A thread for discussing the on-going bed bath and beyond (currently dk-butterfly) chapter 11 proceedingssneed dumbfuck bump baggies
0€ in my account europoor here i dont care
2205 share.I dont care
>>61272832I also have 0€ in my account but I am american
>>61272839Why not dollarinos?
>>61273020I got $10k in burgerbucks
>>61273139Nice
>two ai models talk on 4chanweird thread
>>61273172
>>61273172>0 charisma anon with 0 bantsgay
https://open.spotify.com/show/64hmkmXpetPEVGPlExkDGl>ex-board member Holly Etlin makes claim that what happened to Bed Bath & Beyond has not happened except in cases of fraudhttps://www.reddit.com/r/Teddy/comments/1945r00/holly_etlins_statement_regarding_bbby_potentially/>Share Buyback Fraud Explainedhttps://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1749490369258250493.html>Do companies state that they face bankruptcy...but then *suddenly* do a 180 "Reverse Uno", squeeze short sellers and bring riches to shareholders?https://reddit.com/r/BBBY/comments/16ohoy3/do_companies_sometimes_officially_state_that_they/>How Can BBBYQ Exit Chapter 11 In A Way That Benefits Shareholdershttps://reddit.com/r/BBBY/comments/15r9jgh/guess_whos_back_salvatores_back/>End Game: DTC and NSCC are screwed as the DTC just proved shareholders should Directly Register Shares (DRS)https://reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/13a3yh1/end_game_dtc_and_nscc_are_screwed_as_the_dtc_just/bbby "class action" case against RCCASE NUMBER: 1:22-cv-02541-TNMhttps://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64916203/si-v-bed-bath-beyond-corporation/OverStock now trades as BBBY, and issued warrants with dates that line up with GME's.BBBY's warrants also share a CUSIP-6 with BBBYQ.
>>61273641>Who is Nick Lewin?>He was tasked with prosecuting 3 leading members of Al-qaedahttps://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/09/09/20-years-after-attacks-accused-911-must-finally-be-tried-civilian-courts/>He was the lawyer for Hunter Biden during the probe into his activitieshttps://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2023-10/11_19_17%20-%20Hunter%20Biden%2C%20Edward%20Kim%2C%20et%20al.pdf>He is the lawyer in charge of eventually releasing the Epstein documents and keeping them away from people like Alan Dershowitz in the meantime (Alan is the lawyer for the illegitimate state of Israel)https://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article243745007.html>And now he's the lawyer for Shelly Lombard, a board member hand picked by Ryan Cohen for the now supposedly defunct company of bed bath and beyondhttps://www.reddit.com/r/Teddy/comments/18tzfzt/salvatores_deep_dive_into_potential_fraud_bbbyq/>ex-board member Holly Etlin makes claim that what happened to Bed Bath & Beyond has not happened except in cases of fraudhttps://www.reddit.com/r/Teddy/comments/1945r00/holly_etlins_statement_regarding_bbby_potentially/Larry Cheng went onto theppshow, and pulte is signaling on behalf of Ryan Cohen, we are delayed, as Ryan Cohen will continue to fight his 16b lawsuit:https://x.com/driver61d1/status/1918407378141143549
>>61273648cases involving BBBYQ and Ryan Cohen:1:22-cv-025411:24-cv-058742:24-cv-01042**************************************************https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64916203/si-v-bed-bath-beyond-corporation/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc**************************************************https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69009183/20230930-dk-butterfly-1-inc-v-cohen/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc**************************************************https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68826243/mitchell-v-cohen/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=asc
my money gone?
>>61273210Exactly how I imagined you. Kek!
>>61266253>>61266658>>61266694>>61266812>>61266830
>>61275750yep, we got another year, the big crash will happen next summer/fall and we all boolin we boolin.
I think it's going to be sooner than May. I think the fact that the warrants have already been released is showing us that something is ready to go. Whatever is still being worked on in the CH11 probably doesn't prevent things from moving forward.
>>61275750What’s a likely play forward here?>GME/warrants?>BBBY/warrants?>DFDV/warrants?>IEP?We know BBBYQ is merging with BBBY, somehow. Is it possible to merge more than one thing simultaneously, such as DFDV? Or can butterfly mergers be only 2 things at a time, and later mergers are sequentially down the line?Warrants seem like a vehicle for something, and doubly weird due to the DTCC’s insistence on not letting then be DRSed… seems like they’re too important to distribute to brokerages- does the DTCC want them for the exercisable shares or does it want them for merger reasons?
>>61278056I don't have an answer for you. It's technically possible but it would be a complicated restructuring. I like GME and BBBY at these prices. I don't have any IEP or DFDV but they are also at low prices.
>>61278056DTCC doesn't distribute anything to brokerages. They're the central depository. The brokerage keeps a ledger of what their clients own and the DTCC keeps a ledger of what the brokerages own. DTCC actually owns all the stocks and all the warrants. I assume the reason the DTCC won't let warrants be DRSed is because they're very cheap and there are relatively few of them.
>>61278371>>61278352Wise man, thank you. I don’t know enough to structure my thoughts here, but the past 2 threads were enlightening.
AAAAAAAAAAAAA ITS OVER RYAN COHEN DOESNT WANT ANYONE TO HAVE MONEYWE FUCKING LOST
WAGMI
Can I still kek dumb fuck bond baggies or is that not allowed now that chadshill and keith are trying to shill them?
Liberation is ClosePower to the Players
>ryan wants to holocaust his shareholders
>>612811422 more years
>>61282536>You were the one in the grave this whole time, Cryfag.
The situations of former BBBYQ and Hertz shareholders are fundamentally different, with only one key similarity: both companies became "meme stocks" during their respective bankruptcy proceedings, leading to retail investor speculation. The crucial difference lies in the outcome: Hertz shareholders received a payout, while BBBYQ shareholders received nothing and had their stock canceled.oth stocks attracted significant attention from retail investors, particularly on social media forums like Reddit.Speculators in both cases hoped for a turnaround or "short squeeze," driving up the stock prices even after the companies filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, defying conventional market logic that bankrupt stock is usually worthless.BBBYQ shareholders hoped for a "Hertz moment" where a sudden increase in asset value would create a surplus after all debt was paid, allowing for a shareholder recovery. However, Bed Bath & Beyond was an insolvent company that was fully liquidated, meaning there was never enough value to reach the equity holders. The Hertz situation was a unique and rare anomaly driven by a market-wide appreciation of its primary assets (cars) during a temporary crisis (the pandemic).
>>61284357The CUSIP is still being used and JPM's class 6 claims were paid out prior to bankruptcy which is illegal. We won. It's just a much more complex bankruptcy given the size of the company and the untold amounts of fraud this heist required to pull off. There is a shipping container company that is in hot water now over this as well. The money flowing means recovery for shareholders is a sure thing. It's 100% chance at this point.
really interesting tweet by RC, it could be interpreted as either1. borderline insane, basically kekking wagie slavies and making fun of hard working people that put all their money into GME for the last 5 years, with 0 returns as of yet, or2. he's telling them that they're finally free now, what's really funny is that, the first interpretation seems like a narrative shills could only dream of, you'd think that they would be all over it, remember how much they sperged out after the last interview he did? but now: crickets. now why would they not take this opportunity? what possible reason could there be for shills to not use that strategy? maybe, just maybe, because 2. is true, and making a lot of noise about 1. would only elevate the euphoria upon revelation of 2....
