if s&p500 is guaranteed to increase 10% a year why dont ppl just 100x long it?
Someone doesn't know how leverage works
>>61233053who told you they arent? dont listen to people like >>61233063. they are trying to keep you down/poor.
>>61233053Because you literally have to be retarded to use leverage with orange nigger in office. Everyday, you're one unhinged tweet away from losing everything
>>61233053>>61233063>>61233064>>61233066Because it might go down before it goes upIf it goes down by 50%, even as little as 2x leverage would wipe you out.
>>61233117it would have to do a -50% in a single day to wipe you out on 2x which never happened. low leverage on s&p is profitable with backtesting albeit they suggest closer to 1.5x
>>61233053why not just make more money and throw it into the S&P for guaranteed gains
>>61233053They do
if i could long 10 years above 3-4-5% i would. that's not an option for something to buy. even the stupidest gamblers know as a big picture no one else is going to out perform the US in the next 10 years.like who are you going to bet on, a homeless bum or someone who works hard at a respectable company? pretty obvious. don't worry in 10 years welfare will have completely destroyed the American way of life and we'll all be speaking hindu.
>>61233559>10 years 3-4-5%spoonfeed me on how to buy this?
>>61233981what are bonds
>>61233053you basicly run a risk of getting liquidated on the way to the yearly close 10% up. also fees would absolutely destroy you. there's a point where leverage is just not worth it because it demands an increase of the asset % wise that makes it unprofitable and basicly the same risk for much less return
