>>61522011Gold
they're both 100 pounds so i'll take the feathers
>>61522011I'd probably say the gold, but they're a actually the same value at that weight so it doesn't matter
>>61522061Yeah the feathers are lighter and easier to carry
retard, 100 lbs = 100 lbs
>>61522011depends, how much is that in kilograms?
>>61522063he never said what the feathers are made out of.for all we know they could be diamond feathers
>>61522011I'd rather have 100lbs of BBC
Feathers you know because there's endless opportunity for a decentralized featherchain and and staking my feathers and the concept of algorithmic stablefeathers. Feather adoption is already in the works. Basically there's a high chance feathers would completely replace outdated concepts like corny metal jewelry.
>>61522011feathers, because they will be lighter to carry
>>61522011Feather market probably isnt very liquid, so id go with gold
Gold is heavier than feathers.
>>61522061Gold is measured by the Troy weight system instead of the normal Imperial system, so 100 pounds of gold is heavier than 100 pounds of feathers.
100 pounds of gold is $6.5 million while 100 pounds of feathers is around $200,000.
>>61522427retard they're both £100
>>61522453Op wrote "lbs" not "gbp".
>>61522462okay but he didn't say what feathers, if they're dinosaur feathers they could be worth more than gold
>>61522011You would need a crane to move the feathers.At least the gold is dense and valuable.
I’ll take the gold because feathers will soon be seized by the federal government
Honestly I see the argument for both but I'd probably go with gold because women are still impressed with gold unlike feathers which they know nothing about.
