Seems big desuhttps://x.com/chainlink/status/1988794748707201453
Honestly just don't care anymore, if the value never flows to the token. Yes I'm a demoralized bag holder.
ah seems really good, how can i buy shares of this company?
>>61311307>>61311310are you me, get me off this ride
yeah this is another massive validation of the thesis. the biggest banks and clearinghouses in the world come to Chainlink to build them the tools and infrastructure they need to tokenize every single motherfucking asset on their balance sheets. Chainlink is the standard, not just for price data but for cross-chain, compliance, proof of solvency, everything. a slice of chainlink in every pie, and the pie is worth many trillions of dollars. it's huge but the fuddies will come along and post the chart. they get to laugh for a few years, we get to laugh forever
>>61311299it's getting ridiculous at this pointjust insane that we can get stuff like this and the price doesn't move and gainzy shills pyth as it's "faster"the insane asylum meme is too true
>seems bigwell it's notit's smalllike you're DICKahahhahahahah fuck stinkiesthis is now a $14 waiting room
>>61311330the price isn't moving because the banks are still setting up the networks that will transact trillions of dollars a day. chainlink is key infrastructure to those networks, it both connects them and feeds them the data that makes them rich. the price will move enormously when the time comes, there's simply no way it doesn't. have faith my brother
>>61311307>>61311310>>61311313>>61311330I can't understand the black pilling at this current moment in timeI've been thoroughly demoralized for years, but it couldn't be more clear to me that for the first time in ages we have the wind at our backswe need clarity/market structure bill to pass and we're goldenunfortunately due to the government shut down, I'm not too optimistic it gets passed this yearI get the feeling that not a whole lot of work get done in Washington between thanksgiving and Christmasq1 it is 2026
>>61311353>I can't understand the black pilling at this current moment in timetwo words, bitchpriceandchart
>>61311360it doesn't really matter to methe thesis hasn't changed at alland the necessary piece we've been waiting for (regulatory clarity) is finally within sightit genuinely wouldn't surprise me if we get a giant pump soon after it passes
>>61311353I've been a bagholder since 2019, totally missed the launch, and I'm STILL not demoralized in the slightest. Anything under $20 is like buying BTC at $1.The consolidation event is going to be unreasonably violent. I've known this since 2016 when I started working on an oracle network for blockchains. I did the math before CL ever launched, and promised myself that if I ever saw a startup doing what I was doing, but with the backing of the invisible hand, I'd sell out and go all in.That's what I did and it's going to work out. Trust an economist who invested his life into the paradigm shift.
can the number go up, like.... ever? please i hate waging.
Who fucking cares?Open up the staking pool for fuck's sakes
Just a reminder. You are asking all this from CL employees who actually posted this thread and have put you in a sunk cost hell of bagholding. They target people like (you), with your exact psychology. Gullible financial cult members. Good luck. You'll call me the 'fuddie' as you have been programmed to. If you wont, the shills will. Maybe in 4 to 10 years you'll be able to admit to yourself that you got swindled.
>>61311385Ahh yes! The pool! Damn it, open it up! Everybody wants in!!!! The whole world! Damn it! Open up that pool!!!t. very authentic /biz/ poster>omg gaise>the pool....THE POOL>people still care about the holy grail in crapto.... le poooooool>*sucks the pool's dick*>OmG THE POOL!!! THEY WANT IN THE POOL GAISE
>>61311421the pool of poo heh
>>61311407Only cognitive eunuchs and paid advocates are happy the way things are going for LINK holders
>>61311353Do you ever think that this shit is on purpose behind closed doors to make people like us sell?
