services, like VOIP telephone calls) in the age of the internet - CENTS.
>>61227102>Banks really don't want to use Ripple / RLUSD / XRP tech. Very true.>They are currently using their own tech , swift and wire transfersNo, they're moving to blockchains, stablecoins, RWAs, bridges, ...
PayPal already allows customers to pay with crypto, you can have BTC , ETH or XRP and pay via PayPal. Banks will have to be dragged by their arses, but they will eventually realize that they either COMPLETLEY LOSE THE FINANCIAL MARKETS to crypto, or they'd have to allow customers to use/ connect to crypto markets.>and according to the last SWIFT meetings and various JP Morgan claims, >it looks like banks already realized what is happening Sibos 2025 meeting when banks accepted inevitable happened 3 weeks ago.
>>61227141>The banks have to be forced from an old, slow and very expensive system into a new one,where they'd have to stop charging $30-70 per bank / wire transfer and start charging what money transfers (or other services, like VOIP telephone calls) in the age of the internet -CENTS.so ripple is gonna force the whole industry to use their bridge currency then instead of the clear pivot of institutions right now that are just gonna use stablecoins to atomically swap. Right.
>>61227157>hey're moving to blockchains, stablecoins, RWAs, bridges, ...Exactly, they were using their own old tech until the last day possible. They are now forced to be moving to a new system.
>>61227183>so ripple is gonna force the whole industry to use their bridge currency then instead of the clear pivot of institutions right now that are just gonna use stablecoins to atomically swap.No, but Ripple has its own stablecoin, RLUSD. That is approved by US gov, btw.
>>61227189>They are now forced to be moving to a new system.Yes.And clearly that system involves settling with tokens. Not a "bridge currency".>>61227198>Ripple has its own stablecoin, RLUSD.90% of RLUSD is on Ethereum.Even Securitize exclusively "adopted" the Ethereum RLUSD variant.
>>61226278I love XRP threads so much187 fucking trillion kek
>>61226683or maybe XRPL is pricey and slow and thats why they didnt choose it?
>>61227209>90% of RLUSD is on Ethereum.Because RLUSD was just created, and it is of course connected to 2 largest digital markets, one of them Etherium.Ripple was under US gov lawsuit, so nobody wanted to use it until regulation clarity, which happened recently.So you now have 1) US gov approved, and 2) Us gov sued, all books examined and approved stable coin in RLUSD. Run by US company i.e. under US regulations. Watch what happens in the next couple of years.
>>61227198>No, but Ripple has its own stablecoin, RLUSD.>That is approved by US gov, btw.Take me through the workflow of a transaction thenaccording to you, people are NOT gonna use XRP as a bridge currency ala USD -> XRP -> JPY, because RLUSD is now a thing right? And every bank makes a stablecoin right now.So the new workflow you imagine, could be for example: JPmorganUSD -> RLUSD (this somehow uses XRP, likely burns it, which right now is arbitrarily set anyway mind you) -> DeutscheBankUSDCan you tell me why they would use RLUSD here? Or do you have another transaction flow that would include RLUSD ?
>>61226278BOOOOOOOOOOOMBullish XRP
>>61227230>Because RLUSD was just createdkek whatWhat fucking difference does that make? There's RLUSD on XRP as well but nobody wants to use it.XRPL is home to THE bridge currency, so surely it makes no difference which platform the RLUSD is on right?Right anon?Bridge currency?
>>61227182>paypal allows customers to pay with cryptothey pay the merchants with USD, they are just converting your crypto for you (for a fee). its one less step than say selling crypto to usdc then transferring usdc to usd then into a bank to make a purchase but you arent using XRP or BTC to actually buy the product>completely lose the financial markets to cryptothats some cope right there; the XRP bag holders are fucking delusional at this point
>>61227232Ok watch me.Right now, if someone from Russia (or Saudi Arabia) want to buy something in US.>let's take Russia because sanctionsFrom Russia it takes 5 days to move money to US into USD via a swift system.Russia - rouble - Euro in a russian bank - some euro bank in Latvia - euro bank in Germany -German US affiliate bank - Euro-USD transfer - local US bank. Did you count the number of transactions / banks that make profits on the way?What will happen right now: Russian guy buys RLUSD with his rubles - Money is collected in US in RLUSD in dollars.>done.>takes seconds, costs cents.