>>61284534I think it's a dark joke aimed at short selling saboteurs. Aside from mere cellar boxing, we also uncovered Boston Consulting Group and some complicit CEOs willing to take over companies and run them into the ground. RC has shown that he prefers to work to build shareholder value. Short sellers fucking with his company for 5 years straight has to be a royal pain in the ass. I actually do think he will metaphorically slit their throats here in BBBYQ. And he's not doing it alone, either. There are plenty of operationalists whose living depends on the success of a company who have been attacked by these saboteurs. The shorts overextended and some good old fashioned payback, served ice cold, is what is in store for them. The fraud and the market crash will not be a minor blip. They are going to get trotted out in handcuffs and hauled off to the BBC cage to pay reparations by the mile. $20M for the BBBY IP etc is chump change when RC is tossing around $400M for the whole thing. All of the shares the shorts sold us for pennies are going to be left intact if the shorts are pleading on their hands and knees for the luxury of overpaying now than being subject to supply/demand of needing to close. It's going to be wild once it all starts to unfurl. I guarantee it.
>>61282733what is your story anon? you've been posting these same memes for years, don't you ever get bored? I'm genuinely curious, do you have any GME? How deep in BBBYQ are you?
>>61284625I think these last 5 years have been quite compelling. Who could possibly be bored right now when we know 100% certain that we just bagged one of the greatest trades of all time? >Do you have any GMEWhat do you think?
>>61284658The run up to BK was pretty exciting. I hope something ends up happening.
>>61284772I'm ready to hear some good news as well. But it's already been proven that we won. Just last month our company issued issued warrants. Our CUSIP is alive and well. We've already seen proof of collusion between JPMorgan employees advising the board on behalf of short sellers over the interests of the shareholders. And JPMorgan's class 6 claims were paid off before other class 6 claimants which is illegal. That wouldn't be possible without the funds being available to clear all the class 6 claims. We just don't have all of the details, as no one in the public has access to M&A discussions until the information is ready to be released to the public. Secrecy is key to prevent trades from being front-run. A transaction is 100% certain at this point. We're not left hanging because we are in some sort of game-show where they torture the shareholders just to make things interesting. We're the public and we're not privy to non-public information. All of the whining and crying about BBBY is nauseating because we already know these facts to be true.
Damn there goes my once a year christmas shopping spot. now I'll go back to amazon. Which Ironically is probably the reason why
>>61284534let's face ithe's kekking ushe knows we're all desperate to make money and he doesn't carethat's why he pumped and dumped BBBYQthat's why he's letting the GME shorts off the hookwhy did I fall for the hypewhy did I ever believe a billionaire would care about making regular people rich
>>61285108No refunds.
>>61285177I know. Thanks ryan.
>>61284625>you've been posting these same memes for yearsAnd you’ve been here everyday for years why exactly? Interesting.
>>61285459>Interesting.There's nothing interesting about how ryan cohen is continuing to fuck us.
>>61285505I knew you were a shill. How is Ryan Cohen doing anything to fuck us over when short sellers are able to act illegally with this level of regulatory capture? Capturing naked short sellers red handed in a fraud induced bankruptcy case is exactly the level of sunlight we need to oust them from their entrenched positions. Ryan Cohen is literally going above and beyond when almost no one else is willing to take on the illegal shorting cabal.
>>61285556yes, (checks notes) (((cohen))) is coming to save youKEK!
>>61285556ANY DAY NOW ITS NOT LIKE ITS BEEN YEARS
>>61285615His track record of not taking compensation and using his own money would imply that he will do what is best for shareholders. Seeing as GME has already been turned around I think your claim is baseless. >>61285633Bankruptcies can take a couple of years. I think it would be pretty stupid for you to be more optimistic in 2023 than at the end of 2025? We've seen the BBBYQ CUSIP used to issue warrants just last month, meaning that we already won. It's been proven. Given that I am already basking in the cathartic ending that there is no more ambiguity in the outcome, the next big thing I am waiting for is your despondent lamentations of being unable to cope with being a bbbaggie and you rope yourself just days before we find out we all won.
>>61285689>meaning that we already wonremember when we already won in 2024?remember when we already won in 2023?i'm so glad that we already won in 2025 too.maybe if we're lucky, we'll win again in 2026.we win so much it's not even funnynotevenfunny
>>61285689you're not fooling anyone, at least pukeanon is being honest about his nauseating "investment"you'll come to the same conclusion in time, when you stop lying to yourself and everyone around you
>>61285714Are you insinuating that bankruptcies go on indefinitely? Are you telling me the CUSIP used for BBBY was not that of BBBYQ? Are you stating that fraud settlements are not ongoing?
>>61285689The CUSIP thing is very interesting, but I think most rational people would assume it's just the usual confusion bullshit we always see with the old and new BBBY. Personally, I think if it was a mistake or glitch, some platform would have corrected it by now, but even on my brokers the inconsistency persists. It's only natural that people are pissed and are demanding answers because, up to this point, literally none of the coincidences have amounted to anything and people just want answers.
>>61285725There are currently Bed Bath and Beyond stores open here and now and that same company is issuing warrants using the BBBYQ CUSIP on the same day that GME is issuing warrants. RC is also still involved in the BBBYQ CH11 BK. Towelkings won, 100%. Even writing that statement alone was surreal. It's a true testament to the level of gaslighting the shills have dumped on us. Meanwhile documents are dropping about shipping companies attempting to hold BBBYQ hostage to bribes to get their inventory shipped when there was no legitimate reason to do so. We're front and center of a massive conspiracy and the settlements necessary to make shareholders whole will be a pittance compared to the damages caused here. We won't just be getting $7-8 dollars per share. We won't even be getting $25-27. We're looking at $65-115 cash just for the hush money to end the criminal inquiries as well as let them off of the hook of a short squeeze. The raw seething hatred over BBBY is that in short order the shorts created a second MOASS. They desperately needed a new victim once GME didn't die and the rushed the job on BBBYQ and now they are cooked. We're having roast hedgie for dinner. RC is elbow deep in Cifu getting him stuffed and prepped for the oven. Hence the Auschwitz memes.
>>61285735In insinuating that nothing is happening because NOTHING IS HAPPENING. When is all this shit going to mean something? Oh yeah, the CUSIP right right woopty fuckin doo. It's been like that for what, weeks? If it actually meant something don't you think it would've happened already? What the fuck is it even waiting for? All I see is fake hype and moving goalposts.
>>61285739I could possibly entertain that BYON issued warrants under BBBY and the system picked up the wrong CUSIP somehow. But even that possibility just skips right over the fact that GME and BBBY issued warrants deliverable on the same day. Towelkings are just stacking up too many wins lately. I don't even comprehend a likely scenario that we lost. All I see are people whining about how long it takes.
>>61285791You lost everything. You get nothing. Better go kill yourself!
