The biggest index of one of the biggest stock exchanges in the world; London.
>>61246707Oh wow! Let me buy a link for 1000$ fast!
>>61246707$15 lol
>>61246707what i find interesting tho is, who tf of defi would use that data? Like lets be real, some ghostchain protocol will not go to chainlink to ask for ftse or ICE metals data. So for whom is chainlink doing this shit for? The only other interested parties would be the institutions themselves, doing some onchain stuff and leveraging that data ig but we have sofar 0 development in that region afaik
>>61246707FFS STOP ANNOUNCING SHIT
>>61246724This is not for defi lolThis is for banks and other financial institutions.
Two weeks ago it was S&P Global btw
>>61246707Wow another bootstrapped data provider! Will be really exciting when we get our first paying user for all this data!
>dumps some moreplease stop with the announcments its killing btc
>>61246707finally some good news to push us above $16
>>61246707They could post selfies as Elon's new BFF and it wouldn't budge the price. Maybe the price is correlated to something random like the Dot (https://global-mind.org/gcpdot/). Everyone think UP.
>>61246743>finally some good news to push us above $16oh no anon, this will be the most painful week in crypto history, they will crush the entire market to keep link from breaking out
>>61246729>This is for banks and other financial institutions.yea but thats what i mean, I know tradfi will enter crypto over the next 2y in full probably but right now it feels like chainlink is trying to frontrun being the provider of institutional data before smaller banks etc are coming onchainAll this shit takes so goddamn fucking long though like seriously
Fellow stinkers. I've lost that picture of steve ellis rubbing the women from blackrocks feet. Anyone have a copy?
>>61246829Bumping for Steve ellis pic
>>61246735>bootstrapped data providerInstitutions pay Chainlink, picrelated.You're thinking of Ripple who has to literally buy users.
>>61246760>it feels like chainlink is trying to frontrun being the provider of institutional dataYou're making it seem like Chainlink decides what FTSE does with their data.This is institutions doing the best they can to bring data onchain as part of the general tokenization wave.And "going the best they can" naturally implies "using Chainlink".
>>61246707Cool but we're still dumping
All they have to do to pump the token to new ATHs is start a rally with one huge purchase on Thursday instead of these tiny baby ones. That will kick off mass retail getting in when they see the big double digital % increases and look into Chainlink and find out they’re the most important crypto infrastructure in existence. If they do two huge buys in a row it will solidify basically $100+ within 3 weeks and at that point the OGs can exit, then they can dump as well and make all their money back and torture a new generation of bag holders. This would be in their best interest as it would buy them a lot of time without the negative social pressure and also make them a shitload more money. I really don’t get why they haven’t figured this out, literally every other crypto does it, it’s like CLL missed the memo of how to actually play the game in crypto. I can’t imagine they voluntarily want to both have the largest audience of seething fuddie holders and also get minimum value out of their token dumps. What’s the purpose in not pumping the token price to a new ATH at this point? It literally makes no sense.
>>61247027its because they don't care about token price, i honestly think that. all of their actions are perfectly explained by a company that just wants to keep building infra with none of the economic token value maximizing scheeming that other projects have.
>>61247046Ripple:>builds infra that doesn't involve XRP in any way>"omg they care so much about the token!"Chainlink:>builds infra that involves Link in everything>"omg they don't care about the token"kys
>>61247046They sell tokens every 3 months to pay for operating expenses there is no way they don’t care about the price.
>>61246870>>61246829It wasn't Steve Ellis but I think it was some early Chainlink employee It also wasn't anyone from Black Rock it was Blythe Masters (who developed and used the credit default swap)
>>61247027not only are you wrong about a hypothetical pump, they have no incentive to let their little pet neo-nazis out of their saturnian cage
>>61247027>Chainlink MUST have widespreak financial adoption before it can pump>Chainlink MUST implement collateral staking with slashing before it can pump>Chainlink MUST do massive buybacks before it can pumpWeird how none of this shit applies to any other crypto.
>>61247051i never said they don't care about the tokenThey're clearly not interested like other projects into pumping the token value for shortterm gains. Unlike xrp which is the exact opposite and probably the top washtraded coin in the world right now considering its one of the outliers whose supply on exchanges increased over the last months.
>>61247068not that i disagree with you, but other cryptos don't have btc dumping on every breakout/good news
>>61247073>not that i disagree with youLikewise.>other cryptos don't have btc dumping on every breakout/good newsExactly
>>61247051mad schizo hours at cuckfish's house, he sees Ripple hallucinations everywhere
>>61247068Almost every major alt has market makers helping pump the price with large “buybacks” anon. ETH is the only exception to this rule, and Chainlink. XRP does it regularly, ADA, SOL literally has jobs at the company for this, etc. It doesn’t make any sense Chainlink hasn’t figured out how to do this, it’s not hard because the assets are illiquid and there’s low volume. It takes very little capital (which you get back two to ten fold later) and there is no reason not to do it, especially if most of your income comes from selling tokens like for CLL.
Release staking 1.0 or shut the fuck upNo one cares about these bullshit parternships in 2025. Find some fucking utility for then LINK token, other than dumping it on bagholders
>>61247083>waaaah Sergey has to pump the token manuallyYou sound extremely Indian>SOL literally has jobs at the company for thissource pls
>>61247089>Find some fucking utility for then LINK tokenLink is 100% REQUIRED for literally every single thing nodes post on chain.Go out back and put yourself out of your misery.