>>61227244RLUSD was just created. It is connected to all largest markets, so naturally Etherium being the largest market has the largest volume of transactions . Watch what happens in 2 years.
>>61227262But thats retail isnt it? Why would a bank do that though when they can just atomically swap stablecoinUSD to stablecoinEUR?Or even stablecoinRuble to stablecoinUSD?You would arrive at the same problem as before, forcing people to use RLUSD. Instead of the XRP vs normal bank transfer problem, RLUSD however competes directly with the banks native stablecoin. So why would the bank use a competitor to switch their money?
>>61227276>It is connected to all largest marketsAs an Ethereum token.Why the fuck is RLUSD on Ethereum instead of the XRPL? Didn't you hear that XRP is THE bridge currency?Doesn't this bridge currency make switching between chains effortless?You're a fucking joke, fuck off.
>>61227280It doesn't matter, I am giving you retail as example. It takes 6 steps , 3 currencies and 4 banks to move money from Russia to US. And it costs $70-100. It will take nothing in the future and will cost cents.All banks will immediately jump on board once everything is approved at the political level.
>>61227301If feel like you're misunderstanding. Banks WILL NOT use the 6 steps 3 currencies and 4 banks to move money from Russia to the US in the future, with $70-100 feesYou're right, we're moving away from that.Because banks have their own stablecoin. And they can exchange those stablecoins with eachother without the RLUSD. Thats what I'm saying. Or do you think banks right now are not making their own stablecoins and RLUSD is the only one that will exist? Do you think banks will use RLUSD and give the yield and liquidity to ripple (same way tether profits right now) or they will make their own stablecoin?
>>61227294RLUSD is CONNECTED to the largest markets. Right now the largest market is Etherium, so naturally 90% of RLUSD volume is on Etherium. RLUSD was just recently approved by US gov. Ripple is an american company. US gov won't allow some random foreign controlled entities (from London, Switzerland, Germany , whatever) to run stablecoins.So, it took years, and US gov got through Ripple's books and approved them.
>>61227356>RLUSD is CONNECTED to the largest markets. >Right now the largest market is EtheriumEthereum isn't a market, it's a chain.XRPL is also a chain, and it's 3 years older than Ethereum.And how the fuck is XRP going to serve as the "bridge currency" for the world when even Ripple itself would rather just mint their stablecoin on Ethereum instead of bridging it for their users?ABSOLUTE FUCKING RETARDATION
>>61227331>banks have their own stablecoin.But they don't. According to the latest Sibos 2025 meeting , and according to JP Morgan's CEO Jamy Dimon, banks consider each other competitors , and they aren't going to connect to each other because that would allow more competition. SO , as it turned out , banks connect to central repositories and such. But they are looking outside to innovative companies to provide them with connection rails.
>>61227380Retarded FAGGOT, Etherium and all other coins on Etherium networks are AN Etherium MARKET.
>>61227406>Etherium and all other coins on Etherium networks are AN Etherium MARKET.
>>61227301>all banks will jump on board once its approvedthis is bullshit; stop trying to sell people on XRP; its been the same song and dance since fucking covid with you assholes
>>61227420>>61227380:))) it is over , that's all you can post , obscenities and some spelling crap.When you lost an actual argument. Are you a child, a woman or a pajeet?
