>>61446523
It's already been confirmed that the per capita limit of 15k is going to be hard capped. The only people excited about successive versions of staking are newfags who aren't in the pool.

>>61446523
Team doesn't need it. Benefit of link holders is literally not something they think about.

pools closed chud

>>61446568
Any news on v0.3?

>>61446568
Where was this confirmed? And as someone fully staked right now, even if 15k staked LINK hard-cap per person/wallet was implemented, I'd still be excited as long as the staking pool opens because it'd at least mean more supply getting locked up (which is half the reason people want staking expansion).

The only thing I'm worried about is them deciding only KYC "whitelisted" entities can "participate in the network", even just for staking. (Someone please tell me why they definitely won't do that).

Clarity act, hopefully those FAGGOTS in Washington pass that shit soon

>>61446796
Wtf does that gay ass American politics have to do with anything you faggot

they delivered staking already, they said so on their blog and people got promoted over it