We don't even need to get to there. We just need fiat failure, which is more likely.
>>61249591Okay u want more at a cheaper price, but dont have to be a nigger for that!
>>61249591i think you need a signature in order to brute force the private key with quantum computers. if you send coins to an address that has never been used so far then they're safe, which is probably true for most of satoshis wallets.
>>61249591>it's easy bro just make a quantum computer>it's easy bro just crack sha-256 with quantum buzzwords!lolwhat would be more likely and hilarious is satoshi hates seeing what bitcoin has become and just dumps his wallets on the market for cheapies
>>61249644look up pay2pubkey
>>61249591this but unironically
>>61249691ah okay, so the pub key isn't revealed until a tx is sent in bitcoin (p2pkh). so satoshis coins are safe until hal finney wakes up from cryo sleep.
>>61249748No. Early satoshi coins are in p2pk addresses and p2pkh only got added later.
>update code to exclude compromised wallet>everyone updates their node>literally nothing happens
>>61249591MEANWHILE LINK TOKENS SYBIL RESISTANT QUANTUM RESISTANT FUD RESISTANT $1000 EOY MARINE COMMUNITY BLESSED BY SERGEY WEF SUPPORT
>>61249774well, that sucks.
Bitcoin will fall with SHA2No hard fork can save Bitcoin from that95% of my net worth is in Bitcoin
>>61249848It's a meme anyway. Assuming QC even scale beyond Quantum utility, if the assumption is that someday we know ECC is going to die with absolute certainty, then exposed funds will be made unspendable after some grace period. That can be done via soft-fork so it's no problem. You could also limit how much can be spent in a single block and turn it into a new block reward which would solve the mining problem.the actual QC fud is that we'll need massive signature and address sizes. And hash based signatures don't have pretty mathematical properties. Forget about computing your addresses from a master pubkey for example.
>>61249591>retesting 2020 pre-breakout levelBullish
>>61249591Are you a fucking time traveller? If not STFU.
presented without comment
>>61249591Quantum computers are not real.
>>61250957neither are birds.
>>61249591>OP's chart implies bitshit is going to 129kLmao a little ambitious aren't we?
>>61249600>Waiting for fiat collapseYou KNOOOWWW (((the fed))) can just tie currency to commodities (like Wiemar did) and poof the "collapse" out of existence.You know this RIGGGGHHHTTTT?
Buy QRL, quantum resistant ledger!
>>61249600Fiat cant fail. You can just print more.
>>61249591Satoshis wallet was not hacked. Quantum is a meme, fucking useless for at least another 10 years.
>>61249676I'm pretty sure at this point miners would just refuse a transfer block from Satoshi's wallets.
>>61249591this has been a meme for over 12 years and still isbut funny you took the bait lol
>>61250998i studied bird law and would prove this wrong within seconds if you have the balls to debate me
>he believes in quantum mechanics
>>61249591hbar is quantum proof
>>61252222Checked.
>>61250667>someone: "i don't think that thing is worth money">you: *pays $100,000 for aforementioned thing*>chart: goes to $100,000>you: "AHAH I TOLD YOU IT WAS WORTH $100,000"
>>61251025>like Wiemar did>>61251067>You can just print moreKek. Good ones, anons.
>>61252229>trillions of liquidity>"someone"
>>61252251Replace "you" with "you and millions of others banking on literally nothing but the greater fool theory"
>>61249676I think more likely is china or the USA achieve a 51% takeover attack and the value of the coin craters 40% in a day before becoming a national currency.
>>61252228DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS
>>61252021the wallet is essentially blacklisted from exchanges, there is no dex for bitcoin that will allow somebody to pillage satoshis wallet and get away with it either, the offramps for bitcoin specifically aren't great, literally the easiest paper trail starting from a wallet everybody knows to blacklist