>>61227390>But they don't.because they couldn't. Because they are banks and not a private company like ripple.Only since Letter 1184 from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), (July-August) offered a legal pathway for them to create one, and then surprise, the stablecoin act by President Trump introduced legislation that will fully allow them to create stablecoins. Just before Letter 1184, Bank of America, Citigroup,Wells Fargo, JPMorgan are all looking into issuing their OWN JOINT stablecoin. >https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/some-us-banks-explore-venturing-into-crypto-with-joint-stablecoin-wsj-reports-2025-05-23/Europe has 10 major banks that are exploring a joint EURO stablecoin, after legal clarity and issuance has been done via MICA in the EU>https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/major-banks-explore-issuing-stablecoins-pegged-g7-currencies-2025-10-10/In the next 2y, instead of banks using RLUSD, they will just band together to protect profits and issue their own stablecoinIntegration of private companies stablecoin is ofcourse looked forward to, to absorb liquidity
>>61227448"Etherium" is not a market, it's a chain.XRPL is also a chain. Ripple chose to host its stablecoin almost entirely on Ethereum instead.
>>61227434I am not selling anything. I am trying to see if anybody will provide an actual argument against my logic ITT .And so far you are failing.
>>61227390So why don't they consider ripple a competitor?The rail is swift btw. Which is about to be updated using chainlink to allow banks to exchange stablecoins with each other.
>>61227463what logic? its delusional cope spurned by a gambling cult mindset you have
>>61227458 :))))))))))) Ok let's look at your terminology. Etherium AND all other coins on the Etherium Network - how you would call it? >NAME It SOMETHING>I am calling it Etherium Market because you can easily see the market cap.
>>61227455And to assert current other gov approved coins by the NYDFS(the approval you were talking about with Ripple https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ripple-secures-nydfs-approval-rlusd-065226515.html?guccounter=1)there are 3 other american based and housed companies sofar with the same license from NYDFS>Gemini Trust Company (GUSD)>Paxos Trust Company (USDP, PAXG)>PayPal / PayPal Digital’s NY trust (PYUSD)
>>61227472>what logic?> its delusional cope spurned by a gambling cult mindset you have
>>61227477>Etherium AND all other coins on the Etherium Network - >how you would call it?I told you multiple times: Ethereum is a chain, and "all other coins on the Etherium Network" are tokens produced by Ethereum smart contracts.
>>61227487shilling shill doing what shills doxrp is a big fat nothingburger held up by bagholders. have fun with your thread
>>61227463>I am trying to see if anybody will provide an actual argument against my logic ITT .>And so far you are failing.please read reply >>61227455 and >>61227481To sum it up, Ripple is a private company that just in this year started RLUSD.A few months after, the US gov made legislation that will allow them to create stablecoins.Several major banks already issued statements of joint ventures to create THEIR OWN STABLECOINSNow magically, in 1y, all major banks, that just started making their own stablecoin, will suddenly decide to use RLUSDIs that correct? >>61227487
>>61227495>Nooooo i'm up only 10x
>>61227489Etherium is not a chain, faggot. .Chain is something that niggers wear on their neck. Etherium "chain" is a technical terminology used by geeks. Name all those coins and tokens that are produced on Etherium network.Name it anything other than "smart contracts" because it is also a tech term. Name all of the above with ONE TERM.
