Is quantum computing the next big thing after AI?
>>61238153Biotechnology, quantum computing and robotics
just buy QRL faggots
>>61238153It will always be the next big thing
spoilers: quantum computing is harder than fusion
>>61238153No, AI and quantum computing are both vaporware scams to lure in retards who don't know anything about those subjects. The world's best quantum computers today can't factor the number 21. It will be 30-40 years before they're viable.
RGTI is a scam companyretards think they are early on Quantum like it'll be here next yearWorse, they think in 2 years "AI" will be running on quantum conputersthey don't even know how a regular computer works
>>61238405>>61238375Enlighten me, unironically. Why quantum computing *isn't* the future?
>>61238153hahaha oh noooo they used quantum computers to break encryption on btc, its going to zero now!!! good thing the banks have a replacement version ready to go!! haha
>>61238420Quantum computing is the future in the same way that nuclear fusion is the future: they're both unachievable in the next 20 years. Actually, that might be unfair to nuclear fusion because it's closer than quantum computing.
>>61238449Well I'm still gonna biy some either way, just in case.
>>61238420i dont think anyone intelligent is going to argue it's not. the doubt comes in that its the near future. quantum is as big, or perhaps bigger than the internet or AI, that isn't even debatable. It is debatable if we see it become usable in the next 5 or 10 years. the best analogy I've heard is comparing it to space travel. while we can do it, it's not very useful at this point for practical things. we could have sci fi future with inter stellar space ships and faster than light jump and so on. obviously we don't have those things as commercially viable today
>>61238482You would unironically be better off buying nuclear fusion stocks instead.
>>61238153No. Invest in nuclear, especially SMRs and fission tech startups
>>61238514I'll buy eveything that seems promising.
>>61238153I been wondering this myself, and yes that seems likely that quantum is next, although I don't know how advanced the tech is >>61238155Elon is king of jumping on the in investment trend, and he's sliding into robotics. Also declining immigration and aging workforce means desperate need for automation .. although, I don't know about the industry, but manufacturing robotics sounds like low margin business that will never be a trillion dollar company.. just like manufacturing cars although he manages to lie Tesla into 2 trillion market cap
>>61238515CEG has been good to me
>>61238153>>61238155>>61238420quantum computers are impossiblethere isn't a single existing quantum computer TODAY, with a single fucking qubit why?because you need 500+ physical qubits for each logcial qubit so you need 500 of something that needs 500 each to exist understand now how it's impossible?if I need 500 of something, and to make 1 of that something I need 500 of the same thing...
>>61238375>It will be 30-40 years before they're viable.wrongquantum computers will never exist
>>61238153Quantum computing is a meme but if real and paired with AI then AI just takes over the world
>>61240608This, quantum sciences are Jewish fake science.
>>61240608So you're saying that the "quantum computers" we've been hearing about aren't real?
Is it a good idea to throw like 500 bucks into IONQ quantum stock on the day of earnings, when it inevitably dips? I'm hoping it'll do a goog/amzn and dump like 3-5% then pump up 10-15% after hours like a shitcoin.
>>61240607>if I need 500 of something, and to make 1 of that something I need 500 of the same thing...That just sounds like 99% of job ads though>you need 2 years of experience doing this job to even be considered for this job
>>61238153So far, the aims of quantum stuff are extremely vague and diffuse. In my opinion, quantum stuff is much more suited for a dot-com-bubble-type scenario than AI.
>>61238207Kek. Good one
>>61238375this
>>61240608The argument in the image — about “thermodynamic debt” and an alleged finite-energy limit of quantum computation — is conceptually flawed and physically unfounded.1. Thermodynamic claim:There is no known physical law that forbids quantum error correction. It is energy-intensive, yes, but not impossible. The required energy scales with error-correction overhead, not beyond thermodynamic limits.2. “More parameters than particles in the universe”:This is a rhetorical misunderstanding. The quantum state space grows exponentially, but that’s a mathematical abstraction, not a literal physical storage requirement. The system’s actual energy and resources remain finite and manageable within hardware constraints.3. Real challenge:The real bottleneck is engineering — scaling from thousands to millions of stable physical qubits while keeping error rates below threshold (10-7–10-9). That’s hard but demonstrably improving every year.4. Conclusion:The text dramatizes a real difficulty into an existential impossibility. Quantum computing faces enormous scaling challenges, but it does not violate thermodynamic principles or hit an absolute physical wall.
>>61238153No, it's largely useless (not general purpose, just a handful of algorithms) and hard to execute (put sufficient qubits together to crack some key and noise is higher than signal as if the universe was telling you "no, you cannot shortcut that"). Not buying these stocks; there's no substance and no viable product; only hype.
They are already a part of it
>>61241544wait i am still on biz this is a well thought out and very reasonable conclusion to come to.robotics is going to become much more cost effective but unless you're talking nano we have a mature robotics industry, we can build robots that do whatever, the only question left is if its cost effective. quantum is still in it's infancy. people don't realize it's not linear, its exponential. we have have 10x the number of qubits running in 5 years, it'll 100 or 200 and keep scaling up from there. no one is saying it's going to be easy, but all the smartest people are saying it's possible and it's coming quickly.
Quantum computing is the future and everyone that talks about it like it's an impossibility is just doompoisoned because that's what's currently popular right now.
>>61242337>
elon posting on x about quantum
>>61238153>Is quantum computing the next big thing after AI?It's the next fakest thing after AI and nukes.
>>61238153Haven't they like already used these to communicate with inter dimensional demons?