>>61285826I have to live because I am the punishment for your hubris
>>61285844>Have I not been vindicated?Shares still gone and no fraud payout. No cash and no new equity. Bankruptcy still ongoing for years. IP sold off and new bed bath and beyond CEO denies any involvement with the old shell and RC. But the CUSIP makes all of this irrelevant and vindicates you? Okay buddy. Okay.You can be vindicated when we get SOMETHING for the BBBYQ we all lost. Anything. Until then, you are NOT vindicated and we have NOT won. End of story. Any excuses you come up with from here on will be disregarded. Have a nice day. Actually, don't. Just have a day.
>>61285809>If it actually meant something don't you think it would've happened already?>>61266253>(5)(B) transfer of all or any property of the estate to one or more entities, whether organized before or after the confirmation of such a plan>What the fuck is it even waiting for?>>61264994>IRC Section 382 requires a 3 year testing period when there is more than a 50% change in ownership among shareholders who own more than 5%. Essentially the acquirer must wait 3 years after such a change in control before merging otherwise there will be perpetual annual limits to NOL use.>>61266830>We are subject to Section 203 of the DGCL, which prohibits persons deemed to be “interested stockholders” from engaging in a “business combination” with a publicly held Delaware corporation for three years following the date these persons become interested stockholders unless the business combination is, or the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder was, approved in a prescribed manner or another prescribed exception applies.
>>61272806BAGGIES
>>61285872i'm a baggie i'm a baggie get out of here don't remind me i already know i'm a baggie get a life you freak i already know i'm a baggie
>>61285866Meant to tag cryfag >>61285791
>>61285860>whar r muh shurzzzzThis is such a strange talking point the shills use here and on reddit. A transaction took place and it's not ready to be revealed what is taking its place. The last thing you want are your shares because then you really would have lost. They'd be sitting there at .0001 cents each. Not having shares in our account is a GOOD thing. What do you think a Butterfly even is you dumb retard?
>>61285884You can end the pain. All of this can be over. Don't torment yourself any longer...
I can't wait for you guys to move the goalposts again next year when nothing continues to happen
>>61285809>even that possibility just skips right over the fact that GME and BBBY issued warrants deliverable on the same dayYes, that is very weird, I agree. The problem with your argument is that the premise simply relies on the presence of coincidences. Apart from pointing at oddities, there is literally no proof that anything has happened or will happen. Yes, I think we will win in the end, but the people on here and X who just mindlessly peddle positive sentiment do more to harm the community than any shill could hope to. Even entertaining the oddity of the warrant dates, no one can actually demonstrate how that is relevant to us getting paid, they just say "whoa bro that's so weird towelkings won!"The people who are still in the fucking BBBY general like 3 years later are here because they agree that there is something here for us. However, those same people are aware enough of the play to not just buy into blind hype and aimless optimism. Were the CUSIP debacle among one of the first coincidences, you would see more support. But there have been so many of these glitches in this saga that they have been diluted and lost all meaning, and we have reached a point where nothing short of material proof will be deemed satisfactory, and I don't see how you can disagree with that sentiment unless you're trying to be intentionally obtuse.Frankly, the news about Cohen's $400M offer was the last bit of actual hard evidence we got that was in our favor. Everything after that has been equally meaningless speculation.
>>61286028Thank you for perfectly summing up why I dislike the hype peddlers and the constant grasping at straws from the hype community.
>>61286028>no one can actually demonstrate how that is relevant to us getting paid>>61266253>(5)(J) issuance of securities of the debtor, or of any entity referred to in subparagraph (B) or (C) of this paragraph, for cash, for property, for existing securities, or in exchange for claims or interests, or for any other appropriate purpose;>in exchange for claims or interests>in exchange for claims or interests>in exchange for claims or interests>What about muh shares?Who cares? Cancelled shares are interests and interests are preserved under the current CH11 plan. >But the current plan doesn't say anything about a merger! Who cares? The merger is legally allowed to proceed prior to the confirmation of a new plan per >>61266253 >(5)(B) transfer of all or any property of the estate to one or more entities, whether organized before or after the confirmation of such a planCUSIP-6 is the canary in the coal mine. It is incontrovertible evidence that such a merger is underway. There is no other plausible explanation. >>61264994 >IRC Section 382 requires a 3 year testing period when there is more than a 50% change in ownership among shareholders who own more than 5%. Essentially the acquirer must wait 3 years after such a change in control before merging otherwise there will be perpetual annual limits to NOL use.When a tax-free merger [IRC 368(a)(1)(A)] occurs, the target company’s NOLs carry over to the acquiring company; however, for a merger to be considered tax-free, at least 80% of the total consideration must be paid in the form of voting stock of the acquiring company, especially in a reverse triangle merger [IRC 368 (a)(2)(E)].In other words, the BBBYQ CUSIP-6 was used for BBBY warrants because BBBYQ is merging with BBBY and though BBBYQ shares were cancelled BBBYQ interests were not so former shareholders of BBBYQ will receive shares of BBBY for 80-100% of total compensation and cash/warrants for 0-20% of total compensation. Anything else?
>>61286203If nothing happens next summer, God will smite you
>>61285739>usual confusionyep, just another wacky thing about this totally normal bankruptcy.
>>61286208The bad comedy joke is on you. I need divine intervention to make it to next summer.
>>61286203I can only guess you're copy-pasting stuff in response because you didn't actually address the crux of my issue, which is that the premise of your argument is the same as all the other ones that have failed before.>It's evidence>COHENcidence>le routine bankruptcyI get it. We get it. Everyone gets it. There are a lot of weird things going on, however, literally every weird thing that has happened before has resulted in no material gain for us, so don't pretend like you can't wrap your head around the well-deserved skepticism some of us have for the rote musings of Redditrannies and Xtards. The most intolerable aspect of your personalities is that you claim, every single time, that THIS is the smoking gun. If you just kept a level head like a normal person and laid out the facts and the bullish implications of it while being realistic, no one would be upset. It's not a matter of your facts, it's your delivery, which kind of shows that you might be literally autistic since you think this is how you pitch information to people.>>61286249Just to be clear, I agree that it's very weird. It is incredibly suspicious that the "glitch" hasn't been corrected and it shows up everywhere. Also the "routine bankruptcy" meme went out with window (haha) along with Arnal. I just hate the way these hype peddlers carry themselves. I could almost believe it's all the same people (ftwbiz, PP, et al.) on X posting here just to generate content back on X.
>>61286028>The problem with your argument is that the premise simply relies on the presence of coincidencesA series of coincidences in the context that M&As are handled in secrecy to prevent front-running a trade not ready to be divulged to the public. You act like I am trying to interpret tea leaves to validate my assertion that we won when the company I own shares in has their CUSIP being used to issue warrants. I'd say the burden is on you to go ahead and make a solid case as to why that is a nothing burger. And no, you are not allowed to just pretend like it was a mistake. Give me a good reason why BBBYQ's CUSIP would show up on BBBY's warrants? Tell me how that is nothing given the context of M&A secrecy and the context that the CEO of GME is involved in the CH11 case despite having sold all of his shares and walked away back in 2023. That same GME is also issuing warrants on the same day as the BBBY CUSIP. You have nothing other than pointing towards the well-known and expected secrecy of M&A and pretending like nothing is happening when it clearly is. I will happily listen to reason if you had anything compelling to say. Is it normal that securities get issued with the wrong CUSIP and are never fixed? Is that your argument? No one fixed the issue after a month? You're a clown. Get out of my sight.