>>61227515>A few months after, the US gov made legislation that will allow them to create stablecoins.*allow banks to create stablecoins
>>61227517>Etherium is not a chainWHY ARE YOU EVEN POSTING HERE
>>61226354>you gotta DYOR on what Ripple is doingthey have never done anythingeverwith one correction: now they have a stablecoin on ethereum so 13 years to make a 24KB tether contract clone
>>61227517ok I'm gonna stop argumenting in good faith now and assume you're a complete retard AHHAHHAHAHAHHHAHA
>>61227526Faggot , I am in tech for a long time. Etherium called a "chain" is a geek term that marketers and retards picked up. Try again. Try NAMING all of the Etherium networks' tokens, coins and smart contracts as ONE TERM.>still waiting
>>61227517Lmao holy shit you're a moron and you dont even realize
>>61227546>I am in tech for a long time.>also "Etherium" is not a chain
>>61227546
>>61227546>ONE TERMfraud
>>61227546EVM - Ethereum Virtual Machine
The Xerpie that made this thread should honestly delete it, this is so embarrassing
>>61227557One more time.A CHAIN is something niggers wear around their neck, or something you use to tie or tow things. It is BLOCKCHAIN, not a chain. Blockchain is some tech term. Let's just look at investopedia.: >Ethereum is a decentralized software platform >built on blockchain technology,>> known for its native cryptocurrency, ether (ETH), >and is widely used for developing decentralized finance applications.Etherium is a DECENTRALIZED SOFTWARE PLATFORM, built on a BLOCKCHAIN technology. One of the examples of its usage is ETH crypto currency.https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/ethereum.asp
>>61227594>It is BLOCKCHAIN, not a chain.And even Ripple prefers the "Etherium" blockchain over their own XRPL blockchain.
>>61227594>my car is not a vehicle because it also has radioyoudroppedyourlittlehat.jpg
>>61227594you have lost the argument and now you're attacking semanticsYou cannot address>>61227515>>61227481>>61227455>>61227331
>>61227556>>61227559>>61227563>>61227566It's literally over for all of you if you can't even provide correct terms and definitions:>>61227594
>>61227574The guy who actually made the graph is this account.https://x.com/X__Anderson
>>61227625>It's literally over for all of you if you can't even provide correct terms and definitions:Is it though? Whats your answer that banks will use their own stablecoins and totally ignore Ripples desperate pivot to RLUSD in the last year?What do you say to the 500m in daily volume on the XRPL ledger? The current AMM pools on XRP are literally only 20million USD right now, there's NO liquidity for any potential DEX. Literal shitcoins on ethereum have more liquidity
>>61227615>>61227617>>61227622Etherium is A SOFTWARE PLATFORM. It is not a "chain".It is a SOFTWARE PLATFORM that is using BLOCKCHAIN technology , and is also running Eth crypto currency .It is USED TO DEVELOP DECENTRALIZED Financial applications, so other cryptos (or stuff you all "smart contracts") as well.
>>61227656>you have lost the argument and now you're attacking semantics>You cannot address>>61227515 (You)>>61227481 (You)>>61227455 (You)>>61227331 (You)>>61227654
>>61227656>it's not code, it's an APPLICATION built ON code
>>61227654There are only 3-4 stablecoins that matter right now. And RLUSD is the only one that is approved by US gov.So chances of Ripple's stable coins being used are VERY HIGH.Ripple just loaded $1 BILLION dollars into its stablecoin.
>>61227656What the absolute fuck am I reading.This is the corner cripples have painted themselves into after years of bullshit.Stablecoins have dismantled the entire XRP narrative, and the nail in the coffin is Ripple's own stablecoin being on Ethereum.Somehow I have this feeling that cripples are going to *poof* go extinct in a big ball of fire literally any day now.
>>61227677>And RLUSD is the only one that is approved by US gov.Proof?
>>61227677>And RLUSD is the only one that is approved by US gov.Wow now that sounds interesting. Can you share the official approval of the US gov? I thought you meant the NYDFS clearance.Can you
>>61227515>To sum it up, Ripple is a private company that just in this year started RLUSD.It has been approved by US gov.It has been SUED by US gov and all of its books were scrutinized. And atter that they were approved. Not a single other company like that on the market .
>>61227515>Several major banks already issued statements of joint ventures to create THEIR OWN STABLECOINSIt doesn't matter. Trump banned CBDCs that banks were about to issue. Nobody wants "currencies" issued by the bankers, they will be just more fees and will have more data collection.
>>61227701>>61227713>CBDCs are the same as stablecoinsLiterally all cripples have left is pretending to be as retarded as possible.