>>61311377based and checked
>>61311407I don't work for chainlink labsI actually don't have a job at all as I got laid of for daring to ask a question people didn't like during a woke struggle sessionI'm basically a neet at this point but I'm fortunate enough to have enough cash to lay low for a while>>61311454yes, it has crossed my mind several times, especially during the Biden yearshowever, I developed a thesis that it was regulation that was holding everything back and it's been proven true imothe amount of progress this year has actually been insane
>>61311467To explain, the reason I'm demoralized (and I think many others share this reason) is I own enough link that I can't buy a significant amount to accumulate more, even if I did it methodically over many months. I (and I suspect many others) are in no man's land, 6 figure hell, where we can't significantly change our position through buying more, but if we sell and it finally moons we would kill ourselves. I wouldn't even be upset if it went to zero because 6 figures isn't going to make or break me, but holding the winning lottery ticket, seeing all the writing on the wall, and giving up just before the finish line, that would wreck me. So I, and I suspect many others, just move on with my life. I make decent money (low 6 figures a year), I'm not in a terrible situation, I'm actually pretty blessed compared to the average person. But there's just nothing left to be excited over with link. First it was arbitrum, then it was staking (which isn't real staking yet, just a bone to long term holders), then it was the endless partnerships, and now here we are with swift about to go live, the finish line in sight, and nothing has happened. Will it actually be a God candle? Will they just strangle the market until nobody is looking and then let it run? Was it just a really slow, really inefficient rugpull by Sergey (sorry but dogcoins did it better)? Who fucking knows, but there's not a goddamn thing any of us can do about it. But yeah, that's the demoralizing part. Not the fundamentals, but the fact its completely out of any of our hands at this point. I can't buy an amount that significantly adds to my stack, and if I sell I run the risk of being the eth poster. So I, and others, we sit, we wait, we oscillate between supreme comfiness knowing what we hold and utter boredom knowing how long its been and how long it could still be.
>>61311570no shit manit's been exactly the same for me
>>61311574Well you said you can't understand the black pilling so just articulating it. I still would be happy to see people like adem die in a fire, but it is what it is. I rarely complain either, hoping I'm a bottom signal, but even echoing that means we probably have another leg down to go still.
>>61311585emphasis on "at this current moment in time"I will say though, even in the past year we've been at $30if you're struggling, you could have shaved a little off the topno one can say that Sergey hasn't been working his ass off and we all know we expect to profit off the labor of othersif you're in too deep to handle it, that's kind of on youplus, you had no obligation to not play the rest of the marketmost people that were paying attention this year could have at least caught some profit on hype and zcash
>>61311432>cognitive eunuchsKek
>>61311340this is just cope... where is a speculative pump as we enter the bear?XRP is 12x our market cap, if it was even half the cap i'm retired for lifealso was the artemsis larp onto something?https://x.com/activematx/status/1980704733490037198
Interesting. I just wrote a post about the opportunity cost of holding this piece of shit and it's not being posted despite my 60 goy second timer kicking in. Sorry, 2 anons above me. I tried to save you but they wont let me. TLDR just sell
Holy kek This boars is apparently so fucking raped that they apparently installed an AI filter to filter out truthposts that dissuade people from holding ch*nkl*nkGood luck niggers youll need it
>>61311612I'm not in any bad spot at all. But the reality is its been 5 years that link has been downtrending vs the market. That's the reality. I won't get fooled because my position is set, but now I can see how jews strangle markets, because there's going to be a lot of people who will look back at the last 5 years and realize they could have accumulated a thousand, 5k, even 10k link and didn't because they were too demoralized. They won't get me, but they will get anyone who entered the market post 2020. And even if we do win in the end, the fact those jews who strangled the market win bigger is always going to eat at me just a little bit, not to mention if they didn't hold the floodgates back we all could have made it a few years earlier in our youths. It is what it is.
>>61311673On the other hand, you're a disingenuous faggot. Don't buy chainlink, the funds are all embezzled by the founders and its a scam. Look, it let me post. Also why are you censoring chainlink you stupid kike nigger. Go back wherever you came from.
Gj jannies gj chain niggers LMAO youll keep them in your cult forever Dont worry anonsKeep holding for that .1% pipe dreamThe banks right???? Theyll save you right???Haha yeaSome of you would have been millionaires by now if you held literally ANYTHING besides this POS since 2019With much lower risk involvedYeah just gonna point it out again fuck you nigger jannies and nigger labsYou.fucking morons will keep holsing thoughPraying for a 0.01% event, your nigger god candle, while the rest of the nonscam markets outperform and fuck you sidewaysFuckin idiots
>>61311570>>61311677now say that le women bad toofucking pathetic crying bitchyou've already made it gj
LMAO MY POST GOT FILTERED AGAJN AHAHJAHAHAHAHAJKAJANAJAJAKEKLOOOOOLLOLOL GOOD JOB JNNYYou really hate thr words OPPORTUNITY COST HUH??? AHAJAJ
>>61311677CheckedThere was absolutely no benefit of being "early" to LINKEarly LINK holders have not been rewardingAssholes who got in 2-3 years ago have been able to accumulate huge stacks. Those jerkoffs should have been priced out in 2020Imagine being able to buy ETH at $50 two years agoOr buying BTC at $100 in 2017Chainlink has completely fucked it's early holders
It really seems like we've got it in the bag now.
