Is this real or nothingburger?
>>61248104Nothing burger apparently
>>61248110Sauce?
>>61248104debank always called it 1.0.0Now with how they worded the new rewards season thing, we can't expect staking v1 til at least after 16. December
>>61248104Does the chainlink team ever deliver anything remotely good for the community? You'll find your answer there.
>>61248149Double stuffed
>>61248167Why would that be the case? They took the snapshot today. They can do whatever with staking going forward without it having any affect on the build rewards.
>>61248266>no staking 1.0 github repo >no staking 1.0 contract deployed anywhere>no staking 1.0 press releaseah but a completely random mislabeling on a shitty wallet indexer is all the proof you need
>>61248304What? I didn't say it's happening and definitely not buying that the OP means anything at all. The only thing I was pushing back on was that the rewards announcement has any bearing on when staking 1.0 could possibly begin.
>>61248304they have a private repo tho
It's the debank frontend, not the chainlink github.So absolutely 1000% a nothingburger.