>>61227701>>61227713You're actually wrong on both accounts, here is the official final judgement:>https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-26306Can you point out where it says RLUSD was sanctioned as the official approved stablecoin of the US?
>>61227719https://www.federalreserve.gov/cbdc-faqs.htm>1. What is a central bank digital currency (CBDC)?>A CBDC is a digital form of central bank money that is widely available to the general public.so... a "stablecoin" issued by a central bank... would just be a stablecoin? what would make it a cbdc?sometimes idk who are the biggest retards, cripples or those who trip up fighting them
>>61227685Idiot , one more time. CURRENTY , Etherium is THE LARGEST MARKET , so it is natural to connect your stablecoin to the largest market.NOBODY is going to allow some Russian run decentralized software to be used in US as currencies. No gov also wants Drug money , pornography money, etc. other illegal money on their crypto currencies that they approve.So. It will be 1) US company, 2) that US gov has looked through books3) the tech where transactions aren't hidden 4) that the tech isn't sitting in other jurisdictions, such as Russia, India, China or Switzerland.What else don't you understand here?
>>61227743>central bank moneyYes, CENTRAL bank money.JP Morgan, Western Union, ... are not "central banks". They're just banks.Their stablecoins are not CBDCs, they're just stablecoins.>>61227750>CURRENTY , Etherium is THE LARGEST MARKETEthereum is a blockchain.XRPL is also a blockchain.Ripple chose to use Ethereum almost exclusively for their stablecoin.Not even Ripple uses XRPL tech.Not even the financial companies Ripple buys use XRPL tech.NOBODY uses XRPL tech.
>on the left: a fantasy of what cripple could do if the banks and finance sector just handed us their entire industry on a silver platter and if everything just magically worked out with no kinks or delays or unforeseen problems >on the right: realitykek, xrplets are psychotic
>>61227764and who would insure these regional bank's stablecoins and with what?
>>61227743Central banks wanted to issue CBDCs and make everybody to use their own digital currencies.It would mean the same as digital versions of your local currencies, except all transactions are recorded by central banks. Same as we have now but more fees and more scrutiny.>your account would be blocked if you donated $20 to canadian truckers protests.As it turned out nobody really wants that, what a surprise.
>>61227764>JP Morgan, Western Union, ... are not "central banks". They're just banks.kek
>>61227778>who would insure these regional bank's stablecoins and with what?What does that have to do with anything?
>>61227795I'm just here to learn>nooo it's just a company, not its parent company
>>61227779>29pbtidi wonder what crappy drugs this guy has been at? lol i don't even want to know what he's been arguing about
>>61227809>central banks are parent companies of banks>therefore stablecoins are CBDCsSo this is the brainpower of the XRP holder.
>>61227764You should immediately KYS, idiot.I am NOT Referring to Etherium blockchain tech, idiot.ONE more time.I am Referring to ALL of the Above - eth as decentralized software, and ALL of it's other coins and "smart contracts" built on it - As one term, Etherium MARKET.I am not using your zombified NPC idiotic term, "etherium is a chain".You are ZOMBIFIED, stop being a zombie and use your brain in this discussion.
>>61227809
>>61227854>I am Referring to ALL of the Above - eth as decentralized software, and ALL of it's other coins and "smart contracts" built on it ->As one term, Etherium MARKET.So you're talking about EVM then?
>>61227854>I am NOT Referring to Etherium blockchain tech>I am Referring to eth as decentralized softwarewhat in the unholy fuck is this
>>61227820kek you're fighting strawman
>>61227817I am trying to see if any of you can disprove my points. And so far, I got nothing.
>>61227947Didnt need to, your points arent factual.
>>61227871https://coinmarketcap.com/view/ethereum-ecosystem/ https://cryptorank.io/blockchains/ethereumhttps://www.coinlore.com/token-types/erc20/allhttps://www.oklink.com/ethereum/token-list I don't really want to call it >List of tokens working on Ethereum blockchain I am ok with Etherium MARKET.