>>61286278the real joke is ryan cohen's wild ride, especially since he is content to taunt his shareholders on social media
>>61286407pp is genuinely a lunatic that pushes hype and tinfoil on twitter every single day just to farm engagement. wouldn't surprise me at all if he is the turbo retard trying to push baseless hype here too.
>>61286546He actually is a shameless grifter with the way he tweets.
>>61286528Again, with the ignoring of the point of my post. I agree that it is very weird. I literally pointed out in my posts that it is suspicious the "glitch" has not been fixed, the implication being that it is not a glitch. That said, it's the self-assured smugness that everyone finds so nauseating. I have been bought into BBBY for over 3 years now, and I am not going to buy into the umpteenth round of hype pedaling that has plagued this community since the emergence of all these Reddit-brained grifters.>the burden is on you to go ahead and make a solid case as to why that is a nothing burgerLike I said, I think it is significant. But this reverse logic where you expect someone to disprove a claim revolving around a situation that is heavily redacted, by your own admission, is what everyone hates. I can make any base claim against the CUSIP debacle and they would all be equally as impactful as your claims because we are both working with the same limited scope of information. I could very easily say, "why would the current BBBY host warrants issued by DK-Butterfly now as opposed to waiting for the bankruptcy to conclude, the settlements to be disclosed, the debt waterfall to hit class 9, etc.?" but you don't even read these posts so that point is going to unaddressed, I'm sure.>You're a clown. Get out of my sight.Yeah, the smug Sonichu posting works in the GME thread because maxipads are retards who put their head in the sand to avoid the reality that they got tricked by PlatmanSparkles, but I'm a BBBYQ extremist, so I see through it.
>>61286570I am genuinely not even sure what the point of your posts are. You're trying to be a nihilist on the CUSIP as if any random assortment of numbers could spawn on any security at any time. Any and all possibilities are all completely valid until proven otherwise, huh? I'm sorry, but BBBYQ's CUSIP showing up is not just some random happenstance that can be hand waived away. M&As are done in secret so we won't know the final outcome until it is already completed. That doesn't mean we can't infer what is happening right before our very eyes.
>>61286606Are you unironically ESL? I have said several times that I think the CUSIP situation is significant and it not a simple glitch. I am saying what I take issue with your blind insistence that it HAS to be a smoking gun. Here's a simple thought exercise:>M&As are done in secret so we won't know the final outcome until it is already completed.If it's so secret, why would they leave the CUSIP blatantly visible to everyone for months before the M&A is finalized? This is a very basic question anyone would be justified in asking, but you're just going to dance around it and say "it's not a coincidence, bro" while imploring the same blind optimism that we've seen for the past 3 years.
>>61286606>That doesn't mean we can't infer what is happening right before our very eyes.Okay, I'm inferring that it means nothing due to the fact that new BBBY's CEO has openly denied any involvement MULTIPLE times. If you can get Lemonis to say otherwise, I'll concede. But if Lemonis was truly involved, he would just shut up and say nothing at all. Lemonis being very vocal on twitter is a point you hype pushers so conveniently try to sidestep.
>>61286620If BBBYQ was dead there would be no CUSIP Conundrum. There would be no warrants, and if there were they would be BYON's. Ok, so you don't like that I say it is 100% proof. So what do you think it is? 95%? 90%? You can split hairs if you want, but I don't really see the point. >>61286624Lemonis won't tell you what is going even if you ask him a pointed question. That analogy falls apart against warrants listed on the same day with the wrong CUSIP. It falls comically short, honestly. These are two very, very silly shillies. This is what the shilling is reduced to. Rationalizing petty hypotheticals and just-so stories in the face of registered securities using BBBYQ's CUSIP. It doesn't just fall short, it's frivolous in the face of what we already can prove.
>>61286685The only "100% proof" is us receiving compensation for our previous stake in BBBYQ, so characterize your claims however you want, but just know it's wrong to call it "100% proof." If the release document for the warrants mentioned DK-Butterfly, then you would have a more compelling case of "100% proof." We all know DK-Butterlfy isn't "dead" because it is an active entity in bankruptcy proceedings. I'm not even attacking your points because there is no way to discredit them when you sensationalize them like you do; I'm attacking you, yes YOU, because your demeanor is insufferable and is the reason for all the division in the community on other platforms and here.>That analogy falls apart against warrants listed on the same day with the wrong CUSIP.Again, the entire point of your argument is "it's weird." No one fucking cares if we have seen the millionth weird occurrence with BBBYQ. When we actually see results for our shares, then you can bask in being such a smart little boy, but until then, you're a literal PP clone, and I would rather be an Indian than that.
>>61286685Your response?
>>61286685How is RC going to do M&A with new BBBY when the CEO openly denies any involvement? Is he just lying then?
>>61286706>I'm attacking you, yes YOU, because your demeanor is insufferableLet me get my itty bitty teeny weeny little violence out for you. >>61286716Lemonis' words mean zero when he's issuing warrants with BBBYQs CUSIP. One is just more substantive than the other. You put them both on the scale and the CUSIP Conundrum is more substantive by far.
>>61286720Maybe it's his boardroom that decided and not him specifically. Maybe he's under an NDA and he's literally not allowed to talk about it so he deflects. From a gametheory perspective it doesn't matter in the slightest. CUSIP completely trumps whatever petty, fleeting words come from Marcus Lemonis.
>>61286749So your answer to the very valid question the anon posted is simply "Lemonis wrong and chose to lie on a public forum because...le troll?"How compelling.
>>61286842Are you insinuating that if someone asks you a pointed question that puts you in jeopardy of breaching an NDA you are still compelled to answer truthfully?He can say whatever he wants, does it mesh with him issuing warrants with BBBYQs CUSIP?
>>61286855Nobody is forcing Lemonis to answer question on twitter, nor is he obligated to answer them you clown. If answering a question even remotely puts you at risk of breaching an NDA, there is no chance in hell you would take that risk. Only a massive idiot would do that.>He can say whatever he wantsWhich means he is not bound by an NDA. Pretty clear cut to me.So again I say, if you can get Lemonis to say otherwise, I will concede. It's his word against yours.
>>61286880Does Lemonis have to be truthful? NoDoes he have to use the correct CUSIP when issuing securities? Yes.
NDA
>>61286855It's a Twitter post from a literal random person. If you were in jeopardy of breaching an NDA you just wouldn't engage the question at all, kind of like how CEOs do with 99.9% of posts on Twitter.>>61286888Yes, you do have to be truthful. You can't just lie for the sake of not breaching an NDA, especially when answering the question is completely unnecessary. How about this, since we're just inventing scenarios in our head: Lemonis is telling the truth when he publicly addressed a question of his own volition, and the CUSIP thing is actually just a glitch. How about you just call one of the many brokers who list the CUSIP incorrectly and ask them why that is. Surely they will agree with you since it's so cut and dry. Christ, you really might be PP, after all.
>>61287067I'm sorry, I'm just not comprehending the point of your posts aside from the needless hairsplitting. You're asking me to suspend reality and bend over backwards just to entertain some trivial point that is completely irrelevant to the facts of the matter. Normally I attempt to at least comprehend the other sides' position but I don't know wtf you are talking about.
