CHAINLINK ROBINHOOD INTEGRATION ANNOUNCEMENT COMING AT SMARTCON
>>61234406this is bigger tho but no one is talking about it
>>61234406>>61234425Yo necessito mas
There no way we get past smartcon without the token price going up. right?
>>61234458BTC always finds a way until one day it won’t
>>61234406Nice and all but the price and the shart?
>>61234458>There no way we get past smartcon without the token price going up. right?if I remember correctly we usually pump up to smartcon then dump, but this time its the reverse, memory is foggy tho its been so many years.
The only time I’ve ever seen Link pump post 2021 is before they opened up staking v0.2 and the recent pump to nearly $30 which I think was mostly just macro market movement. No one will give a fuck about anything else but stanking pool expansion. Chainlink could partner with Jesus Christ Himself and no one would care.
>>61234533>the recent pump to nearly $30 which I think was mostly just macro market movement.You mean late last year?That was because Trump's defi thing was buying and adopting Link.As soon as Link got to $30 Bitcoin crashed from 106k to 70 something.
if bitcoin doesnt pump neither does any alt. that includes chainlink.
>>61234743kek you're retarded.Link tries to pump without Bitcoin all the time. It's just that Bitcoin decides to dump every time that happens.
>>61234406>integration with robinhoodMore along the lines of>yeah we'll look into it in the next 10 years
>>61234743I know a GME baggie in real life who genuinely believes this.
>>61234743newfag
>>61234720I believe at some point the network will reward holders and it’ll be too late. Just like how google showed how to make money via ads before IPO. I hope we don’t get fucked over if they IPO, they should match people tokens to shares if they wanna go that route.
Price. Chart. Now.
>>61234406poverty is the eternal friend of the stink marines
>>61234406I'm looking forward to the price dump that will go along with this integration
>>61234458A pump would require capital influx. You expect retail/normies to pump our bags when we're invisible to them, or you think institutional will just come out of nowhere despite legal issues still existing?Only 2 things could pump it:>Staking v1.0 announced and its a fully open pool, not just bigger>CLARITY Act passes & institutions can accumulateMAYBE staking 1.0 gets announced but I doubt with the pool fully open. I don't think we'll see a smartcon pump, at least not one that holds.
>>61235196It's insane how fixated you are on staking.Hardly any crypto has ever needed staking to pump, starting with Bitcoin.Seriously fuck off you absolute turbosperg.
>>61235225Chainlink isn't going to pump any other way
>>61235225He's right you idiot. Chainlink is allegedly making "hundred of million" in offchain deals, once stakers have full exposure it will set a price floor based on utility and real cash flows like BNB
>>61235245>Chainlink is allegedly making "hundred of million" in offchain dealsOFFCHAIN deals = dumping on Binance
>>61234850This isn't the same market as it was in 2017.
They can't allow the token to pump until they dilute bizraelis out of existence. They'll have to create their own chain and migrate to it and that will give them the opportunity they need.
>>61234425Holy shit
>>61235196>>61235245>>61235272hi ThomasReminder that "muh staking v1" is a fuddie tactic to make it look like Chainlink needs to pass very specific requirements that don't apply to any other crypto in existence.
>>61234757Bitcoin only exists to suppress Chainlink so that the 95% of the world doesn’t buy it. Theres Saturnian mind magic covering Chainlink that prevents normies from being able to buy it. The only reason it’s even available to the public is so they can feign its decentralized and that “everyone could have boughten it at anytime over the past 10 years!” Despite the fact they have a 25-layer psyop worldwide to keep eyes off of this shit. Even if someone is able find out about Chainlink the fud campaign will deter them.
>>61235400not everyone who is pissed with the price of Chainlink is thomas you ignorant fool
>>61234406Ngl I will ride a dollar or two on that shit.
>>61235400>Reminder that "muh staking v1" is a fuddie tactic to make it look like Chainlink needs to pass very specific requirements that don't apply to any other crypto in existence.it obviously does or it would already be triple digits from the partnerships alone. didn't think that line through did ya?
>>61235527>if link had staking it would've pumpedWhat makes you say that? Most cryptos pumped without any kind of staking.What on god's green earth are you talking about.
>>61235490Thomas is a nigger tho
>>61235562most cryptos would pump nonstop if they had the partnerships that chainlink has. however, chainlink simply crabs then dumpsthats because it will take actual tokenomics for the price to increase, not simply partnerships news and speculationstokenomics in the form of stakingthats the only way chainlink is going to pump. we have 4 years of evidence that partnerships and news alone do absolutely nothing for the price
>>61235592why does only Chainlink need staking to pump?
>>61235595that's a question above my paygradeI suspect only Chainlink Labs knows the answer to that onebut it's clear they don't want it to pump for some reason
>>61235601>I suspect only Chainlink Labs knows the answer to that one>it's clear they don't want it to pump for some reasonkek you're literally the fudder who's been spamming here every day for the past half decade
>>61235608first month on biz, happy to be here.
