>https://messari.io/report/chainlink-a-full-stack-institutional-platformpic related
So bad or good?
>>61323523bullish, ETF soon too
>>61323517wow so bullish getting diluted since 2020
Released Staking v1 NOWI know you're in here reading this, Chris!
>>61323517Comfy
They're getting ready for the Clarity Act and Chainkink being officially recognised as a commodity.
The last time Bitcoin was 96K, LINK was $29. So all in all we're doing pretty good marines
>>61323517classic PnD pajeet scam formation very bullish saars
>>61323517>This broader scope also reframes the role of LINK, the network’s token. Originally launched in 2017 through a $32 million ICO, LINK currently serves as the unit of payment for oracle services, staking, and node incentives, anchoring Chainlink’s security model while evolving alongside new monetization and value capture mechanisms.Token needed confirmed.
> That gnarly widening margin 2025They spaffed out tokens hard
>>61323640We have to wait until next smart contract for a possibility of release. Chainlink only releases stuff at smart con and this year we only got a humilation ritual of doing quizzes for rewards
>>61324099Yeah build rewards were totally released at smartcon
>>61324099You don't know shit.
Staking appears to be on the verge of being phased out as collateral lock up is no longer needed or required for the Chainlink network to run effectivelyWouldn't be surprised if CLL never mentioned staking again and it's obvious that the advocates are willfully ignoring the subject entirely
>>61324099None of the staking iterations so far were announced at Smartcon.
THE Cuckolds of crypto
>>61324099That's not true but I also doubt they'll release it any time soon if at all. It's not like staking is difficult or precluded by law. Either it's not part of their business model or feeds aren't sufficient for any increase. However I'd almost question the latter given they could easily pay 4% out from the token dumps.Who knows. At this point I think the only thing that could change their course would be the token dumping so hard they panic about their 'war chest'.I know 'staking' not needed has become a fud line but I legit don't see any counter evidence.
>>61324416>I know 'staking' not needed has become a fud lineAs a LINK holder, I have come to realize it quite simply is not needed. The network runs flawlessly without it. No need for collateral lock up.Like I said a few posts above, it would not surprise me one bit if CLL never mentioned staking LINK again. The advocates are willfully ignoring the topic entirely for a reason
>>61324416>>61324441https://daweek.org/resource/the-future-of-digital-assets-according-to-blackrock-and-chainlink-new-york-2025/8:00 if you are interested in token status
>>61324416And neet nodes (and staking) is actually prohibited by AML laws at the moment. Fernando said so in one of his SWIFT talks
>>61323693For what? They’ll just take the logic and use it for payment via anything they pick.
>>61324456I saw this video months agoThe Blackrock guy in the video left to become co-CEO of a failing company called Sharplink Gaming
>>61323517HOLY FUCK IS THAT A RED CIRCLE?!?!TAKE MY FUCKING MONEY RIGHT NOW!!!!!
>>61323517saars we made it
>>61323517chang stink
>>61324456That doesn't answer or negate anything I said.
>>61323517SERGEY BETRAY
>>61324416Of course it’s illegal, at least in the US which runs everything for the foreseeable future. (China will likely be even more ridiculous)Full identities need to be known for all transfers of money. Not happening anytime soon for all that old LINK bought by scumbags.
Fuddies will die gruesomely. Do not engage or give them (you)’s
>>61324215>Staking appears to be on the verge of being phased out as collateral lock up is no longer needed or required for the Chainlink network to run effectivelyhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6ejrz0XvQcWhen you're able to run a NEET node and LINK is still not needed, then you can give up on staking.
>>61324099you fucking incels deserve humiliation tho. dont fuck with based vcs
Imagine timing the dump of tokens with market makers to extract max value.
you fags told me this would moon like 5 years agowhen the fuck are we mooning?
>>613281092 more weeks (unironically)
>>61323517That chart looks like it’s ready to go parabolic. If I wasn’t in Link and I saw this chart I would be smashing up that buy button like you wouldn’t believe
>>61328130yeah we cant all make it, the jews conditioned you good. have fun staying poor
>>61328142Yeah most people dont even know about LINK
>>61328130Looks like Vechain's chart keeeek
>>61328130> lower high > threatening lower low> new lower low on weekly rsi> all in the context of general bull run for the past 2 yearsIt's not a good chart at all
>>61323517It's unreal that we would have at least been looking at $40 valuations this year if we didn't have the mass team dumping so they can larp high society.