>>61227972all fake websites lol
>>61227982Will Forbes work for you, honey? https://www.forbes.com/digital-assets/categories/ethereum-blockchain/ https://cryptorank.io/blockchains/ethereum/performance https://cryptoslate.com/blockchain/ethereum/ Try more , maybe you'll find non fake ones.
>>61227972The point is why does it matter that the Ethereum """market""" is connected?The big selling point of XRP is that it's a bridge currency, so surely it's irrelevant what platform RLUSD is hosted on, right?Except apparently Ripple thinks it does matter, which is why they overwhelmingly host their stablecoin on Ethereum instead of XRPL.XRPL is such a massive failure that even their own devs don't want to use it.
>>61227997Whats your argument again?
>>61228003Boomer, go up the thread and start reading it again.
>>61228026Bro, I'm not reading your slop. Just give me a summary.
>>61227998Look here and try to disprove my point:>>61227750 Name one other company / crypto that can be as US gov compliant as Ripple.
>>61228051>Name one other company / crypto that can be as US gov compliant as Ripple.The guy working with the FED.
>>61228051XRPL has THE bridge currency: XRP.All RLUSD should be on XRPL, and then bridged to wherever it has to be via XRP the bridge currency.Instead Ripple chose to mint nearly all RLUSD on Ethereum instead.How is all of the financial system going to transition to bridge currency XRP when even Ripple won't?
>>61228065>they just will okay!!!
>>61228060NO WAY IN HELL US gov is going to launch US dollar connected stable coins, attach US treasuries, and allow to issue basically US dollars (stable coins connected to US dollars and US treasuries).it they 1) haven't looked through where all the money came from, 2) it isn't DRUG money or porn money or other illegal activities money etc. NOBODY will allow any drug or criminal money on US gov connected crypto currencies.It's just the fact. You can cry all about it, but right now this is how it is.
>>61228090so when I buy meth from a mexican online website in XRP, would you consider that illegal drug money trade?
>>61228102>so when I buy meth from a mexican online website> in BTC, Eth , Monero or Zcash, would you consider that illegal drug money trade?What do you think yourself?
>>61228065>Instead Ripple chose to mint nearly all RLUSD on Ethereum instead.You're concluding this way too early. RLUSD only released mid this year. Have you seen recent mint on XRPL?
>>61228119>You're concluding this way too early. RLUSD only released mid this year.XRPL released in 2012 you fucking moron.There's a small amount of RLUSD on the XRPL, so it's technically possible.XRPL also has XRP which is supposed to be THE bridge currency.If this shit isn't ready for primetime but ETH is, then how the fuck is that not an absolute disaster for Ripple and everything it touches?
>>61228135>XRPL also has XRP which is supposed to be THE bridge currency.meaning there's zero reason to mint on Ethereum when you can just use XRP to bridge to Ethereum.So why won't Ripple do it?Ripple expect all those banks to use XRP as their bridge, but they won't even use it themselves to bridge from XRPL to fucking Ethereum.
>>61228102>>61228116BTW as of right now there are massive crack downs on mexican drug cartels that sell drugs in Bitcoin, for instance.They are currently being mass captured and jailed by US feds.Do you REALLY want to be risking to get on the list? andw why. Are you that dumb?https://abcnews.go.com/US/dea-arrests-600-people-massive-operation-sinaloa-drug/story?id=125386772https://www.latintimes.com/topics/drug-cartels https://www.dea.gov/press-releases/2025/09/08/dea-surge-targets-sinaloa-cartel-networks-worldwide https://www.foxnews.com/us/suspected-sinaloa-cartel-members-apprehended-23-state-sweep-dea If you can't live without a meth hit... I hate to do this, but literally use money that isn't in any way connected to your wealth stash.
>>61228116>>61228161Kek you're hilarious, 10/10 retard for missing the point so hard, good job