>>61311731
>>61311731stupid question, what is the difference between the clarity act and the market structure bill? which is more important? also which one in this screenshot is part of the "digital infrastructure bill" that artemis mentions
>>61311747all refer to same thing
>>61311747Basically the same thing. The House and Senate have their own versions and they have to reconcile everything into one bill which then gets passed onto the president to sign into law.
>>61311711Checked and true, are you caps anon? He regularly made the same point, if so congrats on fixing your caps key.
>>61311299I am amazed that it isn't >$100 rn
>>61311734Huh… can I get a little more details on this, QRD if you will. Actually just looked it up, fiction but they used his name. My head hurts bros… I have 5 eth and I don’t want it I just feel strongly it’s going to 8k then I want out. Trumps bad and Thiels 9% stake in BMNR is my conviction. Am I missing something? Only reason I’m in crypto is cause the death of the dollar and I want to park my jewbucks in another vehicle but if I ever make enough to buy land and a property without a mortgage I’ll exit and never look back.
>>61311817>only reason I’m in cryptoAnd to add, it’s because I know the jew world agenda and the plan to get everyone on ramped to digital enslavement
>>61311353there is zero indication that value will ever flow to the tokenthere is zero indication that value will ever be processed in the quanitities you're daydreaming aboutkeep dreaming, it's all you'll ever get
>>61311360thats 3 words tard
>>61311432>>61311622>cognitive eunuchWhere have I seen that insult before?
2MoreWeeks
>>61311340>the price isn't moving because the banks are still setting up the networksThe price isn't moving because Bitcoin kills any Link move.>>61311307>value never flows to the tokenWhy don't you just say "if the token doesn't pump/go up"?Who the fuck talks like this, other than jeets and reddits?
>>61311828>value will ever flow to the tokenAgain, who the fuck writes like this?The words you're looking for are "the token will never pump/go up".What does that shit even mean? How does "value flow to" the BTC coin for instance?How did "value flow to" the ETH coin in 2017-2018?How did "value flow to" XRP?
>>61312450* years but that's okay. You can chase some PnD scam, i will buy more in meantime.
>>61312436>You own XRP, the bank-themed meme coin.>You have ZERO exposure to Ripple's announcements, partnerships, product launches, and acquisitions of other companies>despite you paying for themIt's crazy how cripples literally copy paste this exact same wording and simply apply it to Link as if it's even remotely applicable.Link = needed for 100% of Chainlink activitiesXRP = not needed for 99% of Ripple activities
>>61312543chainlinkgod is not gonna like this not at all >*edit* thanks for the gold kind stranger I just came back from twitter and chainlinkgod is seething hard along with runthejuels, fishy, don, 42, they are all seething
>>61312495>bastard bitch benchood Bitcoin whales are suppressing chainlink cryptocurrency don't believe the lies of fudders!!!
>>61312569>>bastard bitch benchood Bitcoin whales are suppressing chainlink cryptocurrencywell yes
>>61312573>shitcoiner newfag discovers that shitcoins drop when Bitcoin sneezesbahahahasha have fun staying poor shitcoiner
>>61312559LOL (((SEETHING))) instafags WELL MEMED ANON DEATH TO BULGARIANS
>>61312578>shitcoins drop when Bitcoin sneezesNo, Bitcoin drops when Chainlink sneezes
>>61312582sure, sure....I guess the suppression will end....in 2 more weeks? right?
>>61312587It'll end when enough people know about it
>>61312601wow you're a genius, I bet your 3k Link will make you a multimillionaire anyday now that you uncovered this nefarious conspiracy
>>61311330>gainzynigger
>>61312603You have nothing to say, but still you keep posting because you got triggered so hard.
>>61312559Its true though. While xrpl just burns xrp, a miniscule amount that is quite literally freely adjustable by ripple, basically all of chainlink features NEED link by the customer to execute. https://docs.chain.link/chainlink-functions/resources/billinghttps://docs.chain.link/vrf/v2/estimating-costshttps://docs.chain.link/data-streams/billinghttps://docs.chain.link/ccip/billinghttps://docs.chain.link/chainlink-automation/overview/automation-economicsIn comparison to the burn mechanism of xrp, this ACTUALLY forces consumers of those features to hold linkIn reality you have nothing to say but liesEveryone knows you're just an illinformed retard or a disingenious liar
>>61312617>xrpl just burns xrpIt doesn't even do that for institutional versions of the XRPL.The Ripple CBDC platform for instance runs on a version of XRPL that doesn't burn fees at all. XRP not needed whatsoever.
