>entire scientific community is warning the human race to not develop artificial superintelligence>humans: does it anyways>boomers: DURRRRR WHY LINE GO DOWN?????
>>entire scientific community is warning the human race to not develop artificial superintelligence
>>61316789>>humansjews u mean?
>scientific communitygo back faggot
>>61316789luckily, it's not possible to create AGI using current technology, no matter how many data centers and power plants they build. but one does wonder why boomers are stupid enough to drop everything to develop something they know will destroy life as we know it
>>61316789>just stop developing stuff!!Are you 14?
>>61316827Prove agi is impossible. But first, explain what a neural net is, without using one
>>61316877ah, I see ai evangelists are now at the "prove god is not real" and "explain where the koran is wrong" level of argumentation. not a good look dear
>>61316827You watch too many sci-fi movies. AI would have no reason to hate Humanity.
>>61316877A neural network is a means of function approximationIf you're arguing that human-like consciousness and true intelligence can arise from a function approximator, you are also necessarily implying the human brain is a function approximator. Do you have proof of the latter claim?
>>61316789the concept of the onset of artificial superintelligence created by a single company that requires resources created by only a handful of companies that are traded publicly which both young and old fomo into triggering a financial catastrophe while the single developer of artificial superintelligence is allowed to orchestrate the direction of the human race because the humans are starstruck by the AIs capabilities is fun to think about.
>>61316913I fear AI much less than I fear humans, who are already real and already capable of inflicting devastation on themselves and everyone around them on the flimsiest rationale you can imagine. for example, destroying an already fragile economy by investing in data centers instead of actually useful infrastructure
AI is inevitable. The questions people should be asking and finding solutions for is how we can mitigate any potential disasters
>>61316948Not bailing out chip and AI model companies when the bubble pops, for one
>>61316913>AI would have no reason to hate HumanityHumans are the most empathetic creatures on the planet and we have constructed systematic horrors against animals and other humans, often for mere convenience. Do you really think an emotionless robot would have any trouble sending you to the meat farm if it calculated that the resources spent keeping you around weren't worth it?
>>61316926The burden of proof is on people declaring something is fundamentally impossible you colossal faggot. But yes, I would also make that claim, until consciousness is proven to be derived from the wet stuff in our head, there’s no reason to think it can’t arise in machines. That said, Robert Penrose makes an interesting case for that very thing. But the point is we just don’t know yet.
>>61316894You don’t even understand the discussion, brainlet
>>61316894>ah, I seeGo back
>>61317005Well if we're just spitballing:In the next 50 years some autistic mathematician will bump into something that allows us to more rigorously draw a line between merely turing-complete systems and consciousness-capable systems. It won't be enough to tell us definitively what consciousness itself is, but it will be enough to demonstrate that the gap between turing completeness and consciousness-capability is gigantic. He will be hailed as Gödel 2.0 but not be a powerhouse like Terence Tao. This is the most boring outcome and therefore the most likely one
The same scientific community that circumcised me right? Love those guys.
>>61317019>>61317014cultists
>>61317108Even if I grant you that, which I’m inclined to, how are you sure a Turing complete system can’t achieve something that’s, to us, and for all practical purposes, indistinguishable from AGI? ChatGPT is genuinely more valuable than >90% of humans
>>61317220ChatGPT is *already* more useful than most humans, and it still hallucinations more than terry davis
