reminder:- link price is lower than 4 years ago- link and bnb were the same price 7 years ago- reserve buyback of $1m a week do not offset the monthly $100m sell-offs- ccip only generates $500 daily revenue- svr has barely recaptured a single $1m for cll after a few months operation even after the biggest liq cascade in crypyo history meanwhile hype is printing fees constantly- you havent seen a single cent of the 1% fee share deal from that whatever protocol they hyped a while back- sirgay promised you "hundreds" of build rewards, you only got one - that one reward instantly dumped and never recovered desptite being "the best one"- cll will run out of link to dump after 2029 after which they'll have to shut down operations and network nodes will stop working without subsidies- staking has been a complete scam and disaster, if you staked you lost half your pf value for a measly 4%- "banks in production soon" for 5 years now, still doing "testnet phase trial poc hackathon" in 2025
>>61227061that's a very pretty toilet
you know way more than me and I'm still just holding and not selling lmaomust be extra painful when you follow every bit of news
>>61227061i will sell my liquid stack in december if smartcon turns out to do nothing but never gonna sell my staked link, simple as
fuck stinkies :}
>>61227061>reminder:still not selling LÖL.
OP holds LINK
New peeling thread?
>>61227061nigger
>>61227321do other genetic failures like yourself actually find this comical?
>>61227061Biblical levels of ball torture at this point. There’s no walking away, yet no escaping either.
hate 'em all :}
>>61227061All that effort just for me to not sell
>>61227073yes you are "owning" him by losing money
>>61227596kek same old fud, different day. imagine that loser siting at home making that image and typing all that crap. what a dick
>>61227321based>>61227424why so mad kid. are you triggered by the word "peeling"?
I didn't read the OP but if you guys want me to sell I'm pretty easy compared to a lot of anons just pump the price to $100 it's that simple. Oh you want me to sell my staking stack too? Ok that's fine just pump the price to $1000 it's really that easy.
>>61227424The peeling comment itself is only slightly funny to me, but the seething reactions from peelers such as yourself are what do it for me usually.
>>61228559can you explain the peeling thing I missed the memo and I can't really imagine my life not understanding everything revolving around chainlink
>>61228605Thomas, notorious fudder of middling intellect, had the same name on Twitter (Geoxadem) as on Reddit. His Reddit account contained heaps of posts in NoFap subreddits detailing his struggle with porn addiction, eventually leading to suicidal thoughts. In one of the comments he muses how working through a porn addiction is like peeling back layers of an onion; every time you think you understand or passed a certain aspect of it, you find a deeper, more depraved layer of a mind ravaged by porn. Very insightful for a midwit that took up stock bashing for fun a few years later, possibly to prevent himself from relapsing and having to peel all over again.
>>61228605single dysgenic, loser freak shill spams peeling to make fun of a fellow loser fudder who has a porn addition because the fudder at one point wrote that he is "peeling back the layers of his porn addiction" or something like thatso the single, retarded shill spams "peeling" after every critical chainlink post thinking that it's hilarious
>>61227321>New peeling thread?
>>61228723>>61228727Hi CLL
>>61228767Just a regular anon that has been here since 2017 and keeps up with linkie/board lore and never fell for the crypto twitter midwit trap.
Link baggies are so cucked and fucked that there is a minor figure in their cult pantheon called ride the lightning anon whose sole claim to fame is that he actually sold for a profit and rotated to btc and eth 4 years ago. Being profitable with this coin is so unusual that doing so literally turns you into something akin to a saint.
>>61228723kek, thanks anon
>>61228900Riding a x100 to the pico top, selling into BTC at the absolute perfect ratio, and then riding that huge stack x10 as well for a combined x1000 is pretty unusual anon. Especially since it got him into 8 figure territory instead of the meme coin chasers who brag about x1000'ing $10. We are all hugely in profit (about x80 from ICO), but x1000 is legendary tier.
>>61227061The real question is why you are so concerned that you make multiple threads every day trying to make people sell.It's a conundrum.