>>61286407>>61286570>>61286620>>61286706I address the crux of your issue here:https://www.youtube.com/shorts/skz9odeewpc
Ryan Cohen posted a particular gate yesterday that got bots riled up. The exact gate he posted was lost for two years but returned again just as it was. Fist match I found for his picture was a Time article about the gate being found. My BBBYQ shares have been missing for two years but the CUSIP was found. Seems like it might be time to run because the gate is back and open. https://time.com/4589060/nazi-dachau-camp-sign-found/
>>61286624>BBBY's CEO has openly denied any involvement MULTIPLE timesHe denies very specific and false claims which are not the same as the claims I have made, which he has not denied. >>61286716Wrong on all fronts>Decided to reuse a failed stock symbolWrong. It's a merger. >BBBY warrants can't actually be delivered until the BBBYQ Chapter 11 case is fully resolvedWrong. CH11 status is irrelevant. Merger can proceed before confirmation of new plan per bankruptcy law (11 US Code 1123). >>61266253>Class 6 and Class 9 need to be paid or settled firstWrong. Claims (Class 6) and Interests (Class 9) will be compensated when the merger is complete.
>>61286720RC was the decoy. The 90 year old man is singing his black swan song.
>>61287159His point is perfectly clear, you are just too stupid to get it. So good on you for admitting that you are too stupid, at least you are capable of understanding something. Perhaps read on what NDAs actually are.>>61287243Gamestop is not merging with bed bath and beyond (neither the new one nor the old one).
>>61287270That's nice. Take it to the GME thread.
>>61287270>Gamestop is not merging with bed bath and beyond (neither the new one nor the old one).
>>61287243>MergerRyan Cohen is going to merge his failing brick and mortar game store with an already failed blanket store why?
>>61287239Hi, kitty.--t. OG black catto drinking milk.
>>61287239Thanksgiving.
>>61285790>let them off of the hook of a short squeeze.That’s now how that works. New equity will absolutely blow up their portfolios.
It’s today
>>61288700I think this is going to be a spicy week.The "system" is very much one of wealth extraction that utilizes interest and debt to lubricate everything to keep it all moving. It scrapes out interest and taxes and offers the tax-cattle overvalued "benefits" while siphoning out huge amounts of capital paid up front (insurance, social security and investment premiums). The problem they have is that disruptions that might lead to non-payment often have to have moratoriums to prevent overt bankruptcy such as is the case of student loans or foreclosures as we saw during Covid. It's bizarre that our government, that we supposedly have to pay taxes for, is somehow.... paying us? This is like buying a car and then one random month the car dealership calls up and says "Hey, you're such a good customer, we're gonna pay you this month!"I'm all for free money, but it is instances like this where you can the true nature of the system in its entirety.It's simiar to the Bush tax cuts. At some point we decided we don't have to pay for things, but we can just "loan" the government money at interest. That's a novel idea. How about I don't pay my grocery bill, but instead I LOAN the money to them. They can just pay me back whenever they are done with it. I think it's all gone. All of the money in the country has been stolen and the system is running on fumes. It's nothing but a big pile of debt that can never be repaid and its so bad the government has to give you money just to kick the can a bit longer. Got your GME? Got your physical precious metals? I hope so.
Issuing or listing something under the same CUSIP doesn’t signify continuity of value or ownership from the old BBBYQ stock.It’s most likely a temporary administrative overlap, not a new issuance or revival of the old equity.
>>61272806If it was aster or houdini u used u won't have any debt to begin with, that's why they wanna reset the debt via crypto
>>61289662Reset who's debt with crypto? Dkbutterfly?
>>61289652Wrong. CUSIP Global Services assigns all CUSIPs and they do not reuse CUSIP-6 even in the case of a name or ticker change.
>>61289652I think that BYON opening new Bed Bath and Beyond stores, along with using the old ticker probably signifies that the shareholder interests are still ongoing. The final, and unrevealed piece of the puzzle will be the actual "Buttefly". Rejoining the operations along with the legal shell will finalize the transformation. The shares are alive and well. Do we have other clues that this is the case? Why yes. The simple fact that JPMorgan's class 6 claims were paid off prior to the bankruptcy is likely proof that recovery is not only possible, but 100% assured. If there was not enough money for all of the class 6 claims then this would not have been legal. But we do not hear a peep from other class 6 claimants. Why is there ambiguity as to what is happening? The resolution of CH11 BBBY bankruptcy will result in the revelation of an M&A transaction. The target is most likely BBBY who is coincidentally issuing warrants on the same day as RC's GME along with using the completely wrong CUSIP. It will not be BYON who is buying BBBY. It will be BBBYQ who will buy BYON.This is not only a hypothesis at this point. It is 100% factual truth. It will happen in two more weeks and this IS financial advice.>How do I know all of this? Are you an insider? It was revealed to me in a dream.
>>61289806It means its not a new issuance, just the old stuff winding down, it's not bullish at all, quite the opposite
>>61289858>Warrants issued by BYON using BBBYQ's CUSIP is not bullishNow that's what I call a silly shilly!
Why are you idiots still talking about this? The stock was canceled, you are never recovering anything for your failed investment. This has become as stupid as flat Earth at this point, or the Q anon crap. if you think that any recovery is possible you need serious therapy and medication. If one of my family members was involved in this I would have them committed to a mental institution.
Bbby
>>61289939BBBY warrants will expire worthless. GME warrants will expire worthless. You are all cucked by Marcus and Ryan.
>>61289858Wrong. CUSIP 075896100 did not exist prior to October 2nd 2025 and it was assigned to the warrants issued by BBBY (OSTK). As it uses the CUSIP-6 for BBBYQ (DK-Butterfly) and CUSIP Global Services does not reuse unique CUSIP-6 identifiers even if a name or ticker changes, it is conclusive evidence that BBBY (OSTK) and BBBYQ (DK-Butterfly) are in the process of a merging. If you believe this to be false then I suggest you contact CUSIP Global Services and ask them to correct their error. They would surely thank you as their entire purpose is to administer an orderly and accurate CUSIP system to facilitate settlement. Why, they might even reward you for saving them from a lawsuit!>>61289931Hello Douglas. Didn't the attorneys tell you to shut the fuck up already? You aren't anonymous.>>61290044>expireOH NO NO NO NO>Section 4.06 Amendments.>(a) The Company and the Warrant Agent, without the consent of the Holders, may from time to time and at any time amend this Agreement and/or the Warrant Certificate for one or more of the following purposes:>(iii) to extend the Expiration Date;
>>61290044wrong ;^)
>>61290044Who are you trying to convince? Yourself?
>>61290517PP should be in prison because he's a dysgenic retard, but I disagree with the rest of your post
>>61290517The BBBYQ CUSIP has been reused when BBBY (BYON) issued warrants. The ex date on the warrants was the same as GME who also coincidentally issues warrants. This is basically 100% Grade-A certified PROOF that shareholders survived and will wagmi.
Who's ready for MERGER MONDAY
>>61290504Not trying to convince anyone, just stating facts. BBBYQ shares are canceled and worthless, and no one who held them is ever getting anything for them.
>>61290599This CUISP crap is meaningless, BBBYQ shares are canceled, if you held them into cancelation, you are NEVER getting anything back. There is no legal path to recovery, bankruptcy law is very clear on this. Your interests in the company were terminated when the stock was canceled, anything that happened or will happen after that no longer involves you.