>>61247083CLL most likely wants to keep the token price low so their banker friends can buy tokens for cheap OTC
>>61247089>staking 1.0shut the fuck up man, staking 1.0 is not gonna be the magic pill changing everything if anything staking 1.0 is just what accompanies anything substantial that would pump ushell, a million prerequisites we need for staking 1.0 aren't even here yet. Can it even be called staking 1.0 if slashing is not implemented yet for the community pool?
>>61247094>thousands more partnerships since 2020>price is down 80%shut the fuck up fishy and go get ready for your astrology class you fucking old, fat, bald boomer shit
>>61247104>thousands more partnerships since 2020>price is down 80%Yeah I wonder why.The token has 100% full utility as promised in 2017: it is required to pay the nodes and has been used to pay the nodes EXCLUSIVELY.Your brain is mush.
>>61247068weird how every other defi protocol takes payment in their token but chainlink circumvents it with offchain deals
>>61247111Chainlink Labs can take payment in whatever they want.The Chainlink nodes only take payment in Link tokens.
>>61247110if institutions are onboarded>they arethen then number should go up.... but its not because no on needs to buy to use CLL services
>>61247127>if institutions are onboarded>then then number should go upyou don't say
>>61246707Yea, doesn't matter. No value to the token, all to CLL. Bullrun is over, Daddy BTC slowly going into hibernation. All will bleed into 2026, dump to 20isk k für BTC, Link will be sub 5$
>>61246743Below*
>>61247159>No value to the tokenWhat the fuck does that even mean.
>>61247134Linkfags have been saying for years that retail isn't needed because institutions. Now that institutions are claimed to be onboarding the price still stinks.linkcucks blame BTC. Id these powerful institutions were actually onboarding these little dumps would not stop link.from.going up..thanks for playing..glad i sold a few thousand Link in the 20-30$ range. I wasn't going to get burned twice after 2020/2021
>>61247206>Linkfags have been saying for years that retail isn't needed because institutions.Those weren't Linkfags, those were redditors.The speculative market is 95% retail. It is very needed.
>>61247060Share the love. Post it.
>>61247162Number doesn't go up, number lower than 5 years ago.Understand now, ape?
>>61247249>Number doesn't go upSo just say that instead of "no value is flowing to the token saaahr".Why use such bizarrely convoluted phrasing?Reminds me of jeets saying shit like "do the needful".
>>61247266Dutch is an unusual language. Especially when it's is a 2nd language, with Arabic spoken at home.
>>61247282kek is that what's happening?Dutch sure is memeworthy
>>61247064>they have no incentive to let their little pet neo-nazis out of their saturnian cageThis should be pinned to the top of every LINK shill thread
>>61247266What...the...fuck. "Number go up" is literal retard tier English. How is "no value to the token" convoluted? Guess you're just baiting.
>>61247380>"Number go up" is literal retard tier English.welcome to 4chan
>>61247159>Für>>61247282>>61247297It's a Germ, maybe a Germroach even. Dutchfags don't use umlaut.
>>61247089>Find some fucking utility for then LINK tokenhoudini pointless program the first step
Don't you guys get bored always seeing announcements and deals and shit and NOTHING FUCKING HAPPENS?Link hasn't went above ATH, shit should be over $75 with all the kewl things happening, right?
>>61247578bro that strategy hasn't worked since pre-2021every team in crypto is constantly announcing "news"including kadena who was doing so up until the day they rugged
>>61248083Can you show one of these amazing kadena "news" ?
>>61248095kek, I imagine you crying as LINK implodes>b-b-but OUR news were massive how did this happen to me I was so smart reeeeeeeee
>>61246881>as well as other sourcesI can translate:>95% of funds from bimonthly token dumps on the marines
>>61248115Okay so no examples? Thought so
>>61247578they are dumping millions of tokens these past yearsim surprised it isnt 2 dollars by now... who the fuck is buying is what i wonder.
>>61248570other projects are dumping way more per year and they are still reaching new highs
>>61246707Okay, but, the price?
>>61248095>Can you show one of these amazing kadena "news" ?https://warosu.org/biz/thread/61173464#p61173817
>>61248580>other projects are dumping way more per year and they are still reaching new highssee points 2 and 3
Fuddie kike shill bots get the rope
>>61246707LONDONONDON
>>61249136That's Kadena attending a hackathon at Ethglobal.How the fuck is this in any way similar to this news about FTSE integrating Chainlink?
>>61249142>other coins in the top ten have first mover advantage on linksince when is link a L1 or since when is anything in the top 20 another oraclepyth for reference is 160ish
>>61246829>Anyone have a copy?i am assuming you mean this oneabsolutely isnt ellis thoanyone know what year this is taken in?
>>61249771its dan kochisGod, is everyone here a post-mainnet top buyer?
>>61249778>reading comprehensioni asked what year that was taken, i never got that and i dont assume the first posting here happened right after taking the picture
>>61246829It was Kochis. Whatever happened to him?
>>61249771kek remember assblaster being a blythe master moniker
>>61246707Price and chart status: shart
>>61249771She's such a little cutie.
