If you bet $50,000 on both Dominos and Google in autumn of 2007, your Dominos would now be worth $1,436,405 and paying a $24,706.18 annual dividend while your Google would now be worth $806,700.73 and paying a $2,420.10. This is while AI is on a psychotic bullrun and no one is talking about anything in food or retail at all.Business fundamentals are the most important thing in the world and absolutely btfo hype cycles. If you aren't investing in a business because you believe its earnings will continue to grow and the company will continue to thrive rather than "It's going to the moon!" You're not an investor, you're a gambler who might as well be picking between the Lions and Redskins on Sunday
>>61254901I'm very interested in the subject, but I'm still having trouble identifying such companies
>>61254916Oh for sure anyone who was "good" at it would be a living money printer, but the big point is to ignore hype cycles and focus more on the actual business compared to the cost of owning a piece of it
>>61254901Nig Jew Fucker.
>>61254972SHUT UP
>>61254901>just be a rich boomer in 2007Yeah we already knew that
>>61255042most people if they had 50k back then would probably buy a car instead of buying stocks
>>61254901Now do SPY
>>61255086And Google is still a good company today. But is it going to 20x from here like it did for boomers? Unlikely. And the reasons stocks have been mooning isnt because they are simply good companies , its because of the monetary debasment thats been happening for the last 20 years.
>>61255098Sure$50,000 would be $219,230.03 with a dividend yield of $2,323.84The S&P 500 is a perfectly valid way to invest the majority of your money if you aren't interested in active stock picking
Tfw HIMS is the only stock thats green and its the stock I went all in on yesterday. Too bad it didn't go up enough to make my calls print
>>61255192If you're following your stock by day instead of by quarter you aren't a serious investor
>>61254901yea yea ano, my lock on houdini can outpeform this for real