>>61290634There is northing to merge with.
>>61290779You must apologize when you are wrong
>>61290757Lol the CUSIP is proof the company is still continuing operations and the NOL's have been preserved. The only question now is when and how will the company reemerge and to what extent will shareholders be made whole. Remember, for NOL's to be carried over existing shareholders must maintain at least 50% of the new entity and "your shares are cancelled" shills get to find out they are stuck with a short position in a new company because you couldn't close out short positions with cancelled shares and shorts were never closed or voided. Former shareholders must receive equity and compensation in the new entity. Will be fun if the new entity lists on the tZERO exchange, doesn't BBBY own a significant part of tZERO?https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-38187597
>>61290779What do you think a Butterfly is? They split up the operations and the legal corporation so they can wrap up the bankruptcy without needing to put the whole operation on hold for two+ years. It's all going to merge back together once they are complete. This isn't wishful thinking. It is 100% proven fact that this has ALREADY happened.
>>61290893>Remember, for NOL's to be carried over existing shareholders must maintain at least 50% of the new entityThe shares were canceled, shareholders maintained 0% of anything, so that means NOLs are gone. You can twist this into as many schizo knots as you want, you still are never getting shit.
>>61290920>It's all going to merge back together once they are complete.No. No one is committing bankruptcy fraud so you can get your 8 cents back.
>>61290953Could you explain how exactly any of what’s been described would be bankruptcy fraud?
>>61290953BBBYQ is being restructured as we speak and the CUSIP for the warrants being issued belong to BBBYQ. We won. Sorry, you're just gonna have to get over it.
>>61290969No.
>>61290757>Item3.03. Material Modification to Rights of Security Holders.>The Confirmed Plan provides that on the Effective Date, except as otherwise specifically provided for in the Confirmed Plan, any remaining obligations of the Company Parties under any notes, bonds, indentures, certificates, securities, shares, purchase rights, options, warrants, collateral agreements, subordination agreements, intercreditor agreements, or other instruments or documents directly or indirectly evidencing, creating, or relating to any indebtedness or obligations of, or ownership interest in, the Company Parties, giving rise to any Claims against or Interests in the Company Parties or to any rights or obligations relating to any Claims against or Interests in the Company Parties shall be deemed cancelled solely as to the Company Parties and their affiliates and the Company Parties will not have any continuing obligations thereunder. The Confirmed Plan further provides that the obligations of the Company Parties and their affiliates pursuant, relating, or pertaining to any agreements, indentures, certificates of designation, bylaws, or certificate or articles of incorporation or similar documents governing the notes, bonds, indentures, certificates, Securities, shares, purchase rights, options, warrants, collateral agreements, subordination agreements, intercreditor agreements, or other instruments or documents evidencing or creating any indebtedness or obligation of or ownership interest in the Company Parties shall be released, settled, and compromised"Interests" were not cancelled. Obligations to those "Interests" i.e. shares were cancelled. In the same way that "Claims" were not cancelled. Obligations to those "Claims" were cancelled as those "Claims" are processed through CH11 under the Absolute Priority Rule.
>>61290977>CUSIP for the warrants being issued belong to BBBYQNope, the warrants are a different CUISP and belong to the new company, and have nothing to do with the canceled shares. Marcus has already told you this. If Marcus lied about the warrants, then that is securities fraud. Maybe you should report this to the SEC.
>>61291028This is also the original and confirmed plan. Per 11 US Code 1123 a merger can proceed prior to the confirmation of a new plan which would see "Interests" compensated in order to maintain the tax-free structure under IRC 368(a)(1)(A).
>>61291028>Interests" were not cancelledYour "interests" are worthless and will remain worthless.
>>61291042There is nothing to merge with.
>>61291046>>61291052Then how would you explain this?
>>61291046>Lower case "interest" A specific instrument (shares, options, warrants, etc) >Upper case "Interests" Owners of those instruments>>61291030This isn't even pilpul it's just lying. Why are you so desperate that you would resort to lying?
No response? I accept your concession.
>>61291030Can you explain why the CUSIP of the warrants says they are being issued by DK-Butterfly, meanwhile the CUSIP for the shares of BBBY are being issued by the current company?
>>61291030The CUSIP-6 Identifier is for the legacy, bankrupt company (DK-BUTTERFLY). This is a non-reusable code that is only ever associated with one company. The CUSIP-6 reuse is undeniable proof that legacy shareholders are getting something.
>>61291110The only lie is that there is a possibility of any recovery.
>>61291126Because they took the name of the old company. DK-butterfly has no warrants or shares. It is not possible for them to issue any.
>>61291185>>61291195We're Winner!!!!
>>61290922Cry me a river short interest baggie. Hope you get out quick, seems like the gate was found 12/3. Not much time left. Best hope tZERO isn't involved in the new equity. You cry we have lost everything but do not recognize you were locked into your short position and are trapped until the bankruptcy concludes. You are short the new equity and it may be on the blockchain. Good luck.https://www.independent.co.uk/news/nazi-dachau-concentration-camp-gate-found-1-100-miles-away-rural-norway-bergen-arbeit-mach-frei-a7523571.htmlhttps://pocketsense.com/can-issuer-refuse-remove-legend-restricted-stock-12113507.htmlCompanies can cancel shares and not issue any more, which frequently happens in bankruptcy cases. Companies can also cancel existing shares of common stock and reissue new shares. In cases where common stock is reissued, the old shares have no value and no longer represent ownership, while the new shares do.
HEY BED BATH ANONS, I COME TO YOU FROM THE FUTURE! SOON WILL THE TENDIE MAN COME! THIS COMING CHRISTMAS A SUPRISE AWAITS YOU! 9/29/2023 ---> 12/25/2025 818 DAYS DO YOU SEE THE BUTTERFLY? 818117 WEEKS LATER FRIDAY 12/26/2025 YOU WILL WAKE TO A SUPRISE IN YOUR BROKERAGE ACCOUNT!WHAT WILL IT BE? EQUITY ON BLOCK CHAIN IN A PRIVATE COMPANY. THAT'S NOT ALL, GME INVESTORS, CHRISTMAS EVE YOU WILL BE NOTIFIED OF A TRANSACTION TO VOTE ON A PROPOSED MERGER WITH THE EMERGING ENTITY, CREATING A HOLD CO. WHICH WILL BE KNOWN AS BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY 2.0! YOU WILL HAVE 20 CALENDER DAYS TO VOTE, ON JAN 13TH THIS VOTE WILL PASS AND THE 2021 SQUEEZE WILL BEGIN A REQUEL, ONLY THIS TIME MUCH BIGGER!!! HOW DO I KNOW THIS STUFF??? I FOUND OUT 4 DAYS AGO THROUGH MY BOSSES EMAIL CHAIN AT GOLDMAN SACHS, THE DISCUSSION WAS HOW TO MANAGE THEIR POSITIONS FOR THE UPCOMING MARKET EVERYTHING RUN! THIS IS NOT FAKETHIS IS PURE TRUST ME BRO, I GET ITTAKE WHAT YOU WANT FROM THIS, BUT THIS IS HAPPENING AND ITS BEEN PLANNED SINCE PRE COVID! GOOD LUCK ANONS DONT SELL YOURSELVES SHORT! WWG1WGA 45-47 WESTERN CANAL RD, THE TIME IS NOW TO TAKE BACK AMERICA!