I’ve lost what like 40% this month holding LINKFeels good
It's just a jason parser
>>61229859he's not trying to get people to sellhe's just venting out his frustration of the piss poor price action and trying to get the BRAINDEAD shills to open their eyes to the what has been unfolding in front of themhowever, the shills live in an echo chamber where they dont criticize chainlink labs about anything. this place is the last bastion of impartiality, because on Twitter all of the dissented views of Chainlink have been muted and the "fudders" have been blocked by all the shills
wait a minute>chainlink is a USA company albeit based in the Caymans, Grand Cayman specifically>Based Trump wants to make America first in blockchain probably all techSo 100% those "dumped" token have not been "dumped". Thats completely ludicrous. Its outrageous to claim that sending tokens to Binance means those tokens have been dumped.As an American company those LINK tokens have been send from Binance straight to Israel.
link fudders are on the same tier of poster as the Nikki sixxx log posters on /b/you have to be utterly mindbroken to post the same topics day in and day out for the better part of a decade
>>61230087what about the link shills wasting their lives away kvetching about XRP every single day?at least the fudders are discussing linkthe shills writing daily thesis papers on XRP are the weirdest ones
>>61230037So you spend all of your time pissing your eyes and fudding on a board that all of about ten people visit none of whom have any intention of selling because everyone on Twitter has already blocked you?Holy fuck, what a bunch of fucking losers.
Peelers are in the house tonight!
>>61227452We made that bargain with Chronos. We're going to end up as Ring Wraiths for our sins
>>61227061>- link price is lower than 4 years agoSo are almost every single alt, LINK has been one of the better performers hence why it's still a top 10 alt.>- link and bnb were the same price 7 years agoIt doesn't matter, do you expect us to outperform every single asset on every single time period?>- reserve buyback of $1m a week do not offset the monthly $100m sell-offsTrue, the reserve doesn't do anything for tokenomics but it shows that the team is thinking long-term >- ccip only generates $500 daily revenueFor now>- svr has barely recaptured a single $1m for cll after a few months operation even after the biggest liq cascade in crypyo history meanwhile hype is printing fees constantlyTrue >- you havent seen a single cent of the 1% fee share deal from that whatever protocol they hyped a while backDoesn't matter >- sirgay promised you "hundreds" of build rewards, you only got oneNot stacked so I don't care, but I'm sure the stackers will be rewarded in time >- that one reward instantly dumped and never recovered desptite being "the best one"No idea what you're talking about>- cll will run out of link to dump after 2029 after which they'll have to shut down operations and network nodes will stop working without subsidiesOr that's a known deadline at which point we can expect the system to be autonomous. Do you have a more promising asset to hold until 2029?>- staking has been a complete scam and disaster, if you staked you lost half your pf value for a measly 4%That's assuming ability to time the top before it happen, we know we don't have it so we hold long-term. If you hold long-term, getting a 4% reward is a very nice bonus >- "banks in production soon" for 5 years now, still doing "testnet phase trial poc hackathon" in 2025What do you hold right now that you find is a better asset?
>>61230566wait a minute>chainlink is a USA company albeit based in the Caymans, Grand Cayman specifically>Based Trump wants to make America first in blockchain probably all techSo 100% those "dumped" token have not been "dumped". Thats completely ludicrous. Its outrageous to claim that sending tokens to Binance means those tokens have been dumped.As an American company those LINK tokens have been send from Binance straight to Israel.
i hold link and bnb, among other thingsi also hold a variety of asset classes and multiple sources of incomei've been on /biz/ since december 2017, you think all i have is LINK? i work so hard EVERYTHING could go to 0 and i'd still fucking make it. you have no idea what i've been through in this fucking shit. i worked 80 hours a week 5 years straight never even sitting down at work to become who i am and i will NEVER sell my LINK
spiritually, i am rich
>>61230162it applies for any obsessive topic your examples make you sound like a mindbroken fudder though just saying
>>61230566why aren't you staking? genuinely curious.
Only 3k buyers on coinbase…it’s a dead coin…not even in the top 15 most searched coins
>>61230618I hold LPL and Im never migrating
>>61230162TRVKE link "fudders" are trying to talk about how shit their failed investment is, they want answers. Link shills want to bury their heads in the sand and live in hopium breadcrumb lala land while they blame everything on other projects, people, places. They blame everything and everyone except the leader of the project thats fucking up the tokenomics.
>>61231105wait a minute>chainlink is a USA company albeit based in the Caymans, Grand Cayman specifically>Based Trump wants to make America first in blockchain probably all techSo 100% those "dumped" token have not been "dumped". Thats completely ludicrous. Its outrageous to claim that sending tokens to Binance means those tokens have been dumped.As an American company those LINK tokens have been send from Binance straight to Israel.