>>61312633Lmao that is even worse.For all the ripple holders btw, the chance you're gonna get fucked by a ripple IPO are much higher for you guys :) The reality is that Ripple missed the memo that everyone is using stablecoins and that their bridgecurrency was suddenly useless, so ripple is now pivoting HARD into being a stablecoin provider themselves. The future of ripple is gonna be them profiting off your liquidity that you put into XRP to help RLUSD
>>61312647>The future of ripple is gonna be them profiting off your liquidity that you put into XRPBanking on the speculative value of their holdings of functionally useless XRP coins is literally all Ripple has going on.This is exactly what link fuddies keep accusing Chainlink of, even though it doesn't make any sense at all for Link.XRP is all the worst Link fud, but actually true.Link is all the best XRP hype, but actually true.
>>61311570i've been "bagholding" since november 2017, ive been telling myself this bullrun is gonna be the bullrun i make it, but look where we are, atleast i sold like 20% of my stack and bought a house, this will make me cope and hold the rest of the 80% of my stack until the real value of link is finally rrached, but i swore to myself id sell part of my stack to atleast make a change for me and my family, and i managed to do it, if i have an advice for you, is to atleast pay ofd yoir debt or something, we can afford to sell some link in order to make the coming years holding more "bearable" pun intended.joke aside to me thats how i managed to cope, atleast now i have a nice house and my family is happy, so now i can hold without any stress, it was my dream since 2017, to actually buy a house with my link, and i managed to do it.now link can go to 1000$ or 0$ idgaf, i got what i wanted out of it anyways, only winning ahead
>>61312736this. taking profits is the key to staying sane in crypto and being able to hold your moon bag all the way. I also bought a house last bull run using LINK and it made a huge difference for my stress levels
>>61312736good advice, I'm hoping link can still have a decent run over the next few months so I can do the same.
>>61312617if all this usage does not lead to organic price appreciation, who even gives a fuck?if people don't have to buy it on spot, the "requirement" of the erc is irrelevant
>>61311364>>61311377the *only* possible fud is the staking 1.0 fud. i'm not big-brained enough to understand what, if anything, would break if they never released staking 1.0 and simply kept the network a walled garden. i realize you'd lose decentralization entirely, but would the institutions actually care? without staking 1.0, all the adoption in the world wouldn't matter. that being said, i've been worried about fud before and haven't yet sold a single LINK since the turn of 2018, so i'm sure as hell not doing it now.t. major
>>61313775>simply kept the network a walled gardenYou know you can run nodes and write contracts yourself right? The code is open source.Staking on CLL contracts would only apply to CLL contracts. Those contracts will always be "walled gardens" simply because they're THEIR contracts. Not yours.
>>61313775Decentralization is a meme that no one, including CLL, actually cares about.Sorry, NEETs, no nodes for you.There's a reason why all of CL's nodes are vetted and hand pickedStaking 1.0 isn't coming because the network is working great as it currently runs, why change things up? This current "staking" doesn't even secure anything. It was a bone CLL threw to old time holders, nothing more. CLL can claim there is decent decentralization through the multiple node operators they have securing the network
>>61314120>Decentralization is a meme that no one, including CLL, actually cares about.>Sorry, NEETs, no nodes for you.Looking at the current nodes in use by CLL, many of them are most likely NEET nodes. You just have to apply.Even if CLL allowed unvetted nodes for their feeds, it wouldn't change the fact that THEIR contracts are THEIRS.
>>61313658Consumers quite literally have to buy on spot you dumb mongrel
>>61314412Imagine being so confidently wrong you stupid fuckMost consumers of CL products are paying in their own currency + 10% premium. They never have to touch LINK
>>61314454Yes sure, then read the docs and realize you're still retarded because the non-link tokens get converted via payment abstraction to market buys of linkBut once again, liar or just illiterate retard
>>61314506Sure, if you believe thatNo one, other than CLL, knows what % of tokens are actually being converted to LINK. Sergey even said they are in the process of converting IE it hasn't even been completed yetLike I said, absolutely no need for the LINK token by consumers.Anything else you would like clarification on you braindead, retarded advocate?
>>61311299zzzzzzz
>>61311734a gem
>>61311734i read the book and this is straight up fabricated. put some effort in anons