>>61328191>he trusted an eastern European
>>61328191>>61328191>if we didn't have the mass team dumping so they can larp high societynobody believes your force-fed lies anymore, kikethe jig is up. BTC serves one purpose and that is: supressing LINK
>>61323662And then the next carrot will be dangled and so on until the end of time
>>61324416This
>>61328151There hasn’t been a general bullrun there has been a bitcoin bullrun and a few select coins that you missed out on but spent hours maladaptively daydreaming about how you would have felt if you did buy them
>>61325094It's may be uncertain in the US but not elsewhere. Hence why we have the small pool so far. If the cause of not moving ahead is fear of legal consequences they never would have released v0.1, which has been running zero legal issues for years now. The legal cope is so fucking threadbare and will wither when all these meaningless congress bills and acts pass with no subsequent accumulation.
>>61324441>The network runs flawlessly without it.lol whatNodes can't post anything onchain without using the token.It's been the absolute backbone of the network since 2019.You're probably thinking of Ripple, which doesn't need XRP for pretty much anything they do.RippleNet, Interledger, Ripple CBDCs, Hidden Road, Ripple Prime, 90% of RLUSD ... none of it requires XRP.
>>61328297keeeeek dumb shitcoiner, keep spamming those meme charts
>>61328347Not that select, I consider myself an irresponsible all in alt degen and even I caught a couple that rose this time. XMR and SOL. But to memory you also had BNB, XRP, ZCASH, ETH, various memeshit, HYPE, PUMP, ASTER. There will be more but that's just reeling off on the spot. There absolutely was a crypto bull market that needs to be taken into context when looking at any specific chart.
>>61328370Did you just say ETH had a bull run?Fuddies arent sending their best
>>61328376It put in a new ATH, if link had reached $52 again I would have considered it pretty decent and no-one would be sitting here like this.
>>61328379Yeah bro it hit ATH for whole 2 secondsAnd difference between LINK and ETH is fact that ETH isnt suppressed to shitIf it wasnt a total TNN shitcoin ETH would be already 10k
>guise guise the bullrun hasn't evens started yet trust the plan!!I refuse to believe there are people this dumb
>>61328383Yeah yeah ETH is shit and market makers are dumping the 2 trillion MC btc just to keep link down. It's not that theranos is faulty it's big pharma keeping it down. They were really on their game pumping BTC for 2 years this time to stop link pumping from BUILD season one battlepass excitement.
>>61328394Yes
>>61328394Link baggies unironically believe this. 5 years of atrocious price performance made them all schizos
>>61328401Well I am a link bagholder as well. I just find the inane 'suppression' cope boring. I think it's literally just one anon repeating it infinitely. Link has been around for 8 years, hardly any shortage of time to accumulate if anyone wanted. Yet now it's also the case that we need the clarity act for accumulation, but also they were suppressing so they could accumulate for years. The October 10/11th crash really showed it up when link cratered harder than anything else, showing that the buy side for it was thinner than most other tokens going.
>>61328444>the buy side for it was thinner than most other tokens goingwell, given the fact that the team literally transferred 18 million LINK to Binance hours before the crash, I'd say it makes perfect sense
>>61328444Checked. Real talk, why are you still holding? Seems to me you're smart enough to get most of the bullshit yet you keep holding. I don't get it.
>>61328394>market makers are dumping the 2 trillion MC btc just to keep link downthis
>>61328531Jamie pull up $23 chart and $9 chart. Could also pull up the DvP announcement dump
>>61328444>I just find the inane 'suppression' cope boring.The suppression is extremely obvious, and makes up 99% of the reason Link isn't in the top 5 right now.And checked
>>61328538>Jamie pull up $23 chart and $9 chart.For me, it's the $26 chart
>>61328474True but they obviously don't insta sell it. They'll slowly sell that over months.>>61328486Well link did well for me in the early days and it's easy to become hooked and lazy once you have crazy returns on something. It also came at a time in my life when I really needed a fucking win. I think I am pretty clear headed on it being a mistake at this point and won't put more money in. Think I need to get boring and just move into stocks and commodities.
>>61328349I’m going to screenshot this. Let’s see who is right in the next 6 months
>>61328571You sound like a total faggot bro nobody cares what you do just sell and shut the fuck up lol
>>61328606no point in screencapping anything, you'll pretend that you never said all that shit and that it was fuddies trying to demoralize, like you always do
>>61328620You sound more demoralized than a link holder
>>61323517Am i the only linkie that is also buying some CWD? It could be links MSTRHow retarded am I?
>>61328667you sound ESL
>>61328703That was perfect English pradesh
>>61328707calm down, benchod 6 more months until big moon sars
>>61328708Pool’s closed