>>61230618If I could I would but the pool is closed. What am I missing here?
>>61230162What the fuck are you talking about? I havent seen anyone talking about XRP vs link since xrp guys flooded that swift post about chainlink like 10 months ago. Only fuddies bring it up. Update your discord script, its boring.
>>61231205oh ok, so here you are lecturing people when you have just gotten into link recently.yep, just re-read your answers. not even aware of space and time. take a hike, kiddo
>>61231281what the fuck are you going on about?all the link shills on twitter spend more time obsessing over XRP than they do talking about Chainlink. fuck off you lying sack of shit
>>61231286>>61231297wait a minute>chainlink is a USA company albeit based in the Caymans, Grand Cayman specifically>Based Trump wants to make America first in blockchain probably all techSo 100% those "dumped" token have not been "dumped". Thats completely ludicrous. Its outrageous to claim that sending tokens to Binance means those tokens have been dumped.As an American company those LINK tokens have been send from Binance straight to Israel.
>>61231286I bought LINK in 2017 I'm just a big picture guy and never bothered with the technical stuff.How am I supposed to get in the pool when it's full? Sniping bot? Linkpool?
>>61231297I only come here.
>>61231416why didn't you get in years ago? just wait until the pool size expands i guess>>61231425fair enough, my apologies, dude
>>61227061>>61227424>>61227638>>61228605so how many layers of your porn identities have you peeled back today, my brown little friends?what DOES it mean to "peel back" the layers of ones "porn identity?"is it comparable to shedding skin like a reptile might? do you become a bigger, dumber, browner twitter groupchat fudcuck after doing so? or is it like degrees of masonry? has anyone ever achieved the 33 degree of peeling?
>>61231441>why didn't you get in years ago?You think I'm getting updated every single days about LINK? I can spend months and months without knowing what's happening with the token, I don't remember what I was doing back when 0.2 launched > just wait until the pool size expands i guessThere are other ways though, aren't they?
>>61231494Not really. Linkpool is a scam. Sniping bots are at best capable of slowly getting you entered in and at worst a great way to lose your stack.Especially if you’re not a “technical guy”
>>61231569Linkpool scammed LPL investors (me included), but isn't their system a transparent smartcontract?What about spending my day manually refreshing the official pool page until someone unstack? I looked at the pool's adress and it seems to be happening at least once a day
>>61231156Yeah sending tokens to exchanges to dump? Thats crazy talk! Hes obviously just storing them there to keep the funds safu. Or maybe he's even buying more! Just ignore the circulating supply rising haha.. its probably just a glitch xD
>>61227077Simple as
>>61231635People obviously do not trust certain chainlink node operators so they dont trust the chainlink network
>>61231889SO WHAT IF MONEY GETS SENT TO ISRAEL YOUR REALLY RILING ME UP ANON WITH THIS BLATANT UNAMERICAN TALK
This has actually shifted my perspective on the whole company, I'll sell half my stack at $2,000 and the other half at $3,000
>>61227061All of this is correct, that's also why the token price is dog shit. CLL is doing everything for CLL, which is reasonable. The token price is irrelevant for them because they're probably not even dependant on the token sakes anymore. If everything pans out they will IPO and slingshot to a 1+ trillion market cap. I hope it pumps a little with SC and/or the fabled swift deadline end of November so I can finally sell a five figure stack and pay off my house. Fuck this shit, 8 years in and we're at double digits, fuck them, seriously, i wish I had rotated into BTC last bullrun, I would have over 10 million right now.
>>61231297This is also correct . I blocked all the Link shills, so fucking annoying. One of them tweeted that link will be something along 180-400$ in the next 12 months. These faggots are all just engagement farming (for what?) because apparently they think BTC will just go up forever or move sideways until 2100 or w/e that last coin will be mined
>>61228723i have chainlinkthomas notifications on and he's always talking about bbc and politics. it's like his bbc porn addiction is intertwined with politics for some reasonanyway important reminder -- the rules are changing fast and chainlink will benefit
>>61236472dude is spiraling down the drainmentally gone
>>61236608he's funnyother than the liberal bbc and chainlink fudding he's coherent
>>61236673I think uncle is pretty funnyand that video that exposechainlink made a while back is hilarious, I watch it every so often for a laughhttps://x.com/ExposeChainLink/status/1814301976806482217
>>61236692
>>61231488>man talking about overcoming porn addictionHow is this supposed to demoralise me again?