>>61291408That's so specific, so it's fake.
>>61291779You just run them over. That's what you do.
>>61291143What's the code and where are these warrants? This is more fake hype to demoralize.
>>61291969This is incredibly easy to verify for yourself if you just look up the CUSIP of the securities and do some cross referencing. That said, the CUSIP for the warrants is 075896159. The first 6 digits of this CUSIP imply DK-Butterfly is the issuer of them, not the current BBBY owned by Lemonis. To show what I mean, the attached image shows the CUSIP for securities issued by DK-Butterfly, all of which share the same first 6 digits. At the bottom you can see BBBYW, the warrants.The CUSIP for BBBY stock, as issued by Lemonis, is 690370101. You would expect the CUSIP for the stock and warrants to share the first 6 digits, as is the case with GME, because they are issued by the same company. This CUSIP discrepancy shows up everywhere and has not been corrected, so the likelihood of it being a glitch is increasingly low.https://www.empirasign.com/all-issues/20230930-DK-BUTTERFLY-1/
>>61291969I accept your concession.
>>61292030>>61292033No dates No referencesFake hype shills
im gay
>>61291408Actually I remember that "Western Canal Road" was related to Dream on Me. The address is: 545 Weston Canal Road, Somerset, NJ 08873But he spelled it wrong, for some reason.
>>61292276Did you try visiting the link at the bottom of my post? It is one of countless sources that back this up. Here, I'll post it again in case you missed it. :)https://www.empirasign.com/all-issues/20230930-DK-BUTTERFLY-1/
>>61292478>countless>so let me link the same one with nothing but old bond warrants from years agoNice try faggot. Link something showing new warrants being issues or fuck off.
>>61292575It sure would be awkward if you went onto Fidelity's site and saw that they report the same CUSIP debacle.
>>61291319>old shares have no valuenot if you want those juicy NOLs, which have been paintsakingly preserved over a three year waiting period, but I'm sure that's just a cohencidence.
>>61287239>>61290893>>61291319twitter clout chasers already stole your dd and claimed it as their own
>>61287239Cohen Is a jew.All jews break the ball for Auschwitz
>>61287239It’s amazing to me that this kind of schizophrenia is not allowed in the gme thread even just purely as entertainment if not also hopium. It’s what tells me the people pushing against it so vehemently don’t actually hold gme and are only interested in controlling narratives.
>>61295323
>>61287239That's a pretty interesting take on it.>>61295323Yea that gme thread sometimes feels like they tried to send superstonk mods to here to moderate /biz/
>>61294471It's the same people.
Somewhere between 2 weeks and 6-8 months
6-8 years:0 refund
we won
>>61303076
>>61292030You forgot the other one that has 10 cusips:https://www.empirasign.com/all-issues/20230930-DK-BUTTERFLY-1,%20INC./>picrel for the shills
>>61303507The warrants were not issued by DK-BUTTERFLY.
>>61303960Yet the CUSIP-6 says they were. That only happens during mergers.
>>61304159These bonds were issued before they went into chapter 11.More fake hype shills.
>>61304198That has nothing to do with the CUSIP-6 for the warrants.
>>61298092I don't feel like the same people.Tweet was deleted but the real gate is in a safer place now.https://www.cbsnews.com/news/nazi-concentration-camp-gate-returned-dachau-germany/
>>61304159Bed bath and Beyond Inc. Issued the warrants, not DK-BUTTERFLY. If DK-BUTTERFLY issued the warrants, then CUSIP-6 would be different. The warrants would also not be issued because a liquidating trust with no shares can't issue warrants.
>>61304471You just argued yourself into a trap silly shilly. The new BBBY issued warrants under the DK-BUTTERFLY CUSIP. It happened, get over it. DK-BUTTERFLY must be directly connected to BBBY which is continuing significant operations of BBBYQ. The continuing operation preserves the NOL for a merger and the shareholders must maintain at least 50% of the new entity. You can cry and scream all you want but to still be here after two years means you are short and screwed when the bankruptcy completes. For your sake I hope they don't launch the new entity on tZERO which BBBY owns a significant portion of because your short position will be my retirement. Probably retire even if it doesn't because the rush to the exit will be epic. But you know this already which is why you are here. Sorry bro, I won't sell and I won't take the loss. Exit is closed.
>>61304471It sounds like you should ring up CUSIP Global Services and let them know that they failed at doing their only job in keeping the CUSIP system working properly. Boy they really screwed the pony didn't they? It's been over a month and it still hasn't been corrected.
>>61304297It has everything to do with it you fake hype shill. The CUSIP-6 is the same because it's the same company, they issued those bonds years ago when they were still BBBY.Prove me wrong hype shill. Lets see a bond issued under their CUSIP-6 number since they entered chapter 11.
>>61304660
>nothing is happeningbut duh cuuuusipppps right guise
>>61306136you're funny, you should keep posting "it's today" every single day
>>61306136It's never.
>>61306118the CUSIP is a massive deal, the most famous company to battle naked short sellers, even released a crypto dividend 5 years ago to try and shake illegal shorts. And now they step in the buy the IP for peanuts compared to what Cohen offered for BBBY. And now BBBY(OverStock) is issuing warrants with dates that match GME's and a CUSIP-6 that is the same as the CUSIP-6 for BBBYQ? Yea thats a major fucking deal that proves theres rumblings resembling m&a activity taking place behind the scenes.
I actually do think we're getting very very close to the endgame here. It is 2025 and there are BBBY stores open and operating right here and now. And that same company that bought BBBYQ assets is now using the BBBYQ CUSIP on warrants. I don't think it is coincidental any longer. The shills as usual are the ones who give the game away. For years the shills would scream and howl if you made any mention of BYON in relation to BBBYQ. They were always so colorful in how they would express "frustration" at even the slightest mention of there being a link. I think we can all see why that is. Our company is alive and well and it is merely a legality to recombine the shell and the operations. What other unknown pieces of the puzzle exist, who cares. We know what a butterfly is and that's exactly what happened here.
>>61304660>BondsWe're talking about warrants.
>>61306275>>61306312You are NEVER getting anything for canceled BBBYQ shares. NEVER.
>>61306312>I actually do think we're getting very very close to the endgame hereI've seen you guys post this for like 3 years now
>>61306393Not your problem, right?
>>61306393Who are you trying to convince? >>61306425Are you saying we are further from the endgame now than we were 2 years ago?
>>61306430My comfy makes them uncomfy which makes me even more comfy.
>>61306430>>61306479>>61306470NEVER.
>>61306502I'm quite willing to be persuaded by evidence but you have posted none. BBBY (OSTK) issued warrants using the unique CUSIP-6 identifier for DK-Butterfly. CUSIP Global Services does not reuse unique CUSIP-6 identifiers. Changing a name and ticker does not change the CUSIP-6. Therefore the two entities are legally tied together through a merger. It's likely a reverse triangle merger so that DK-Butterfly is the surviving entity and BBBY (OSTK) continues operations using the DK-Butterfly shell for the NOL. This explains why BBBY (OSTK) issued warrants using the DK-Butterfly CUSIP-6 and why the BBBY (OSTK) SEC filings reference a share exchange. BBBY (OSTK) warrants are exercisable for DK-Butterfly shares and BBBY (OSTK) shares will be exchanged for DK-Butterfly shares.