>>61235608Are you guys really so dumb that you think its controversial to want the next iteration of staking? Are you all retarded newfags who dont realize the end game of holding link is to staking your entire stack and living off if the gains? >you say you work in tech anon? As a node operator? Sounds very sexy big boy
>>61235640the shills refuse to post anything that can somewhat be construed as critical about chainlink labs. makes you really wonder whether it's actually the shills, not the fudders, who are getting paid.>God forbid you ask for a staking 1.0 update after 3 years! The team works at their own pace! You have no ownership rights in the company, just shut up, watch chris post AI slop on Twitter, and be grateful for the opportunity to be invested in as asset that has gone down over 65% the past 4 years!
>>61235640>>61235648Staking would be great, and would've been even better five fucking years ago.But you're absolutely retarded if you think staking is needed for crypto to pump.Without the constant suppression Link would've been three-four digits easy without any staking. As would any crypto with Chainlink's adoption and partnerships.This is just you trying to blame Sergey. Because you work for Redstone.
>>61235661>But you're absolutely retarded if you think staking is needed for crypto to pump.For Chainlink, this crypto, to pump, yes. All the news in the world will not pump LINKTokenomics in the form of staking is what will pump itIf you think differently, you haven't been paying attentionNot every frustrated holder is a paid fudder you hipster doofus. Sooner you realize that most the fudding comes from holders who have waited years for LINK to do something, the better off you'll be
Can't believe tron and doge are in the top 10 meanwhile link isn't. Hell even some bullshit named hype is. It's so over.
>>61234406>INTEGRATIONwhere are you getting that? it's just going to be "yeah you can trade crypto on our platform, LINK is one of those, so sign up for robinhood. have a nice day"
just give up, stinkieshere's an idea: sell your stupid stinks, use the money for a down payment on a house, and try to live your life. make up for lost time. you aren't getting any younger you know
>>61235677>All the news in the world will not pump LINKWhich is hardly Sergey's fault.
>>61235677I disagree with you based on the staking part, and I know how it will work and what the tokenomics will be. The reality is that frontrunning will always happen
>>61235699>muh btc dumpage conspiracywe're tired of the nonsense dudeGET A LIFEBUY INDEX FUNDSBUY REAL ESTATEMAKE A FAMILY
>>61235699who has been mining BTC since the early days?
>>61235704>conspiracy
>>61235702Ok, so how do you envision the LINK price appreciating in value? Because clearly news, partnerships, integrations, etc do nothing at all
>>61235722it won't :}that's the beauty part
>>61235704>GET A LIFE>BUY INDEX FUNDS>BUY REAL ESTATE>MAKE A FAMILYwe have done all those things, unlike you stupid wifeless, childless groupchat fuddersand yet...(pic related)
>>61235805man bitcoin dumps, allowing link to take over as predicted and link just sissies outpathetic
>>61235698I already own a house outright.Still up on stink plus Nvidia and Tesla.Sorry, Abdul.
>>61234406Houdini announcement overshadowed it completely
>>61235831Please, realize that you are a person that just says stuff. Completely unfounded reality. Why do you do it? I don't know. But don't do it again.
>>61235805>>61235947nope + cope
>>61236734>omg they took out the world champ just to stop the other racers!
>>61234406Thats cool and all... but... price?? Oh... and chart??
>>61236842this :} stupid ass stinkiestell me about the pricetell me about the charttell me about BOTH THESE THINGS XD
>>61236882TELL ME TELL ME TELL ME YEEEAH TELL ME ABOUT BOTH THESE THIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINGS OH GOD YESSSSSSS
>>61235698>>61235704Already did all of this in 2020-2022 and still have most of my stack. Don’t you have some peeling to do?
>>61236882Well, the price? Has gone way up. The chart? Looks like an asset just continuously going up with some MASSIVE pumps and then smaller dumps on the way. You think it’ll just go up forever, lol? That would be cool, considering I own 60,000 of them and will only ever sell staking gains which I’m currently already living off of.
>>61235196so easy to tell the latecomers/non og's who didnt get into staking and are salty. staking 1.0 aint gonna do shit- whats gonna pump the price is real $ going to stakers not CLL pocketing it and paying it back to themselves in the form of "buybacks". seriously, if that 1 million USD was given to stakers instead of CLL on a $ per link basis its fucking more than stakers are making right now. That alone should make stakers livid, yet not a single person in the community has mentioned it except some guy with 250 followers
>>61237744I’m in the pool, anon. The reason why an open pool will pump the price is because it gives retail a reason to buy the token. Right now no one can make yield on LINK except us, when there are plenty of tokens out there with staking yield. It makes the asset much more attractive to buy and hold. Institutional investors also will only come in when there’s yield available. Nobody is throwing tons of money at a speculative high risk volatile asset with no yield when there are plenty of other options that pay anywhere from 2-15%+ annually. I agree fully the buyback money going to stakers would be great but part of the purpose of the reserve is for CLL to create a long term holding. Dump operations and accrual operations are two separate things, I get the dumps vastly outweigh accrual but if they were to continue accruing long term at some point the scales tip balance again. Especially if network activity grows. That could unironically cause a massive price bump as well some day, but it’s likely years out.