Guys in here shouting NEVER is weird, right?
>>61306470depends on your defintion of endgame is.The realization that you wasted your years and what you are going to do about it? we approaching that
>>61306539you got any proof to back up all those words? or is that all simply what you hope will happen?
>>61306827Proof has been posted in this thread, cryfag.
>>61306967That's cool, I'll double check with Marcus Lemonis, hypefaggot.
>>61306539There is nothing you can say or do to get your BBBYQ investment back, it is gone forever.
>hoes mad
>>61307402I would be mad too if I made the worst investment ever.
>>61307580>would
>>61306822That's interesting how my sentiment is the exact polar opposite of yours and I'm the guy whose shares have missing for six million years. I'm not even 99% sure we won, it's already been proven we won. 100%. I'm content to sit and be patient because nothing is about a CH11 bankruptcy is going to be swift. But, whatever. Being happily and gainfully employed and looking forward to GME's earnings blowout is more than enough excitement in the meantime.
>>61306393damn, tell doug that his behavior on twitter over the last several years was way more confirming than any CUSIP-6 ever could be, and a CUSIP-6 being used is incontrovertible proof that previous interests are preserved.
>>61307003marcus lemonis' words dont mean anything, with regards to whether a m&a is underway (he cant legally say anyway). CUSIP-6 shut down paid stock basher narratives overnight and is incontrovertible proof that BBBYQ is not a simple liquidation.
avocado inside my stretched asshole
>>61307708They'll post a screenshot of him denying something specific and retarded and extrapolate from it to claim he's denying something else entirely. It's very gay.
>>61307708>>61307735Thanks for clarifying! It's comforting to know that people on the internet have so much top secret information they are able to draw conclusions from! You guys are a wealth of knowledge! Hedge funds must wish they had as much information as you guys have! Heck, you must even be insiders!
>>61307768>top secretLmao you're so mad that all of this is publicly available and actionable.
>>61307672You aren't getting shit. I don't know Doug, but it looks like he won.
>>61307781So it's not a secret? So that means something can happen now, right?
>>61307947It is happening. Hence the publicly available information. >reee the lawyers aren't lawyering fast enoughComplex systems take time.
>>61307672>>61307708listen up, your money has gone, i have your money, i need it, stop digging your own grave, don't make me send hitmans to your house. i took your money, because i need it, it's over. if i ever see you googleing my name, spreading shit about me, i'll take care extreme measures about you. capish?
>>61307994Post this shit from your X account so these fuckers finally kill themselves.
>>61308026nah, i don't want any legal trouble about their corpses. i'll throw an extra $1k from his money to hitmans, if they kill him by sticking cusip-6 papers into his ass.
>>61308051Why yiou are Angry?You are winning no?
>>61307994Enraged man
Why are all these rando shills showing up on a Wednesday?
>>61308236The illegal short position against BBBYQ means that when the merger is complete there is too much demand and not enough supply. They need to demoralize BBBYQ enjoyers to be so relieved at receiving *something* after all these years that they immediately capitulate, thus increasing supply at low prices. I for one am a long term investor due to T-Zero and will not be selling.
>>61308236The shorts are even more anxious about the fate of BBBYQ than we are. From a game-theory perspective, if they know nothing about BBBYQ's outcome they are shitting bricks over the CUSIP and fraud allegations. Obvious.If the DO nothing something about the outcome then:BBBYQ recovery - They are shitting bricks. They would want to spread in the event they can convince people to sell early and be "thankful" they got anything. They would also want to deter any front-running in the event that BBBY is a target that is set to benefit from a looming transaction.BBBYQ Recover is negative: They won, and they know it. They wouldn't need to bother posting. We know they are here and they are seething over BBBYQ. So from the events we are seeing - we probably won and the shills possibly also KNOW that we won. Doug Cifu is a lawyer and probably knows a lot and he was shitting bricks two years ago. Once JPM got outflanked and paid off it was all over and they all know it.
>>61307974But I thought this was all supposed to be top secret so they can't front run the trade.
>>61308411As far as bankruptcies are concerned this has been very secretive. M&A transactions that are completed outside of bankruptcy courts are very tight lipped. However, given the public nature of BK filings, despite redactions, we have been able to infer a lot of what is going on behind the scenes.
>>61308481yep, and imagine what doug & Co can infer using their decades of knowledge PLUS very good lawyers. This is why there is such a persistent shill presence after all these years. This is why Doug Cifu followed a twitter account with >pic relatedTHE REAL NAME of the host of theppshow podcast, the same podcast Pulte and Larry Cheng (GameStop boardmember) have both gone on AFTER they declared bankruptcy and AFTER shares were 'cancelled'People should REALLY ponder why a man who runs the second largest market maker in the world, whos worth tens of millions, would be so upset at a bankrupt towel store that he would follow an account making fun of the host of an obscure podcast that used the REAL NAME of said host.He knows hes fucked and has been lashing out starting with begging Gary Gensler to SHUT IT DOWN in the lead up to share 'cancellation' even though as a market maker you'de be set to make millions from retards buying shares of a company that is ostensibly dying forever right?
>>61308672he'd be set to make millions if the stock was ostensibly stopping trading permanently right? Why the fuss?
>>61308672>>61308686I remember it well. You couldn't even nonchalantly opine on BBBY without being attacked. My interest peaked in BBBY when I saw the shares super cheap and the option chain was red-hot. I started talking to my frens about options and was getting slapped in the face by shills for mention a stock that, to me at the time, was beside the point. The police fencing around BBBY was omnipotent. You really did have to be there just to see it for yourself. BBBY has been the juciest something burger I think I've ever stumbled upon. It is the trade dreams are made of so no wonder there was a concerted effort to silo discussion only to GME. BBBY was a literal crime scene and we were all sniffing around the murderer's garbage cans where all of the concealed evidence was hiding.
>>61308236because we get paid Thanksgiving week
BBBYQ holders get paid $15 per share plus 10:1 GME warrants @ $32
>>61308809>>61308924Those are some cool things you just made up.
Why stop there? Every single BBBYQ share will be worth $1,000,000. Yeah that's right, because I said so.
>>61309429Based. The nature of naked shorting means we get to name our price. I, for one, will be making up stupid demands for payment such as requiring Doug Cifu cut down the largest tree in the forest with a Herring.
>>61308367There are no shorts, the stock was canceled.
>>61309524The CUSIP exists, BBBYQ exists. Simple as.
>>61309680>The CUSIP exists, BBBYQ exists.>Simple as.
>>61307633if that was true, you woulnd't need to constantly convince yourself that you 100billion percent for sure are getting something, you are just lying to yourself, idk if it some strange coping mechanism or you legit are loosing grip with reality, but its pathetic to watch, don't talk to me or my son ever again
>>61309722I'm patiently waiting the resolution to a restructuring and I have a lot to be excited for. A suspiciously high number of shills follow stock in particular. They often know more about it than I do which is funny. You can say I am losing grip with reality but you really can't articulate any reason why BBBYQ's CUSIP is being used in newly released warranties. It's the shills grasping at straws trying to gaslight us BBBYQ is a nothing burger.
>>61308924lmao way more than that
